[UPDATED] Start Jamie Dixon To Southern Cal Watch Now, Scandal Ridden Tim Floyd Quits Tainted U$C*
Looks like many of you have been all over the breaking story in our fanpost and fanshot sections.
Well it's time to start Jamie Dixon to USC* watch all over again.
Not to anyone's surprise Tim Floyd has quit as the head basketball coach of a scandal ridden, tainted basketball program at U$C*:
"As of 1 p.m. today, I am resigning as head basketball coach at the University of Southern California. I deeply appreciate the opportunity afforded me by the university, as well as the chance to know and work with some of the finest young men in college athletics. Unfortunately, I no longer feel I can offer the level of enthusiasm to my duties that is deserved by the university, my coaching staff, my players, their families, and the supporters of Southern Cal. I always promised my self and my family that if I ever felt I could no longer give my full enthusiasm to a job, that I should leave it to others who could. I intend to contact my coaching staff and my players in coming days and weeks to tell them how much each of them means to me. I wish the best to USC and to my successor."
In a statement from the school, Garrett said the school will start a search for a new coach immediately.
"I accept Tim's decision and wish him well," Garrett said.
Floyd has been accused of giving money to a man who helped O.J. Mayo land with the Trojans. According to a May 12 Yahoo! Sports report, Louis Johnson -- a former confidante of Mayo -- said that Floyd gave Rodney Guillory, an associate of sports agent Bill Duffy, $1,000. Such a payment would constitute a major violation of NCAA rules.
In the USC statement, Todd Dickey, senior vice president of administration said: "The University is cooperating fully in the continuing investigation with the NCAA and Pac-10 into all allegations of NCAA and Pac-10 rules violations at USC. The University, the NCAA and Pac-10 have jointly conducted interviews of approximately 50 witnesses. No conclusions have yet been reached. At this point, it would be both inappropriate and premature to comment further."
It will be interesting to see the spin coming out of now from the Trojan apologists who have been going through all kinds of hilarious mental gymnastics to make excuses for Floyd last few weeks [See for example the hecktacular cutting and pasting spin job from Adam Rose, who is now working OT to spin Carroll out of his current PR mess]
Chis Chase over at Yahoo!'s sports blog is LOL at Floyd's resignation statement:
One week after Floyd passionately (and hilariously) came out against one of his players declaring for the draft and two months after he rebuffed Arizona's coaching advances because he said he wanted to build his own traditions at USC, we're supposed to believe that he can't muster the enthusiasm to coach? Floyd is many things, but dispassionate isn't one of them. Now he, and USC, expect the college basketball world to think that this resignation is about apathy and not about the explosive allegations that were reported by Yahoo! Sports last month? Oh, come on.
And I am also not so sure whether Floyd actually "rebuffed" Arizona. Something about that part of the story that never seemed right.
It will also be interesting to see who Trojans pursue in the coming days. We have already discussed at length that why we think there is a good possibility that Dixon could be in the mix at U$C*. As hard as some Bruin fans might find it to believe, we have heard from folks we trust that Dixon would indeed be interested in the U$C* position if the Trojans are smart enough to create a scenario that works for him.
We will see how that scenario unfolds in the coming days. The question for tonight though is really simple: if Floyd did nothing wrong why did he quit so abruptly (although not too surprisingly for those who have been following the Trojan shenanigans for years)?
GO BRUINS.
UPDATE (N): I think ryebreadaz's projection here is on the right track:
[I]f SC is smart, they’ll hire an interim coach for the year and embark on a coaching search next offseason when it’s not so late in the process and there’s a better idea as to what sanctions they’re facing. Next summer Dixon could take the job, but I’m not sure SC will wait for their permanent replacement.
I think at the current snap shot of time the immediate possibility of Dixon taking over as the U$C* head coach is remote. However, that said if they only hire an interim coach to get them through for next few months and they wait to see what they hear back from NCAA, Dixon to U$C* conversation is going to be hot and heavy all next season. I am sure Pittsburgh will be well aware of that as well as programs like Cal that will try to hold on to Montogomery. But still it's never too early to speculate a Dixon to U$C* scenario given the information we have heard about his interest in returing home to LA. GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
41 comments
|
Comments
If Floyd has just left for Arizona
and these allegations about specific violations with Floyd dolling out money, I’d agree that DIxon to SC was a legitimate possibility. Now, with it looking more and more likely that the NCAA might actually act, I think Dixon would be wary of the job. if SC is smart, they’ll hire an interim coach for the year and embark on a coaching search next offseason when it’s not so late in the process and there’s a better idea as to what sanctions they’re facing. Next summer Dixon could take the job, but I’m not sure SC will wait for their permanent replacement.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jun 9, 2009 6:21 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
From what I have heard
Dixon is extremely interested in the job.
Of course we have no heard Monty could be curious as well.
by Nestor on Jun 9, 2009 6:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I know he's interested in it
but I don’t think he’d be willing to pull the trigger until next summer when he has a better idea of what state the program is in.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jun 9, 2009 6:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m sure he’s interested & Monty might be too, but I’m fairly certain they’d like to know what they’re getting into
by impaulv on Jun 9, 2009 6:28 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
it's all bittersweet...
As much as I enjoy watching ’SC basketball go up in flames, I must admit this is all bittersweet. The USC basketball game was the closest thing UCLA had to a rivalry game.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m still gonna be the first to camp-out, but how competitive is the game really gonna be? I will definitely be looking forward to U$C’s basketball program rebuilding itself into a force to be reckoned with. That would definitely make the future victories much, much sweeter.
But for now, I guess I’ll just have a beer and enjoy this trainwreck while it lasts…
by bruinbasketball on Jun 9, 2009 6:28 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
U$C basketball
They have never been our rivals. The only program that is close to being our “rival” in the Pac-10 is Arizona.
You can google “JustSC” or go through our archives to see how we relate to U$C* “hoops”
by Nestor on Jun 9, 2009 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If they ran a clean program and weren’t a bunch of one-and-dones there might be something approaching rivalry. That’s two very big ifs.
JF in for the Lakers now.
by ucla717274 on Jun 9, 2009 6:44 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
believe it or not...
only in recent years the USC basketball game has been more anticipated than arizona… people camped out for two days before the ‘SC game, while Arizona didn’t draw as much of a crowd. Yes, the student section is full nonetheless, and of course historically Arizona has been our rival, but still. Most ppl on campus would consider the USC game the biggest and most exciting game of the season.
I still don't understand why little kids wear 'SC apparel when the come to UCLA on field trips... newsflash--you're not cool
by bruinbasketball on Jun 9, 2009 6:50 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
student section doesn't necessarily aren't savviest bunch
it was the student section who also serenaded the previous coach with “We Love Lavin” tunes.
I get that it’s always exciting to thump the Trojans but that doesn’t necessarily make them our basketball “rivals.”
by Nestor on Jun 9, 2009 6:56 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
the student section
also seems to be the only section showing some emotion at basketball games in Pauley Pavilion…
while the trojans may not be our primary rivals (I agree that Arizona is our primary rival), they still must be considered rivals… whatever we call the trojans, the point is it will suck not to have a competitive game
I still don't understand why little kids wear 'SC apparel when the come to UCLA on field trips... newsflash--you're not cool
by bruinbasketball on Jun 9, 2009 7:04 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
It might suck for you
that Trojans are not going to be good enough … but shed that tear for them somewhere else.
by Nestor on Jun 9, 2009 7:10 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
believe it or not...
only in recent years the USC basketball game has been more anticipated than arizona… people camped out for two days before the ‘SC game, while Arizona didn’t draw as much of a crowd. Yes, the student section is full nonetheless, and of course historically Arizona has been our rival, but still. Most ppl on campus would consider the USC game the biggest and most exciting game of the season.
I still don't understand why little kids wear 'SC apparel when the come to UCLA on field trips... newsflash--you're not cool
by bruinbasketball on Jun 9, 2009 6:49 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Steve Lavin Is Available
And then U$C* could really put its BB program in the toilet.
If the NCAA ever gets off its collective asses and turns over the U$C* FB program, too, for basically the same kind of conduct, goodbye Pete Carroll.
Bleeding powderkeg blue and gold for 55 years. Go Bruins!
by Digdog on Jun 9, 2009 6:50 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Easy answer
if Floyd did nothing wrong why did he quit so abruptly (although not too surprisingly for those who have been following the Trojan shenanigans for years)?
He didn’t want to compete.
by SuperBruinMan on Jun 9, 2009 6:53 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Will the lying at SC ever stop?
It’s amazing to compare Timmie’s comment above with the comments he made at his April 3rd press conference to announce he’s staying at SUC:
“I listened, I heard what they had to say,” Floyd said. “But there is something really special about building your own traditions and your own history.”
“At the end of the day I have a great situation here.”
by bornagainbruin on Jun 9, 2009 7:01 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder if Floyd will be right
about USC being his last job
by SuperBruinMan on Jun 9, 2009 7:11 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
it should be.....
the man is a horrible coach………and his record in both the pros and college speak for themselves.
Godspeed Nick - RIP - 1986-2009
by norcaliangelsfan on Jun 9, 2009 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot will depend on the NCAA's findings
The truth will matter less than what the NCAA says happened.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jun 9, 2009 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
At this point, I would say in NCAA, yes
Andy Katz mentioned last night that he still has some connections with the Chicago Bulls, and someone could pull some strings for him and he could be a consultant. Katz also implied that because of his previous NBA experience, financially, he doesn’t need to find a job right away.
by bruinbabe2000 on Jun 10, 2009 2:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Timberly jumps a sinking ship
and we’re worried about Jamie Dixon taking over this SCandal-laden joke of a program?
Please.
Just because Dixon’s from southern California?
Not going to happen.
by godblesstyus95 on Jun 9, 2009 7:31 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I am telling you ...
It will be a possibility next year.
by Nestor on Jun 9, 2009 7:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're giving Southern Cal basketball
way too much credit. Dixon has that Pitt program rolling right now. I just can’t see Dixon pining for an opening at a mediocre program likely facing sanctions and surely facing heavy scrutiny, all the while going up against good buddy Howland in his own back yard? Going from Pitt to SC isn’t even a lateral move. I just don’t see it happening.
by godblesstyus95 on Jun 10, 2009 5:21 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bittersweet
I wanted Floyd to stay at $c forever. He was so fun to hate and not a very good coach IMO. On the other hand, he’s such a shady, classless weasel and he deserves to go down in flames like this. It’s more than obvious that he is GUILTY and the NCAA knows it. I am just hoping and crossing all my fingers that football is deservedly punished along with hoops…
GO BRUINS!!!
by uclafan11 on Jun 9, 2009 8:41 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I pray to Baby Jesus
every year that the NCAA hits them where it hurts: Right in the footballs.
I think that it will happen but to what extent they will be punished, I don’t know. It’s nice that such a scumbag like Floyd went down and the gap closers will no longer be pestering us for a year or so but it would be better to see Cheatie Petey get slapped as he most deservedly should.
I feel bad for all those fans that went through the logical contortions, and still do contort (Adam Rose) in order to explain the bad things U$C* does away. “Felons never tell the truth” and “Petey was worried about the children’s safety.” I didn’t buy it and neither did those that really matter, the non-partisans.
In short, REALITY SKEWS BLUE AND GOLD…
by Bruins102NCAA on Jun 9, 2009 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What is the maximum penalty that SUC can get?
I can see SUC getting at least one year probation, lost scholarships, etc. if found guilty of lack of institutional control. However, if the charges against Floyd are found true, is that enough for SUC to get the “death” penalty?
by Gen2Bruin1987 on Jun 9, 2009 9:16 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
They'd really need to stretch it for a death penalty
To hand out the death penalty, a single program must be found guilty of multiple major violations within a three or five year period (I can’t remember which it is). Now, I guess you could argue that Guillory is one violation with a lack of institutional control in there and Floyd giving money is another, if both are proven to be true, but it’s a stretch. If precedent is any indication, those two will be considered one MAJOR, MAJOR violation, assuming they’re found guilty of both. The max penalty I could imagine at that point would be five years probation, a two year postseason ban, limited off-campus recruiting and two or three lost scholarships per year for three years. That’s the worst case scenario I can imagine if there’s clear and indisputable evidence to both claims and those penalties would cripple the program for years.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jun 9, 2009 9:24 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do they care
if scholarships are taken away? They’ll just create more jobs for recruits’ parents.
by bru79 on Jun 10, 2009 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Southern Cal Sucks
I find this whole SCandal hilarious. And yes, this is not just a coach slinking off into the night. The SCandal is emerging.
I think it’s hilarious that Timmeh claims to bleed ketchup and mustard, and yet in his statement he uses the term “Southern Cal” which is a term they hate.
I find it hilarious that one of Timmeh’s unnamed buddies claims that he is innocent and that he resigned because it would just have been too exhausting for Timmeh to beat down the allegations. Yeah…right. Only someone with an SC* edukashun is buying that one.
I find it hilarious that the bomb is about to drop on the b-ball program and Timmeh jumps ship before it drops. How courageous.
It’s also hilarious that Lil Romeo will get serious playing time and that we will probably beat them by 50 in Pauley East next season. Get your tickets now.
Now let the bomb drop on the whole dreadful university: The University of SCandals and Cheaters.
What fun.
by Barnes2JJ on Jun 9, 2009 9:37 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Correction
Make no mistake-Timmeh didn’t jump ship, he was pushed off the plank.
by Karl II on Jun 9, 2009 10:00 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK, pushed off the plank....
of a sinking ship.
by godblesstyus95 on Jun 10, 2009 5:29 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
Bye Bye Pink Volcano
Too bad we didn’t get to see you erupt again on an SC sideline.
Unless Dixon really hates the East coast, no way he coaches at SC.
by Free the 16 on Jun 11, 2009 9:34 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
2 things
1. I agree with rye and others when I say that not even rick majerus will touch that program with a 10 foot poll and an all you can eat buffet. No legitimate coach will risk taking over a program that is about to be hit with significant sanctions. If Dixon takes that job, he is either dumber than I think he is, or he has inside information that the NCAA and the PAC 10 will not come down with significant sanctions.
2. 50 people? Really? Who are the 50 people that SC interviewed? The same people that OJ interviewed to find the “real killer”? The same people that Cheatie interviewed before he determined that Reggie Bush and his family received extra benefits from rogue agent ninjas who lurked only in the shadows, twisting and turning to avoid the klieg lights of the righteous Pete Carroll looking through every corner for wrongdoing?
Shamelessly building on an earlier post, here are some of the 50 that were tirelessly interviewed in search of the truth:
George Bush (“there was one?”)
Kelly Clarkson (“I didn’t see any illicit payments made at the roast beef carving station”)
Will Ferrell (“you’re welcome, cheatie”)
Snoop Dog (“cheatdiggity”)
Kim Jong Il (thanks again nestor)
Duffman (“free beer goggles for all 3,500 guests (not children!!!!) on the SC sideline!”)
Traveler ("Neeeeeeeeaaaahhh!)
by Karl II on Jun 9, 2009 9:59 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Question?
I know that Dixon has SoCal ties, but I also know that he hates playing against CBH (and vice versa). If he were to take the SC job, it would mean playing CBH twice a year, plus the Pac10 Tourney. He has a good thing going at Pitt. It would be a lot to give up. Would he do it?
by BruinFan96 on Jun 9, 2009 10:32 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Re Dixon
Do you leave a program that was one stop away from a Final Four and remains loaded for another that has no returning starters and no recruits? Maybe he once though it would be fun to coach against his old buddy CBH, but he’d be better off at UCSB than U$C. I think we haven’t heard the end of this story, that Floyd was pushed out the door as a diversionary tactic so that Garrett could point to him and say he was the bad apple and he’s not there anymore.
by Herodotus on Jun 10, 2009 5:20 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
there is no way dixon goes to SUC
I just don’t see it.
And if he does, CBH will bury him.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jun 10, 2009 6:16 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Next coach?
Todd Bozeman as a front runner since he’s familiar with the Pac-10 and the way usc does business.
They might drag Tark the Shark out of his bitter cave so that he can have even more reasons to dislike UCLA with the annual beatdowns he’ll get.
Or maybe they just have Ol’ Cheatey serve a dual role as football and basketball coach. Of course, I don’t know how he’ll get away with having players under 18 on the sidelines since he’s so adamant about not letting them there.
by UCLA4Life on Jun 10, 2009 6:43 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
My money is on Cooper
Let him be the interim and hire someone else to coach the women.
by Free the 16 on Jun 11, 2009 9:35 PM PDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 























