Spaulding Roundup: Challenges & Opportunity In Palo Alto
Over at College Sports Hotline (a San Jose Mercury News blog) Jon Wilner (Brian Dohn's predecessor at the Daily News) provides his scouting report to beat Jim Harbaugh's Stanford:
To beat Stanford, you must 1) kick away from Chris Owusu, 2) limit turnovers and 3) contain Toby Gerhart.
No. 1 is easy; it’s just a matter of how bullheaded opposing coaches want to be.
No. 2 isn’t easy, because Stanford is smart and physical and has some ball hawkers.
No. 3 isn’t easy either, although the key to containing Gerhart is limiting his long runs more than his total yardage. (You can’t let him bust 30-yarders because the impact it has on field position.)
In theory, being successful with 2 and 3 would force Stanford to drive the ball long distances and do it 5-6 yards at a time, which would, in turn, force Andrew Luck to make some difficult throws.
(Luck has done a fine job managing games and limiting mistakes, but he hasn’t been in very many tough situations thanks to Stanford’s running game and the porous defenses he’s faced.)
How can UCLA accomplish all three? Well let's start with number 1. Here is what Rick Neuheisel had to say about his team's coverage plan this weekend:
Neuheisel is concerned about Stanford's Chris Owusu, who played at Westlake Village Oaks Christian and has returned three kickoffs for touchdowns this season.
"We're going to need great coverage and good hang time on kicks," Neuheisel said. "Or we can do some other things, like not kick to him."
We also need to add better tackling and staying within coverage lanes into that mix. Bruins simply cannot afford to give Stanford short field on Saturday afternoon.
Moving on to number 2, it is going to be very interesting to see how the coaches work with Craft to manage the game this weekend. We don't need to go over the details of how Craft was decent but unspectacular last time out against Kansas State. The main concern I have with Craft (even though I generally agree with how coaches worked the QB situation against KSU) is that he hasn't shown the ability to throw downfield.
If you watch the game against Kansas State, you will see Craft badly misfired in all of his long ball attempts (except when Austin was wide open with no one within 15 yards of him). What I notice about Craft is he doesn't have the ability to throw the balls in a way which would be impossible for the DBs to get to it. He always seems to throw them towards inside making it easy for the DBs to pounce on it. So what will the coaches do with Craft on Saturday?
Well for one thing I hope we are not calling for those long bombs. Hopefully our offensive line will be able to answer the Stanford challenge (as they will most definitely be loading up the box) by imposing their will, opening up running lanes and give Craft some protection. Craft is pretty Ok when you roll him out, get him on the run, and make him throw short to medium range passes. So I hope coaches have schemed up a steady dose of Presley, Paulsen, Harkey and Moya this weekend, and also working in some flanker screens taking advantage of some of the speed we have in our offense this season. However, if Craft is not getting it done in his first 3 or 4 series, I sure hope the coaches are willing to give Brehaut a chance in a series or two and see what he can do.
As for containing Gerhart, here is Jon Gold from the Daily News:
Their running back is maybe as good as there is in the country," UCLA head coach Rick Neuheisel said. "He's a different kind of running back. He's not going to try to make you miss as many times as some as some of the elusive guys do.
"He's as powerful and tough to bring down as any back I've seen in college football for some time."
What makes the Gerhart gameplan so tough to defend is not just a matter of his quality, but his quantity.
Stanford makes good use of the burly back, as quarterback Andrew Luck feeds him often. Gerhart has 91 carries in four games, 13 more than Oregon State tailback Jacquizz Rodgers and 22 more than Cal's Jahvid Best.
"They know what they had in him, and they feed him," Neuheisel said. "He gets his chances. There are a number of players who are very hard to defense, but they don't get the ball 30 times a game."
If UCLA is to contain Gerhart, the first step is tackling him. It will not be an easy task.
We have already talked about how our defenders will need to swarm towards Toby and perfect the art of gang tackling. However, ATV and co. are also bracing for possible wrinkles Stanford might thrown in against the Bruin defense:
"They like to pound it, pound it, pound it and throw it," Verner said. "But they're definitely going to have some wrinkles or surprises for us to see where our discipline is. We have to be aware and prepared for everything."
Verner recalled two trick plays the Cardinal used against the Bruins last season. One was a flea-flicker and the other had the tight end falling down then getting up to catch a pass.
"The flea-flicker didn't work, but it did," Verner said. "That's one of the only PI (pass interference) calls I got last year. I was trying to make a play and they said I yanked him.
"The throw back (to the tight end) didn't work as effectively. I had to guard the tight end for some reason on that play. I ended up making the tackle, but he ended up making the first down."
In other words, ATV and co. will have to mentally alert for every play against these guys. I wrote this past weekend about how ATV has been coaching up the youngsters. He will have to look out for Sheldon Price, who appears to be holding on to his starting position at the other CB spot. CRN noted yesterday that the coaches are sticking with Sheldon becauyse of "a comfort factor" and "his size."
That's kind of interesting to me because I thought Sheldon was giving up too much cushion against the KSU receivers and Courtney was rather solid against Tennessee. Perhaps this is a way for the coaches to send Courtney (and everyoen else) a subtle message about how no is entitled to a starting position just because they have seniority, and that they will have to given everything they can to earn back the spot. Hopefully Courtney is up the challenge. We are going to need everyone in their top form this weekend in Palo Alto.
Too often in recent history, we have seen UCLA melt under this kind of situation or get off to a horrendous start. I don't think it will be the end of the world if UCLA doesn't win this weekend. However, it would be great if they can come out and play with the same emotion and fearless tenacity they displayed at Neyland Stadium. Playing that way in a consistent basis is what is necessary for this program to take that next step. It will be interesting to see how they handle that opportunity this weekend. It will definitely not be the last opportunity for this program (because given this year is shaping up so far, they are doing ok). Still if they can somehow pull out a victory or can play a solid, clean, hard fought game, it will set them up in good position when they come back to the Rose Bowl.
GO BRUINS.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A message to the starters?
So they want to send a message to their corners when playing a team with an inexperienced yet (so far) efficient QB? I’m all for sending messages but I really hope Price earned his starting spot if he gets it. I just hate to think our coaches are under estimating anyone so early in the season. Another possibility is that Sheldon was giving up such a big cushion against KSU under coach’s orders. Hence, he did his job to contain against the big play and has shown his coachability by sticking to the game plan for the entire game. Perhaps in practice he’s shown that he can do a good job when let loose. In any event, it looks like we’ve got some pretty good depth in the secondary especially once Hester comes back. Should be fun!
Oh UCLA you sweet bitch, you've BRUINed me for anything else.
gerhart
Gerhart is very tough and fast, too. We were fortunate last year that he had to take breaks at inopportune (for the trees) times. At least twice, they were driving due to his runs. He trotted off, Kimble came in and got stuffed. They punted or kicked a FG. I believe that if he had stayed in for those plays, we would have lost the game.
This year, I like our defense better. I think we’ll be better able to contain Gerhart, which means he averages 4-5 yards per carry instead of 7. Will that be enough?
by BruinsRule on Sep 29, 2009 8:10 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Stanford by 6
For what it’s worth, that’s the line I saw on the game (for entertainment purposes only, folks). It seems about right to me.
Personally, I’d like to see us play a conservative game. Run the hell out of the ball. Play field position. Wind down the clock. Don’t go for the big play and try not to make mistakes. Let Stanford make the mistakes.
I can’t think of any other cliches until my coffee kicks in. A stitch in time saves nine. Beware of the dwarf.
I think we will be all right. We came to play before 100,000 screaming Vols fans. We can come to play at Stanford.
For Now, Sounds About Right
Will be interesting to see how much the line fluctuates between now and Saturday.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Sep 29, 2009 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions
I agree with this line
“However, it would be great if they can come out and play with the same emotion and fearless tenacity they displayed at Neyland Stadium.”
I think that will be key and am a little worried about the 2 week layoff in that respect. If we come ready to play, and we limit mistakes, I like our chances.
by RealisticBruinFan on Sep 29, 2009 8:50 AM PDT reply actions
Normally I'd be concerned about rust
I have to think that the way our team has been battered and injured, that potential rust is a tradeoff I’m willing to take for some health benefits. I think the big key here will be not putting Craft in too many positions where he has to make tough throws because that likely means that we’re not moving and possessing the ball, subjecting our defense to more Gerhart.
Price and other comments
I agree with CRN that Sheldon Price should be starting. To me the message is around: “don’t let the team down by violating the rules”. Viney has work to do to earn back the starting spot, if he does.
A comment tying 2 threads together: a ball control game is what I believe our coaches are hoping for this Saturday. But, the “bend but dont break” defensive strategy means that Stanford will probably get a lot of yards, and may over time, win the field position battle. I think that also risks the big guy, Gerhart, gaining some advantage as the game goes on. Big running backs usually gain momentum as the defense tires. I still think the bend but dont break strategy will win out because it is so hard to put together 10+ play drives consistently. And we have a strong pair of kickers that should help us on punt exchanges and kick-offs IF we can fix our coverage issues. Our kickers are worth 3-6 points a game.
Nestor: I would also say this game is more important than you imply. Likely wins into the future probably include only WSU and Oregon State. This is clearly more winnable than some games later in the year.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Sep 29, 2009 9:09 AM PDT reply actions
The thing is
Viney already paid for whatever it was with a 1 game suspension. From what I’ve seen, he’s a much better corner. Maybe you’re right though and Price is they symbolic starter. I still hope Viney gets more total time.
I Really Doubt That The Coaches Will Pick A Starter To "Send A Message"
At this point in the season, with it being the conf. opener, and Viney having already served his suspension, I’ve got to believe the coaches will base their playing time decisions strictly on who gives us the better chance to win.
They may decide to start SP simply because he’s bigger and they feel he can provide better run support. I don’t feel the need to second-guess their choice here.
Craft + long ball will be key.
If he doesn’t go long at all, its going to be a very tough day. I’m sure Stanford has figured the kid can’t throw safe/accurate out routes past 20 yards….
So long as we can keep the defense honest
By keeping the linebackers out of the box (ie, play action short and medium range passes), I think we’ll be fine.
I dread the thought of having Craft throw long balls. As Nestor said, he is completely incapable of placing the ball in a spot on deep routes where only the WR can catch it, or no one else can.
I would rather we just not have him try anymore. Play to his strengths, which is PA mid-range roll-outs. Steady dose of that should keep the Stanford D honest enough.
Got a call from my son-in-law
He lives in the area of Palo Alto. He says they are expecting 40K+ for the BRUIN game this weekend.
Not too bad for a Stanford game.
See ya there!!! GO BRUINS!!!
Low turnout...
Do they hate football in Palo Alto?
Owusu...
It seems they’re going to try to kick to him. I can’t say I’m upset about that.
CRN keeps saying he wants Brehaut to play
Regardless of how Craft does. What do you think this means? If things are going well (in a relatively close game), I don’t see them even risking a possession just for the hell of it.
Obviously if Craft is horrible from kickoff I can see them ready to make a change. If not, though, the only motive I see for bringing him in off the bench in a close game is to do something with him that they can’t do with Craft. Like, say, try a well-timed deep ball or trick play.
Thoughts?
confidence
Well, I think Craft will play well enough to win if everybody else plays up to potential. That being said, this does allow CRN to pull Craft if he starts poorly and still say it was to give Brehaut an opportunity rather than it was because of how Craft was playing, potentially preserving some of Craft’s confidence as well as the whole teams confidence in Craft.
by bruinforlife on Sep 29, 2009 5:10 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
As to the expected crowd
I am pretty sure I read that the crowd for the U-Dub game was under 40,000, in a stadium that holds about 60,000, so 40,000+, though bad, is good. Personally, I hope we empty the place, except for those wearing blue, by the end of the third quarter.

by 



















