This email was in my Youtube inbox this morning and while I can definitely respond on my own, I thought the lovely people here at BN could help. I mean, WHERE do I begin?
I'm a U of A fan, I brought up the fact that Steve Lavin would be a solid coach to be considered for the position. He knows the Pac-10 and the west coast very well, it's proven he can recruit on the west coast and nationally, he's put numerous players in the NBA, he made 5 sweet-16's in 6 years including 1 final-four in the most pressurized head-coaching position in college sports. But lately every UCLA fan has said he was a terrible coach who nearly put the program in shambles and shouldn't ever be a head-coach again, can you explain to me how he was a bad coach and put the greatest college basketball program in shambles? I just can't seem to understand why they would think that... Thx