A Few More Random Ben Ball Post-SeasonThoughts
Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N
1. I’ve not taken the time to see how many of the remaining tournament teams start players who started last year. I have a hunch (meaning not supported by fact) that tournament time is the time that experience counts — that "sleeper teams" are often starting players that have played together, lots of minutes, in previous years. We’ve always said that we started three players two of whom had little starting or playing experience and one who had none and that that was part of the reason we were the team that we were — a highly successful team but one that was vulnerable at spots.
2. No matter what men want to believe, size does matter. And, we were not "big" where it mattered. JH, as good as he was, will be better after a year in the weight room — whether he plays for us or in the NBA. And, more importantly, the remaining members of the young guns — if they hit the weights hard — will have Westbrook like transformations. As we know, RW exploded not just because he had a year of experience but also because he hit the weights hard in the summer between his freshman and sophomore years.
3. In a like manner, in Ben Ball, toughness matters. I think the players we have coming back have a nucleus of people who can play tough — and by tough I mean in the LMR/PAA mold — if they want to. JK is one of them. Although he did not have his break out year — and I thought he would, he is big and strong. ND played a lot tougher this year, in spurts, than in years before. I think toughness is both a matter of strength AND attitude. ND has started to develop that attitude. At the beginning of this season he was still playing a bit weaker on D and letting the ball go by rather than getting on the floor for it. Then, he bought in and, with the exception of some lapses, really got tough. He played hard on the boards and — to the best of his ability — some good D stretches. I really expect him to be totally tough next year. Kids like DG and ML were tough this year — but somewhat smaller than need be to carry it out throughout the entire game (seem my comments about size matters — these are the guys, who if they spend their time in the weight room, will be dominant players).
4. Bobo: IIRC, as a child, Bobo had some serious problems with his legs. And, from what I recall, with grit and desire, he’s become a great player and overcome most of the vestiges of the problem. If that’s true, we have to be careful how we talk about and judge him. If he is running as fast as he can run and playing as hard as he can play, that’s all we can ask. If he’s not as fast on a hedge or quick coming down court AND that is a reflection of his body not his effort — so be it; and if he brings other things we need, I trust CBH to adjust the D game to account for Bobo's strengths and perceived weaknesses.I know he had other skills to learn, needs to learn the D — as do all new BenBall players — , and it is said that he needs to lose weight — but it is not fair to him to have expected more from him than one should expect from any freshman. It sounds like he will work very hard this summer. I look forward to seeing him next fall.
Bobo has become one of my favorite "I really don’t know much about him" kids. Much has been made about his comment about coming here "selfish". I love the fact that he is both sufficiently perceptive and honest to make that statement. He’s still just a kid. Do you think he’s the only hot shit high school player who has come here "selfish" and with an expanded sense of self importance? How humbling it must be for these High School all stars to find out that they are surrounded by bigger and better players who know the system and game. Many of us here were probably high school valedictorians who coasted through high school only to get their first "C" or worse at UCLA in their freshman year. I think the criticism of Bobo is misplaced. He’s just a kid in his first year of college ball. To predict that he will never amount to anything is simply wrong. I love his attitude, his sense of team, and his laugh (just as I always loved JS's smile) -- it shows depth and perspective. He will make a major contribution to Ben Ball lore before he leaves.
5. I stayed out of the post game analysis that followed the end of our season. You all were doing so well. And, honestly, although I was not disappointed in our team, I really hated to see the season end. So, I just want to take a moment to thank the entire team and coaching staff for giving us such a great year — and congratulate JS, DC and PAA for being all that I would want a Bruin to be.
sjh
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
5 recs |
61 comments
Comments
Bobo
I appreciate your level-headed analysis. As one of those who has openly criticized him for his lack of foot speed and overall lack of quickness, I’m willing to wait and see whether CBH can find a place for him and whether his skill set matches with the grander scheme for the future of the program. I too, love his attitude and sense of humor. It is great for team chemistry and morale.
As for the leg problems he had as a youth, a call for sensitivity with our criticism is valid. On the other hand, that is-who-he-is and if he is unable to compete effectively at this level in CBH’s system, I think it is appropriate to raise concerns. I’m willing to take a wait and see attitude, and I trust the Coaching staff’s ability to asses talent and readiness to play, but if he can’t perform, I’m going to lobby that he spends more time on the bench and less time on the floor. I’ll keep in mind his physical limitations but I’m still going to push for the best talent to get the most playing time.
Also, I doubt CBH will adjust our D scheme to fit the limitations of one player. He has made it fairly clear that he is set in his ways when it comes to defensive schemes. The staff will work with Bobo to get him ready for the rigors of the CBH defensive system. But if Bobo can’t cut it, don’t look for changes in our D- look for Bobo on the bench with his warm-ups on.
by Bald Eagle on Mar 26, 2009 8:01 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
We are pretty much in agreement
If there is a better player, the better player should play.
Bobo has good inside move, strength on the boards, and can block or change shots.
He’s also a natural 5, something we did not have this year. PAA was a versatile master his entire career, but it is nice to have someone playing “in position”
We had problem “hedging” this year. ND was slow getting out and getting back. The double team was not as strong this year because, in the past, it was PAA or LRMM doing the doubling.
If we do not have the talent to hedge in the same manner with did with previous teams, I expect that CBH will make adjustments to the D scheme. That’s what I meant when I said that CBH will figure out how to use Bobo (and others) next year.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Mar 26, 2009 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rebounding
CBH’s recent quotes really focused on our poor rebounding this year. Hopefully Bobo can concentrate on improving that part of our effort. It will depend on how long he can stay in games as I fear he will continue getting cheap fouls called on him trying to hedge screens. Because of his poor foot speed and agility it will be challenging for him to master that aspect of Ben Ball defense.
But you’re right, it will be nice to have a true “5” on the floor.
by Bald Eagle on Mar 26, 2009 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Heck of a quote...
“Many of us here were probably high school valedictorians who coasted through high school only to get their first "C" or worse at UCLA in their freshman year”
That’s a wake-up call, even though I wasn’t valedictorian in HS. The adjustment to college was rough on all of us; I can’t iamgine what it was like for a guy playing before mass media — or at least, semi-regional-blackout-cable-tv-with-poor-clarity every week —like Bobo and our other freshmen had to do.
Bobo sounds like a good kid, who really needed the year to get his feet wet. Not every frosh C is a Kevin Love. As long as Morgan keeps putting honest effort and energy and attention in, then he’s going to be just fine.
It may take him until his soph or junior or maybe even senior year to breakthrough and play with confidence and swagger, but so be it. Everybody’s got their own speed, especially at that age.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 26, 2009 9:10 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Wake up calls
I remember writing my first Eng 10 composition, feeling pretty good about myself, and then getting a D+. I was aghast. I remember thinking, “Damn, thanks for the "+” there prof, at least it’s not just a D!"
I can imagine that working into CBH’s system is a bit more challenging (btw – that’s sarcastic gross understatement for effect – not learned in Eng 10) than writing essays in English class. And if Bobo can recognize that, and he’s awake to the realization that he has to step up his effort and dedication, then he has exactly the most important quality he needs to succeed. And I believe he will do it. Can’t wait!
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
by gbruin on Mar 26, 2009 11:08 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Road game
Going that far south of the fireplace must be the equivalent of flying to Philly for the tourney.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
by gbruin on Mar 26, 2009 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually
I was still a South Campus major when I took that class. After that I realized I needed a change in direction of my program major. The difference in lifestyle after that “switch” (its been a key word around here lately!) of majors (campus sides) felt the exact same way like experiencing the difference in watching UCLA basketball under Howland after Lavin.
by Nestor on Mar 26, 2009 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm...
I think we were in that class together too, Nestor…though I got an A…sorry :)
Unfortunately I never got a wake up call…I got one B+ in my first 2 years…then all A’s. So I stuck with the premed thing. #$#%.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Mar 26, 2009 2:37 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
funny formatting...meant to be a cuss! :)
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Mar 26, 2009 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Who did you take 6A from?
I used to grade for that class – albeit after you graduated I believe. I graduated undergrad in ‘03. I know many of those professors well and always get a kick out of people’s impression of certain ones.
by zinlinez on Mar 26, 2009 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Geez, 6A? I took "Physics for Poets"...
… aka Physics 10.
My ’Nova was Calculus 3A and 3B - got an A in the former, scraped a C- in the latter. Yeesh.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 27, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gosh darn inadvertent strikethru...
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 27, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My first case
I needed a language, and a guy told me that I should take Dutch-Flemish/Afrikaans, because I had already taken some German, and D-F/A was similar but without any irregular verbs. So I took the class, and was the only sophomore. There was a freshman from South Africa, a junior from South Africa and a senior from South Africa. There were also six grad students in Germanic Languages, two of whom had been my teachers in German.
So my first case went something like this. I went to see the prof, explained to him that it was fairly likely that I could speak Afrikaans better than 15,000 of the 30,000 kids at UCLA, and on that basis should get a C. But if he graded on a curve, I obviously spoke the least Afrikaans of the 10 people in the class, 9 of whom could speak it before they showed up. The prof agreed, and our deal was that if I came to class and tried hard, he would give me a C.
I was never able to find the guy who told me that the class would be a breeze because of the absence of irregular verbs.
by Fox 71 on Mar 27, 2009 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I flunked the spelling portion of the subject A test
and had to take “dumbbell English”.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Mar 26, 2009 11:46 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I got past Subject A thanks to great high school English teachers
and then I was blessed to get an assistant prof, rather than a TA, for English 1A. This guy was destined from birth to teach English, and he was one of the top two or three teachers I ever had — George Bernard Tennyson. What a perfect name.
by Fox 71 on Mar 26, 2009 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Are you serious?
If so, it looks like his parents were pretty big English lit folks too.
by bruinbabe2000 on Mar 26, 2009 2:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great prof
I had him for English 1A and 1B. Then I I took 46A (the big survey of English Lit) from a different prof. I knew I was in over my head when I had to compare and contrast “Ode to a Nightengale” and “Ode on a Grecian Urn,” and I didn’t have all that much to say about either one. Anyway, I called Prof. Tennyson the night before the final and he talked me through the entire course, and I managed a B. He also gave me the sage advice that I didn’t really want to think about majoring in English. I don’t know whether he was a great scholar or writer, but he was sure a good teacher for an undergrad.
by Fox 71 on Mar 26, 2009 6:59 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
My first quarter
I got not one, but two C+s (Math 3A and Comm. Studies 10). First ever ones in my life. About a week later, I saw Uncle BB at his Christmas party. “How did you do?” he asked. “A- and two C+s, not very good,” I said. “What the hell are you talking about? That’s great for your first quarter,” he replied. I hit cruise control the rest of time at UCLA.
by bruinbabe2000 on Mar 26, 2009 11:55 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
JM had Growth Plates Removed ...
between the 7th and 8th grade. N. referenced a Dohn article (link no longer valid) in his game day writeup before the Mercer game that described this.
Now, I’m not a medical guy, but this seems like a rather drastic procedure that could easily permanently effect one’s mobility and footspeed. It could very well be that no matter how hard JM works at it, he won’t get any faster, through no fault of his own. Perhaps one of the MDs among us could shed more light on this procedure.
by snorkeldorf on Mar 26, 2009 11:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Bobo & Physicalness
I actually thought that he was pretty good in the half-court. Sure he lacks foot-speed, and sometimes had the Sam Perkins stare to nowhwere look, but in the half-court I thought he was a unique offensive threat. When he was given the ball, he had moves, and he was efficient. Gordon is athletic, and will be a slashing run-n-gun big man that we will all love. But I think Bobo will be our best half-court low post threat when all is said and done (if not next year, the year after for sure).
Finally, let me just say how frustrating it was to hear the commentators this year talk about how UCLA from the Pac-10 just can’t match up with tough physical teams from the Big East. If I recall, the last three years ALL WE HEARD was about how physical UCLA was, and about how they were just as physical as the Big East teams. And, didn’t we beat a tough Pitt team in the Sweet 16 two years ago (answer, we did, because I was there). So anyway, this fiction that we can’t be physical is ridiculous (not talking about any of your comments 66). This year we were weaker—but that will all change when we have more size playing (like next year).
Make no mistake about it, in 2 years—UCLA will probably be ranked # 1 as both the most physical team and the most skilled. I really think it is pretty likely.
by rfirpo on Mar 26, 2009 11:14 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
OT, But...lol re: The Big Smooth
Thanks for sparking the memories…Sam Perkins and my Sonics, in the NBA finals against the storied Jordan-led Bulls. Yes, the stare was disconcerting…but also misleading. In additional support of 66’s trenchant point regarding previous tournament experience being a factor in tournament success:
I remember Sam being a tremendous leader during these Finals in Seattle, and a big part of the calm determination that gave them two wins against the nearly-indomitable Chicago Bulls of 1996. (Yes, Kemp and Payton were crazy-good, but Sam was huge, too. He played with a “decidedly unimpressed” attitude toward MJ, Scottie, Rodman and Co. It worked.)
(We will have (up to) 5 sophomores with tournament experience going into next year, in addition to our Keefe, Roll, and Dragovic.)
Love My Bruins
by Bruingirl83 on Mar 31, 2009 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
James Keefe and bobo
JK, in terms of defense, was probably our best option at 4 this year. It took him a while, but I think he will be an impressive banger/garbage player next year. Drew Gordon is a god damn savage and I love that, but right now I see Keefe starting next year with good reason.
Bobo has by far more post moves than any of his teammates. Whatever it takes, hope he plays more.
by tajcarny on Mar 26, 2009 11:17 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Agree about Bobo's smile
from the few glimpses we’ve had into the locker room, people seem to gravitate toward him, he seems to have a good spirit much like Josh. In the same way Josh battled back from injury and an average season last year, and went on to have a stellar senior season, lets hope Bobo takes on the same mentality and is the best he can be with the physical limitations he has himself.
Also, theres an interesting quote from Howland via Dohn, he says JA has the potential to be a leader much like JF and AA were. I know we were speculating Whether it would be DG or ML that takes on that role, but its interesting to see CBH pegging JA as potentially “that guy”
O.A.
by Ollie on Mar 26, 2009 11:47 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Trust me, I like Keefe
But…what does he REALLY bring to the table? Definitely energy and defensive aggression, but what else? He’s not big enough or strong enough to actually be a significant offensive or defensive presence in the post, and his jump shot’s not good enough for him to be a reliable mid-range or perimeter guy. Honestly, the only truly memorable game Keefe has ever had as a Bruin was his 18-point, 12-rebound game against Western Kentucky in the 08 Sweet Sixteen (and it’s important to note that the Hilltoppers had zero players taller than 6-9) that fooled us into thinking that he was a potential breakout star. If the last starting spot comes down to a competition between him and an in-shape, more agile Bobo, I hope JMM gets the nod. If he plays to his potential he’s much more valuable: he could definitely become a big-time shot-alterer and dominating inside offensive force.
by theslammer on Mar 26, 2009 11:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
bobo would be much more valuable
on a team that played zone defense. I know we never will, but I just don’t see him hedging and being able to be as mobile as necessary in CBH’s defense
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Mar 26, 2009 2:54 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly!!!
He may have some offensive post moves, but he will, in my opinion, forever be a defensive liability in CBH’s aggressive man defense. Especially when teams draw him out and make him hedge when his man sets screens for the ball handler.
He would be great in a system that allowed him to sit back and be an enforcer and just block shots.
But that will never happen in CBH’s system. We are unwaveringly committed to man to man.
by Bald Eagle on Mar 26, 2009 3:05 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well, K Love was one of the slowest dudes I've ever seen
And he was able to play in CBH’s defensive system. I know for a fact that he was MUCH slower than JMM, and you have to take Bobo’s wingspan into account which will help him to compensate if he does let guys get around him due to his inferior speed.
by theslammer on Mar 26, 2009 3:24 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
KL had LRMM playing next to him and that really helped
it is possible that Bobo will have someone of equal quality playing next to him — if not next year, certainly in the following year.
I am very optimistic about where we are and where we are going.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Mar 26, 2009 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Mbah a Moute had stayed
I bet we’d be a #4 seed and looking forward to a showdown with UConn/UNC/Pitt/Louisville right now. Sure, based on our opponent we’d probably be giant underdogs, but it would at least give the seniors a shot at grabbing glory one last time. Alas. (And trust me, under no circumstances would I actually HOPE that Mbah a Moute had stayed. He’s got a very good thing going in Milwaukee and he’s bringing a lot of respect to UCLA and Ben’s system, and he’s economically secure for life. Good for him for knowing his NBA potential more than we did.)
by theslammer on Mar 26, 2009 5:13 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If LMRAM had stayed, I'd have bet $50 in Vegas on us to reach the Final 4.
Seriously. Rebounding and defense would NEVER have been an issue with PAA and LMRAM grabbing boards, drawing charges, double-teaming the post, and taking names.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 27, 2009 9:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If Luc had stayed, we'd have been a 2 or 3 seed, at worst
Our D would have improved from a sieve to a strength.
by BruinsRule on Mar 27, 2009 10:10 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OT but want to bring it up
I’m watching Nova-Duke right now and the refs are calling the game 100% different than they called our game. It’s touch basketball at it’s finest…the refs aren’t being uneven or anything but its just amazing how different officials are. Makes you wonder what would’ve happened if the refs were this stingy in our game. We still would’ve most likely lost, but you have to wonder…
by bucknellbruin on Mar 26, 2009 8:27 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
No you don't have to wonder
Villanova beat the snot out of us. They play 7 guys, and all of them can score and defend. They were quicker, stronger, tougher, more experienced etc. Officials could have called everything or nothing and we still would have lost by a wide margin.
by BruinsRule on Mar 27, 2009 10:12 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Villanova killing Duke
Up 64-46, 5:30 left despite shooting 3/14 from the 3 pt line. Just goes to show how good of a dribble drive team they are.
by dokein on Mar 26, 2009 9:06 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
OMG OMG OMG
Coach K needs to change his philosophy!
by Nestor on Mar 27, 2009 4:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you are a Ben-Basher...
…then you are FOR SURE going to be a Coach K-basher after this game!!! Coach K isn’t even as good of a coach as Howland…what a horrible coach, getting blown out by 23 points!!!
(tongue-in-cheek, but you get my point)
by BeeTheBruin on Mar 27, 2009 12:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Coach K is a top coach
He’s a good coach, and he’s a great recruiter, but he’s not a top coach. With the recruiting classes he gets every year, not going past the Sweet 16 since 2001 does raise quite a few questions.
by dokein on Mar 27, 2009 1:34 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I disagree. Coach K IS a good coach, WAS a good recruiter
Since winning the championship in 2001, he hasn’t brought much talent to Durham. Shelden Williams, JJ Redick, Luol Deng, Gerald Henderson and Kyle Singler. Some role players like Thomas and Scheyer. That’s about it. Contrast that to the period between 1998 and 2001 when he brought in Battier, Brand, Dunleavy, Boozer, Jay Williams, Duhon, Avery, Maggette.
He recruits guards that are too slow, bigs who are stiffs. Paulus was a bust from day 1, and he got worse as his career went on, yet he started at point guard for 3 years because there was no one better. At the end, Nolan Smith and Jon Scheyer, nice players but not in any sense elite, replaced him, and Paulus looked like freakin’ Rudy out there. Just terrible. It’s only becuase of his coaching and the mettle of his players that his past 5 teams played well enough over the course of the season to get 2 1-seeds, 2 2-seeds and 1 6-seed over the past 5 years, and not surprising that with their lack of athleticism and point guards that they have not survived past the Sweet 16 since 2004.
Any solace gleaned from Duke getting spanked as badly as we did should be tempered as we remember that Duke is not the elite team it once was and certainly no longer a model of greatness for a program like UCLA to emulate.
by BruinsRule on Mar 27, 2009 10:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think we basically agree. I don’t really watch much basketball outside of UCLA, but I would say he’s a great recruiter by seemingly being able to fill up his team with McD talent every year. He’s a good coach, but not a great coach because he fails to select the right McD talent and because he fails to develop the McD talent.
by dokein on Mar 27, 2009 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Final score
77-54. Makes me feel a little bit better about losing to Villanova by a large margin.
by dokein on Mar 26, 2009 9:20 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Likwise
Not that I’ll ever be feeling great about Saturday, but at least ’Nova having the decency to give the Dookies the same beatdown that they gave us.
Also, it game be an excuse to use a slightly cryptic Arrested Development reference as my current Facebook status.
by bruinhoo on Mar 26, 2009 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arrested Development
One of my all time favorite TV shows.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Mar 27, 2009 5:39 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope the movie is just as good
Last night I watched the “MR F” episode. That slayed me when I saw it for the first time.
by Tydides on Mar 27, 2009 9:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Indeed
I still don’t understand why couldn’t it get a bigger audience.
by BruinsRule on Mar 27, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have the DVD's from all three seasons and watch them constantly
From the episode I was watching today:
Gob: Hey, can you do me a favor? A young neighborhood tough by the name of Steve Holt will be dropping by, and…
Michael: Your son?
Gob: According to him.
Michael: And a DNA test.
Gob: I hear the jury’s still out on science.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Mar 27, 2009 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I watched that episode last night too!
I love the Chicken dances…
CAWK-KA-KAAA
CHAA-CHEE-CHAA-CHEE
A-COODLE-DOODLE-DOO
COO-COO-KA-CHAW
Has anyone in this family even seen a chicken?
by Tydides on Mar 28, 2009 12:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
But not as large a margin as Duke's loss to Nova?
Come on, Seth, Hubert, Digger, Dickie V!!!
Let’s see all you ACC ball-washers say that Duke is SOFT, that Duke has NO TOUGHNESS!
I frakking DARE YOU to say it!!!
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 27, 2009 9:24 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did Seth Davis
pick Duke or ‘Nova? Nova put a bigger beat down on the #2 (over seeded) Devils than #6 us. I also don’t mind seeing Missouri cruise past Memphis. Can Pitt get their act together and beat ’Nova? Xavier hung close until the bitter end.
by Vanman7475 on Mar 26, 2009 9:29 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Seth Davis is a tool
But I do think that he picked Villanova over Duke.
Nova and Pitt are both physical teams with good athletes. The way Nova attacks the rim is going to put Blair at risk of foul trouble. It seems that Nova has more ways to beat you than Pitt does and is playing really well right now. So, it’s a question whether Pitt’s big 3 players can score enough to keep up with Villanova’s balanced team. I would lean toward Villanova at this point.
by BruinsRule on Mar 27, 2009 10:27 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nova looks really really strong
I expect them to beat Pitt.
by haster123 on Mar 27, 2009 12:42 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
If CBH doesn't get us there this eyar, I kind of want Dixon to pull off the whole thing.
It may give CBH a mixture of a warm glow in his heart and an anuerysm to see a good friend and former assistant take home the crown before he does, but I wouldn’t mind seeing the Panthers win it all.
M
"In this program your passion bucket must be full to play SC." -- CRN, to Dan Patrick, 1/2008
by Meriones on Mar 27, 2009 9:26 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Judging a player's potential
on foot speed is like relying completely on a star-rating system to fill out your roster.
It seems to me this preoccupation with JM’s physical limitations is missing the boat. OK, he’s not as agile and graceful as Kareem, nor as athletic as Bill Walton.
But, games are rarely won on foot speed or some other lifeless measurement, alone. Listen to Coach, himself, spell it out in the clip posted by drebruin.
Listen at about the 16-minute mark, when he’s discussing Doug McIntosh, and other players who were not naturally imbued with great stopwatch-measurable abilities. Paraphrasing, he talks about their being very good shooters because they took only high-percentage shots and stayed within themselves. He talks about their being very good rebounders because, instead of waiting to see if the shot would miss and then reacting, they assumed it would miss, and therefore were in good position for the rebound.
There is a lot more to basketball than foot speed. With the right coach, which he has, Bobo can be a very good college player. Something about being the best you are capable of being.
by Bruinut on Mar 27, 2009 11:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
If any coach can bring out the best in a player, it’s Ben. And I highly doubt he went hard after JMM on the recruiting trail, both prior to his LSU commitment and after he asked out of his scholarship, just to bury him on the bench. Ben’s not an idiot; he knows that we need a post presence on offense so that we don’t struggle to get easy baskets again. I think JMM gives us that advantage.
by theslammer on Mar 27, 2009 11:37 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 





















