Spaulding Roundup: Film Talk, Confident Aztecs & Solving The Chaos Of 3-3-5
So we will know sometime today about the status of Saturday's game due to fire related conditions around Pasadena. I still think the officials should wait at least one more day till making their final decision since officials have made it clear that the game will not be moved to another stadium (See LA Times report). If the officials are not going to move the game to another stadium, I don't think logistics should be that big of an issue.
I think the rescheduling the game will put the team in a tough situation considering it will mean that Kevin Prince, a completely revamped OL (featuring 3 players making their first starts in UCLA uniforms), and all those young guys at skill positions will start the season against Volunteers and 104,000+ screaming fans in Knoxville (not good). So to me at least, it would have made a lot more sense if they waited till tomorrow to make the decision. Anyway, guess we will know about the decision sometime today.
If you want to keep monitoring online the general air quality in Southland, here is the AQMD website (HT Section2Rocks in Bruinzone, via Rico Bruin in BruinGold). The air quality has been improving, although the Pasadena is still marked "unhealthy for sensitive groups." Here is to hoping for the best and praying the fire situation comes under control soon.
The players and coaches continue to prepare for the Aztecs. Let's talk about film watching a bit. Here is Brian Price on poring over film for last two weeks:
The Bruins have pored over various game tapes, even old film from new SDSU coordinators Al Borges and Rocky Long's days at UCLA.
"Last year it was like this against Washington State," said Price, referring to second-year Cougars head coach Paul Wuff. "We looked all over for film. It's the same now. Everybody's used to it. And we have no school, so we can watch a lot more film."
Obviously there is more to just simply watching films. From Jon Gold in the Daily News:
UCLA defensive end Korey Bosworth said the challenge is in viewing with a purpose.
"The balance comes in just recognizing what you're looking at," Bosworth said. If you're looking at SDSU personnel, that's what you're looking at. If you're watching the Ball States or old UCLA films, you worry about the schemes. It's all about knowing what you're watching."
On the other side, the San Diego State players sound confident. Per Kevin Gemmell in the San Diego Union Tribune, the Aztecs' OL has "had a technique overhaul, going from pass blockers to maulers." Guess that goes along with Brady Hoke's philosophy of playing rough and tumble Big-10, physical brand of power game. Their junior cetner Trask Iosefa is sounding comfortable about handling Brian Price:
"He's all over the backfield. But I think we'll be able to block him with our two guards. They'll do a good job."
Nelson (senior right tackle Peter Nelson) said he isn't concerned with the inexperience on the left side.
"Football is football," he said. "They still have experience playing the game. There is a lack of experience, but I think our coaches have done a good job coaching us up and we'll be prepared and we'll work hard."
Speaking of working hard Norm Chow has been going over Rocky Long's 3-3-5 scheme. More on that chaos scheme after the jump.
So here is what Chow said about preparing for the 3-3-5:
"I think that's what he (Rocky Long) knows and what he does best. He has to do it. You wouldn't coach something you didn't know best. We've been studying it for the last two weeks now."
Well Brent Schrotenboer of the San Diego Union Tribune did a great write up on Coach Long's 3-3-5 in a report entitled "Chaos Theory," in which he went over the concept and the genesis of this defensive scheme (dating back to Long's days as an assistant at Oregon State). The defense comes with high rewards (of making big plays) and risks:
Mistakes happen when risks are taken so often. Blitzing is risky. And Long's defense blitzes 80 percent of the time, compared to maybe 20 or 30 percent for more conventional defenses. The idea is to send one or more defenders into the offensive backfield to break up a play before it starts. But if the offense sees it coming or reads it right, it can adjust by flipping the ball away or scooting past the blitzing defender for a big play downfield. By the time the blitzing defenders realize it, the ballcarrier has blown past them.
"It's like Stonewall Jackson said: I don't think they take counsel of their fears," Leach (Mike Leach) said. "They're willing to stick their neck out because it can have a big payoff. The risk is calculated."
To an opposing offense, Long's 3-3-5 can look chaotic: constant movement, players lined up in unconventional spots, blitzes coming from almost anywhere.
If there's a weakness to Long's defense, it might be a quarterback who's studied it well enough to know what might be coming. In that case, the quarterback has to be able to frequently change the play at the line of scrimmage based on those educated hunches.
Some might also surmise that the 3-3-5 should be disadvantaged against the run because it doesn't have the size up front. Not true (see Long's record above). Speed can make up for it, if the players can tackle.
"If they can't tackle it really doesn't make any difference where you line them up," Dunn said. "The first things you have to do is get players who can tackle."
It will come down to Kevin Prince and the UCLA offense being very patient on Saturday (which is why this will be a great test as a first game of the season). Ted Miller from the WWL writes:
Long's funky defense will be eager to make life difficult for redshirt freshman quarterback Kevin Prince, who hasn't played in a football game in two years.
"I believe he is going to have a great freshman year," Neuheisel said.
Toss in freshman tailback Johnathan Franklin and sophomore receiver Taylor Embree and you have a really young offense.
That suggests that the Bruins, inevitably, will be confused at times and will blow assignments.
How many they blow -- and how well they bounce back from those mistakes -- might provide a good measuring stick for what we can expect from a UCLA offense that is trying to rehabilitate itself after a horrendous 2008 performance.
In other words we will need to be patient. It is going to be incredibly important for all of our guys to stay with their assignments. Sure the Aztecs will be flying around but that also means there should be number of instances when they will be over commit opening up opportunities for huge plays. Meanwhile, at the same time we will have to play our game and just keep pounding straight at them. If we can keep coming at them relentlessly gaining 4-6 yards per down and get a rhtyhm going, I think the offense will find its footing.
I am excited to see how Prince and our offense handles themselves on Saturday.
GO BRUINS.
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
Screen passes
I would think that NC will be working in quite a few drawn up screen passes/short slants. The extra pressure should open up that part of the game (I think).
How has Franklin looked catching the ball out of the backfield? Does Prince stand tall in the pocket? All reports point to “yes,” but I haven’t seen the team live yet.
Go Bruins.
by hicalliber on Sep 2, 2009 6:13 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
screen passes are great to change the pace
but we won’t be able to rely on them as the base of the offense. Rocky’s too smart for that; if we start calling screens and slants on every other play he’ll just start faking blitz and leave it up to Prince to decide whether or not the blitz is actually coming. If he guesses wrong, it’s a pick. Basically it would change the guessing from the defense to the offense and give them the advantage.
To me the gameplan should be centered on controlling the middle of the field; be it runs up the middle, crossing routes, etc. If we keep hitting them up the middle they won’t be able to spread the D out as much. It would force them to start guessing the plays, and THAT’s when you hit them with the screens
by bucknellbruin on Sep 2, 2009 8:23 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'd definitely would like to see...
…us pounding the rock. It will take pressure off Prince, and it seems our OL is quite a bit bigger than their DL, so we should have an advantage. A steady dose of Coleman/Franklin could wear them down in the heat as well.
Go Bruins.
by hicalliber on Sep 2, 2009 9:45 AM PDT up reply actions 0 recs
What makes me nervous
are thoughts of the Utah game two years ago. UCLA came into that game and looked like they had no idea what the hell was going on and what they were up against….and got smacked annihilated as a result. I only hope that our team is sufficiently amped up with all the young guys chomping at the bit to play in (many cases) what will be their first college game….
by Scotucla03 on Sep 2, 2009 7:56 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
yep
I was at the game at Utah and UCLA looked like a bunch of jerks. They were very passive and laid back during warm-ups. Joking around. Thinking “hey, we’re UCLA, all we have to do is show up to beat these guys”. It was pretty embarrassing. Then in the game UCLA was back on their heels the whole time and Utah basically smoked them. Let’s hope that was a lesson.
I’d like to see the game played this weekend but not at the Rose Bowl. There are people risking their lives right now just up the 210 freeway one exit or so and to have a game right then and there would be in bad taste, not to mention disruptive to traffic and logistics.
I think playing in San Diego, or Anaheim or Exposition Park would work. Sure we would lose the home field advantage. But I wouldn’t want to go to Knoxville without a game under my belt. Hell, I think even a game in the cozy confines of CSULA, CSU Fullerton, CSU Long Beach, Mt. SAC, CSUN, etc. would be better than no game. CSULA has a nice little stadium which was used in the 1984 Olympics for field hockey.
Powder to the People
by bruinski on Sep 2, 2009 8:32 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
Let's Hope this is a GOOD sign...
From AP:
LOS ANGELES (AP) — Firefighters made dramatic gains early Wednesday on a massive wildfire north of Los Angeles, buoyed by lower temperatures and higher humidity.
The fire had little active flame, fire spokeswoman Gail Wright said, adding: “This is a good day.”
by uclafan11 on Sep 2, 2009 9:00 AM PDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm a little worried
We have a QB that hasn’t taken a game day snap in 2 years and never at the college level. We have only been able to watch film from other schools with different personnell and we have a green O line. AND these guys run a defense that is built on creating choas.
Sounds like a day that our D is going to have to shut down the Aztecs and let our offense get grounded with runs and quick drops.
Go Bruins
TRM
by G0Bruins on Sep 2, 2009 12:58 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
The 3-3-5 is dangerous
This would be an excellent strategy by SDSU against our offense. They know our offensive line is suspect, so giving up some run coverage is not a big deal. Meanwhile, the blitz is going to give Kevin Prince nightmares if he isn’t able to pick up on the direction of the blitz. With our offensive line woes, it actually makes more sense to run a spread offense to give Prince the extra second to spot blitzing linebackers – but we’re not really going to be doing this.
So, it’s up to Prince – how good is he at reading the blitz? Can he complete short and medium-length passes to our good TE’s and WR’s? If he does, we’re going to cruise to a victory. If not, this is going to a long, hard-fought game.
"I never watched baseball on TV. It's slow and boring. I'm not a fan. Never was." - Jeff Kent
by Yoyo on Sep 2, 2009 2:03 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs
lets not forget guys
Our offense is definitely a question mark against this unknown Aztec D, but we have a really, really good defense. Barring multiple picks in our own territory, I would be highly surprised if SDSU scored over 20 points. I would say it’s more likely they’re around 10.
As is said way too much, Prince just needs to “manage” the game and we’ll be just fine. I trust our D to give us a chance to win just about any game the offense doesn’t give away this year.
by bucknellbruin on Sep 2, 2009 3:07 PM PDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




















