Bruins Sweep The Bay [UPDATED w Video Highlights]
Not sure where to start. Bruins finally flashed their potential as Ben Ball warriors by pulling out probably the toughest win of 2008-09 season. Bruins sweep the Bay Area road trip with a gutty 72-68 win (boxscore).
The decks were stacked against them. They came into the game not playing so well, losing 3 out of their last 5, and looking very shaky against a bad Stanford team at Maples. Add into the mix, a fired up Haas Pavillion, and a Cal team smelling blood, looking to clinch an at large NCAA bid and possibly more given ASU's loss earlier in the day, things were not looking so great for Howland's Bruins.
They got off to another mediocre start, looking sloppy on defense, incredibly frustrating on offense (blowing layups and missing FTs), and getting outhustled on the boards. And when they coughed up a 5 point lead early in the second half I thought it was going to be one of those games like we have seen previously this year, when the other team outwilled us to another frustrating loss.
Well boy am I glad to be wrong. Thanks to this guy:

Photo Credit: Jed Jacobsohn/Getty Images
DC perhaps put together one of his most clutch performances in his legendary Bruin career to pull out what could shape up to be a key win. When the game was on the line DC took over in the second half and keyed a blistering 16-2 run leading to UCLA's toughest win of the season.
The game got close again in the closing seconds but the Bruins held on with some clutch FTs and a huge shot from DC. DC finished the night with 22 points and 6 assists. Besides DC, PAA and JS chipped in with 12 points. Despite some atrocious defense early on ND also contributed with 12 huge points including being in the middle of a 7 pt possession which the WWL analysts obsessed over much in the second half.
With a record of 22-7 (11-5 in the Pac-10) Bruins still have a shot at a share of the conference title. But that really doesn't matter. What matters is for the Bruins to use the momentum from this road sweep and use it finish it with a great home stand honoring three of the greatest Bruin seniors in Post-Wooden era. They sure got the goodbye party started tonight.
There is lot to talk about from this game which we will get to later. For now enjoy yet another Bruin win in the Bay (and making Digger sound like a toolbag ... again).
Fire away in our post game victory thread.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
35 comments
Comments
College Game Day about to do their daily wrap up on the WWL
I can already hear Hubie and Digger blaming their poor forecasting on the 7-point play.
by snorkeldorf on Feb 28, 2009 8:59 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Who cares about those bufoons
I am watching SNL.
by Nestor on Feb 28, 2009 9:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Three hours away for me ...
enjoy!
by snorkeldorf on Feb 28, 2009 9:05 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I rather watch reruns
than listen to Digger and Huby.
by Nestor on Feb 28, 2009 9:07 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Digger an Idiot
Did you catch Digger at the end of the halftime show say that Collison and Shipp are going to bring it, but Cal will win the game. Well I guess you were partially right – DC really did “bring it” to Cal in the 2nd half. Digger just keep your fat mouth shut when rooting against UCLA, you just end up looking like a bigger idiot – I’m sure you’re still thinking about our dismantling and embarassing of Notre Dame on national TV.
Bob Knight you do provide pretty good analysis (much better that the crew you work with), but let me answer your ? about the difference between the foul from behind on ND leading to the 7 point play and the one at the end of the game on JS (he claimed there was no difference and the one Cal committed on JS was worse) – the difference was ND had a clear path to the basket and the Cal player had no play on the ball, the one fouling JS was around the 3 point line with no path to the basket. I’m not sure i like the intentional foul call, but there was a huge difference in the two plays. Come on Bobby you’re smarter than that, you may not agree with the call, but don’t use an inappropriate example.
Good win, but still concerned about our inconsistent D and high opponent FG %.
I posted as a fanshot, but should have done it here
by shaq on Feb 28, 2009 9:01 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
I didn't get that comment earlier
and I was especially surprised at Knight because it was just a few minutes earlier that he himself said a defender going for the ball doesn’t get called on that.(when discussing the ND play).
by bornagainbruin on Feb 28, 2009 10:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I think this confirms it
My time in the game thread is over.
Great win for the Bruins and while we can find plenty of issues with defense early, rebounding, etc., DO NOT underestimate the difficulty of winning conference games on the road. Rarely will road wins be pretty and our experienced guys really showed up tonight to pull out a gutsy win. Our starters played huge minutes and looked tired late, but they battled through it and played like true Ben Ball Warriors late.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 28, 2009 9:08 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Guess you and Tydides will need to stay away!
by Nestor on Feb 28, 2009 9:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I will schedule shifts
during all tournament games, as well.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
by gbruin on Feb 28, 2009 10:00 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
A win is a win
Darren is the perfect example of a 4th year player who’s come into his own in a big time way. We are so lucky to have this kid. He’s such a gritty, classy player. They picked up the intensity, thank God, in the second half. There was a better sense of that desperation and more energy. The defense picked up. Howland managed a great game tonight. We were disciplined on offense, took good shots and made the timely free throws.
But, there were some big concerns. On one of those last possessions Darren had to make a circus shot after we passed it around to the guards and forwards without any entry pass to the inside. I think we need to utilize the inside a little more; at least get that extra pass down low. Also, Jrue vascillates between self-assured and tentative. He just needs to play basketball but I think is thinking too much. He’s such a talent. I hope he comes on here at the end and something happens. He needs to put out a better effort for sure, though. There were several times I thought he wasn’t hustling. It’s odd.
I’m glad we got the win and this thing is still a work in progress. I’m proud of this team for going up and getting two good road wins when we needed to prove to ourselves we could. This will give them confidence for sure. There just needs to be more passion on more possessions. Maybe they’re just trying to be under control but sometimes don’t hustle on every possession.
by bruin95 on Feb 28, 2009 9:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
JH tentative
I’ve noticed that his ball control is often not that good – he often loses control of the ball (either by himself or by a defender getting a hand on it) – he or a teammate may regain the possession (therefore no TO), but it seems to happen way too often. It also seems that he is often cruising around and his dribble is slow (meaning the ball is in the air too long) – this type of dribbling makes it easier for a defender to poke it away, it is much harder to get a hand on a quick, compact dribble. He’d benefit by moving and dribbling more quickly and by being more assertive. On defense, I wish he’d stay closer to his defender (again seems to cruise around) and keep his arms up. I hate to pick on him, but he has too much talent – if he wants to be a great player he needs to develop that Kobe, Wade, and LeBron work ethic and killer instinct.
by shaq on Feb 28, 2009 9:32 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Kobe, Wade and LeBron
are pro players and Jrue is 18 years old. The killer instinct might not come just yet. He might be a late bloomer. Jordan was at UNC for three years, was a great college player and the rest is history. Most would probably agree Jordan benefited from being under Dean Smith’s tutelage and was a better player for it. I know it’s a whole new thing now with the one year and all the money but Jrue could benefit from at least one more year. Not all these kids are ready for the league at 18-19-20 years old and he could be one of those guys. Look at DC. He’s a winner and will go on and play in the pros after 4 great years. Jrue just needs to not think and go out and play for now and into the tourneys. The other guys, too, like Jerime and Malcolm.
by bruin95 on Feb 28, 2009 10:04 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Now I know why I never liked Bobby Knight
40 minutes of Knight was enough for me. Remember , this is the guy who agreed with that Kansas City Sportscaster who had him ahead of John Wooden on the alltime baketball coaches list.
I have a ton of respect for Pete Newell, but Knight comes from that side of the coaching tree and will never give Coach or UCLA thier proper respect. Head fake my ass.
I am hoping that tonights game is a watershed point for our Bruins. DC is the leader and clutch player that can lead us to some tournament wins but we need to be able to play lock down defense and take allowing scores personal. I liked when Coach Howland pulled four starters to put in a fresh crew.
Biggest concern for me was that there were many times that Cal went harder to the ball then we did. That accounts for at least one half of the rebound differential.
I’m glad we get the Beavers on a Thursday night at Pauley. They could be a problem.
Go Washington State- bite the Huskies.
Go Bruins
TRM
by G0Bruins on Feb 28, 2009 9:19 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Two reasons to root for Cal next weekend
1. Cal beating ASU would set them up for the third spot in the conference. That will give us the tiebreaker over UW if we manage to get into a tie with them. Also, if we lose a game next weekend, we’d get the two seed over Cal in a tiebreaker, but the three seed if tied with ASU because they swept us.
2. Cal is just outside the RPI top 25 and if they move into that RPI top 25 we’ll have three RPI top 25 wins on the year, which is a respectable number for the committee to look at.
One more note going into the final weekend. Not only do we want Wazzu to beat Washington for our own reasons, but if Wazzu beats Washington, USC will be playing in a Wednesday Pac 10 Tournament game regardless of what they do versus the Oregon schools.
If I can find enough to talk about I’ll put together a primer for the final weekend of Pac 10 player that delves into the possible scenarios conference-wide.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 28, 2009 9:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Dang, Rye
that was truly a quality post.. Very good insight on a few reasons to care about CAL’s games next week and a good secondary reason to care on WSU/UW.
I also want to see OSU beat SUC….giving SUC the sole possession of 8th place.
by bornagainbruin on Feb 28, 2009 10:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously I know nothing
Seems like WSU could still take 8th away from SUC, even if OSU beats SUC.
by bornagainbruin on Feb 28, 2009 10:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Correction
If USC sweeps this weekend they won’t definitely end up playing on Wednesday night. I thought Wazzu was 9-7, but they’re 8-8 so a USC sweep puts them in a tie with the Trojans, even if they beat UW and USC has the tiebreaker. USC could still end up playing on Wednesday night if they sweep, but that’s dependent on a multiple team tie that could be complicated.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 28, 2009 11:08 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Only thing about $c playing in the 8-9 game
is that if we are 2nd we play them first. Don’t really want that, but if it happens we’ll just have to kick their sorry butts. hehe. GO BRUINS!!!
by uclafan11 on Mar 1, 2009 11:09 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Keys to the game
Field goal attempts: UCLA 65, Cal 51
Turnovers: UCLA 6, Cal 14
We held our own on the boards and took care of the ball. If DC can take his man off the dribble with consistency like he did tonight, and our D steps up, we’ll be a dangerous team.
by godblesstyus95 on Feb 28, 2009 10:12 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
bilas: "he's not only got quickness"
he’s got great speed
that was the most inane thing i heard all night~!
by lilbobdog on Feb 28, 2009 10:15 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that was hilariously stupid.
by haster123 on Feb 28, 2009 10:53 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
disagree
I think there is a difference. Quickness should be referring to reaction time, 1st step. Speed should be referring to time from baseline to baseline, which is not at all the same thing.
I don’t always agree with Bilas, but he did pay appropriate homage to DC, and noted both his quickness and his speed.
by islandbruin on Mar 1, 2009 6:43 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree with islandbruin
Quickness and speed are two different things.
by bruin8uclap on Mar 1, 2009 7:08 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
No question island is right and so is Bilas. Bilas has seemed to always like DC.
formerly known as popopapa
by 84 on Mar 1, 2009 7:48 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Speed means who get down the floor faster, quickness is...
… the rate at which you can tap that speed from a dead stop, or change direction, or use that ability on defense against an opponent coming right at you.
A player can be quick to react to cut somebody off, but may not be able to outrace that same player on a breakaway.
The past 2-3 years, Bilas has been REALLY vocal in praising CBH’s guys, especially DC. Even during DC’s struggles this year, Bilas has been touting DC as one of his Top 2 or 3 PGs all year, and last year he said up and down he thought DC was the best PG in the country.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 1, 2009 7:29 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
This is why
NFL scouts use the shuttle run as opposed to the 40 as a better indicator of how a player will perform in the NFL. Quickness is preferred, but speed ain’t bad to have either.
by bruin8uclap on Mar 2, 2009 5:18 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I LOVE DC
I remember when he would come off the bench for Farmar as a freshman, he was really quick and often out of control. I can’t believe what a badass he’s become. Every year he’s gotten better. I liked how he was yelling at his teammates and getting them more into it today, and how much he wanted to win. And I LOVE how much he loves UCLA. I know there’s more to this season, but I’m starting to miss him already!
by aurora027 on Feb 28, 2009 10:26 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Slightly OT
Southern Cal goes down in flames again. SC basketball is irrelevant, as always.
Enjoy the No Interest Tournament, guys.
by Barnes2JJ on Feb 28, 2009 10:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
DC's defense
I was listening to the UCLA post-game radio show in L.A., and they interviewed one of the Bruin’s assistant- Coach Garston. He mentioned that they always want DC pressuring the ball, even if it is way near the half-court line, since he can disrupt the other team’s timing. Cal runs multiple screens for their shooters, but DC’s defense on Randle did not allow him to run their plays they normally do.
The coaches don’t mind that DC gets beat off the dribble once in awhile. This will happen since he is in the grill of his opponent most of the time. It is the responsibility of the other Bruins to cover for him by rotating. DC’s been playing this defense for 4 years. He’s looked bad this year by guys like Wise, Thomas, Rochestie, and Glasser not because of his defense, but the overall Bruin defense. I was critical of DC’s defense lately, but the coaching staff is happy with his ball pressure. I guess I have to trust CBH and his staff. We showed spurts of good defense this weekend, it is time to amp the defense to tourney level.
I would like for the Bruins to work on inbounding the ball more effectively. We’ve turned the ball over several times this year, and it almost cost us tonight.
Go Bruins!
by UCLA Championships Made Here on Feb 28, 2009 11:41 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
Agreed re: DC's defense.
Without the top-flight rotations we had last year from RW and LMRAM, I think DC"s been more cautious in trying to intercept opposing PGs. We may not have had a dominant shot blocker the past few years, but at every level, guards are more likely to go for steals and one-man pressure if they know someone’s ready back them up.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 1, 2009 7:31 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Pete Newell comment on where he lived
Bilas said that Pete Newell used to come watch Bilas play in high school, and that Newell lived on Grandvia Altamira, in the Rolling Hills area. Actually Grandvia Altamira is in Palos Verdes Estates as those who live here know. Bilas must have forgotten what town he, Bilas, lived in. Is that possible?
Bill
BillSouthBay
by Mensgym on Mar 1, 2009 6:45 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
you wouldn’t consider the rolling hills area to include palos verdes? that’s all been the same hill to me. but then again i don’t live on the hill myself, represent the RB =)
Across The Face
by rb bruin on Mar 1, 2009 10:54 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Was at the game behind to good guys bench
amazing the insight into the game that can be captured when not relying on just the tv cameras. Great road win in a loud, very loud, Haas Pavilion. And we did it not at full strength. I don’t know if it was mentioned pregame, but talking to a trainer just before the game we found out that ML and ND were battling probable food poisening from eating some undercooked hamburgers at the hotel. They were both late coming out for the pregame shoot around as they were back in the locker room recovering a bit. JK apparently saw a chiropractor on Fri. Was feeling a little better but still not 100%.
Also this may have been mentioned previously, havn’t read the game thread, but Tracy Murray had a stat that we had 11 dives for loose balls, a season high, and got possession on 8 of those. Interesting stat that typically isn’t posted. For those of you in radioland he probably mentioned this.
DG and MR appeared frustrated at times with short playing time. MR seemed better in 2nd half but DG couldn’t seem to shake it on the bench. Wasn’t his usualy spirited self. He had alot of family courtside and he probably is just itching to get more minutes and demonstrate the skills we know he has. We all know his time will come, whether this year or next.
Best thing about being at the game is not having to listen to Digger or Knight.
formerly known as popopapa
by 84 on Mar 1, 2009 8:38 AM PST reply actions 0 recs

by 

























