Bruins Nation: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Spaulding Roundup: Spring Football News & Notes

The team gets back to practice today out at Spaulding. Although there wasn't a lot of news out of Westwood yesterday found some interesting notes here and there on the internets on Bruin football. Let's start with a note on our ongoing QB competition for the starting position. Adam Maya from the OC Register thinks "its obvious to anyone attending Spaulding Field on a daily basis" who is the no. 1 QB at UCLA. From his notes in the OC Register's UCLA blog:

“We still don’t have a quarterback yet,” were the first words Coach Rick Neuheisel offered following Monday’s practice.

Neuheisel was unprompted, mind you, perhaps looking to avoid that question. The answer which he knows, and he knows we know:  Kevin Prince will be UCLA’s starting quarterback going into fall.

Prince still gets the majority of repetitions, but that is irrelevant at this point. His pocket presence, command of the offense, arm strength, accuracy, efficiency … in just about every significant way, Prince has been better. Often by a lot.  Richard Brehaut came in with a thrower’s chance at the starting gig. The freshman, still just two weeks old in college, has performed admirably given the circumstances. More and more it seems like he will not redshirt next season but serve as the No. 2 quarterback.

Kevin Craft is still too turnover-prone. Brehaut, despite all the calls he’s been missing, is already more reliable. To win the job, however, he would have needed to be outstanding and for Prince to be mediocre, which might have pushed the competition into fall.

There’s no need for that. Prince is legit.

Well that is good to hear. However, I am going to wait till we officially hear something from either Neuehisel or Chow.

I have to say I am encouraged with the reports I have heard on Brehaut hanging in there. There is not much more you can ask for a kid who still isn't a freshman yet. I guess more and more elite high school athletes are getting accustomed to adjusting to college enviroment because of the recruiting timelines getting drastically moved up (as lot of players are now being tracked as juniors or even sophomores). Similar to Brehaut, Presley is going through his adjustments but he is hanging in there as well. From Dohn's blog:

I talked to UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel recently about the potential of freshman tight end Morrell Presley. Neuheisel was highly complimentary, but added Presley needs to improve in many areas.
"He's got a long ways to go before he's a reliable pass catcher," Neuheisel said. "He's got a long ways to go before he knows what he's doing, but he likes playing football. He's not shy of contact, he's not shy of anything.''

It's been a while since we have had a physical offensive threat at UCLA. It will take a while for Presley to completely adjust to Chow's scheme but once he gets the hang of it, look out  ... it should be fun to watch.

Speaking of fun to watch had to post the following comments from Jaguars general manager on locking up MJD - one of their key cornerstones of the franchise - to a long term deal:

"It's an opportunity with Maurice to kind of reward one of our own, someone who's performed on and off the field," general manager Gene Smith said. "I don't have a son, but if I did, Maurice would be someone I would love to have as a son.

"He's done the right things in the community, has passion for his profession and presents himself as one of the faces of our franchise."

Well he is making the Bruin Nation proud representing himself as one of the most visible booster of UCLA. Of course he not only talks the talk but walks the walk as he is doing whatever he can to motivate the kids in our program.

Lastly, we will end the roundup with these interesting notes on scheduling:

ESPN/ABC was trying to put together a 2010 season- opening headline tilt between UCLA and Auburn at the Georgia Dome in Atlanta, but Auburn backed out as negotiations intensified.

ESPN/ABC then tried to get the Bruins to play Georgia Tech in the Georgia Dome, but UCLA balked at playing what would amount to a home game for the Atlanta-based Yellowjackets.

Part of setting any high-profile matchup included the network buying out UCLA's game at Kansas State, which is slated for Sept. 4, 2010.

Discussions for another game are dormant, but other possibilities could materialize.

Hmm. Let's not get into the boring SEC-Pac-10 smack fest. Hey I used to take part in it myself back in the day (wrote some posts on it when BN first launched four years ago). But the topic has gotten a little stale. I wonder though why wouldn't Auburn want to play against UCLA in Georgia Dome which is a venue where there would probably would have been swamped by Auburn fans anyway had the game taken place.

I totally understand UCLA's reluctance to play against Georgia Tech in Atlanta. That's a no brainer but I am not getting why Auburn wouldn't want to play UCLA.

As for Kansas State, I was never excited when that matchup news came out. I hope the AD continues to explore other options to replace that game in 2010.

GO BRUINS.

0 recs  |  Comment 11 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I'd like to see us play GT

Unless we think we’ll still be majorly rebuilding at that time and thus get spanked, I’d love to see us play GT in the Dome. From a fan standpoint, it would be much more exciting than Kansas State.

by RealisticBruinFan on Apr 16, 2009 9:26 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

I would prefer not too...

Aside from the obvious home support Georgia Tech would receive were the game to be played at the “neutral” site of the Georgia Dome, I would just as much rather play Kansas State for the sole reason of not having to have our boys prepare for the Triple Option offense G Tech currently runs.

Beyond the difficulties that would result from having to prepare for, in my opinion, the gimmicky offense that can be a nightmare for teams (which is pretty much every team but G tech and Airforce and Navy, off the top of my head) that have not faced it, the triple option uses a lot of chop blocks and misdirection that can create serious injuries. Add that to the artificial turf of the Georgia Dome, and I’d prefer the less risky idea of facing a less exciting, though still Big Six BCS opponent in K State. Thats just my two cents, though.

by NorCalBruin08 on Apr 16, 2009 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

1) the option is only a part of what gatech does

2) chop blocks are illegal and occur in any offense that ues double teams….basically every offense

3) the flexbone is not a gimmick….and its not so much different than playing oregon up on the artificial turf up at autzen.

Playing georgia tech would be a challenge for our defense, but I’d love to see UCLA vs them, if only to watch georgia tech play…they are a joy to watch.

by jtthirtyfour on Apr 16, 2009 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions   1 recs

My point is...

1) As I am sure we both know, Paul Johnson, the G-Tech coach, brought his unique “spread option” offense with him from Navy. His starting QB had 800 yards passing for the entire year, while his team rushed for 3500+ yards. We should be able to agree that Johnson’s offense is considered unique and an outlier in college football (among successful, big conference programs), and rather than having to spend time trying to deal with the specific headaches it creates on a defense, I would just as soon play K state. Sure, G Tech would likely be a more high profile opponent in 2010, but we could still play a team from a big conference and avoid having to spend a lot of time and energy preparing for a style of play that we are not accustomed to (and that we would not use again that season, but for a few similarities to Oregons offense).

2) I realize chop blocks are illegal and that they are not unique to G-Tech’s offense. Again on the assumption we have both watched G-Tech play, they rely on misdirection and confusion and are often criticized and penalized for illegal blocks. Though not a great source, this link demonstrates their fans’ frustration with chop blocks being called against them (http://www.stingtalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28543). It is a real concern for teams facing G tech’s offense, generalities aside.

3) I dont mean to criticize their offense. It is effective. But it is also largely considered outdated at worst and a modification of offenses that have long since passed at best, when the game was dominated by the rushing offense and not passing. As for the artificial turf…I’d love it if Autzen Stadium went to a more player friendly playing surface. I am not sure why because we play them there every other year on that surface that we should not take into account playing teams, especically ones with misdirection like G-Tech, on artificial fields. Playing Auburn’s straight ahead, pounding running game of an offense would be better than facing Gtech’s offense at the Dome. But why play on more artificial turf when we do not have to? We have enough injury problems practicing at Spaulding Field. No need to increase the risks.

With all of the said, I would enjoy watching us vs. G-Tech. They are fun, different, and I would take pride in us solving their offense, if we managed to. But, as per the reasons I’ve already mentioned, I think its more prudent to stay away from this matchup at this field. Sorry for such a long winded post!

by NorCalBruin08 on Apr 16, 2009 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

That would be an extremely tough game to win

I think Neuheisel is setting up for a strong 2010 run that would take us hopefully to the Rose Bowl and possibly a top ten ranking, assuming our talent develops. We already have a very tough non-conference match that year with UT in Austin, so I think two extremely difficult road games would be suicide.

That being said, it is great to have a coach that understands the importance of scheduling and national exposure, unlike CTS who scheduled dangerous mid-majors like BYU that end up making us look like fools for losing. I think if we can beat Texas Pasadena and schedule one more elite non-conference game for that year, we could have a shot at running the table and challenging for a championship in 2011

by Sideout11 on Apr 16, 2009 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Much rather play Auburn that GT

Couple of reasons:

You’re still not going to win many brownie points from the East-Cost folks if you defeat an ACC team. The ACC is still regarded as pretty awful as a football conference.

Secondly, Tech is a far more dangerous team than Auburn is going to be in 2010. Auburn is likely going to be pretty awful in 2010. Tech would be much better.

by CAJason80 on Apr 16, 2009 2:15 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

What about Michigan

I’ve often thought UCLA versus Michigan would be a great rivalry. Two of the country’s best public research universities with proud athletic traditions.

Plus, both programs are rebuilding now so it could be a more or less even matchup in the near future.

by FreewayBruin03 on Apr 16, 2009 10:45 AM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Michigan plays Notre Dame every year

So I doubt they’d want to lock in another team every single year. We could probably make a home and home happen, but I doubt they would want to make it an every year thing.

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Apr 16, 2009 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good point.

Home and home still sounds like a good deal for both teams.

by FreewayBruin03 on Apr 16, 2009 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Perhaps our new PAC-10 Commisioner ...

Could negotiate a home-and-home deal for each PAC-10 team to play a team from the Big 10 (11), Big 12, and SEC every year cycling through every team of each conference. Eventually, each PAC-10 team would play every other team in all three conferences. It would make for some intriguing marquis early season match-ups and potentially generate a huge amount of revenue for many years on end.

by snorkeldorf on Apr 16, 2009 3:52 PM PDT reply actions   0 recs

Unfortunately,

marquee Big 12 and SEC teams have no reason to play an additional out-of-conference game that includes greater risk to their win-loss record. While there are some Big 12 and SEC teams that bite at this (Auburn, Tennessee, Arkansas, Colorado), there’s no real reason for the Florida’s and Oklahoma’s of the world to play marquee OOC games. (I get that Oklahoma isn’t a fantastic example since they played UCLA just a few years ago, but still…)

They’re not getting punished for beating up on the Florida Atlantics and North Texases of the world, and their conference schedule is certainly strong enough to place them in contention for the title every year.

They’re going to sell out their home stadium whether they’re playing Michigan or Southern Eastern Mississippi Polytechnic State.

They both already play an extra game against a ranked opponent thanks to a conference championship game, should they take care of business.

I agree it’s great for the sport overall, but the risk/reward just doesn’t line up for these teams.

by CAJason80 on Apr 16, 2009 5:39 PM PDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. GO BRUINS.
Start posting about the Bruins »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Morrell_small
Wildcat and the UCLA Running Game
Ucla_small
Everyone needs to calm down about Ben Ball
Trojanssuck_small
An Angel in the Defensive Backfield
Small
UCLA at Washington State: A memory

Recent FanPosts

Small
More evidence that the LA Times might be pro-U$C/ anti-UCLA
100_1894_small
Like Coach Said...
Telemachus_small
ASU @ UCLA Highlights
Small
Darren is Going Nuts v. Hawks tonight
Bruinsnation_small
Dragovic Needs To Focus On Getting His Life Together ...
Images_small
Bauer Paces Blue To Blue-Gold World Series Sweep
Small
My two game season starts tonight
Small
Have You Been Watching Darren?
2603_1028618641249_1398823305_30086007_6195771_n_small
Trying to Keep the Mojo Going
Bruinsnation_small
Ben Ball Roundup: Gameday Notes

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

094_small Ajax

Bruinsnation_small Nestor

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

Small Meriones

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Small Odysseus

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Authors

Images_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Official Partner of CBS Sports