Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Yu Darvish Diagnosed With Mariners Fever

BN Pac-10 Power Poll: Week 1

Photo


We've got a new feature here on BN...the Pac-10 Power Poll. Each and every Monday, the BN frontpagers will vote on the Pac-10 teams from 1-10, although we may not have every frontpager every week. First place votes will be worth 10 points, second place votes 9, third place votes, 8, etc. Please use this weekly post as your chance to sound off on the Pac-10. Tell us why our rankings are idiotic and how you'd rank the 10 teams. Share your thoughts on the weekend's Pac-10 action. Give us some insight into the various Pac-10 teams. Basically, if it's Pac-10 football related, this is your place to go at it. Please keep in mind that while we will make attempts to be impartial, we are still Bruin fans so UCLA may get the benefit of the doubt and USC never will.

So here are our week 1 rankings. I did say that these rankings will be every Monday and they will, but I didn't think of this until last night so you're getting the first rankings on a Wednesday. First place votes will be in parentheses and each person's individual ballot will not be posted, but if they choose to do so, they can post it in the comments below so here we go. Pac-10 Power Poll week 1.

1) USC Trojans, 1-0 (2 first place vote)- That first quarter was less than impressive for SC, but they turned it on and ran past San Jose St. Big deal. This week is what matters as they head to Columbus with a true freshman quarterback to face Ohio St. Lucky for them, Ohio St. did not look good last week, especially on defense where they seem to lack the necessary speed.

2) California Golden Bears, 1-0 (1 first place vote)- Playing at home against Maryland, the Bears came out firing and destroyed the Terps, 52-13. Jahvid Best looked like the player everyone expects him to be this year, but the real shocker was the play of QB Kevin Riley. If his mechanical adjustments make him play like he did on Saturday for the rest of the year, Cal will be the real deal.

Star-divide

3) Oregon St. Beavers, 1-0- The biggest concern for the Beavers in the offseason was the Rogers twins. We knew they could play, but both were recovering from injuries so how would they bounce back? Well, both looked healthy as can be on Saturday in their win over Portland St., but the next two weeks will be the real teller for them as they hit the road for a good UNLV squad and then host a dangerous Cincinnati team.

4) Arizona St. Sun Devils, 1-0- Danny Sullivan had a pretty good opener for ASU as their fans must have felt more comfortable with their quarterback play after the night than they did before. Their 50-3 win over Idaho St. says more about their opponent than it does them, but the Sun Devils will get their test in just two weeks when they head to Georgia.

5) Oregon Ducks, 0-1- An ugly game for the Ducks, followed by an even uglier post-game, but this team is still loaded with talent. While games against Purdue, Utah, Cal and Washington St. isn't an easy run of games, all four are at home so they can get on a little run over the next month if their defensive line improves.

6) Stanford Cardinal, 1-0- Boys and girls, your Pac-10 leader. Stanford's 39-13 win over Washington St. has them atop the Pac-10 and say what you will about the Cougars, I don't think the Cardinal are complaining about a Pac-10 road win. A trip across the country to Wake Forest awaits this weekend though.

7) UCLA Bruins, 1-0- Caution from the Bruin faithful? A nice looking win over San Diego St. and all three phases of the game were good, albeit at different times of the game, but 1-0 is 1-0. How improved this team and program are will be tested at hostile Neyland Stadium on Saturday. A win could jump them well up these all important standings.

8) Washington Huskies, 0-1- This team is improved and not just in the way any team that went 0-12 is improved because they can't get any worse. The defense looks like it could be decent and a healthy Jake Locker makes a world of difference for that offense. The Huskies, especially at home, are no pushover this year, as LSU found out last week in that close game.

9) Arizona Wildcats, 1-0- A less than impressive win over a poor Central Michigan side could have the Wildcat fans worrying. Matt Scott actually played pretty well at quarterback, taking over for Willie Tuitama and Nic Grigsby can run the ball. We'll see if those two can help them out in two weeks when they play at Iowa.

10) Washington St. Cougars, 0-1- New coach, new hope, same ol' Cougs. A 26 point loss to open Pac-10 play, at home no less, will crush any hope the Wazzu fans had entering the year. but with Hawaii and then SMU coming to the Palouse over the next two weeks, they have a chance at picking up a W.

So what do you think of the rankings? Is UCLA too low? Is Arizona St. too high? Are we just bumbling fools? Share those thoughts and anything else you have on the Pac-10 below.

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Oregon

While I agree that he Ducks are loaded with talent, they looked pretty bad against BSU and I would have them lower on the list until they show me something better (and win).

Otherwise, I think the rankings are pretty dead-on. I hate to bash on SDSU, but we didn’t look all that great against them. SDSU should be an annual punching bag and we didn’t exactly blow them away (like $C did against SJSU). If it were not for the blocked FG return, the final score would have been a lot closer in our game. If we win against the Vols, I will be impressed with our progress and return to respectability. If we lose—which is certainly a possibility given all of the various factors—we just know that we have a ways to go.

This is a fun post, Rye. I’m looking forward to reading more of these.

by Barnes2JJ on Sep 9, 2009 12:19 PM PDT reply actions  

When

are you getting to Knoxville, Rye? We need more blue in this orange town! hehe! :)

by uclafan11 on Sep 9, 2009 12:22 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll be there Friday afternoon

I can’t wait though and don’t you worry. I’ll have my blue on.

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Sep 9, 2009 12:28 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Washington Looked Tough

I was impressed. They won’t be a “gimme” in any game — so long as Locker stays healthy.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Sep 9, 2009 12:40 PM PDT reply actions  

Arizona

their offense stunk but I was impressed with their D. Central Michigan isn’t that bad of a team, and they have one of the best QB’s in the country in Dan LeFevour. Holding them to 6 points was a very good game for that defense.

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Sep 9, 2009 1:19 PM PDT reply actions  

New and improved Pac-10 logo

May I humbly suggest an updated Pac-10 logo for this discussion?

by bryanucla on Sep 9, 2009 1:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Logo link

Guys, I must be doing something wrong in displaying this logo, although I tried to follow the formatting guide. Here’s the link in case any of you know how to get the image to appear:

http://www5.snapfish.com/slideshow/AlbumID=1545429014/PictureID=86644847014/a=120960951_120960951/otsc=SHR/otsi=SPIClink/COBRAND_NAME=snapfish/

This version seems a little more timely than the older Pac-10 collage.

by bryanucla on Sep 9, 2009 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Look back to 2005...

the last time we opened against SDSU we won 44-21. That SDSU team went on to win 5 games. That year UCLA featured an extremely prolific offense. If SDSU is a punching bag, don’t you think our offense would have been able to put up even more points?
Who knows how good this years’ aztec team will turn out to be? We did manage to basically shut down the aztecs for most of the game.
I really think this first game told us very little about our football team. I heard Bob Stoops say once that a college football team improves the most between it’s first and second game. Thats where we will see how good we really are. I agree with UCLA’s placement in these rankings. We have a LOT of room above us.

by 13-9 on Sep 9, 2009 2:11 PM PDT reply actions  

I agree

I learned very little against San Diego St. Most of what I saw on Saturday was the same stuff that I saw in practice. Most teams don’t show much in their first game. The only teams I really learned a lot about were Cal, Arizona St. and Washington. I’d heard a lot about Riley’s changes in his throwing mechanics, but seeing them made me a believer and a believer in Cal as a result. Arizona St.‘s Danny Sullivan looked pretty good and I feel like they could get decent QB play, which I questioned prior to the year. Washington looked very much improved and I think they’ll be competitive this year. I think they could have a year similar to us last year. The record won’t be great, but they’ll be competitive for the most part.

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Sep 9, 2009 2:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oregon?

I was more impressed with Stanford and UCLA than I was with Oregon. And the Ducks just lost a player that was probably the key to their offense.

by BillyZoom on Sep 9, 2009 2:37 PM PDT reply actions  

poll results...

pardon me for being a BRUIN but i would rank UCLA higher than 7th!…7th?…really?
tough crowd here…

by bruincheerleader on Sep 9, 2009 2:52 PM PDT reply actions  

Sorry I missed your email last night ...

Too late for this week. But this is how I would have voted:

1. Cal
2. U$C*
3. Oregon State
4. Arizona State
5. Stanford
6. UCLA
7. Oregon
8. Washington
9. Arizona
10. Washington State

by Nestor on Sep 9, 2009 3:54 PM PDT reply actions  

HERE...

USC
CAL
OSU
UCLA
ASU
STANFORD
WASHINGTON
OREGON
WSU

by bruincheerleader on Sep 9, 2009 4:01 PM PDT reply actions  

tough crowd, indeed

so unimpressed by U of A that you kicked them out of the conference?

:)

by insomniacslounge on Sep 9, 2009 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

OOPS!...let me correct myself

usc
CAL
OSU
UCLA
ASU
STANFORD…hey guys they only beat wsu afte all…get real…
ZONA
WASHINGTON
OREGON
WSU

by bruincheerleader on Sep 10, 2009 5:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

i think 4-9 are all pretty close, but here's mine

1. USC
2. Cal
3. Oregon St
4. Arizona St
5. Stanford
6. UCLA
7. Oregon
8. Arizona
9. Washington
10 Washington St

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Sep 9, 2009 4:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Heres my take

USC Cal Stanford Ucla OSU Oregon Washington UOFA ASU WSU

by westwood12003 on Sep 9, 2009 9:34 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Oregon has to drop to second to last.

Everybody chooses to remember Blount’s meltdown after the game, but few choose to remember how completely Oregon was dominated on both sides of the ball. Many will want to point out Oregon’s stable of athletes as the reason they should be respected and that’s fine. But, in a Power Ranking it is all about what you have done for me lately. Oregon is going to have to turn that ship around and earn that 5 spot. Until then, it’s cellar dwelling time for the Ducks.

A coach is someone who can give correction without causing resentment. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Sep 9, 2009 9:52 PM PDT reply actions  

ryebreadraz & SDSU Game

ryebreadraz stated he learned very little from UCLA’s performance against SDSU. I think ryebreadraz learned a lot more than he realizes. What if UCLA had lost? What if UCLA won by only 3 points? What about the defense after the first quarter? What would you have thought if SDSU scored a touchdown in each of the last 3 quarters? We aren’t so goodl, right?

I was happy to see the score had allowed Brehauf to get his feet wet. He made a nice pass. I feel a lot better knowing he is there if we need him.

Looking at UCLA’s schedule, I look at the Tennessee game as somewhat comparable to the BYU game last year. I don’t want to see any more 59-0 losses.

by rustyscrew on Sep 9, 2009 10:26 PM PDT reply actions  

What should I have learned then?

What did you learn? I saw exactly what I expected to see. Our receivers are good and deep. Our offensive line is improved and might be mediocre. Prince can be damn good, but will look like a freshman at times. Our defense is very, very good and we are very, very fast, albeit short on depth. I expected that and saw that. What did you learn that I should have learned?

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Sep 10, 2009 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

lol

Yeah don’t hold back on us rye!

by Nestor on Sep 10, 2009 4:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Oregon lost a talented RB

and did lose in the opening week, but to a really good Boise St. team on the road. I would wager to say that everone in the Pac would have done the same. I see them ahead of ASU…and I’m tempted to put Wazzu @ 6th. they lost but controlled the tempo of the game to the #11 team in the nation. Pretty impressive. As for our Bruins, I think we are where we belong right now. We struggled a bit on D in the beginning and on O late (it was hot as hell out there in Pasadena!). We’ve got to come out of the box swinging this weekend. I’m counting down the seconds til Tennessee! Go Us!!!

by westwood78 on Sep 9, 2009 11:17 PM PDT reply actions  

You mean

Washington, not Wazzu…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Sep 10, 2009 2:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB