Assess Ben Howland's Job Performance As Head Coach Of UCLA Basketball
Previously here on BN we have embraced Coach Ben Howland's self mention of "the Caretaker of Westwood." Well following another unacceptable and disgraceful loss in his seventh season in Westwood, we'd like to take note of the collective pulse of this entire community. We have put a poll up on the right hand side of this blog assessing Ben Howland's job performance as the head basketball coach of UCLA. Please take time to vote on the poll. If you want to add your comments on how you voted please add it in this thread.
I want to add few notes to this. First, we have already laid out in detail why a losing basketball season will never be acceptable at UCLA. We think Ben Howland is heading towards the hot seat if he is not on it already if this season ends up being a losing season. That doesn't mean we are advocating for the firing of Ben Howland. However, we do think Howland and his entire staff needs to realize we are not going to be quiet and accept the debacle(s) we are experiencing this season, and let him get away with low expectations (i.e. satisfied with just making the tournament next season).
What is happening this season is extremely disturbing. It's not acceptable. Nothing wrong with tough rebuilding seasons. We have gone out of our way to set reasonable expectations for both of our programs. However, there is something wrong when we see a basketball team that routinely comes out and goes through the motions, plays listless basketball without any passion and desire, and utterly defiles the spirit and tradition behind the four letters stitched in blue and gold. It's not acceptable and the responsibility for that falls on the head coach, who leads the program. Here is the link for you to vote.
GO BRUINS.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
OT i know
but i was wondering before i head out if there will be a gameday thread for the televised womens basketball game against USC today (2:30pm, FSN). With Oregon getting swept this weekend by the Arizona schools, the winner of today’s game takes sole possession of 2nd place in conference, so it’s huge. I know this is OT, but hopefully it can be a nice distraction for those still frustrated over yesterday’s performance.
by truebluebruin24 on Jan 17, 2010 9:14 AM PST reply actions
Question re: poll
Is it regarding his overall performance, or his performance this season?
by McNown to Farmer on Jan 17, 2010 9:26 AM PST reply actions
Not really clear
I thought it was for just this season, but I just reread the question and I’m less clear.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
I voted based on overall performance
Therefore, I voted approve. Ben Howland has had six great seasons (including 3 Final Fours) and one terrible one.
This season, however, is simply abysmal, and Howland needs to make adjustments. Big adjustments.
"I never watched baseball on TV. It's slow and boring. I'm not a fan. Never was." - Jeff Kent
Polls
This poll is going to be far more telling one year from now. His next recruiting class will make or break it. If this slop continues next year then its hot seat to ejection seat.
Just Not That Talented
For the record, I’m a Butler grad, but also a Bruin fan. As you guys know, BU has been a fine mid-major program for 15 years. I saw all the games in the Anaheim Tourney and frankly was surprised by the Bruins talent in comparison to West Va., Minnesota, Clemson and Texas A and M. The Bruins and Bulldogs played an excellent game which we won in the last second. But honestly, I thought we had better talent than the Bruins – which is astounding. My brother observed about the Bruins: “I can’t believe that UCLA has no one who is a pure shooter” and “I think UCLA is a bunch of really good sixth men.”
I think Ben Howland is a fine coach, but he really needs to find a couple of guys who can just shoot the damned ball. Our old coach at Butler used to say — “Putting the ball in the basket corrects a multitude of sins.” Be nice if BH recruited a couple of Klay Thompson’s. Go Bruins! (and Butler!)
Until this season..
…I would have given Coach Howland an “A”. I bought into everything he was doing with our program.
And I still believe he will bring us back to elite status in the next few years. I wish I could see it happening next year. I can’t.
What disturbs me most is our carelessness with the basketball and our lack of heart defensively. We look like a High School JV team on our fast breaks (in the rare occasion that we actually HAVE one). Have we had even ONE break this season that looked like this…Outlet, pass, pass, layup or dunk? Just one? I can’t remember it.
Defensively, we just don’t seem to care if the opposition gets to the rim or has a wide-open look at a 3. WE JUST DON’T CARE. We don’t play help defense anymore, we don’t sell out or take charges, we don’t swarm to the ball in trap situations. I don’t believe we lack the athleticism to do this…I think we lack the heart.
Earlier this season someone posted about Coach Howland needing to stay away from the four-star prima donnas (Jrue Holiday, Drew Gordon), and go back to finding those “heart” guys who are underrecruited elsewhere (Westbrook, Mata, et al). I agree. I’d rather suffer another season of losing while knowing that we are building something strong with a bunch of kids who care, then have an 18-win, 6th seed NCAA team next year that plays with a little flash led by two or three players who are more concerned with improving NBA draft position.
Great minds think alike.
I just want to point out that we were both typing our comments at the same time. And made the same observation about our team looking like a HS JV team.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
My son coaches a HS JV Team....
in Bloomington, Indiana. Right now they look way better than our Bruins do!
I may work with the Waves, but I'm still a Bruin!
this game reminds me of the Michigan game last year
In my mind, that was when it really became apparent that something was amiss. But, having players like DC, and JS really covered up a lot of painful truth.
What is most perplexing to me is how, with a squad of highly recruited basketball players, we can look like a HS JV team. Did they just all undergo some kind of athletic amnesia? I understand that a lot of these guys are not fundamentally sound or play much defense in AAU, but that does not explain atrocious shooting. And, don’t blame SC’s defense, because the missed open shots are what really jump out at me.
As for the voting, I’m an “unsure” because even in our peak moments with CBH, it seems a lack of offensive ability has kept us from breaking through to the Championship level.
As for the Hotseat, I agree this season is warming up and the coaches, all coaches, should be put on notice. However, I will recall the old adage that you don’t fire a coach unless you have a firm replacement in mind, and in place. And, looking across the CBB landscape, I just don’t see one. Mark Few of Gonzaga comes to mind, but I think if we were going to hire him, it was going to happen after we got rid of Lavin.
Throws hands up in confusion
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
CBH job performance
While this year is a painful debacle, I am reluctant to say that the same coach we have been calling a genius and savior over the past few years has now become a goat. His 3 Final Four appearances in my opinion have given him some “buffer” points for me. While I agree that a losing season can never be acceptable at UCLA, I’m confident enough in CBH’s abilities, as proven by his track record, to stick it out with him. Hopefully the development of this year’s freshman class, together with the infusion of next year’s talent, will be enough to bring us back to the top of the Pac-10 where we belong.
Approve
Here’s why…
The team’s results have to do with many factors. The performance of the coaches, the players, the opponents, intangibles like injuries, intensity, transfers, fan response, facilities, etc… they all contribute to the W/L record.
Of all these factors, I am the most comfortable with CBH. Howland has proven he can win to the tune of 3 Final Fours. That buys a lot of credibility in my book.
Our seniors have not shown that they can consistently lead this team to wins, and one seems to have proven the opposite. The young players are not taking over in their stead. We had several semi-unpredictable occurrences (early departures, injuries, transfers) which have hurt the this year’s team. The fans are fickle and unsupportive (as defined by Pauley not being the toughest ticket in LA). It has all added up to a complete mess this season.
To me, only CBH has any standing and credibility in our program at this time.
This season is lost, and I blame the players more than I blame CBH. Not much else has changed since the Final Four years – same head coach, same building, same opponents (even weaker this year), same Den. The roster is the most significant difference. CBH made tactical errors in selecting these players. I hope he has learned his lesson. Going forward, I want CBH and his system to stay, and get back the type of players that made it work.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
also approve
I agree with everything you just said…
Very fair question
Maybe MR can start, as I think he’s usually at least trying. He just doesn’t have the skills. The others ought to be filling water bottles, although one of them would likely miss and just pour the Gatorade on the floor.
I don’t agree with everything CBH is doing this year. I just have more faith in him than in anything else.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
MR deserves to start
At least most of the times he makes an earnest effort to play a complete game. Can’t say that about our other senior.
Can you save your job once you are on the hot seat?
Differentiating between hot seat and at risk of firing is semantics. Once the heat really starts on CBH it could impact his recruiting. And recruiting is the only way out of this.
I said it earlier in the year….no one knows is CBH can sustain a program or just turn it around. He has absolutely earned the right to find out at UCLA.
This season is ugly. I mind the losing less than the lack of effort and the lack of intelligence. Will these guys ever to learn to pass the ball crisply? I am sure CBH and staff tell the team to pass precisely…but…..
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 17, 2010 9:54 AM PST reply actions
slant
“At the midpoint of 09-10 hoops season, what is your assessment of Ben Howland’s job performance in his 7th year as the head coach of UCLA basketball (7-10), heading towards its only 3rd losing season since 1948 (Lavin is responsible for the previous 2)?”
first of all:
‘what is your assessment of Ben Howland’s job performance in his 7th year as…’ clearly indicates it is an assessment for JUST this season. You cannot say it counts for both after you’ve already singled out just this season.
secondly:
wow, what an amazingly biased question. “how is he doing? don’t forget this might be only the third losing season since pre-wooden days! oh, and just to make sure you know that’s a bad thing, Lavin (a guy we all hate) had the other two!”
amazing.
by balancedbruin on Jan 17, 2010 9:57 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
you are more than welcome to write a fanpost
with a poll you think will offer up the right balance (you can do that without attacking the moderators or anyone else on BN).
buuut...
I, like many people that read this site I’m sure, don’t have the time to do the great deal of work involved in moderating and maintaining such a site. That’s why I am a frequent reader and greatful for the, literally, up-to-the-minute updates and coverage of UCLA athletics. What you and the others do is extremely appreciated and, especially for bruins abroad like me, vital to maintain an appreciation of the current activity in the program.
That being said, moderators are people too, and in the spirit of free speech, active fan discussion and BN being a “home for discussion about bruin athletics” should be able to be critisized. If that is not an option, this becomes a site for propoganda rather than an open discussion.
The post was less an attack on the moderators (the work of whom is appreciated) but an inication that the poll question is counter-productive if the goal is to determine the overall satisfaction with BH’s coaching.
by balancedbruin on Jan 17, 2010 11:23 AM PST up reply actions
I didn't take your post above as an attack on moderators
All I was saying is you have the option to write up a fanpost and put in a poll in it which you think will be more fair. However, I added that if you do it make you sure you do it without attacking the moderators.
My problem is with his staff
I remember Pat Forde making fun of the fact that CBH has something like 18 people on his staff. My question is this: what do they contribute to this program?
One area where CBH’s teams have fallen short during all seven years is advanced scouting. His teams do the exact same thing no matter who they are planning. I know part of this is due to CBH’s stubborness that his way is the right way and thats the end of the story. But if that is the case, why pay for all of these worthless assistants?
I would fire the whole staff but keep CBH for next year if I was Dan Guerrero. Most staff are on one year deals, so there is no concern about paying out contracts. In fact, slimming down the staff would save the university money. I would force CBH to hire an “offensive coordinator” to bring an actual offense to Westwood. Normally teams bring in a “defensive coordinator”, but CBH can handle that end of the floor. Offense, not so much.
by bruinponcho on Jan 17, 2010 10:11 AM PST reply actions 1 recs
+1
Great line about bringing in an Offensive Coordinator
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
I am unsure
CBH proved to me during the final four runs that his system works IF he has the players to make it work. But, it is also painfully clear that this system does not work regardless of who the players are. CBH, like most coaches, are truly only as good as the players they recruit.
And, not only have we recruited players with less talent and less heart than in the past, we have recruited guys who did not fit or buy into this system (Stanback, Holiday, Gordon). What coach/program can withstand losing as many players to the NBA as we have PLUS the transfers? As was previously noted, we are left with a team of sixth men, of role players.
It will help us next year to lose Drago and Keefe. And, although MRoll had a horrible game last night, he will me sorely missed next year because at this point, we have no one capable of replacing his offense. To expect either of the two incoming freshman to be any better than our current freshman is a stretch. And, I haven’t seen the JC point guard play but again, to expect a JC player to come in and make an immediate impact at the D1 level is asking a lot, even though he almost has to be an improvement over JA.
So, I am unsure because I do not see any way we can improve significantly enough in one year. And, if we have two terrible years in a row, can we expect to recruit the type of talent it takes to win the Pac 10 and make future runs at final fours?
Just throwing this out there.
I was sitting here reading all the posts and had something come to mind. I am not saying I believe this to be the problem, but just something for discussion.
My thought was, that the team started off this season with an attitude problem. There was dissension on the team, they didn’t like the way things were being run and wanted coach to change. Obviously that didn’t happen, but I am wondering if the effects are lingering. If you get one or two people that are regular players that aren’t giving it there all, then the tendency is for others to say “well if he isn’t going to put forth the effort, why should I?” Just a passing thought.
It may be that we just don’t have someone on the team that is a go to leader type that the team can lean on and get motivation from(e.g. Kobe). So when things go bad the team is in disarray and when someone like Drago or Roll start hitting threes back to back, they pull together and start to feel confident.
Howland: For his time at UCLA, I approve. This year I somewhat disapprove, mainly because of the times when Drago is clearly hurting the team and he isn’t sitting on the bench. I would much rather see one of the kids in their getting some game experience than sitting on the bench watching how it should not be done.
All my problems with him are simply being magnified this season.
So a solid dissatisfaction vote.
Speed, Speed, Speed!!!!
Sustained success on the college bball stage requires speed. CBH’s fatal flaw this year was not recruiting good speed the last two years, especially last year. IMO, not recruiting a PG in the last class is inexcusable. You must build teams with your recruiting. Who the hell did he expect to carry the load in the backcourt? We simply have not built enough depth in the backcourt. Simply stated, his flaw is recruiting, which is a critical element of coaching this program. Other coaches are well known for their recruiting, but sometimes lose early the the tourney. He needs to balance his teams better.
Louisville, KY for UCLA class of '87
Howland thought he had a up and coming pg in JA.
I knew of JA from his press clippings out of HS, but my question for all you bb junkies, is: was JA’s performance as a high school point guard so extraordinary that Howland would not only place such confidence in him but secondly, not even recruit another last year? I don’t know if high school proves anything (well maybe in the case of John Wall there was pretty good certainty as to talent), but I don’t even recall JA’s performance being that spectacular anyway. What was his competition? Did he “make others around him better” — as a great point guard should? Or was he just hyped beyond his skill and athletic level and CBH bought into that.
difficult to get a good PG recruit to commit
when you have at least one (JA) and possibly two (JH, while recruiting season was on) point guards just one class ahead, with ML also a supposed combo guard. We were lucky to get RW as a guard commit because he held out for us until JF decided he was turning pro.
by britishbruin on Jan 17, 2010 11:40 AM PST up reply actions
True
Many have blamed CBH for leaving the cupboard bare of PG’s after Holiday’s extended “decision making process” to go pro…but it could very well be that he just couldn’t get anyone worth having, considering the uncertainty around Holiday and everyone still expecting JA to be a good, serviceable PG. IIRC he was a 4-star recruit. I certainly did not expect such a lack of basic skills from him going into this season.
by gradstudentbruin on Jan 18, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions
The other humorous thing
is somehow thinking a man to man defense is the best way for a slow team to play defense….
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 17, 2010 10:31 PM PST up reply actions
Frustration
I’m still a supporter of Ben. However rebuilding a program in the 7 th year is not acceptable. I think it all boils down to recruting. I can understand the srategy here. He does not seem to be going the pure athletic route. The last 2 classes have not been full of great athletes. JM BL RN JA MM these guys all struglled against mediocre PAC 10 athletsism. Skill forget about who on this team can dribble penetrate make a shot hang on to the damn ball. I went with a friend to a d3 cal poly pomona game a few weeks ago and honest to god these kids had better skills than guys like JA JM. I have never seen a ucla team with so little talent. Logic and just probability tell me that Smith Lamb and Jones can’t be busts if they are then well what’s the common thread here coach Howland.
by uclamike on Jan 17, 2010 10:57 AM PST via mobile reply actions
I vote "disapprove"
And I am talking about overall performance, not just this season. Part of the problem for me is that I am a self-described “typically spoiled UCLA basketball fan” in that I grew up watching Coach Wooden’s teams. That being said, I don’t expect a championship or final four appearance every year. What I do expect is for UCLA to be a serious contender for national honors more often than not. An “off” year should be what we experienced last year or in Coach Howland’s second year. Years like this year should be unheard of. Remember that we never saw anything like this before the last year of Lavin.
Coach Howland did a great job in rebuilding the program after the disaster that was Lavin. Three straight Final Fours was a great accomplishment. But it seems that he is unable to attract sufficiently athletic players to the program to keep it at a high level. Either he chooses not to recruit those players for various reasons or they don’t want to play in his system, it is hard for me to know. In looking at the team that took the floor yesterday, it is hard to see anyone who looks like a first line player. I think UCLA may have the lowest talent level of any team in the Pac 10.
I don’t buy the excuse that the current level of talent is because Coach Howland has lost players to the NBA. That could explain a year like last year, but not something as bad as this. Look at SC’s situation: they have lost a lot of players before their eligibility expired over the last few years, lost their coach, lost their recruiting class and still fielded a much more athletic and talented team than UCLA. The current low level of talent simply can’t be excused.
What are UCLA’s prospects for the future? There are no juniors on the current team and only one of the sophomores seems any good, Malcolm Lee. It sounds like he may go to the NBA next year and from his comments to the media does not seem to be on the same page as the coach. While Reeves Nelson tries hard and Honeycutt looks to have some talent, I really haven’t seen signs that they or the others on the team will be marquis players like Farmar, Afflalo, Westbrook or Love. Will Smith or Lamb be such a player when they come in next year? We have to hope so and also have to hope that the current freshmen will develop. Recruiting is going to have to pick up big time over the next couple of years for things to get better. Based on the last few years of recruiting, I don’t have confidence that Howland can do the job but we’ll see.
Voted Unsure
Like N, I am of the firm belief that at UCLA, certain things are simply unacceptable, no matter the circumstances. That’s a losing season. That’s a performance like last night. That’s getting blown out by 30 against Portland. That’s losing on your home floor to Cal St. Fullerton.
All of the talk about “perfect storms” and “youth” and “inexperience” and “bad recruiting luck” and “students not listening to their teacher” is just speculation and conjecture, trying to make sense of something that just doesn’t make sense: the plain, simple truth that UCLA basketball sucks right now.
Look, I think Howland is a good coach. I think he is an even better person. I have met Howland more than once, and he is a magnetic, likeable guy who loves UCLA. I know for certain this is eating him up 10 times more than what it is doing to any of us right now. He has proven that he can rebuild programs and bring them up to an elite level.
Unfortunately, he has now proven to me that a program can deteriorate under his watch. He has proven to be that the unacceptable can become a harsh, painful reality
Now the questions I have are these: Can Howland get this program back to an elite level? Can Howland keep us there? What is the ceiling for a Howland-coached team? Can Howland bring in 5 star talent and develop them and get them to play to their potential? Is 3 star “diamond in the rough” talent the only type of player that will generally flourish under Howland? Is 3 star “diamond in the rough” talent that flourishes under Howland good enough to win us a title? Will we see more seasons like the one we are having now in the future? Which is the anomaly: the Final Four runs propelled by favorable regional locations, or the disasterous 09/10 season ruined by the “perfect storms”?
I have all those questions, that is why I am unsure.
My stance though is this: next season, like Dorrell’s last at UCLA, will be Howland’s “show me season”. He is got to answer some of those questions that I have.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
I'm ready for Ben to be shown the door
I think his best days are behind him. He will have difficulty recruiting elite talent after this year, and his stubbornness will be his undoing as every coach in the conference has a book a mile long on what he does, and it never changes. He is joyless and unhappy, and I can’t imagine anyone saying they would want to play for him after his second disappointing season in a row (this one as a disaster).
Further, he has poisoned the team with his playing of favorites and different standards of accountability for different players. Of particular concern is his holding freshman to higher standards than seniors… Freshman who make mistakes get pulled. Seniors who make mistakes get unlimited playing time. I am surprised people can’t see this team has tuned him out completely. That’s why there has been zero improvement.
Ben’s a good enough coach to get us back to some Steve 16s, but the days of final 4s are over unless CBH does something he has not shown a willingness to do: Change, Adapt, and Grow.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 17, 2010 10:35 PM PST reply actions
A Losing Season: why?
Watching the Trojan win on Saturday was painful in the extreme, considering that USC lost its best recruits after Floyd resign. BH has shown he can coach and win and this year’s team is one that simply cannot play the BH way. The problem, it seems clear, is the level of talent on this year’s squad. Not recruiting a point guard this past season was a major mistake, given the level of incompetence JA has shown on the point,
It seems to me you have to bring in a point guard every year, just like a football coach needs to bring in at least one QB every year, It seems that bringin g in a bunch of frontliners one year and a bunch of guards another is not the road to success. BH’s early years here showed he could identify and bring in top talent. His signing of RW was a great move, so good that RW ended up being a two years and out player, drafted in the first round one spot above above KL. One does have to wonder whether you can work in the long-run interest of the team bringing in players like KL and JH. I hope BH can turn this around, because of his accomplishments with the program, although I’m not overly pleased with the offense we are running. At this point he needs to consider playing the freshmen and Bobo more.
uclatl

by 



















