Tourney Seed Comparison (Big East v. Pac 10)

The Big East has had a remarkable year, and has some great teams. But I am a little sick of hearing how the conference has proved to be even better than expected during the Tournament. For gods sakes, when you get # 1 seeds, you don't even begin to prove anything until the second weekend. Anyway, not to take anything away from the Big East and their fine year, but I find it amusing that with all the talk, they are actually underperforming in the Tournament given their seeds (-1, as to seed expectation as of today). I know, it doesn't mean much, but it sort of means that, as of right now, they have not entirely lived up to the hype. The Pac-10, by the way, is at +1, assuming I figured it correctly.