Thoughts on the Freshman and Mental Toughness
Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N
Much has been said about team chemistry or more to the point, team dynamic. What is the dynamic of this year's basketball team I wonder?
It's easy, I think, to assign an identity to this year's team based on the past. With us, this is an easy thing to point out. Rugged defenders who dictate the flow of the game, get transition buckets and like to grind out victories. That's been our MO, and I credit that style of play for getting us to three straight Final Fours. And to a large extent, that's the identity the team strives for on a nightly basis. But watching our team this whole year, I feel that there's been a shift in team dynamic. And it's not a shift in athleticism or physicality, it's a shift in our mental makeup.
I mean to say this as more of an observation than a criticism. But our losses this year have followed a similar pattern. There have been offensive droughts and lapses in defensive intensity. But the most glaring thing to emerge is a discernable timidity from our freshman players. The teams that have beaten us have largely relied on an alpha dog who imposes his will on the game (AJ Abrams, James Harden, and most impressively IMHO, Taylor Rochestie). Washington, excluded...we've always had problems up there.
We of course have Darren Collison who has shown in the past that he's capable of taking games over. But I've always felt that this was a designation that was placed on Collison out of necessity. He's in his element when he's managing the game, taking shots in the flow of the offense. Contrast that with guys like Arron Afflalo who played like an animal in the clutch. Darren is a more polished player than Afflalo was, but in terms of being that alpha dog...I'm not sure it's really his game.
Which brings me to the freshman. In years past, we've been blessed with young players who come in and hit the ground running. I could rattle off a bunch of names, but the one that comes to mind first is Luc. Remember, he had to start his freshman year because of injuries and he responded big time. Every freshman/sophomore from Luc to Love to Farmar, took over the reigns of the team and led our teams deep into post-season play. What was most impressive was the mental fortitude they exhibited in the face of huge pressure.
Contrast that with this year's freshman. I would say that from top to bottom, this year's freshman class has more raw talent than the Farmar class or the Luc class. But there is a marked drop-off in terms of mental acuity. They have been solid contributors all year long, no doubt...but when games gets tough, a freshman has not emerged to be a viable threat down the stretch.
Does this mean that this year's freshman are in any way inferior to our superb classes in the past? No, not at all. But we do have to take into account that intangible quality...team dynamic. In the past, Howland had no choice but to turn the reigns over to his freshman (something I feel no coach would be comfortable doing). Edward Young once said that "Affliction is the good man's shining time" and classes of the past were forced to step up...thrown into the fire. And their talent certainly shined through.
This year's team has a completely different mental makeup. I love our seniors. Aboya, Shipp and Collison have all stepped up their game. Unlike years past, however, Howland hasn't had to turn the reigns over to the underclassman. This is a team that belongs to the seniors.
I point to that as the major reason our freshman haven't forged that mental "aggression" yet. They'll get there...they'll have to when the seniors graduate. But for THIS year, we are a good team. If we want to be a GREAT team, a Final Four team, it's time for the freshman to assert themselves and take a more aggressive hand in the formation of our team identity. We'll have to bite our tongue when they make mistakes, but I'd rather have them be aggressive and making mistakes, than passively deferring to the seniors. That'll be the difference between good and great.
Heads up Bruins. We've had difficult stretches in the past and Howland has shown time and time again that he's able to turn lemons into Final Four appearances.
Our upperclassmen will be there in the clutch. They've been there, done that. It'll be our freshman who will determine how far this year's team will be able to go.
Go Bruins!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
6 recs |
6 comments
Comments
Great post Crisp
Great post. Recommended.
by Nestor on Feb 21, 2009 3:18 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Second that.
Many great points of analysis there. Don’t you think it reasonable to depend on the seniors to draw out the fire in the Freshmen? In my eyes, that is the central problem of this year’s team. We don’t really need a clutch player – I think Collison is Mr. Clutch himself – we need a LMR, Luc, or AA. Someone who HATES to lose. Will do ANYTHING to prevent a loss. And most importantly: will make that obvious to everyone around him. We need someone who you do not want to spend time with in the locker room after a loss. Right now, the players almost get along TOO well (that of course is a silly thing to say, but you get my drift).
B.F.
by eubruin on Feb 21, 2009 4:17 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
great thoughts
I think, a big thing people don’t realize out there is that the freshmen defer to the seniors because they’ve been to 3 FF’s, and have the experience – but at the same time, those seniors were always secondary players to the rest of the team. Yes, one might consider DC the leader last year so he has experience in that, but Aboya was a backup roleplayer before this and Shipp was always the 3rd option.
by blinkshot on Feb 21, 2009 6:03 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
good analysis
My first post on bruinsnation, but have been lurking here for many years and all the other boards. One of the best sites for real fans. Bad game yesterday but i still believe in this team and will support them even if they don’t make a deep run as I would hope all bruins would. That being said many have said how much we miss westy and love from last year but the one i miss the most is luc. he was the heart of the defense. Having been lucky enough to attend many games, pac10 tournament and the early rounds of the ncaa tournament his defense was out of this world. the quick double, the amazing recovery time. ability to guard any player on the court. His loss really took alot away from our defense and thus our primary identity as a team. One thought i had watching yesterday (i hope i dont get blasted by this), i wondered if CBH should go back to how he use to coach “newer” players. i remember that he use to take players out of games right away if they made a mistake (especially defensively) correct them and send them right back in – so as not to “punish” but teach. he doesnt seem to do that as much recently. I know people use to complain about this breaking down the “flow” of the game but i always thought it was a great way to teach players.
by ASTROBOY on Feb 22, 2009 10:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Actually you have a good point
re how CBH sends message to his younger player. A player has to D up to get mins for Howland. That has been the mantra. That’s why ML got the start in second half. It will be interesting to see how ML/JH dynamics shape up in rest of our games because right now ML is a better defender than JH.
by Nestor on Feb 22, 2009 10:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent Post
I think we can all agree the Bruins desperately miss LRMM this year. The defensive intensity and intangible he provided have not been adequately replaced.
My feeling about the freshman is that as a group they expected to come in a make a immediate impact and so far it has not happened. These are players who are not used to sitting on the bench and I think, a gut feeling without any proof, that is part of the problem. There’s been hints on BN regarding team chemistry and dynamics and that the freshman are to blame. I don’t think it’s because any of them have bad attitudes; they are simply used to being the “man” and maybe they are not adapting well to their new situations.
Case in point is Holiday, a talented player who is at his best when he gets involved in the game early. But if he struggles early he seems to carry on to the rest of the game.
Conversely, one of the great stories this year has been ND. His shot from the outside is a thing of beauty and I would like to see him get more shots. But his emergence is also a complete surprise and is probably, IMHO, one of the contributing factors to less playing time for some of the freshman.
Maybe we had to high of expectations on the freshman. Maybe they had too high of expectations for themselves. Either way, they still have time to step up and their contribution is still the key to the Bruins success in the tournament.
richramus
by richramus on Feb 22, 2009 11:36 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















