Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Bill Plashke's 3rd SC column in a week

and fourth since August. Not a word about UCLA.  There is absolutely no way any bruin can in good conscience support the LA Times when their coverage is so clearly slanted towards USC. I would love a sports editor of the LA Times to come on here and explain why their coverage is either about how great USC is, or how terrible and irrelevant UCLA is.  Do they really think insulting the large contingent of bruin faithful is the way to sell papers?

 

Boycott the Times until they start offering positive coverage of UCLA athletics. Cancel your subscriptions and tell them why you are canceling. Send letters to the sports editors. Go to the daily news for your UCLA coverage until the Times pulls its head out of its behind. 

 

Go Bruins! 

 


<a class='sbn-auto-link' href='http://www.sbnation.com/ncaa-football/players/78123/Matt_Barkley'>Matt Barkley</a> gives USC one to grow on

Matt Barkley gives USC one to grow on

September 13, 2009

The word kid is gone, vanishing within a pack of bouncing, braying teammates who rode him through a stomach-dropping Saturday night.

 



This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 9 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No one reads the LAT. Honestly, who cares? The BN gang does a way better job than those hacks. Stop worrying about it. We’re coming off as cry babies.

by impaulv on Sep 16, 2009 8:49 PM PDT reply actions  

Actually we care about any discussion

that has a media angle wrt to UCLA sports.

Your comment reminds me the same kind of concern trolling (“cry baby” insult) we used to hear from other so called UCLA fans during Dorrell era.

Good post from silver.

by Nestor on Sep 17, 2009 4:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

During the 8 year win streak we got the bigger headlines.

We were constantly ranked highly, and just more likely to win the Pac 10 and make a push for the National Championship back then. But, they never wrote the man crush pieces they do now, and they always seemed to take particular delight when we lost one. Miami any one?

Like Impaulv says, you can’t let it get to you. We will just have to go out there and handle it on the field. After all, they can’t ignore the final score when it reads something like 13-9.

A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Sep 16, 2009 11:43 PM PDT reply actions  

But he wrote that one article 8 years ago!

It’s amazing how USC fans continue to point to that Plaschke article about UCLA owning LA when UCLA was a top 5 team and USC had a losing record. For the last few years he has gone to every USC home game and only occasionally (as in maybe once a season) gone to a UCLA game that wasn’t against USC. Even Plaschke has acknowledged this in his own columns.

by SuperBruinMan on Sep 16, 2009 11:51 PM PDT reply actions  

this is sports….you put more coverage in regards to the team that does better, and USC has a history recently of doing incredibly well. while more extreme…the clippers rarely get coverage… success brings respect and coverage. screw what the attention level is at right now. just win :)

go bruins

by TheNewbster on Sep 17, 2009 5:12 PM PDT reply actions  

I wrote BP

And he referenced his KP article on Aug 20th, 2009. It’s a decent article, but I had to use google to find it.

Just thought I’d mention it, but the count is still 3-1.

by hicalliber on Sep 17, 2009 7:22 PM PDT reply actions  

apparently the LA Times doesn't remember he wrote it

because its not on the list of his most recent articles. Weird….

and its 4-1 this football season. 2 on Barkely, 1 on Stafon Johnson and 1 on chetey petey

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Sep 17, 2009 7:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

thanks for the clarification though.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Sep 17, 2009 7:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

Silver is right

The next time there is any reference to the fishwrap in the BN should be when there is something critical (i.e., honest) about justsc.

I would settle for that instead of a total boycott. Just fairness. Until they start reporting on all the crap that goes on, we should leave them alone.

N, I disagree with you on this. I don’t care what the Conquest Cornickles reports about UCLA. I also don’t care what it’s mainstream counterpart reports. Just remember – every newspaper bought and every click on a ‘wrap website means that you’re paying Simers’ salary.

I know N disagrees, and as soon as I find 30 or 40 extra hours in a day to do all the work N does and make my own blog, I’ll enforce my preference. Until then, I’ll have to keep trying to persuade. Not to put too fine a point on this, I don’t have any intention of boycotting the BN because Nestor and I disagree on this point. I would boycott it if Nestor was as intellectually and morally dishonest as the ’wrap “journalists” which obviously is not the case.

by Fox 71 on Sep 17, 2009 9:08 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB