Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: Sounder At Heart for Seattle Sounders Fans!

Huskies Thinking About Pac-10 Title/A Sweep in LA

The Huskies are buzzing up in Seattle. They are excited and fired up about winning their first outright Pac-10 championship since 1953 (it was Pacific Coast Conference championship back them). Senior center John Brockman is looking to jack up his intensity even more to set an example for his younger team-mates for their trip to LA:

"I think our guys realize how big of a deal this is. And I know I'm going to do my best to try to show them," Brockman said Saturday after the Huskies' 103-84 victory over Oregon. "With this whole thing winding down, the last time going to L.A. for me to play these two schools, it's unbelievable how much more focused I am as a senior right now. As a sophomore, a freshman, a junior, you think it's going to be there forever.

"But I've only got a couple games left, and I'm going to try my hardest to get them to realize that. I think they already see it a little more and are starting to see what is at stake here."

Brockman's younger team-mate - Isaiah Thomas - is not only looking forward to playing UCLA, he is thinking about a sweep in LA:

"These last five games are big, especially this next one," Thomas said. "We can really separate ourselves if we can get this sweep."

Meanwhile, their head coach Lorenzo Romar is talking up Justin Dentmon as Pac-10 POY:

Romar again made a case for Justin Dentmon to be Pac-10 Player of the Year, saying "if we are fortunate enough to be very successful and do well, you've got to put him into the equation.''

And looking to get a victory in Pauley:

There was also talk of the challenge of Pauley Pavilion Thursday, where UW has won just once since 1987, and Romar noted that UW just passed a hurdle by winning at Stanford for the first time in a while time "and maybe this (winning at Pauley) is something we can change this year as well.''

Guess Romar and his players are looking forward to a party in Pauley on their way to a coronation. As for UCLA, I think there is not a lot of mystery in terms of what our guys need to. We have talked on and on about the need to rediscover our defenisve intensity. Howland and his players also talked about the need for rebounding:

Coach Ben Howland said before season rebounding was a concern, and it is showing in the Pac-10. UCLA has been out-rebounded in all four of its league losses, including getting beat 34-27 on the boards by Arizona.
"We weren't blocking out,'' UCLA power forward Nikola Dragovic said. "(Jordan Hill) was standing their by himself and got like six, seven offensive rebounds. It led to second and third shots."

ND and his team-mates will have to do a much better job of blocking out and not allow Brockman and co second and third opporutnityes to get their shots. Moreover, the Bruins will have to be much more aggressive on the offensive. Remember the last time we took on those guys the Huskies went to the line an astonishing 43 times, while we took only 15. We also settled for way too many three pointers (going 9 for 24), which seems to be a trend in most of our losses.

I also think our guys cannot afford to get themselves into a false sense of comfort just because of the fact they are playing at home. Reading the comments from the Huskies players and coaches, you can sense they realize they might not get an opportunity like this in near future to win the Pac-10 title. They are going to throw everything they have at UCLA and our guys will need to be ready for a battle.

Hopefully DC and co will come out with the same intensity they showed in their last home stand in which they were able to take control of games by being aggressive on the defensive side which enabled to jump start the offense. It will be an all out battle on Thursday night. Let's hope it's our guys who come in with more focus and energy this time around.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs  |  Comment 19 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

False Sense of Comfort & Danger of relying on Defense to Create Offense

False Sense of Comfort

I don’t see how we could have a false sense of comfort mentality. We lost two games in a row, and we are playing like the 3rd or 4th best team in the conference. I think that won’t be a problem.

The potential problem, as I see it, is a sense of panic and lack of confidence. Confidence is earned through solid play against good teams, and that is one area where we have struggled. I think a lack of confidence is our biggest enemy right now—and it highlights how important our crowd will be this Thursday.

Danger of Relying on Defense to Create Offense

I have heard a lot of talk about defensive intensity recently, and particularly during the four game win streak, we heard about how it was our best offensive weapon. Obviously good defense leads to less points scored by the opposing team, which helps us win. However, what I am driving at here is our seeming reliance on our defense to play good offense. It seemed like after the four game win streak we heard a lot about how our defense gets our offense going. Well, I wonder if relying on our defense to create easy points is not a little dangerous against good teams. Not that good defense isn’t helpful against every team—but I wonder if this team relies on it too much (particularly against good teams, where you can’t expect them to wilt under pressure).

We didn’t deliver our best defensive performances in Arizona. That is certainly true. However, I thought we lost to ASU in part because we couldn’t score when we had to in the half court set. Same goes for the game against ASU at home, and against Washington on the road. It has me thinking—does this team rely too much on our defense to get our offense going? This is kind of a complicated argument, since we have been, relatively speaking, very sucessful this year. However, maybe it explains our losses to the best teams on our schedule.

Generally speaking, I do think our best defense will help our offense. No doubt about it. But against the best teams, and particularly on the road, I do not think our best defense will automatically lead to victory. The reason: one would expect good teams not to falter under extreme defensive pressure, which means regardless of our defense, a victory will require our execution in the half court. It also means that, if we are relying on our defense to get us points, we could run into trouble.

Statistically, our offense is very good. And I think that is completely valid. But, I wonder what our offensive numbers are against good teams in late game situations (in other words, when it really matters). Without crunching numbers (and I don’t even know how I would begin to do that), it seems to me that against the best teams, our offense has lagged in critical late game minutes. And I think that might be an important reason for our losses this year.

Bottom Line (and stat people, please correct me): I am beginning to think that our inablity to reliably score in the half-court during crunch time might be a just as important deficiency in this team as our hot-and-cold defensive effectiveness. Of course, our defense is still critical. But with all the talk about our defense and lack of heart costing us, I wonder whether our offensive execution when it really matters may not be worthy of equal blame. (E.g.- in each ASU game I thought we played relatively good Defensive, and in each, just one or two buckets would likely have meant victory).

Press

Let’s assume this team’s best offensive strategy is good defense (and it entirely possible). If that is the case, perhaps we should try instituting a press during the game as a strategy. We have a relatively deep team, and it might just kick us into gear. Who knows.

by rfirpo on Feb 17, 2009 8:34 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

confidence

….i think that’s my biggest worry as well. It seems that we dont have confidence when our backs are against the wall. I’m not sure if that’s due to all the media talk about UCLA not having a quality top 25 win yet, but I really hope our Warriors are able to play with the confidence that they can take any given team on any given night when playing at their best. A win against UW with some solid effort may give us the confidence that we’ll be needing come tourney time as well.

by BMV268 on Feb 17, 2009 4:31 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Press

Early on, I started posting that this team seems to have the talent and balance to press, and I, too, would love to see us try. However, it’s not something one just throws in and if we haven’t practiced it I’m not sure we can master it for use in crunch time.

As for D to O, I don’t think you disagree with those who say our best O stems from our D. In essence, what people are saying is that we score better in transition than in our half court sets — and that most of our transition scoring comes from (1) turnovers or (2) D rebounds with fast outlet passes.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Feb 17, 2009 9:01 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Anything we can do to control the tempo of the UW game would help.

if a press would do it that would be great. Their three guards, Dentmon/Thomas/Overton, are fast and do have a tendancy to get a little out of control at times. Do you ever remember CBH pressing other than late in a game where we are behind and desparate? Agree that it is unlikely to occur since we have never practiced it in a real game.

formerly known as popopapa

by 84 on Feb 17, 2009 10:02 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'd argue that pressing UW would benefit the Huskies more than UCLA

Though our offense this year has the ability to be much more uptempo than the past few seasons, a frenetic pace is EXACTLY what UW wants. They want to come into Pauley and get in a track meet. They want the score in the 80s or 90s. I say we grind this game out, force UW to run all of their offense through the half court, and eliminate all fast break opportunities. Lets go back to the days where the media whined about our “boring” style, where we imposed our methodical will on every opponent and took them out of their rhythm. If we hold UW in the 60s, I like our chances much better.

GO BRUINS!

by rgalloucla on Feb 17, 2009 2:40 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

it would be ideal...

but i think that’s a much taller order than it sounds. We’ve hardly been able to hold our opponents to 40% like we did in the past, which CBH has stated as his defensive goal each game. Without getting that FG% down, even with a slower pace, it may be harder to hold our opponents down to 60. I dont think we need to change our style of play completely, but we have to play a little bit to our strength this year compared to previous years. I think this involves running the ball when our defense creates these opportunities for quick easy baskets.

by BMV268 on Feb 17, 2009 4:29 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

I'm ok with an occasional fast break off a turnover

If we are forcing turnovers and we can get out and score an easy bucket, I’m all for it. But trying to speed up the game will only serve to play right into Washington’s strength. Their guards want to run up and down the court for easy layups before our defense is set. If we can get them into half-court offensive situations and make them work, it will be much more toward our strength than theirs. They have been held under 70 points only twice this season: a 73-54 loss to KU and a 68-48 win over WSU (a team with no offense at all). My point is that they are not as familiar with playing a slower tempo game, and are especially vulnerable if their opponent can score out of the half court set. They are very comfortable running and scoring in the 70s or 80s. I don’t want them to feel comfortable in Pauley at all. I want to control the game from the beginning, challenge every possession, and force them to walk out feeling thoroughly beaten. Back to basics: Ben Ball inside-your-jersey defense!

GO BRUINS!

by rgalloucla on Feb 17, 2009 9:10 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree 66 and 84.

If we haven’t practiced it, it’s tough to execute it well in crunch time. And yes 66, I totally agree that our best O stems from good D. I was just thinking that maybe better execution of half-court O might be the difference in our losses. Just a thought.

by rfirpo on Feb 17, 2009 10:11 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Per CBH, UCLA will NOT press

I have been to multiple events where different members of the UCLA basketball coaching staff have spoken. The question of a full-court press is a common one. The answer that is consistently delivered, regardless of which coach is speaking, is that CBH does not want to press. CBH argues that the press creates situations in which our defense must gamble and a couple good passes will lead to an uncontested layup for the opposing squad. His commitment to tough man-to-man defense and contesting EVERY shot and possession does not mesh with a full-court press. Its the same argument as to why you will NEVER see UCLA play a zone defense, either.

GO BRUINS!

by rgalloucla on Feb 17, 2009 2:34 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Not in our house

Harass their guards, rebound good, and win in our house!

by blinkshot on Feb 17, 2009 11:42 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

Intensity on defense is linked to intensity on defense

For whatever reason, with this team, there is a link between good defense and offense that everyone seems to ignore: intensity. In addition to the easy scores off of turnovers, defensive intensity helps our offense by feeding the offensive intensity.

If we are coasting on defense we settle on offense.

The best reason to press on defense is the energy it would generate on offense. Though I agree: it is not what we practice.

So here is to defensive intensity leading to Bruin drives to the basket and other forms of offensive intensity!

by Bruin Dad and Grad on Feb 17, 2009 11:59 AM PST reply actions   0 recs

yea

…I think I remember reading somewhere that Howland never wants to be in a position where they can give up the open shot as well. Although sometimes I personally would like to see them press, I think it goes against Howland’s philosophy. I’m sure CBH has enough experience under his belt to know why he’ll never want to press, and I guess that’s good enough for me

by BMV268 on Feb 17, 2009 4:26 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

in spite

of all the whatchamahoos and doodoo birds singing lately, u-dub is far more likely to get swept in its socal trip than get a sweep. book it

Across The Face

by rb bruin on Feb 17, 2009 6:12 PM PST reply actions   0 recs

Agree

I think the LA trip has become the most difficult in the Pac-10 and it is nearly impossible to sweep because either UCLA plays too well at home or teams overlook U$C and they usually make them pay for that. Also, didn’t Washington win the Pac-10 in 04-05 when they were a 1 seed? Or did they tie with Arizona?

by turs12 on Feb 17, 2009 10:23 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

None of the above

In 2004-05, Arizona finished 15-3 while Washington finished 14-4. That’s beyond me how a team that did not win it’s conference while losing 4 conference games got a 1 seed! Overrated??

GO BRUINS!

by rgalloucla on Feb 18, 2009 8:20 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

UW swept LA in 2006

but I don’t see that happening again.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Feb 18, 2009 11:12 AM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Damn

I guess I was wrong on all fronts then.

by turs12 on Feb 18, 2009 5:52 PM PST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2145443360_ab27e15b11_b_small
Bleeding Blue and Gold ... Always
Morrell_small
The UCLA Passing Game Under Norm Chow
Arron_afflalo1_small
NBA Opening Night (Bruin Edition)
Rowing_picture_small
Football is like a box of chocolates
Th_ucla182c2_small
Broke the $3000 mark today- Thank you, Bruins!

Recent FanPosts

Bruinsnation_small
Harrison Barnes' Amazing Trip To Howlandwood
Bruinsnation_small
The Big Red Signs Off
Moreyouknow_small
Pre-Game Guesses: Oregon State Results
Screen_shot_2009-09-28_at_6
13-9’s Tidbits: Washington Edition
Small
Hartman doesnt get it
Ucla_small
Ben Ball 09-10, Day 1
Small
Google News Bruin feed created
Bruinsnation_small
Adam Maya/OC Register In CYA Mode: Fails To Take Responsibility, Attacks Player's Parent
Small
Random: Reggie Bush has a framed UCLA jersey in his house
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Game Day Roundup: Season Starts Tonight

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports