Philly Wrap
So wanted to share with you some of my extended notes and thoughts from the weekend trip to Philly. The game wasn’t fun but we are more than glad to make that trip to see one of the best senior classes in the history of UCLA basketball to play their last game. Plus the rush of hearing our band, getting to do eight claps with hundreds (if not about a thousand) of fellow Bruin alums all decked out in UCLA blue, three thousand miles away from home is always more than worth it. As I said in my immediate post after the game the loss yesterday had a different feeling. It wasn’t the sense of shock, disgust and outrage we felt after losses in certain first round games in post-Wooden era. Saturday’s loss wasn’t the kind of loss we experienced against Penn State (91), Tulsa (94), Princeton (96) or Detroit-Mercy (98). We lost to a better team with a Bruin squad which was imperfect (more on that below). And after the loss instead of feeling angered, I am looking forward to next season given the players we have coming back and joining us next season.
I don’t feel like we have to do a lot of analysis on what went wrong on Saturday afternoon. It was clear Villanova was the better team. As Coach Howland said himself in his post game comments we were out played and outcoached. I think Jay Wright’s team would probably beat UCLA 6 out of 10 times in a neutral court. There is no shame and no reason to apologize for a "rebuilding" season featuring 25+ wins. That is a successful season in our book despite what you hear from people who didn't graduate from UCLA. If people want to denigrate what this group of players did by posting outlandish, nonsensical takes, they need to find another venue.
Our regular season record was just about what I expected with three seniors and upperclassmen who were role players in Final-4 teams and the freshman class of this season. As mentioned in the post game thread, I think Coach Howland built a team for this season with the expectation that he was going to lose KL and probably RW and DC at the end of last season. The dynamic changed when LRMAM decided to leave (which created a huge hole defensively and also in the front court) but DC decided to come back. With the return of DC, Howland had to move JH over to 2 (even though he is a natural pg) which shaped the dynamic of this year’s team.
DC did a great job this season and he will always be one of my favorite Bruins of all time. However, with him at the pg I think our offense at times (especially when the game was on the line) was predictable. DC as good as a shooter as he is and as fearless he has been in crunch times, doesn’t have the instincts and natural ability to pass as JH and create more options for the team. Again, I am writing this by no means to diminish what this kid has done for UCLA. No way. No how. I am just writing this because that is what my eyes saw through this season. That is all.
Moreover, I think the fate of our team’s post season run was also impacted by this:
Photo Credit: J Rosenfeld
Simply put our offense hasn’t been the same (with DC) ever since he went down against Oregon. He didn’t look himself last night or against VCU and during the Pac-10 tournament. He looked tentative from the free throw line. Not to mention he was bloodied up early in the game.
We all got glimpses of what JH can do from the 1 spot towards late in the season (during the Pac-10 and NCAA tournament). That leads to the question why didn’t we see Howland use JH at the spot lot more this season with ML at the 2? Here is my theory. Given all the hype and speculation about JH being a "one and done" player this season, my gut feeling is that Howland wanted prepare JA as much as he could to take over the 1 spot this upcoming season. JA by all account needed lot more seasoning his freshman season than JH. So I think Howland wanted to make sure he got JA as much experience as possible for next season.
As I mentioned yesterday following the game the two players who come closest to matching the gumption of AA and JF are DG and ML. I think it is difficult to sense the intensity and emotion DG and ML brings to the game just by watching TV or looking at cool shots like this:

Photo Credit: E. Corpuz
To me when we are going through tough times we usually get two different kind body languages from our players. First there is the kind of expression in which players look frustrated, dejected. There is also the second kind of emotion when things are not going to well. It’s the sense of anger we were so used to seeing in Ed O’Bannon and AA (again for those who followed Yankees during the 90s can remember the emotions of Paul O’Neil). DG was not a happy camper on Saturday. He was the only Bruin player that seemed to be upset (at least externally) with the way events were unfolding inside the Wachovia Center. I was really zeroing in on the bench. To me it seemed like all the emotion of the entire team was exploding out of DG. We have seen this kid's explosion all season long:
I think once Coach Howland refines his defensive skills and he develops a consistent low post move the sky is the limit for him at UCLA:
Speaking of taking things in personally, it’s clear to me at least the guy who takes playing defense personally is ML:

Photo Credit: E. Corpuz
At the beginning of the season Howland wanted JH to take on the mantle of defensive stopper of this team (in the mold of AA and RW). While JH made some noticeable impression throughout the season (as evident in the way he defended Derozan at Galen and Klay Thompson during the Pac-10 tournament), I think ML is the best defender among freshman. Again, I don't think one can really get a sense of how active this kid is on unless you see him defending in person:
He has that grean wingspand and he is lightning quick in the way he rotates on defense. In fact he rotates much faster than JH (at least he did on Saturday). He also gets all over his player just like AA and RW used to execute their defensive assignments. If anyone wants to get a sense of how ML defensively impacts a game go back and watch the first half against ASU (in Tempe) from few weeks ago. Go back and see how our defensive intensity changes when Howland brought in ML. I simply love this kid’s game. He is fearless:
He still has to develop physically. He also had the offensive tools which I think will come through once he gets the mins like RW did in his second year at UCLA. Still to me he has the best potential of emerging as the true leader of this team.
I also don’t see any reason to get down on JA. He had a tough game yesterday like he did on some other occasions against more physical guards (ala Washington). But he will get there. After a year or two in Howlandwood and going through off season workouts, he will be ready. Same goes for JMM. Obviously JMM wasn’t ready to contribute this season in Howland’s defensive scheme but his comments from this weekend were more than encouraging. Moreover, if anyone wants to question the possibility of the kind of leap a player can make in Howland’s program, just think back to where ND was just last year. Sure ND has lot more room to improve but two years ago he couldn’t even manage to stay on the floor because he had no clue how to play defense and would just chuck up bad shots. Now ND is playing within himself offensively lot more. He still needs to get quicker on his rotations. We can always hope for that to happen next year. What I am hoping for next year is Coach Howland trusting his bench a little more. I think it could help if he allows kids like MM and TH extended mins in early season, if our current guys at the 4 spot are not stepping up. We can always hope that the switch will go on for JK next year like it did for PAA this season. However, in case it doesn’t I hope Howland is not afraid to trust his freshmen.
BTW, yes the refs were terrible on Saturday. No doubt about it. But at the same time, we have to be honest with ourselves and can’t blame what took place against Nova on the refs. From my pov, we didn’t get the calls on Saturday and frankly throughout this season, because we haven’t been as aggressive on defense as we had been in previous years. The rebounding numbers speak for themselves (you guys pointed to it all day during the game thread and aftermath). Couple of instances stood out to me. I think they both occurred in the second half. In one sequence the Wildcats pulled down three consecutive offensive rebounds and break our back with a three pointer. Then another time, a Nova player pulled down an offensive board with four Bruins in the paint. Pretty inexcusable.
I think the talk of Villanova having a home court advantage is somewhat overblown. No doubt the crowd inside got loud when the Wildcats were making their runs. However, I didn’t think it was anything overwhelming. The arena seemed like a typical NBA arena which is kind of cavernous and built to amplify the acoustics, however it doesn’t give the sense of kind of intimidating atmosphere of a college arena ala Mac Court in Eugene (where the rafter shakes) or Cameron Indoors down in Durham. Besides as mentioned yesterday, the Bruin contingent was loud. And I have to say our band did a great job as much as they could to fire us all up in the early going:
BTW here was another sign when we knew we were going to be in trouble. Our camera battery ran out right after we took that picture and we realized that we had left extra batteries back at our hotel. Yikes. That was a bummer because we had fantastic seats in the lower section (4th row) right behind Plaschke and rest of the MSM haters from Southern Cal. lol We are sorry about that guys because we could have gotten some great shots of the Bruin contingent who did a great job rooting on our Ben Ball warriors.
Speaking about being at the game, let me share something about Don McLean. We have talked all year about Donnie Mac is our favorite announcer during Bruin broadcast. He does his best to sound impartial without trying to do too much and sound completely fake (and annoying in the process) ala Marques Johnson. He was sitting in just few rows ahead of us. And I wish I could describe the anguish in his face as the game was unfolding in front of our eyes. Donnie was in pain. I also loved how Coach Garson came over to him right before the tip off and did a little fist bump. McLean is clearly a big part of this program and I love it.
Going back to Coach Howland and what he would have, could have, and should have done. I think the tone 98 percent of this community has struck is the right one. Sure it is all right to express frustrations or disappointment with some of his strategic decisions (i.e. the way he decided to shape his backcourt mins this season) this season. However, some of the washed up and recycled second guessing we have seen on other boards and sporadically on here about his scheduling decisions, the way he uses TOs etc, are LOL funny. All on a sudden the coach who has reestablished this program as one of the best in this country, and taken to three straight Final-4s has to make whole sale changes because he lost a second round game with an imperfect team, despite winning 25+ games in a rebuilding season. Again as mentioned above, we just have a simple suggestion for these people: call in the local radio show or write to the dying LA Times to get off your cheap thrills but please keep that nonsense out of Bruin Nation.
Lastly, I wanted to end with a plug for Philadelphia. It’s a fun town. Sure it doesn’t have the name recognition of Boston or NYC out in the West. I get the sense many people have the notion that Philly is a gloomy and a depressing city. It’s anything but. There are tons of fun stuff to do in this cool sports town with great bars, restaurants and parks. We didn’t get to stay in the team hotel because we planned our trip at the very last second in late Friday afternoon. Still we ended up having a great time. We stayed in the Warwick, near Rittenhouse Square (around downtown I think). It was right in the middle of tons of cool places to hang out. Despite the tough afternoon, we decided to make the best out of it and enjoy a great weekend.
This trip was very different than my last trip to Philadelphia to see UCLA lose to Nova (in 2002). After that game we went out with other alums from East Coast at a local bar, and commiserated about a lost program being conned by a head coach in name only, who now poses as an "analyst" on ESPN. This time around we left the arena knowing that we still have one of the best coaches in the country, who will bring us back next season with another edition of Ben Ball season, contending for a Pac-10 championship, ginning us up and getting excited for March Madness. The fun will never stop in Howlandwood ...

... as long as we have the Caretaker leading our program.
GO BRUINS.
2 recs |
34 comments
|
Comments
Great wrap on a fine season.
It’s 6:38 am here in Minneapolis. Woke up greeting your excellent take on the finish in Philly and our season overall. Honored to possibly be the first to comment!
I completely agree with your analysis. Sadly, we seemed headed toward an early March exit – not enough defense, not enough rebounding, maybe not the right leadership. It didn’t have to be as brutal as Villanova – but that might have been the right “tonic” for our returnees going forward.
Since Howland’s arrival, I’m ALWAYS excited about next year. Without getting overly analytical, who wouldn’t be with guys like Jrue, Drew, Jerime, Malcolm and J’Mison (theoretically) all coming back.
Just to weaken for a moment and put a little analysis on next season, I’m hoping that Tyler Honeycutt is good to go because we’re losing a lot of offensive punch with the departure of Darren and Josh. TH seems to be a guy with legitimate offensive firepower. I’d hate to have that all put on many minutes from Mike and Drago because I just think they both have physical limitations that ultimately compromise our defense and rebounding too much for FF aspirations, imho.
It always used to kill me having to wait for Bruin hoops to return – but now we’ve got CRN and a new era in football to look forward to!
And thanks again for running an awesome website!
by mplsbruin on Mar 23, 2009 4:49 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nestor Travel Plans Next Year
Nestor-
Thanks for setting a great tone. I am glad that you got to see your (and my) Bruins in person for the NCAA’s. I hope that next year to do the same, you will be purchasing a ticket to San Jose or Spokane and Salt Lake.
As was mentioned in the post-game thread, it will come down to defense. The offense was certainly final-4 caliber in terms of stats- the defense is where the rebuilding team came up short.
Again, thanks, and hope to see you need to reset your watch for next year’s NCAA games.
by islandbruin on Mar 23, 2009 7:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Balance
Next season may be Howland’s most balanced team in terms of the number of guards and forwards/centers that he can utilize. This year’s team certainly wasn’t as balanced, and not as deep as in years past. Next season a lot of players can see playing time, which will result in much fresher players come tournament time for a nice, deep run. The only problem right now is the unknown. We have no idea who is going to step up, but at least there will be fierce competition for all the starter positions.
by UCLA4Life on Mar 23, 2009 7:44 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great recap
Enjoyed the ride this year with the BN family.
Some further analysis:
Your takes on ML and DG are spot on. I fully expect for them to have break out seasons next year and DG to be the emotional leader of the team.
As for JMM, I have been pretty down on him this year. He is really slow and plodding and I’m not sure yet he has the foot speed to compete at both ends of the court at this level. I do like his comments about having a chip on his shoulder. Hopefully, he channels that into a great off season and improved 09-10.
Jrue has a lot to prove next year. I think, like many people, I had such high expectations for him, (possibly too high) that it was almost inevitable that I would be disappointed. I truly hope he stays and helps lead this team to greatness again next year. He has such upside and I hope we get to see it in a UCLA uniform vs. on some NBA squad.
ND, MR and JK. Leadership is what we need from them and continued improvement which I have no doubt we’ll see. These guys are warriors and tireless workers both on and off the court which is what is needed to overcome their lack of superior athleticism. If they can provide quality, steadying minutes next year along with our current and incoming freshman, we’ll be really tough to beat.
Finally, at times I thought this team took on the “laid back” personality of Josh Shipp. In our losses we lacked a certain intensity and grit and hustle. JS was an amazing Bruin and had a memorable career but I truly believe he lacked the edge of AA or brought the intensity which I believe was needed to overcome our deficiencies. I’m not blaming JS, its just that teams often adopt the personalities of their leaders. At times I felt they played like they expected to win or could merely “turn on a swtich” and prevail, rather than going out and trying to prove it every game.
Oh well. Sorry the season is over but can’t wait till 09-10.
How soon before spring football??!
by Bald Eagle on Mar 23, 2009 8:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Next year...
You’re right about teams taking on the personality of their leaders. Many times, during the season, it felt like the Bruins played without a sense of urgency. I’ve been through the very bad with them, so this really doesn’t hurt as those years w/ Lavin and the more talented squads he had at the time. What really left me awestruck was seeing the Bruins heart get ripped out by Nova. It looked like at times like they wished it was over. Never the less, the season has come to an end and it is time to get ready for the next. I hope DC, JS & AA2 get themselves into the NBA and do good things.
Somewhere in another post, I read a link to the LA Times were Coach Howland made a comment that when AA, CB or RW got beat, they took it to heart and played to not let it happen again. I see that in DG and ML, more so in DG. You can tell this kid is going to demand the very best of his teammates next year with his passion for the game. I look forward to next season and seeing these kids back in the tourney…
by RScal on Mar 23, 2009 7:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lots to cover
Great job, N, as usual.
It’s comforting that our “rebuilding year” equalled or exceeded the “great” years by ASU, UW, Cal, $c, and, by virtue of their Sweet-16, UofA. When the noise-mongering media complains about 26 wins, nearly winning the conference, and winning a tourney game a long way from home, the state of the program must be ok. Besides, we know Coach’s definition of success. This team achieved that. No question.
I think your description of the offense as “predictible” is telling. That’s why JH’s possible return (I’m hoping, praying, and begging for it) is the key for next year. He will make the offense unpredictible by creating many more options, thus making it much harder for an opponent, esp one with an athletic and motivated defense, to slow us down. While we were very efficient this year, our offense didn’t leave much room for error by our vulnerable defense. With JH at the point, that will tilt further in our favor.
Despite that, defense is still the key, and needs to be better next year if we want to go deeper in the season. ML is going to be very important in this regard. JK and ND need to step us their game inside. I really welcome the overt emotion DG is going to bring to the game, as well. His fire will be contagious, both to his teammates and to the fans. CBH said a point-blank “No” when asked if he’d consider a zone next year, so the team needs to get the Bruin D back to where it was the previous 2 seasons.
But finally, clearly, the most obvious take-home message from this season, more than anything, and which the final game proved beyond a shadow of a doubt, is that Nestor and Mrs N should forever be banned from watching us play Villanova in Philly. The stats bear this out. I hope you at least “spilled” something on Plaschke.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
by gbruin on Mar 23, 2009 8:30 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
post season wrap
i agree with Nestor’s comments
1. It was a rebuilding year, and really not so bad under the circumstances.
2. We have one of the best coaches in the country. 3 final 4s is historic—with three very different teams. You can harp about the playing time for specific players, but we dont see practice.
3. We all knew this team just wasnt that good; we have seen it all season. our inside game (offense and defense) was too dependent on one guy who wasnt that good. He was a Steve Patterson without Wicks and Rowe. Weak inside play dictated the rest of the line up. we should celebrate the accomplishments of our seniors. A really good group of guys that stuck out four years.
4. We know Howlands teams are always good defensively, and this team just wasnt able to ratchet it up—esp v. Nova. Weak side rotation was slow; and too many penetrations that broke down the defense; I dont know why this team didnt seem to bring the high level of intensity.
5. college bb is getting predictable; penetration, weak side rotation to create block, charge or pass out for a 3 ball. has everyone forgot about the 10 ft pull up???
by bruins72 on Mar 23, 2009 8:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks again Nestor for a great season
I had to be fairly absent while pledging, but as always this was still the first place I came everyday to stay a little connected during the first part of the season. Can’t wait to see how next year’s team develops, who matures, and who can step in and play a role as a freshman.
While we can set the bar high again with a leader like Howland, I am at peace with the way this season ended, and with everything the boys accomplished. With the great talent coming in, and the talent that spent a lot of time on the bench this year, maybe next year we see a little less rebuilding and a little more reloading, but only time will tell.
anyway, on to baseball and spring ball!
O.A.
by Ollie on Mar 23, 2009 10:09 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great write up
I was in philly too. Not in the ucla section, but two sections over. I was so surprised and happy we had so many fans. I think UCLA got better overall representation than UCONN or Texas AM. Even many of the nova fans were just locals cheering for the local team. No one gave me any personal attitude really, so all was good on that front.
I walked by a few bruin fans who said next year, and I agreed. I know we lose a lot with shipp, collison, and aboya (and hopefully not holiday). But I think we have a lot to look forward to in this program. By the looks we have more players coming in next year, maybe some of the freshmen will be of the farmar, mbah a moute, afflalo mold where they are ready to start from day one. Regardless no final four, I think 26 wins and a tournament win is good. Ideally this team had the potential to win a couple more games in the regular season get a better seed, and make sweet 16 or elite 8. We were not physically the type of defensive team that made three straight runs. Losing mbah a moute might have been more key than many people thought. I’m excited to see reeves nelson, honeycutt, moser, stover and lane. I think the first three might contribute quickest.
by realfabfive on Mar 23, 2009 10:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Post: one quibble and one request
Nestor, to me the only disappointment for the season is that we did not win the PAC10. I am not a fan of judging a season exclusively on how you do in the tournament. A few wins in a row (3 gets you into the Elite 8) does not a quality season make IMHO. If we had taken care of business in a couple of winnable games we would have won the PAC10. But that is a quibble. As many have noted: 26 wins is great for a rebuilding year.
The seniors deserve Congratulations and Thanks for everything they have done for the Program.
Can someone on BN set up a poll: which player will have the most improvement over the forthcoming offseason? The reason for my faith in CBH (despite differences here and there) is the amazing growth of players in the program from one year to the next. Think PAA, ND, RW, DC just over the last few years. These guys had HUGE improvements from one season to the next. My guess is that it will be DG next season but that is one of the most exciting things about the early games: seeing who blossomed over the off-season.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Mar 23, 2009 10:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Brilliant!
Thanks for the recap Nestor. In terms of emotions, this season was much more of a roller coaster than last year. It kind of makes it fun in a way, when you don’t know how your team will do, as opposed to expecting to win every game (and let’s be honest, last year, we could have won every single game we played!).
Here are some further thoughts for me:
1. I think that as Nestor pointed out, LRMAM’s departure was unexpected and threw a big wrench in our lineup. That, coupled with DC staying, really mixed things up in terms of the rotation. Just think, if LRMAM had stayed, our starting lineup would likely have been JH, MR/ML, JS, LRMAM, AA, or something like that. I think that’s a completely different team. No one could have predicted Luc leaving early, or DC staying. Sometimes, these things happen, and I think CBH did a phenomenal job reworking his lineup.
2. I hope no one forgets this: we were two points from a fourth straight Pac-10 championship. Two. Points. Thank you Ben Howland.
3. DG next year: fewer fouls, a few more points, a few more rebounds, a few more blocks, a few more screams and a few more dunks! Yes please!
4. JMM: YOU CAN DO IT! If Dexter Pittman can do it, there is no reason why you can’t. Your coaches will help you! Go talk to the soccer or tennis coaches if you have to, and they’ll get your footspeed up to Riverdance standards.
5. ML: yes, it is personal. No one should stop you and no one should get by you.
6. ND: if you make as much progress on defense next year as you made on offense this year, you’ll make millions in the NBA. And you’ll win lots of games for UCLA.
7. JA: in case you hadn’t noticed, you’re next in a long line of amazing point guards at UCLA. I think you know this. Work on your handle. You should be dribbling a basketball all the time to improve. At the supermarket, in the shower, while you pee, I don’t care. The ball is yours.
I don’t know if JH is coming back, I don’t expect him to, but if he does, it’ll be a treat!
GO BRUINS!
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Mar 23, 2009 10:35 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, Nestor
for the excellent reporting and fine analysis. While I found the margin and manner of our defeat upsetting, I blame no one, and it seems clear that CBH got the most from this combination of players.
Here’s the thing: Bruin fans can say “wait til next year” and know in their hearts that it’s not just an empty, wistful hope. For Bruin basketball, next year can’t get here soon enough.
As for JH, he will certainly benefit from another year under Coach Howland. I hope he and his advisors are smart enough to realize that.
by ReineSeite on Mar 23, 2009 10:36 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Sure was a tough game...
…to attend but I certainly agree with the general tone near the end of the game. It wasn’t all gloom and despair – probably due to lack of expectations, I felt much better about this loss than in the past few years. In any case, I’m truly excited about next year. For me, that’s the toughest part – no more basketball for 7-8 months! Let’s go CRN and co!
And thanks for the shout out for Philly – as some of you may or may not know, I moved out here for work from California a little over a year ago and have been absolutely pleasantly surprised. It gets a bad wrap but it’s a unique city with an absolutely underrated art museum and a great bar/night scene. Here’s to hoping I don’t get to see my Bruins in Philly anytime soon though – I’d much rather they have some home cookin’ for the tournament.
by zinlinez on Mar 23, 2009 10:57 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Mild Disagreement
Let me be clear: I remain a big Ben Howland fan, and I appreciate our departing seniors as exemplary represenatitives of our school and our basketball program. But I regard this season as a disappointment, based on the UCLA Basketball standard of excellence that is best defined by the fact that we don’t put up Final Four banners, we only put up championship banners (a standard that has been embraced by CBH since his first day on the job.)
We did not win the PAC 10 regular season title; we did not win the PAC 10 tournament title (nor did we make the semis; our record against ranked teams was lousy; and our road record was lousy. Additionally, we did not survive the first weekend of the NCAA tournament. By the standards of most schools in America, we had a successful season. By UCLA standards, it was a disappoinment — and primarily so because of the particular games we lost, and the way we lost them.
My above case for success based on UCLA standards is open to debate. And I acccept that. What ultimately soured me most on this season was THE WAY in which we lost many games. How many times did we hear our players concede they were out hustled? That the other team played like it wanted the game more than we did? Too many for my taste. I can accept getting beat in the NCAA tournament by a better team — even an inferior team. Hey, it happens. What I don’t accept is a lack of effort. Beyond the wins and losses, what has made me happiest about Howland’s teams are that they (before this season) played hard and with extreme effort, night in and night out. Our shots might not have fallen; we might have made mistakes that cost us the game; but we always brought our best effort — the most energy we had to give.
Ultimately, I think the fact that things were different this year falls on both the players and the coach. Talent isn’t everything. If it was, the NCAA tournament would not feature so many upsets and/or near-upsets. Emotion, effort — these things matter. I expect more from Ben Howland-coached teams because that is the standard he has set. And based on that standard, I am not happy with this year’s results, even though I remain a big backer of the coach and appreciative of our seniors. The fact that I had to read from our own players that ‘Nova played hard than we did was particularly unacceptable to me. In my opinion, I should be reading that we lost because of poor shooting; because we turned the ball over too many times; because we couldn’t contain their best offensive player. But not because we were outmatched on the effort front.
I will leave my thoughts on this year’s frosh and next year’s incoming class for a future thread. But I want to close by saying what probably impressed me the most this year and gave me what little pleasure I was able to glean from this season, and that is Alfred Aboya. In my opinion, Alfred Aboya played himself into the NBA draft with his play this season. He showed talent that I never guessed he had. That is a credit to both himself and the coach.
by Bruin Die Hard on Mar 23, 2009 11:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Don't necessarily believe a player who says he was outhustled
Shipp and Darren are confident, so they may say they were outhustled when in fact their lateral quickness is simply not a match for some of their opponents. They say they were outhustled merely because that’s easier for a confident player to believe than that the other guy was faster or quicker or better.
I personally think that we did not lose for lack of effort against Villanova. We lost for lack of athleticism as compared to the Wildcats. In most of our losses we were exposed for lack of athleticism, quickness, size and defense. In some instances we were not quite ready at the opening tip, but I don’t think we lacked hustle.
by BruinsRule on Mar 23, 2009 11:40 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Aboya was awesome!
He has become my favorite Bruin!
I understand your point about standards, but circumstances must also be taken into consideration. Howland’s rotation and the team he had started building took a big hit when Westbrook and LRMAM left. Those were not predictable departures, especially when you look at their recruitment out of high school, and that really threw a wrench in the lineup. I think Howland did a fantastic job this year. So perhaps in a vacuum, the wins and losses and the types of losses were not up to your standard, but I guarantee you that is not what Howland had envisioned and there’s only so much you can do in recruiting without having to also prepare for unexpected departures to the NBA. The emotion may not have been there so much, but I believe the effort was there almost all season, until we ran into teams that clearly had a physical advantage. To me, the game against WSU at Pauley and the one at Arizona were the only ones in which I thought our effort was poor. I put an asterisk on the U$C game in the tournament because I think DC was just too injured in the last few games.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Mar 23, 2009 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
haven't been able to read all the comments yet
but I think not enough has been said about the impact of that hard foul on DC during the oregon game. (i wish one of our guys would have at least gotten into the face of whatever punk put him down) After that hit, DC wasn’t the same in terms of extending on his free throws and 3-pointers.
Now i don’t think that would have changed the outcome of the nova game too much (they played very inspired bball) but i think it does highlight something that i am hoping for as we look forward to next year… a little bit of bunker mentality, us against the world attitude…cliche as sounds, I noticed a lot of times this season when our guys were on the ground after a foul or loose ball, there weren’t alot of teammates rushing over to help them up. I think our team this year had many great pieces and parts but they just didn’t learn to coalesce as a whole (not game in and game out anyways).
I think also we must be reminded that the only time that our team has “out-talented” other teams on the court during the Howland era was last year with KL, RW and LRMAM… the previous final four teams did not have pluses on their side in terms of positional match-ups. we did not have traditional post presences that most “experts” say we need. but they made it work because everybody understood their role and fought hard together.
Perhaps its a freshmen thing but i hope that we don’t fall into thinking that because we’re UCLA we deserve to have everyone get out the way and give us the PAC-10 championship and a berth to the final four every year just based on recruiting classes. hopefully this experience will humble our athletes and even us as fans, to work harder and cheer each other on to a return to excellence earned not entitled.
by lilbobdog on Mar 23, 2009 11:24 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Antedilluvian Standard
I wish that UCLA administration would allow Final 4 banners to be hung in today’s competitive college basketball climate. I think it’s cool that we can say that we only hang championship banners – but I also think that it denigrates what the previous three Final 4 classes have accomplished. To have no banners to commemorate their incredible – unparalleled (in contemporary times) – achievement – seems short sighted. I also think it places undue pressure on CBH and his players.
Don’t get me wrong – I appreciate and value what CJRW accomplished here at UCLA. My heart beats proudly when I think about the legacy that he established for all future UCLA athletes and students. I try and live my professional and personal life with the same principles that JRW espoused. However, it is a totally different basketball climate today – and the fact that fans of UCLA continue to hold that standard against today’s teams proves that it needs to be let go. With the one and done climate – the fact that CBH could get to three straight FF’s – while adjusting his personnel – is amazing. The fact that he lost three players that are now starting in the NBA – and still won 26 games – is incredible.
Of course – that’s just my opinion though.
by freudianslip on Mar 23, 2009 11:40 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea
I don’t like the idea that there’s no real recognition of the past three years at all. It’s not like we’re hanging anything for “postseason appearances” or something ridiculous like that. The Final Four is a lofty and legitimate goal, especially the way college basketball is now. You could just put one up and list all the years that we’ve made it, like other schools do with conference championships or something else that we do with frequency that doesn’t come as frequently to other schools.
We know who will come out the loudest against this proposal, and so I say that we should use it as a bargaining chip. Get the old people up and out of their seats and hold the banner hostage like the movie Speed. If the decibel level at Pauley drops below a certain level, the banner goes up.
by Tydides on Mar 23, 2009 11:50 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
if not pauley
why not at least the wooden center or morgan center or the weight room
by lilbobdog on Mar 23, 2009 11:53 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Awesome Wrap-up Nestor
Thanks for the thorough and fair summary of this season. Nice to get some closure on this season while looking forward to next season. I personally think that next season could be a rebuilding season as well if JH decides not to come back – thereby making 2010-11 a very special season. However, if JH does come back (which I’m not expecting him to) – then I believe that this season could be special as well. Nonetheless, I am incredibly excited about the improvements that we can look forward to in some of our BenBall Warriors next season. Specifically DG and ML – as I believe that DG can be an enforcer (perhaps a more skilled PAA) and ML can be a lock down defender – with some real offensive upside.
I know I addressed this briefly in a previous post – but I think what CBH has accomplished in this contemporary college basketball landscape – is nothing short of amazing. The day of basketball dynasties is over – as it is incredibly difficult to maintain any type of consistency in a one and done climate. Yet, we have won at least 26 games in each of the last 4 seasons – went to three consecutive FF’s – and have been put in the position to be competitive in each and every season (including next season). I can understand why people had high expectations for this team (with DC, JS, and PAA coming back) – but this team was obviously very different from the previous BenBall Warrior teams. Even the seniors that stayed were different in either disposition or skill set than AA, JF, KL, LRMR, LRMM, RW, etc. However, this team competed well despite their limitations. It may have been an up and down year – but I bet that CBH is already at work developing next year’s team (and probably the year after that – as he is a relentless worker).
Finally, I want to thank the seniors and CBH for a very enjoyable last 5 years. Nobody takes UCLA losing harder than the players and CBH. So as much anguish as I experience with each UCLA loss – I take solace in knowing that we have players and coaches that have tremendous character and pride – and represent UCLA exceptionally well.
by freudianslip on Mar 23, 2009 11:54 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Some nice stats to remember
This was truly a great 4 year run:
-Our 14 tournament wins in those 4 years currently ranks #1 overall. Memphis will tie us with one more win in this tourney. Kansas could get to 15 if it wins the championship, and UNC would tie us if they win the championship.
-We are one of only 6 teams to post at least 1 win in each of the last 4 tournaments (the others are Memphis, Texas, Texas A&M, UNC and Pitt).
-Our 124 wins ranks 2nd behind Memphis.
-We did this despite losing 5 players (and 9 seasons) early to the NBA draft. That’s 5 out of 14 players who signed letters of intent and enrolled. None of the other top programs came close to that. (When people argue that Howland has not done well with recruiting, keep in mind that guys like JH and ND may have excelled as role players on this year’s team had Luc or RW not left early.)
-We did this despite having posted only 39 wins in the 3 years leading up to this run. The seniors who graduated 4 years ago experienced only 1 20-win season (and it was exactly 20 wins) and 59 wins total in 4 years. This year’s senior class more than doubled the win total of that class.
Next year should be an exciting year. I am already amped to see who of Lane, Nelson, Honeycutt, Moser and Stover is able to step into the line up from day one and constribute. Who will be a pleasant surprise like Luc or RW? Who will develop over the 4 years like LMR or AA2? Who will be a warrior like AA?
by BruinsRule on Mar 23, 2009 11:59 AM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Whenever people complain
I ask them, which other team would you rather be? Sure, Kansas or Florida, if you want to have won championships. But look at where Florida is right now. Kansas got a good seed, deservedly, took care of business during the season and is in the sweet sixteen. Fine. But no one has had a run like ours. And Memphis can kiss my ass, because 60% or more of their wins are against cupcakes. Yes, they’re good, but when you can pretty much rest your starters 10 minutes into the second half of almost every game, it changes the complexion of your season. So, again, who would you rather be?
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Mar 23, 2009 12:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Interesting statistic (losing 5 players and 9 seasons) to early NBA
If it is true that “none of the other top programs came close to that” then we really have to celebrated CBH for recruiting skills and coaching skills to maintain the quality.
It appears to me that winning the title will increasingly come down to keeping your NBA players the longest. Florida got back to back because of it. IF UNC, for example, wins this year it is further proof.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Mar 23, 2009 1:03 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice summary
but I have to add some Pac 10 comments. First, Arizona making the sweet sixteen is not just a fluke of their seeding and region. Lute really hurt these guys with his “I’m back, no I’m not” decision. Pennel has done a good job of getting the big 3 to play well after such a long losing streak. Good luck! and I have to congratulate the hated Trojans – they hung in there with NO HELP from the old man (I mean Taj) and really came close to the upset. When I was a student, ‘SC had great bball teams and it made our victories all the more sweet! I fear they will start a down trend now (if Hackett, Derozan, Taj leave). Finally, I disagree that our team didn’t have heart and I don’t believe Josh did any less than give 100%. DC belongs in the class of elite Bruin bballers. And I am sorry Pac 10 coaches, but there is no question that PAA was the most improved player of the year. Now for next season: 3 seniors, 5 sophomores (tourney tested) and 5 classy freshman? Wow,the other 9 coaches cannot be happy. Go Bruins.
by Vanman7475 on Mar 23, 2009 12:35 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice Summary - but.....
I do agree with almost everything said here by everyone. But, I must say that when the refs are calling you for ticky tack fouls, it is very hard to be aggressive in your defense. Villanova played a heck of a game and deserved to win but we didn’t stand a chance with those refs. They took us out of our defense because, I believe, that our players were afraid to do anything that might be construed as a foul. The refs have the power to control the game and the outcome of the game if they are not calling it the same for both teams.The refs were bad in all the Pac-10 games. Washington’s Brockman was hammered by two guys and there was no call. Even an sc alum agreed that all the Pac-10 games were not called fairly. It sounds like sour grapes, but if you are afraid to foul – you can’t play good defense.
In the Orange County Register today, Youngman had nothing but bad things to say about UCLA “not showing up for their game like sc had”. He also commented that Guerrero next year will probably try to get all UCLA’s NCAA games at Pauley. He and many of the announcers and newspaper sports reporters STINK!!!! We need to get Nestor to be a reporter and tell it like it really is. GO BRUINS!!!!!!!
by Forever a Bruin on Mar 23, 2009 2:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Some questions, though...
… and allow me to say I absolutely LOVE that we play style of game based on defense, toughness, rebounding, fundamentals, and smart shot selection. At the same time, I also believe smart shot selection and offensive efficiency can be used by hard-grinding teams that score in the 50s-60s, or fast-break teams that score in the 80-90s. It’s all a matter of playing to the strrengths of your personnel, and taking away the strengths of your opponents’ personnel.
Now that that’s out of the way, here’s my point: we’ve heard a LOT about officiating for, oh, WEEKS. Everyone has known that, one way or another, one game after another, we’ve had to deal with bad calls and no-calls, ticky-tack calls and over-the-back non-calls. SPTR is already a well-accepted moniker around here.
Nevertheless, has anyone noticed that it seems like in every single one of the past 4 years, as we’ve flamed out by double-digits against our very final opponent, foul trouble has been an issue:
2009: Villanova, 2nd round.
UCLA PF: 21
Opp. PF: 22
Margin: -1
Players with 5 fouls: DG
Players with 4 fouls: ND, JS
(Also: PAA with 3 fouls, 2 of them early.)
2008: Memphis, Final 4
UCLA PF: 17
Opp. PF: 14
Margin: -3
Players with 5 fouls: DC
Players with 4 fouls: RW
2007: Florida, Final 4
UCLA PF: 26
Opp. PF: 17
Margin: -9
Players with 5 fouls: LMR, LMRAM, AA (including 2 early ones)
Players with 4 fouls: AA2
2006: Florida, Championship Game
UCLA PF: 22
Opp. PF: 13
Margin: -9
Players with 5 fouls: None
Players with 4 fouls: LMRAM
Everyone knows we play an aggressive man-to-man style of D. That’s our calling card. That’s our CORE, our backbone — and it has worked far, far, FAR more often than not while CBH has been here. We would be nowhere without solid D.
Even so, my questions are simply these:
(1) Why have we been eliminated from the Tournament by double-digits for four straight years?
(2) Why is foul trouble an issue for us in each of our biggest losses?
(3) Is the issue with the refs, our coaches, our strategies, our players, our depth, or some combination of any/ all of the above?
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 23, 2009 3:13 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
M, those are good questions
I think I can answer the question about fouls. The overall foul margin was close in our last two losses. This year, when we were a poor team at getting to the free throw line, we still managed to stay basically even with Villanova, who, as a team, shoots a lot of free throws. So the only real outliers in terms of # of fouls are the Florida games.
Let’s face it, Florida (and to a lesser extent Memphis and Villanova) had superior size and quickness at multiple positions. Noah, Horford and Brewer were nightmarish matchups for us. When you’re slower and smaller and not as good, you’re going to foul more than if you’re quicker and bigger and better.
On top of that, teams that are behind will take more chances, rsulting in more fouls. And of course, at the end of games, the losing team will often foul several times intentionally in an attempt to extend the game.
by BruinsRule on Mar 24, 2009 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Blaming the refs is juvenile
The refs do make bad calls. It’s a part of the game. But I have watched almost all of our games this year, and I can honestly say that the only bad call that had an impact on the game was the “charge” on Collison at ASU.
The reffing in the VCU game was about the worst I’ve seen. UCLA would get called for blocing fouls when Maynor lowered his shoulder to initiate contact, but they didn’t call VCU for the handchecking they did the entire game.
In the Villanova game, Villanova got called for a lot of hard fouls, and it seemed not much else, but that’s becuase they played a physical style of defense and punished us whenever we took it to the hoop. We didn’t get whistled for many physical fouls because we were so soft. In other words, Villanova got a lot of mileage with their fouls because they fouled hard, we didn’t get much mileage with ours because we fouled softly (still a foul).
by BruinsRule on Mar 24, 2009 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
On Brockman
Washington got a TON of calls against Purdue. Namely, every time Thomas would drive, a whislte would blow. Purdue was apoplectic. People who look at a game like that and conclude that Washington got screwed wanted Washington to win and were viewing it with purple shaded glasses.
by BruinsRule on Mar 24, 2009 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
The future looks SO bright...
… and I can’t wait to see what we’ll become.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 23, 2009 2:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree
Meriones is great with his facts. As I said before, we can sound like we are blaming the refs
but their calls or lack of calls can really take you out of your game. It is hard to play good, tough defense if you think that you are going to be called for any little thing. I do believe that it is a combination of things – but the refs seem to keep the Pac-10 schools out of the tournament. I know others feel the same way. I couldn’t believe what I saw Villanova and other schools getting away with and our Pac-10 guys were getting into foul trouble. It doesn’t seem fair for this to happen and Meriones’s facts seem to point out that something is wrong -very wrong
by Forever a Bruin on Mar 23, 2009 4:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I have thought about the same thing, Meriones,
and, while I am not sure I have a good answer, I think it has something to do with tempo on offense. If we are not able get stops against the other team, we are bound to struggle to keep up because we customarily use a lot of time during each offensive possession. We play a system based on tough D on one end and a grind-it-out, move the ball, make the extra pass approach on the other. Normally, this works to our advantage, but when we meet a team that is very efficient on the offense, because of great shooting, offensive rebounds or whatever, this self-limiting approach may not work. Also, I think that many coaches are now stressing better defense and we have had trouble with that as well.
by ReineSeite on Mar 24, 2009 9:50 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Great Write Up
I think your third paragraph perceptively explains the season.
And, I’ve always thought Donny Mac would make a great assistant coach (but I assume he’d have to take a pay cut to do it).
I share the same emotions you do — I feel good about the season and feel honored to add JS, DC, and PAA to my list of very special Bruins.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Mar 25, 2009 8:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















