Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Takeaways from a Rough Week for the Bruins

Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N

Rough week for our Bruins, as we drop two in a row for the first time in what seems like forever. But such is life in the Pac-10, where road games, especially against two amped up teams, never come easy.

Pro’s and cons from this game. Well let’s see:

Cons:

1. Outrebounded again.They outrebounded us by 5 boards, including two offensively. But it wasn’t the raw totals – it was the fact that we weren’t securing the ball when we were touching it. I saw way too much tipping the ball around, knocking it out of bounds, etc. which gave Arizona a ton of extra chances. This ties into our lack of a big post presence which has hurt big time – getting outrebounded, and having little defense in the paint. Sure we stopped Harongody, but against Harden & Pendergraph, and today against Wise & Hill, we got burned repeatedly. Right about now, I really wish Bobo was able to play better defensively, because a big body underneath means rebounds and clogging the paint.

2. Did not get to the line again. 7 free throws vs. 30. Yeah, some of it might be home cooking, but we just did not do a good job in the inside. Our lack of interior presence really bit us too with Hill there.

3. Defense. Defense. Defense. They shot over 50% from the field. You can’t win often if they shoot greater than 50% from the field and they burned us throughout the game. We were slow on rotations which meant a lot of 3’s were being relatively uncontested.

4. Lackadaisical playing. We need to play more aggressively both on defense and offense. Our defensive intensity was WAY down, we didn’t play that man to man coverage on each possession we’ve gotten used to, and it cost us time after time. Offensively, I saw us get them to commit on jump shot fakes and what not, but seemed timid to press the case when the defense over-committed.

5. Turnovers. Wow, the first half was uncharacteristic of a CBH coached team. Inexcusable.

And that leads to my biggest con from this game was:

6. Our lack of intensity and focus coming in. Both against ASU and AZ, we fell into early holes that we could not dig ourselves out of. On the road, that is lethal. The best course of action was to take the crowd out of the game and play our style of ball. Instead, we fell behind and let them dictate what to do.

Now typically I have no issues with Coach Howland’s coaching or preparation, but these past two games have disappointed me tremendously. It’s both up to the players, team leaders and the coach to get our team motivated and prepared for road games against good teams. Instead, for the first time I’ve seen in a long time, if ever, CBH was outcoached for a half of the game. Defensive lapses, inability to adjust to the aggressive zone, etc. are largely on the shoulders of players, but adapting to the game and preparing players to focus is also on the coaches.

Now I fully expect ourselves to rebound from this trip with a new focus and with eyes set on crushing UW at home. I know CBH will not let us lose 3 in a row and I certainly hope the lessons learned here will be learned by everyone on this team.

Now for the Pro’s:

1. Our offense is still excellent. We shot 49% from the field, and 40% from 3’s. When we make shots, we still score. Had we not turned it over 18 times, 12 times in the 1st half no less, this game would’ve been within reach even with our poor playing on the defensive end.

2. Our freshmen still play with incredible intensity and energy. Again, I’d love to see our depth get more playtime on the court. Lee, in particular, stood out this game – his length and athleticism made him a capable defender against Harden at ASU, and when he came in during the 2nd half this game, he really helped us on that run towards the end of the game. Add in the fact that he’s got great offensive moves and is a shooter, and I think he could be a gem off the bench if he played a bit more (consistently, as well).

3. JH. I know we are down on JH, and he made some boneheaded passes himself, but I have a hard time faulting him too. He also made some brilliant plays and passes we’d all be raving about had the guy on the receiving end held onto the ball for instance. In a lot of ways, JH is mature in the game way beyond his years – he sees plays and passing lanes a lot of players dont expect. He makes the pass, but the player’s dont expect it. I’d like him to be more assertive on the offensive end to finish as he’s a great offensive rebounder and finisher, but if nothing else, make plays to free up shots for DC.

4 DC was torrid from 3’s tonight. Hopefully this will give him some of that confidence that he can make big 3’s still. I know DC has shouldered a lot of the pressure this year, and he isn’t the greatest playmaker on the floor, but he’s still our #1 offensive player.

I know we harped about getting go-to-guys this year, and our team is incredibly balanced offensively – but the truth is, DC has been our to go to guy. In fact, even last year. Sure, Love put up the big numbers - but who was the guy at the end of the game that drove for the layups, made the big free throws,and put teams out of their misery?

Now, I know Howland is grooming Anderson to be our PG of the next few years, but I don’t think it’d hurt if we experimented with switching up the scheme a bit. For instance, play JH at PG and DC as the shooting guard. Or even JA at PG at times. My logic behind this is that it gives DC some time to rest from the pressure of handling the ball at all times, and it also allows JH or JA to use their playmaking ability to get some free looks for DC, especially out on the perimeter. Plus, it keeps opposing defenses off guard when they realize we don’t have only 2 official PG’s to watch.

5. We didn't give up. This team should never have dug itself in its hole had the team played the first half like we did in the last 10 mins. No excuses there. But at least we didn’t give up even when down 25. Louisville packed up for home before the 2nd half even started against ND, and at least we tried to gain some of our dignity back. We might have played like crap, but we did not quit.

And finally

6. Two losses in a row will spark a fire under the butts of the players and coaches. No doubt about it. This is going to be a hell week of practices I bet, but there is no greater teacher than learning from defeats. And no greater coach for these lessons than Howland.

-----------------------------------

Wanted to add this too, since I hear it a lot: people claiming our recruiting class was overrated. That could not be more wrong. Maybe Holiday isn't the same star people thought he would be - a Love or Durant type player or something, but few players are.  In fact, how many players have single-handedly led their team to a NCAA Championship, or even Championship game? Carmelo is the only one in recent history to single handedly come in and take over, but he's obviously an incredible talent that should've went straight to the NBA and would've been the #1 pick had Lebron not been in the same draft. (Oden doesn't count either, since he came in with Conley, who was also highly regarded)

Kansas won last year with recruits from their 2005 class (Brandon Rush and Chalmers) which was their #1 class. It took Kansas 3 whole years for their #1 ranked class to cash in a final 4 appearance and championship (it didn't hurt that they were #8 the next year also with Arthur and others).

How about UNC? After winning it all in 2005, they brought in the #4 class (including espn-love-fest Hansborough) and then the #1 class the next year and.... they got blown out in the final 4 by Kansas

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

5 recs  |  Comment 13 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Reformatted your post a bit

As for trying JH at 1 and setting up DC at 2 (to take advantage of his shooting), I have been lobbying for that from early in the season. Thanks again for your analysis blink. Good stuff as always.

by Nestor on Feb 14, 2009 3:52 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Great stuff

I also would like to see JH at point guard. His athleticism would be utilized well at this position, and he would be tough for opposing PGs to defend. I also agree with blink’s point that JH would be able to drive and kick, creating open looks for DC and others.

And that was not Ben Ball defense being played today. The aggressiveness that contributed to the four game winning streak just wasn’t there today.

by BruinFanBaby on Feb 14, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

oops

Just edited it again to add that bottom blurb I was thinking about, sorry about that, didn’t realize you went and formatted it again!

by blinkshot on Feb 14, 2009 4:01 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

No worries

Another thing I want to bring attention to folks is the way you offered up constructive criticism of Howland. We all love Howland here. We adore him. However, that doesn’t mean we cannot offer up our criticism and disappointment in a respectful when warranted. You showed how it’s done blink. Hopefully it’s not lost on the random trolls who show up here only after tough losses.

by Nestor on Feb 14, 2009 4:07 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not sure about Collison at 2

On some possessions this season Collison has played the two with JH at 1 — and nothing’s come of it.

I think the problem is Collison isn’t comfortable at the two, and not particularly good at getting himself open. I’m not completely sure about this, but I do know that it hasn’t worked when it’s been tried so far.

by bluebland on Feb 14, 2009 9:02 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I think we've seen a bit of Collison at the 2 (or maybe 1.5)

Holiday has sometimes taken it up the court, as others have mentioned. Today, there was also a little mix of Collison with Anderson – it’s in Tele’s highlights. And if you look at the box score, they combined for 44 minutes, probably about 2 mins together.

by jaffa on Feb 14, 2009 11:18 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Something that we did see last night was Jerime Anderson and DC in the game at the same time. It was interesting, although I wasn’t really sure if that lineup accomplished what Howland was hoping it’d accomplish.

by chenalex on Feb 15, 2009 2:08 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I mean yesterday morning.

by chenalex on Feb 15, 2009 2:09 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Line Up Change Suggestion #2: Start DG at the 4

If PAA starts to get into foul trouble, we can pull DG in favor of ND. If we need more outside scoring, again, we can trade out for ND.

DG is faster than ND and more tenacious. And, I think we need an infusion of his heart.

I’m very pleased with the way ML and JA are playing and it appears CBH is, too. They are fearless in driving into the lane.

JH did not have his best weekend — but his contributions are often overlooked. He hits the boards hard. His biggest fault is that he is too unselfish. He needs to drive and shoot more. Yes, his inside shots have been rimming out, but they will fall, soon.

This is a very strong team and I have confidence we can win the Pac 10, the conference tournament and make a run in March.

I love this team and am proud of each and every player.

I would not trade our coaching staff for any in all of sports, including the pro’s.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Feb 14, 2009 4:02 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

respectfully disagree about DG starting

Now I would definitely like to see him play more, but sometimes it’ss better to have those “energy” guys coming off the bench.

The only other basketball coach I see a lot of is IMO the best coach in the pro game, Phil Jackson of the Lakers. Throughout the first half of the NBA season, people have been questioning starting Luke Walton at the 3 over Lamar Odom or Trevor Ariza. Clearly, Ariza and Odom are more talented players, and Ariza especially is known for his hustle plays.

However, sometimes that kind of play is exactly what a team needs off the bench. When a team starts out flat like we did tonight, it somehow has a way of affecting everyone on the court. Playing high school basketball for the last 4 years of my life has taught me that. There would be games that my team just didn’t have it, and all of us starting could just feel it. That’s when you bring those “energy guys” in off the bench and see if they can’t jump start the rest of the team.

Now, I think in this game we should’ve seen him sooner. It was apparent from the beginning that we weren’t matching their intensity. But part of me feels that if DG started, he would’ve fallen into the same lackadaisical style of play. Obviously I have no proof of this, other than the fact that I’ve seen it happen before with other teams. ND’s shooting was a huge factor in our winning streak the past 2 weeks – having that sniper from the outside is a huge asset at the start of games. A few quick threes can kill an opponent’s confidence quickly. Plus, ND’s defense and rebounding have improved to the point that he’s not a liability anymore.

So basically what I’m trying to say is that I know what you’re thinking when you say DG should be starting. However, the reasons you give are the same reasons I feel that he should remain in the 2nd unit. That hustle and heart is a great boost of the bench. I’d just like to see him more often and sooner in games like this.

by bucknellbruin on Feb 14, 2009 4:33 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

DG = bad defender

DG’s amazing athleticism and obvious energy are fooling way too many fans, who don’t seem to realized that — right now — he’s a bad defender.

He’s a bad individual defender, and a terrible team defender. More than half the time he’s completely lost, plays with his back to the ball, and can’t prevent anyone from getting to the basket 1-on-1. He can make up for it sometimes with blocked shots, but that’s no substitute — and honestly, way too many he times he tries to block a shot way too late rather than boxing out for the rebound. Right now he’s best trait is his ability to trap a defender as the second man on a double-team.

One day, perhaps as soon as next year, I think DG will be a great defender. But now he’s a major liability, and nobody seems to notice (except Howland). He looks great in blowouts but in any close game against a tough team we suffer dearly when he’s spelling Aboya — and it has nothing to do with his poor offense.

by bluebland on Feb 14, 2009 8:57 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Kind of why it's tough for Fr to get minutes from Howland.

Howland, and I love him for it, wants to do more than just play aggressive, solid man defense. I think he wants to use it to create advantages by trapping, hedging, etc. That means as a Fr, you’ve got a lot to learn (like “team defense” as you say!) despite your ability to run, jump and shoot. It’s limiting Drew’s minutes and probably accounts for J’mison’s lack of quality PT.
But the guys are coming around, and there’s plenty of big games left in this season for the Fr to contribute.
Next year, I hope we remember to be patient when Howland, early on gives minutes to Drago and Keefe when we have more talented, younger players itching to get in. Their time will come, and I’ll bet it will be worth the wait!

by mplsbruin on Feb 15, 2009 12:05 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

good analysis

from all the posters. I believe CBH has been focused on what he wants our guys to do, while the opponents are focused how how to stop us. A subtle difference, but this is what happens when your team is recognized as the true “standard”. I’d like to see more rotation of DG and JK into the game to really pressure the inside and help PAA and ND. I know JK has had some poor games but he always shows up on D. We have got to take care of Brockman as well as those Husky guards. Finally, though the stats may be somewhat misleading since we were so far behind, the standout difference against Ariz was the free throws.

by Vanman7475 on Feb 15, 2009 12:59 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Morrell_small
Wildcat and the UCLA Running Game
Ucla_small
Everyone needs to calm down about Ben Ball
Trojanssuck_small
An Angel in the Defensive Backfield
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory
13-9_ucla_baby____036_small
Videos from Washington/UCLA Football Game!

Recent FanPosts

Telemachus_small
ASU @ UCLA Highlights
Small
Darren is Going Nuts v. Hawks tonight
Bruinsnation_small
Dragovic Needs To Focus On Getting His Life Together ...
Images_small
Bauer Paces Blue To Blue-Gold World Series Sweep
Small
My two game season starts tonight
Small
Have You Been Watching Darren?
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
Trying to Keep the Mojo Going
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Gameday Notes
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
SI Poll: They Like Us, They Really Like Us ... sort of ...
Bruinsnation_small
Colorado Interviewing Karl Dorrell To Be Their Next Head Coach?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports