How We Won In Knoxville
Bumped. We will get to how we deal with Prince's injury tomorrow am. Here is a hint we are not going to sit and around mope with "here we go, woe is us" nonsense. Meanwhile, some great points from mdjohns4 on last night's game that are worth highlighting. GO BRUINS. - N
I got a chance to watch the game again last night on DVR, and a couple of things became more clear as to how we pulled it out against the Vols.
1) Tackling. Especially from our secondary. We just did not miss tackles yesterday, plain and simple. The linebackers missed a couple, but were quickly swallowed up the secondary flying to the ball. As well as Rahim Moore played, no one made as many key one on one tackles as ATV. He was simply superb in coverage, but even better making plays in the backfield and wrapping up the legs of wide receivers and running backs in space. Courtney Viney had himself a great game as well making tackles and providing blanket coverage on plays where Crompton wanted to go deep. Regardless of Crompton's ability, the coverage downfield was good enough to keep him from even making an ill-advised throw. A couple of plays come to mind, one resulting in a coverage sack by David Carter as Crompton tried to scramble after having enough time to make a throw downfield, the other a throwaway after play action.
2) The defensive line was nasty. Given the size of the Volunteer offensive line, our line simply did not look as overmatched as I thought they would, to say the least. Brian Price was in the backfield all day. On his sack he just beat the RG off the snap and swallowed up Crompton before he could go through his first read. David Carter spent his day taking on blocks and ripping his way into the backfield. Jerzy was effective eating up blocks and allowing our linebackers to fill the gaps. The defensive ends played responsible assignment football by not losing containment and forcing plays back inside where big BP and Reggie Carter were waiting to make tackles. Both Bosworths played inspired football, refusing to quit and finishing each other's tackles. The defensive line played so well at times that the rush prevented a screen pass from developing, when getting the defensive line upfield behind the offensive line is precisely what is needed for an effective screen. On that play Korey Bosworth rushed upfield saw the running back start to peel off and moved off of the tackle to body Hardesty up.
3) Johnathan Franklin is our starting running back and deservedly so. Several of his runs were responsible for getting the offense in a position to score. If our downfield passing attack could have been at all effective against UT's secondary, we would be bringing out Kai to kick extra points instead of field goals. But Franklin was easily the offensive MVP yesterday in my mind. Without him, Kai doesn't have a chance to score points for us. Jet Ski made some great cutbacks and had a great burst all day. His vision and ability to cutback through open gaps really separated him from Coleman against UT. The power running game was not effective against that speed and size. Franklin was 17 for 80 yds (4.7/carry) and I'd argue more effective than Hardesty. More after the jump.
4) Kai Forbath is incredible. He had the leg on that 51 yarder, just couldn't get it to draw back inside the post. Even after the illegal formation penalty that nullified a 42 yarder, he calmly nailed it from 47. It's nothing new around here, but he very well could be the best in the country. Jeff Locke is a good one. His kickoffs (in the endzone!!!!!!) kept Tennessee out of good field position the entire game. He averaged 47 yds on his punts with good hangtime. That 64 yarder will do just fine.
5) NORM CHOW. Recognizing that our offensive line could not hold up the entire game against the Tennessee pass rush he utilized the tight ends, running backs, and full back effectively on short passing routes and various screens. These plays, in combination with Franklin's hard running, helped move the ball downfield when lining straight up against the UT defense and running seven step drops were not in the billing. We played most of the game in two tight end sets, which was clearly necessary. On a day where we couldn't sustain a long touchdown drive, Chow's contributions to this team through play calling were most impressive. The fact that we scored 19 with no defensive or special teams touchdowns against that savage UT defense is a borderline miracle. Thank you Kevin Prince for not throwing interceptions. Thank you, for the love of God, thank you!
Lastly, as well as the defense played, it is still uncertain as to how good we would have looked against a better offense. They certainly proved they can make a one-dimensional team look below average when forced to run every play. Then again, how many defenses will we play that are truly as good as UT? Only one, and that's SC. Our offense is much more capable of scoring points against a lesser defense. And frankly, not many teams are going to score more than 20 points against UT. Two young offenses against two stout defenses yesterday, and the outcome was not far off from what I was predicting: a low scoring tight game that we lose. I was glad to be wrong on the latter. Cal might be the best offense we face, so until then, I reserve the right to make a judgement on how good this defense really is. But it certainly looks legit right now. We're only heading into Week 3 so let's stay grounded, but nevertheless optimistic as to where this team has the potential to go after two years with this staff and this talent.
Oh yeah... GO BRUINS!!!
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
17 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is good stuff
I think the cautionary notes you throw up re. our defense is totally legit. It’s too early to make any kind of conclusions at this point of the season. We will see how Tennessee does rest of the season.
I completely forgot to mention the tackling. I particularly though the open field tackling was awesome. There were two situations in which Reggie Carter and ATV made huge tackles that prevented first down conversions. Again, after watching Bruin football for more than two decades, I had to pinch myself a bit while seeing the tackling and toughness in yesterday’s game.
Great stuff John. Make this a habit on Sunday!
Haisaik and Williams...
Could you focus on those 2? The few plays I watched…they were having some difficulty! I would appreciate it. Thanks.
Off of memory...
I remember Williams getting beat off the edge on one of the sacks on Prince. With Hasiak, he was downfield and needing to put a hat on somebody twice that I recall (one was for sure on the Knox reception) and either whiffed or touched no one. Those of course stick out cause the made visible mistakes but I’m sure they had some strong plays as well. Either way, as 1st time entrenched starters – more film to look at and improve upon…they should only get better.
Free Brandon Wood!
Man.
In the words of coach, “it’s a good day to be a Bruin!”
It’s been a whirlwind week for my family. My toddler nephew had to have frighteningly serious cranial surgery during the week, and our whole family was understandably on edge. Flew out to Johns Hopkins to be with my older brother (UCLA ‘98) and his wife (UCSB ’99) for my nephew’s surgery. Thankfully, all went well with the surgery. The week was capped off with my brother and I catching the Bruins win at the hospital. Looked back at all the pictures we took throughout the week to send back home to the fam in LA and realized we were unknowingly wearing UCLA gear the whole time. Gotta love it.
But to stay on topic, I was happy with what I saw. What was different about last week (which gave me some goosebumps) and yesterday at moments is the balance of the team. Throughout the KD era, we had a couple seasons where were able to throw points up on the board at will, but had an abysmal defense. Then towards the end of his stint, we couldn’t buy points, but our defense was stellar (at times). FINALLY, finally, I’m seeing flashes of what’s to come. At the end of the game, CRN had a look of “see, this is what we’re doing here in Westwood.” It was a sneak peek of sorts.
I’d also be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge the O-line. Though still not where we need it to be, this is COMPLETELY different than what we had going on last year. Last year’s O-line, in all of its infinite configurations, was admittedly inefficient, undersized, and inexperienced—more simply, awful. Yesterday, they were cohesive.
Lots of good things to come. And how about that interception machine (Rahim Moore, not Kevin Craft)?
Hopkins is Bruin-friendly
Hope your nephew’s ok.
Steven Muller, a Bruin alum, was the very popular president of Hopkins in the 70s and 80s, and the elite Hopkins lacrosse program identifies very strongly with UCLA basketball. Besides, Blue Jays hate Maryland, and that helps.
trying not to get ahead of myself, but...
Given what we have seen what the Bruins can do, and seeing some uneven performances from the likes of K-State, Stanford, Oregon, WSU, UW, doesn’t a 7 win season seem probable and even a couple more seem possible? Sitting at this point and looking at the schedule I’d day anything less than 7 wins would be underachieving.
Powder to the People
I think it's clear
that the success of our season rests mostly on our quarterback play and the success of the running game. If we can run the ball, that makes the QB’s job a lot easier and opens up the passing game a bit. But can’t do either without a cohesive OL. I liked what I saw yesterday from the line. They will only get better with time.
?
Then, by that logic, it really just depends on whether or not UCLA scores more than the other team! Haha
no jkjkjk. I see what your talking about
by ucla13_usc9 on Sep 13, 2009 8:36 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
there's only so much
we can expect from a freshman quarterback. gotta make up for it in other areas.
…and we need to score more than the other team does. haha
I say I can see a possible run
Comparing defenses and offenses, UCLA could be looking at a possible top third finish. Considering who we play away, and at home, and looking at those team’s performances, UCLA might end up being there. I’m aimin for el paso, but not paying for a hotel would be nice!
by ucla13_usc9 on Sep 13, 2009 8:35 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
That means
Winning out, first of all, all the teams we should beat, beating the teams we can beat, and surprising the teams we shouldn’t beat. I’m not sure, doesn’t sound like a very realistic task
by ucla13_usc9 on Sep 13, 2009 8:57 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Once concern
According to the drive chart, we had a grand total of minus 5 yards in the fourth quarter. Of course, some of that was taking a knee at the end of the game, but even without those, we had negative yards. I don’t want to read more into those numbers than should be, but it could be that our big guys got a little worn down by the end.
In any event, I’m confident that if I noticed those numbers, then Coach Neuheisel and Coach Chow did, too, and they’ll take care of things.
KP is out with a broken jaw.
Just read that KP had surgery for a broken jaw. here is the link from LAT.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-kevin-prince14-2009sep14,0,7803410.story
very good observations
David Carter (and Holmes to a lesser extent) had great games. I feel a little better about our depth at DL.
I love Franklin, but he fumbled twice (IIRC) and recovered both times. We can’t turn the ball over against K-State because that’s an easy way to lose a home game.

by 




















