Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Ben Ball Whiners Continue To Deflect Blame

Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N

In the latest round of disgrace from this current group of players attending UCLA on scholarship to play basketball, RN let loose this dandy:

"People who don't play with heart and don't play with balls don't register with me," Nelson said. "I'm not going to bad-mouth my teammates, obviously, but today was a gut-check and we got checked pretty hard, and that showed."

Thankfully, RN didn't publicly name teammates (I'm sure Nestor has an inkling on who RN was referring to). But wow. To be fair, RN has played with the most energy all season, but his 9 points, 5 of 9 free throws, 2 rebounds, 0 blocks, 2 turnovers, and 4 fouls isn't exactly bringing it either.

And it looks like ML wasn't the only one thinking that his coach got outcoached. RN took some blame for the players saying that the blame should go

"Maybe 60-40."

Unreal. Not only is this team not fun to watch or cheer for on the court, they are becoming increasingly dislikeable off the court as well.

Star-divide

It seems that CBH is the only one willing to take any responsibility for this team's struggles.

"I'm in charge of the program," Howland said. "The buck stops here. It starts here. We were not well-enough prepared for this game. Nor did we understand how they were going to come out and jump us with defense."

I'm glad that CBH is taking responsibility, but really coach, you didn't think SC would play tough defense?!?! Did no one on your 18 person staff notice the fact that SC leads the conference in almost every defensive category? Have you not seen them play for two minutes this whole season? Unbelievable.

The worst thing about CBH taking responsibility is that his immature players see that as an excuse for why they aren't playing well. "Coach said its his fault, so I'm clear for playing terrible." Some of this may just be the result of young players not understanding how the media works (MR is really the only media savvy player on this roster), but if they are willing to say these things publicly, one wonders what is going on in their heads and private conversations.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Reeves

Not sure why he is calling other people out. He quit in this game along with the rest of the team

by lil eg not cs on Jan 18, 2010 1:54 PM PST reply actions  

interesting post

Glad to see the rest of the Howland quotation, after he was taken to task on this board for placing ‘embarrassment’ on other people but not on himself.

One question of interpretation

Nor did we understand how they were going to come out and jump us with defense

I read that as him saying that some of their defensive tactics were unexpected – ML said something about them jumping out in front of our set plays and cutting them off – not that tough defense, per se, was unexpected.

RN seems like an interesting case. There is a perception here that he takes too much responsibility for mistakes – getting down on himself while other players don’t (ND is noted for his cold-bloodedness in this regard, never allowing a previous poor shot to dissuade him from taking another difficult shot) – but he didn’t seem to be taking much responsibility on himself in those quotes. I guess the right thing to do is to say “we as players have got to do a better job”, but it’s tough to know what to say if being asked whether it is the coach’s fault whent he coach has already taken responsibility… also unclear which way he meant 60-40, from the article context.

Again, as with the ML quote previously, he definitely has a point in what he is saying. As RN says, they looked gutless in that game (and unprepared for $Cs play, per ML). But saying that to the media seems to indicate either some major discontent, or alternatively some majorly naive misunderstanding of how to give an interview.

But hey, at least we are giving Reeves Nelson the media-playing time so that he is ready to take on that leadership role next year. I don’t want to hear the excuse next year that our poor media relations is because we didn’t give our frosh enough media time this year…

by britishbruin on Jan 18, 2010 1:56 PM PST reply actions  

where to start....where to go?

I am getting a sense that not only are some of us here at BN continuing to put the blame on CBH…looks like some players have been reading and beginning to deflect the blame as well. If that’s the case, we are looking at an even worse season yet. The problem is not where the blame goes, the problem is that our players continue to see that it is their very own lack of effort that is bringing the whole team down.

Are you telling me that with this group of supposedly 4 star players, were they to put in 110% (pardon the cliche), we wouldn’t win a few more extra games? Forget the coaching, we are talking about teams we shouldn’t even have close games with just on the fact that we supposedly have better talent.

As a teacher, and other teachers and coaches can jump in, the heart lies in the kids. We could be the best teachers or coaches, but without the players buying in and believing, we can only take them so far…usually mediocrity. Look at SUC, on every chance that I get to watch them, they dive for the ball, they get low to pick up loose balls, they jump up and down like pogo sticks…constantly. You don’t think CBH is asking our kids to do that? You think our kids are just told to stand around, just flap your hands down if there is a loose ball and if we’re lucky the ball will fall in y our hands? The kids are not putting in their effort. You can see it in their eyes. Some games, they want it. Some games, they can’t wait to get out of the game and go somewhere better in Westwood!

The only one I see jumping up and down, showing emotions, flapping hands up and down, trying to direct traffic, shouting from the top of this lungs in every single game is…Coach Ben Howland!

CBH is stubborn and I do fault him for that. I would have changed the line up and rotation a long time ago. However, in other aspects…I can’t see what else we can ask him to do. This is a group of kids that have poor fundamentals, footwork, ball handling ability, makes poor decisions, can’t shoot free throws, can’t understand the Ben Ball system, etc…

The list can go on and on. In how much time can you correct all these problems and still watch film to get ready for opponents. 24 hours in a day. They go to class. They don’t seem to pay attention. How much more can one do with this group of lazy and even more stubborn than our coach players.

My fear is that players are not thinking they need to do better. Now, the players believe it is the coach that needs to do better.

by bruin98 on Jan 18, 2010 2:05 PM PST reply actions  

I taught for many years.

The difference in my life as a public school teacher and CBH’s job is that I had no control over what students were placed in my class. Some cared, some didn’t, and it was my job to motivate all of them regardless. CBH wasn’t randomly assigned players by the NCAA. He had full control over the recruiting choices he made. I fully realize there are players who surprise you one way or the other (as incoming freshmen JK seemed promising; LMR appeared, to me at least, to be a waste of a scholarship yet developed into a textbook Warrior), but CBH chose every one of these players. To not be able to get them to buy in, to not have a single leader on the team, is a reflection on him.

by KSBruin on Jan 18, 2010 9:15 PM PST up reply actions  

believe me, i know this all too well

for the past 11 years, I’ve been dealt year after year with the toughest kids with no records or files about their previous history (it’s kindergarten!). Some are great, some are terrible, some are thieves, some are graffiti artists, some are homeless…so it’s true, we don’t get to pick and he did.

I agree with you KS that I really think Howland got lazy, fell asleep, mistrusted his assistants, however you want to put it, and got himself into all this mess.

My hope is that he can fix the mess, just as Nestor hopes. I also agree that he has done a lot for this program to deserve a second chance before we fire away with firecoachhowland.com.

I would like to see a poll here on how many feel we should keep him and trust him, wait another 2 years or fire him now…or a poll on how many years/seasons do we expect Howland to fix this mess? That would be interesting to see…

by bruin98 on Jan 19, 2010 5:23 PM PST up reply actions  

It's only going to get worse, this is a team ...

… that has devolved “out of control.”

Howland has no one but himself to blame. And as I have said taking responsibility doesn’t mean much to me at this point. I will wait to see if there are real changes on the court.

by Nestor on Jan 18, 2010 2:08 PM PST reply actions  

+1000

I knew this season would be a punt and wait until next year type of thing, but the regression on the court is heartbreaking.

by Bruin'96 on Jan 19, 2010 12:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I hear you...but...

and I know taking responsibility doesn’t mean much anymore. But Howland has already taken responsibility, not just saying it, but he’s tried zone, he’s given the kids more free throw practice, he’s worked with JA on fundamentals, I think he’s trying…by the way, where are all the assistant coaches?

Now, have any players take the blame and done something about it? Have any players taken extra time on their own to improve themselves. Blake Griffin took time to work out on his own, get stronger, get better.

If Howland isn’t our coach, and we have…Bill Self? Coach K? Kevin O’Neill? Would these kids be better? Would we be top 25 by now?

by bruin98 on Jan 18, 2010 2:17 PM PST reply actions  

He tried zone?

Not with a sincere effort to say the least. It was pretty obvious we should have zoned the Trojans. Yet we didn’t go to it until we got blitzed out of the tip off and fell behind 4-15.

After being successful against ASU, he hardly bothered with it against Arizona and then offered up weak explanations.

He has no excuse for not developing players like Lane, Moser early in the OOC season while wasting minutes with scrubs like Dragovic.

We can look up many Howland’s comments after embarrassing losses started from last season. He never really made meaningful changes. It looks like now his players have tuned him out and his program is starting to look like a Dorrellian joke.

He broke it, he needs to fix it. Until I see him making earnest adjustments with his team on the court, and getting control of his team, his words are not going to mean much.

by Nestor on Jan 18, 2010 2:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Nestor, list 10 things you would do beginning tomorrow

I would like to know what you would do if you were in Coach Howland’s shoes. I suspect the Belgrade Bricklayer may be at the top but I would like to see 10 things you would do. But if you list 10 concrete changes it will foster intelligent thought and real debate.

That’s different from answering the question of what has gone wrong. Coach has made adjustments, changed the starting 5 and shifted to a part-time albeit porous zone.

Finally, I think words matter. For example, the first step for an addict is to admit they are one. When I have fallen flat on my face, I never really got any better until I acknowledged that my mug was planted squarely in the floor. Coach’s words have impact with me. And I understand you have real respect for him—you just want Coach to start delivering on his words.

by peggysue69 on Jan 18, 2010 5:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I have made my recommendations clear

For the short term:

1) Change in starting lineup that is built around players who have a defensive mindset (relatively speaking to the current core)
2) Refrain from using a quick hook with younger players, especially freshmen (in relation to giving preferential treatment to players such as Dragovic)
3) A genuine commitment to using zone defense (not using it hap hazardly)
4) Grab total control of the team so that there is no finger pointing or second guessing going in public

In terms of the long term we will have extensive discussions on the makeup of current assistant coaching staff as the season goes along. Given what we have seen this year, we will need to see changes. It hasn’t worked for Howland since the departures of Keating and Ziegler. This program during last two years have drifted away from the tenets of classic Ben Ball.

by Nestor on Jan 18, 2010 5:17 PM PST up reply actions  

Thanks

I can’t come up with 10 (and incidentally there may not be 10 concrete things that are immediately worth changing.)

by peggysue69 on Jan 18, 2010 6:34 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I was giving Dragovic the Pat Burrell treatment, but no more

The Rays fans waited and waited for “Pat the Bat” to produce, but that didn’t happen all year. Pat’s a nice guy, but there’s no room for any non-producers in the Rays’ lineup in a tough division. I had been taking the same approach with Dragovic, as Coach Howland apparently has been. Alas, Drago is having the same sort of year Pat the Bat had. Here’s his line against just$c*:
Minutes 31
Field Goals 0-6
3 pt FG’s 0-3
FT’s 2-2
Off Rebs 0
Rebounds 2
Assists 2
Turnovers 2
Steals 0
Blocks 1
Fouls 0
Points 2

Two things in that stellar line stand out to me besides the obvious lack of scoring. First, he still was in for 31 minutes. Three fourths of the game. Unless he was contributing in ways that don’t show in the box score, I think that is just wrong. Second, in 31 minutes, he managed to get zero fouls. How can you play aggressive Ben-ball defense and have no fouls? From what I’ve read here (and I have only seen one game), it could be that Dragovic can’t manage to get close enough to the guy he’s guarding to commit a foul.

The Rays continued to play Pat the Bat even when it was clear that whatever he had last year in Philly got left behind when he came over here. Whatever it was that Dragovic had last year apparently got left in his locker. I think it’s time to let Nicola contemplate how he can improve his game from the bench.

This is my first concrete actual criticism of Coach Howland. I’m wondering if I’ll be struck by lightning when I hit the post button. If you don’t hear from me any more, it’s been fun.

by Fox 71 on Jan 18, 2010 9:54 PM PST up reply actions  

as a baseball fan...

in a tough division

Tough is an understatement… and it’s only getting tougher

by nickramz on Jan 19, 2010 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

Fox...?

You okay out there…?

greg in denver - UCLA guy for life

by gbruin on Jan 19, 2010 11:46 AM PST up reply actions  

I've been carrying a 2-iron over my head all day

… because as you know, not even God can hit a 2-iron.

by Fox 71 on Jan 19, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Four more for the short term

5. Give ND the quick hook. If he is hitting the bombs as in ASU, he plays. If\when he bricks, sit him, quickly!

6. Give up on JA. He does not play anymore at all, at least until he is healthy. He is just not good enough. Play MAH 4 minutes a game as backup point. He can at least shoot.

7. In man play MR on the weakest player 1-4. He is too slow in man. Jason Kapano was similarly slow years ago and sometimes even played four on defense. (Just an example, don’t shoot me.) It is not a great solution but MR is a liability on that end but on this team needs to play.

8. When Bobo comes back, give him 15 minutes plus a game off the bench. He has height and weight and has shown flashes of ability. Unlike say JA, Bobo could be a partial answer and moreover could really play in the future. (Not saying it will happen but I could see Bobo as a substantive player. A point guard who has trouble catching the ball, well that seems to be a bit hopeless.)

by DCBruins on Jan 19, 2010 4:32 PM PST up reply actions  

And your last paragraph is ridiculous

We are not looking for other options besides Howland. We want Howland to fix the mess he is responsible for. If he doesn’t then we might look other way. But this is way too early and we recognize that. Howland has done enough that he deserves to time to fix the mess. However, the time is not unlimited and we do need to see some sincere and genuine commitment from his part to start making some changes.

by Nestor on Jan 18, 2010 2:24 PM PST up reply actions  

"[CBH has] given them more free throw practice?"

I know what you mean, and I don’t mean to attack you. I just want to jump off of this.

These are kids on scholarship to UCLA. If they’re clanking FTs and it’s losing us games, they need to be in Pauley on their own time fixing it. We have absolutely no excuse to shoot so poorly from the charity stripe. FT shooting is one of the few things in basketball you can practice all by yourself. There’s no reason these guys can’t practice that anywhere there’s a hoop, anytime. There is no need to waste CBH’s time practicing free throws when this team has so many other issues to fix, and the fact that he would even consider wasting practice time on this shows how little personal accountability there is on this team.

by b d on Jan 18, 2010 7:29 PM PST up reply actions  

I hope you're right then...

I just think there is more than Howland needing to change in order for us to improve.

by bruin98 on Jan 18, 2010 2:26 PM PST reply actions  

how has howland taken responsibility exactly?

other than via redundant platitiude?

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Jan 18, 2010 3:30 PM PST reply actions  

I think BB has it right

re the meaning of “jumped.” What CBH is saying is that he didn’t prepare his players with the correct counters. Of course, being basketball players, they might have just reacted to what $C was doing, a species of overplaying, but their offense is so patterned, they probably couldn’t. As for whose fault this all is, Nestor is right in downplaying all confessions of guilt. It just has to be fixed, and both CBH and the players have to do their jobs. I have seen a lot of performances by Bruin teams through the years, but I never saw anything as disheartening as that first half against the tOJams.
The Bruins did show energy, but little else, at the beginning of the second half. I do think the $C shooting performance was better than they should usually expect, but you can’t hang your heads, ever. You can’t give up on yourself or your team. You have to battle back, even if only by taking some hard fouls, by putting your body on guys, by tying up the ball even if you can’t secure the rebound, anything that shows fight and pride. Maybe you can turn it around, maybe you can’t, but don’t just stand there. And if we’re going to play zone, play it in a troublesome, attacking, trapping manner. And learn how to handle the short corner attack! And give a damn! As for ultimate responsibility, this ugly baby is CBH’s, of course. Nevertheless, I absolutely believe he is a good man and a good coach. I see from the recruiting news that help is on the way, but it is this season we have to deal with, and, idiot that I am, I don’t think it is too late.

by ReineSeite on Jan 18, 2010 7:23 PM PST reply actions  

I see this a bit differently

First, let’s talk about RN’s chat with the press. He shouldn’t have said anything. That’s a lesson he’ll have to learn. It comes with age. When someone shoves a microphone in your face, you don’t have to talk. You can control the flow. You don’t have to play into a reporter’s sense of a story. Best example: Norm Chow last week. He played the press like a violin — a virtuoso performance all to the benefit of UCLA. How did he play it? By not playing at all.

Second, CBH’s quote. What I see is CBH trying to take the blame and focus off of a fragile and probably shell shocked team. There are no words he can say that will satisfy those of you who are so upset with him. Words to the press are not important. What’s important is what he does. We need a sense that he is trying to coach and lead us out of this mess. I have that sense. Many of you don’t.

Press stories are just that, stories. Over the past couple of years, BN has developed a very healthy skepticism about MSM media stories. We’ve seen lines taken out of context which, when put in context, don’t support the headlines of stories.

And, we should never presume to know the motivation of people like CBH when he speaks. We are not his audience. To a great extent, his team is. My read: he knows best what they need to hear to stir up the courage to try and get past these disappointments.

Where I do agree with many of you, and I was with you a couple of weeks ago — I think we should play young for the rest of the season. The only senior players I’d play are MR as a starter, and AH of the bench, minimize ND and JK and hope Bobo gets back soon. Yes, we might lose some games we could have won — but I’m not sure we will be all that much worse. And, we will get a good read on our talent so as to guide us for recruiting in the next two years.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jan 18, 2010 8:21 PM PST reply actions  

Nestor, I don't get your passion for the zone

Simply because it doesn’t correlate with preparation for the future. We’re never going to a final four under Howland by playing a sometime 2/3 zone. The only great zone defenses are full-time matchup zones that their coaches specialize in teaching. Other teams that employ a sometime-zone are usually offense-first teams that don’t play great defense. For Howland, who specializes in man-to-man, success will only come when his team can play great man-to-man. So he might as well do all he can to make that possible.

The need for a zone this year is to pull out some games by hoping the opposing team misses all its outside shots. (Like Cal.) That’s not an unworthy goal. But it’s the equivalent of playing Dragovic big minutes, hoping that a shooting hot streak will win us a few games. Neither one is preparing us for the future, which will only be bright if the young guys learn how to play solid man defense.

by bluebland on Jan 18, 2010 11:23 PM PST reply actions  

For me it's a mesaure

to suit the available talent/athleticism on our roster this year. I haven’t advocated to go to zone exclusively. I want us to go to it as needed against teams like Arizona and Southern Cal. I still think the team should be built around the concept of man-to-man. However, given our issues we need the coaches to be adapt and adjust accordingly.

by Nestor on Jan 19, 2010 4:06 AM PST up reply actions  

+1

I made a similar comment a few days ago. I agree with what you say, and think that the ‘win as many games now’ strategy involves playing streaky seniors and hoping for the best with the zone; while the ‘build-for-the-future’ strategy involves playing young players more time and keeping them in the style they will be playing next year. (It might also mean playing players in the position they project to next year – e.g. you might move RN to the 4)

At the same time, the more I think about it the more I think it would be good to be able to mix in a serviceable zone defense every now and again to throw an opponent for a loop for a couple of possessions, which might argue for using it some of the time this year for learning purposes – unless we are sure we won’t play it at all next year.

by britishbruin on Jan 19, 2010 6:38 AM PST up reply actions  

Both are right.

A great matchup zone like Chaney used to run, (goons included) made for some good tournament runs with not the greatest players. It is a better fit for the current to hide some of the weaknesses. Not great for us, but probably better than avgerage if we actually practiced it.

Now, next year and beyond, of course we need some real players with heart than can actually man up liek we used to.

by Bruin'96 on Jan 19, 2010 12:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Its playing the defense that is best suited for your players

If you are going to recruit a roster full of tall long players with marginal quickness, then you should be playing a zone.

If he wants to play man to man solely, he needs to do a much better job of talent evaluation and/or recruiting. This roster is SLOW.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Jan 19, 2010 7:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Adapt and adjust

Nestor spelled it out with that phrase. The staff and the team seem unable or unwilling to adjust. While as a coach, I have used both zone and man defense plus combinations of both with good results. I prefer trapping man to man but realize sometime I do not have the personnel or the opponent to do that so a tough zone with defensive board crashing where able. I also think the lack of quickness is hurting usin man but would still show-up in man but maybe not as tellingly.

by john4justice on Jan 19, 2010 1:24 PM PST reply actions  

our lack of speed

is definitely still noticeable in the zone, as our close out speed on shooters is poor.

As well as speed, we lack size/strength/athleticism necessary for good defensive rebounding, which gets more exposed in zone than in man as we appear to have more difficulty boxing out in the zone. Check out, for a tongue-in-cheek example, how much ND’s rebounding stats have fallen off since we’ve started mixing in zone – no more waiting for the ball to fall into his hands uncontested while his teammates box out….

by britishbruin on Jan 19, 2010 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm going to defend Reeves Nelson...

Frankly, this is about the only kid I like on our team (other than Michael Roll who is a limited player), but makes the most of his skills). He is a freshman who is being asked to play out of position. He has been a warrior in terms of playing with injuries. I think he has pride in what he does, and is doing the best he can. I think he simply said what many of us feel. He did not name names. I think he was trying to show some leadership. Take some responsibility. I think he is a warrior. I hope he stays. The rest of them — they haven’t shown me much.

by waters96 on Jan 19, 2010 2:00 PM PST reply actions  

+1

He is a kid who plays with passion and to the best of his ability. He’s not one of the 5 star disappointments. He’s in the LMR school of player and is playing as well, if not better, than LMR played in his first year — particularly on O.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jan 19, 2010 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

LMR school of play--you are right!

RN is an animal just like LMR. And a better free throw shooter to boot.

by peggysue69 on Jan 19, 2010 9:52 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

He said it was 40% coaching 60% players

that doesn’t sound like avoiding blame, it sounds to me like he is saying it is everyone’s fault, which it is.

"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"

by silverlakebruin on Jan 19, 2010 7:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB