Latest Bracketology, UCLA 7 Seed in the South
I don't really have any complaints. Anyone else have an opinion?
8 months ago
bruin8uclap
4 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Yes
But not about UCLA’s position. I don’t understand how Arizona State is only a 5 seed. They are 21-5 with two wins over Arizona and UCLA (and some other good ones as well). To put the Pac-10 co-leader outside the top 4 seed lines is a disgrace.
Meanwhile, look at the Big 10, which doesn’t seem all that strong to me, and Purdue, its #2 team is on the 4 line despite one more loss, a worse RPI rating than the Sun Devils, and only one victory that is the caliber of ASU’s top wins (Michigan State last week).
by BruinsRule on Feb 24, 2009 11:00 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
ASU is not the co-leader yet ...
still second to UW by 1/2 game, but I agree this seeding is too low, even though it doesn’t surprise me coming from an East Coast biased source. I also think that conference champions should automatically be seeded in their “home” regional.
by snorkeldorf on Feb 24, 2009 11:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
Thats what jumped out at me too. I might be wrong, but more often than not I see the Big 10 under perform (compared to the seeding of its teams) in the big dance year in and year out.
by bruin8uclap on Feb 24, 2009 8:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Bruins Nation
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
