Some Cold Perspective On A Fun/Emotional Night (For UCLA) In (A Half Empty) Pauley
I will keep hammering home the point about not losing perspective following the euphoria after last night's game. Let's reset the big picture again. With last night's win Bruins now have a record of 8-10 (3-3 in the Pac-10) with 3 games remaining in the first half of the Pac-10 conference. They will be a slight underdog in our next game against Washington State (at home). Right now no one has any clue how we are going to finish the first half of the conference season based on what we have seen in recent games because we still haven't seen a shred of consistency from this basketball team. So while I am feeling good over the short term exuberance from an emotional win, I can't really get excited for rest of the season based on what we have seen in previous 18 games.
Last night's win provided another feel good moment just like Michael Roll's buzzer beater did about two weeks ago. However, last night's shot was not result of a lucky bounce. Mustafa was all clutch (thanks to a smart pass from Roll) and precise in the way he executed the shot (after faking out the Husky defender). He sounded like a coach (someone who studies the game) talking about his shot after the game:
"You know, and don't take this the wrong way, but I saw an interview a long time ago where Kobe Bryant was talking about the game-winners that he made," Abdul-Hamid said. "And he said that as an offensive player you know the clock. The defense doesn't because their back is to the goal. So I knew I had a little bit of time.
As mentioned last night he connected on another game winning buzzer beater earlier this season (even though it didn't count in the record books because it was in an exhibition game). I think KSBruin and others have a convincing case at this point that Hamid should be getting lot more minutes from here on out and be regular part of our rotation even when Anderson comes back.
Hamid's productivity is evident not because of his buzzer beaters but how he is playing the game. He doesn't have the natural talent as some of his uber recruited backcourt mates, but he plays the game the way Howland wants this game to be played. He plays with passion and intensity on defense (despite being limited athletically) and more importantly he is patient and precise on offense. Ramona Shellburne has a good piece on Hamid on tWWL which details how Hamid typifies the quintessential student athlete at UCLA. Howland was emotional about Hamid yesterday following the game:
"I've never been happier for a player since I've been in coaching than I am for Mustafa," Coach Ben Howland said. "He's spent countless hours by himself, working on his shot. It's so rewarding and gratifying to have a kid like him in our program. You ask any player on our team and they will say no one works harder."
Wonder if that will translate into more minutes for Hamid even after Anderson fully recovers from his nagging injuries. Guess we will have to find out.
Just like that buzzer beating shot was not luck, neither was the way the Bruins won yesterday. I think it was cool to see the Bruins not depend on once in a blue moon three point barrages from Ragovic and Roll's shooting to win the game. We won the game despite those guys collectively only attempting 4 shots from behind arc (not making any of them). Instead of depending on three point shots, we saw an offense that was being set up thanks to some great passing spear headed by Tyler Honeycutt's all around game.
While I came down hard on Nelson because of his post-game comment, he was once again instrumental in our win. His motor runs the entire game and he always comes at it. He does need to work on number of areas to improve his game and they are all obvious. He needs to work on his FT shooting, get stronger so that he can finish with easy dunks and layups down low, and also get better acclimated to playing defense because he does have lapses in our defensive scheme every now and then. Still he is only a freshman with lot of potential to improve in next couple of seasons.
It was also interesting to see Howland sticking with the 2-3 zone even though the Huskies were connecting in the first-half:
The Bruins opened the game in a 2-3 zone defense, forcing the Huskies to the perimeter, and Washington forced it right back at UCLA, hitting 14 of 24 first-half shots, including 6 of 12 3-pointers.
But Howland stuck with the zone and Washington went cold, scoring just eight points in the first 15 minutes of the second half and finishing the game in an 8-for-27 slump.
"We knew that it was a very difficult team for us to match up with man-to-man, so we were going to stay committed to the zone," said Howland, who admitted to praying about the game beforehand. "Even though they made the shots in the first half, I told the kids at halftime that they can't stay that hot - `Keep working hard, and it will get better.' "
Again, while I like hearing that from Coach Howland, it just makes me wonder what would have happened if we tried it out earnestly against Arizona at Pauley. Seems like a huge blown opportunity to me.
Speaking of opportunities Brendan Lane and Mike Moser combined for 2 minutes of playing time in yesterday's game. Just have to wonder why Howland was not intent on red-shirting them along with Anthony Stover, if they were never going to get meaningful minutes this season. Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
I just can't get all that hopefully about last night's win being some kind of "turning point" this season. As mentioned repeatedly, we beat a mediocre basketball team with serious athletic talent. I'd be surprised if they don't pummel us with a double digit win in Seattle (and I am sure SPTRs will make sure they get to the line 25 more times on their home court). Just like Cal, I think their guys came into this game extremely confident following our back to back disgraceful performances against Stanford and Southern Cal.
Do we have enough left in our tank to win against Washington State and then beat less athletically talented opponents up in Oregon? We don't really know.
It is nice to revel in the moment. However, at the same time I can't help thinking about the big picture. Despite another encouraging Thursday night thanks to a ultra mediocre Pac-10 conference, right now I am still not seeing any consistent signs of hope for rest of the season.
Thankfully we have football recruiting to follow for few weeks.
GO BRUINS.
38 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Mustafa
Hey, after all our collective criticism of CBH, let’s give him a little credit for having Mustafa in the game at the end.
by Arturo del Mundo on Jan 22, 2010 9:35 AM PST reply actions
Dude's my starting Point Guard the rest of this season.
Solely based on heart, determination, and a squad full of scrubs.
Time to pick who were gonna count on for NEXT season, and they get the bulk of the minutes now.
And the zone defense
His lack of speed is offset by the “new” defense we are running.
But early in the season he had trouble getting the ball up the court. We could insure he has some help.
He clearly deserves more playing time.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 22, 2010 5:51 PM PST up reply actions
I want to give Howland
credit for having a timeout available near the end of the game. IIRC, he has been maligned in the past for not having timeouts when they’ve been really needed. I think there was a timeout called with about 30 seconds left?
by inhowlandwetrust on Jan 22, 2010 9:41 AM PST reply actions
Agreed
I think there were multiple TOs. He also had TOs that drew up the play to Nelson (IIRC). And Arturo’s point above is spot on.
do you think the Nelson play was what CBH drew up?
Mike Roll came free on the backside for an open three, but RN ignored him and went to the basket himself, getting the hoop and the (spurned) chance at a 3-point play. Down 3 and with the clock getting under 35, I’m surprised he called for the (not very quick) 2…
If it was the play drawn up, kudos, as getting your 3 point specialist completely open is a great decoy for a tough move to the hoop.
by britishbruin on Jan 22, 2010 9:46 AM PST up reply actions
Aaaah
You are right. I thought at first it was drawn up because it seemed like similar play we were calling during the crunch time in the Cal game. But Marques IIRC made the exact point you just did (totally forgot about that … my bad).
Every play has options
The design was for Roll to get free, but by the time he did Nelson saw his opening for the layup. It was optional and he took the aggressive option.
taking the contested (double-teamed?) two and hoping to make it and get fouled and make the free throw
was definitely an ‘aggressive’ option… :-)
by britishbruin on Jan 22, 2010 2:20 PM PST up reply actions
Good summary
Last night is easier to get behind than the other conference wins because we played a consistently decent game and weren’t reliant on lucky shots falling to stay in it. But they need to back it up with a consistent performance against WSU if this isn’t to be just another false dawn.
Re: zone – it looked like we’d actually spent some time practicing it when we came out in the first half, but we also had spells later in the half (and throughout the game) where we didn’t look like we knew who was supposed to be where, which gave outside shooters a little more time to spot up. Good to see RN, TH, JK, ND et al fighting under the basket to hold our own in the rebounding department despite the zone.
Re: MM/BL – redshirting them both along with AS would have left us (potentially) very short-handed. I don’t know how many teams ever redshirt that many players (though perhaps someone else can put this into perspective). BL would get some significant minutes if JK or ND were to go down; he is just in an unfortunate situation of having two seniors who play his position; it may have made sense to redshirt him, or CBH may have expected him to improve more than he has. On the MM situation – it seems to me that there are minutes available for a backup guard, but that MA-H is earning them ahead of MM. CBH likes competitive practices with people competing for playing time; if you redshirt too many players (and have an open scholarship due to DG departing) it’s difficult to do that.
Yeah I think the redshirting argument makes more sense
in MM’s case. RSing Lane would probably create issues of us being short-handed. But then again if he just ends up averaging 5-6 mins season this season … we will see I guess.
the other person relevant to the BL question
is Bobo. If CBH had thought Bobo would give solid minutes, then redshirting BL would make more sense – we would have RN/JMM mostly playing the 5, ND/JK mostly playing the 4, and if one of them went down the others could compensate without feeling like we are stretched thin; but evidently Bobo isn’t there yet.
We seem relatively thin at guard/sf, with TH/MR/ML the starters and JA the first backup; I think it says something about MM than MA-H is apparently working hard and earning minutes ahead of him. MA-H looks notably undersized/unathletic compared with some of the matchups he is drawing, but seems to be making his minutes count with hard work smart decisions.
by britishbruin on Jan 22, 2010 10:03 AM PST up reply actions
re: redshirting
do we want a bunch of marginal 5th year players in a few years? i.e. say these guys turn out to be of keefe or dragovic level players, do we want them taking up scholies as 5th year players? i’m not saying that they will (in limited time I’ve seen good and bad flashes from each)
Perhaps too much redshirting might leave us less flexible in future recruiting efforts. Plus a couple more injuries (remember honeycutt was down so moser was playing) and moser gets 10+ minutes a game, if lane didn’t perform poorly in his 2 minutes he might have seen a few more.
by realfabfive on Jan 22, 2010 10:33 AM PST up reply actions 1 recs
Yep
If MM can’t crack this rotation, I am not sure he will be able to in a few years. This is not the Chance Stanbach situation. Chance didn’t play on a very good ,deep team (for example, that year Mata went from starting center on a final four team to bench that year.)
This team is short on talent. What I have seen of BL is not overly encouraging either. Maybe they can grow and learn (I hope) but personally the only I see with a chance, emphasis on the word chance, to be a good PAC-10 player is Bobo. He has size and could be decent center if he was not so soft. Not KL, or even Ryan Hollins but again maybe a contributor.
Re BL
I like BL and think he will be a good role player next year and possibly a go to player by his junior year, but he just isn’t ready right now. When he came in yesterday, we gave up the IIRC 7-0 lead in those two minutes. My buddy sitting next to me who is a bigger ND hater than even Nestor had this priceless comment after BL came in for ND who had just made a hustle play to get a loose ball. “So wait, when Drago plays well we take him out. When he plays bad we leave him in. I don’t get it.” At this point, BL is just too nice and weak to be effective in pac 10 play. He’ll get there, but he isn’t there yet. That said, if something were to happen to ND or JK, you have to have him ready to play.
I think ND was taken out after an early foul?
Don’t think he was being treated to the reverse quick hook for accidentally playing well for a few minutes …. ;-)
by britishbruin on Jan 22, 2010 9:53 AM PST up reply actions
I dont know
It was only NDs first foul and it was about 4 minutes in. CBH seemed really quick to pull ND. With CBH sticking with the zone and pulling ND early, I almost got the feeling he is following the advice of fans too much. :)
by bruinponcho on Jan 22, 2010 10:06 AM PST up reply actions
One question on RN
Does anyone know what he was being disciplined for last night? The announcers mentioned it at some point as the reason he was sitting the first five minutes with JK getting the start (who I thought actually looked decent in the center of the zone for that time).
Don't know but did notice
that CBH yelled at him at least twice to get back. on D and that was watching on TV. Both times RN was bitching about a non-foul call and he did get burned real bad one of the times this happen. (Had his back turned on D because he was late and then got a foul.) It is obvious there is some tension there between those two as well.
I think\hope RN is the hyper-competitive type. These types sometimes clash with coaches but leave it all on the floor. The good news is they are relatively coachable and often happy problems.
yeah
another time, UW scored on the 3rd or 4th tip-in attempt while RN failed to get back after a non-foul call.
by britishbruin on Jan 22, 2010 2:21 PM PST up reply actions
I noticed what DC noticed too
CBH yelled at him to double a guy in the corner once as well.
While JK was steady he also made some silly fouls and was an absolute zero on offense. RN is light years ahead of him in terms of scoring on the low block. I still think JK fancies himself a spot up shooter, which doesn’t help when your playing the 5. Unless we’re trying to draw out the opposing center to free up the key for other players on O.
Also, I thought I posted this earlier, but must have forgot to hit POST, but I prefer to characterize Pauley last night as “Half FULL” vs. “Half EMPTY”. Sorry, N, that’s just the kinda guy I am……
Love RN but
He does take plays off particularly on offense. Compare his movement without the ball or his screens to JK (OK he got a few fouls but he is hustling).
Somehting for him to learn. No big deal. And probably unrelated to the discipline.
I thought Marques said the plan was for him to sit so the asst coaches could give him some insight into the game.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Jan 22, 2010 5:55 PM PST up reply actions
my recollection
was that the first comment was that he was being sat for disciplinary reasons;
and that while he was sitting, he was being given instructions by our bigs’ coach.
by britishbruin on Jan 22, 2010 7:06 PM PST up reply actions
Redshirting BL and MM
Sure, BL and MM are not going to get a lot of minutes this year, but would either of them stay and play their fifth year if they sat out this one? OK, maybe BL might be around that long. But I suspect MM will improve dramatically and move on before he plays a fifth year at UCLA.
by Arturo del Mundo on Jan 22, 2010 9:55 AM PST reply actions
We r n rebuilding mode....
and I am enjoying the journey this year. It has been ugly at times but we have been gutted the last couple of years and there was no way for us to expect another Final 4??!! We have seen some progress even if it’s not as fast as we would like, maybe that’s a good thing considering players like Westbrook, Love, Holiday? blowing up and leaving after a great season (not in Love’s case but u get what I mean). Maybe we will still see these guys in Bruins jersey’s 2 years from now?? Howland is creating a nice nucleus for the future in Nelson, Honeycutt, Lee. Lane will b serviceable, while Moser, Morgan and Anderson remain to be seen. Anderson has been a big disappointment, we need to bring in some major competition for his job.
Overall, I like what we can become in a few years. But we need to stick with this team and watch it grow. I think we will be back in the Final 4 in the next few years.
That's a good question
about what play was drawn up by CBH. The announcers seemed to suggest that RN was the first option because he had a relatively weak defender and could take him to the basket. I wonder if we’ll ever know for sure. Anyway, that was a much-needed and very exciting win for CBH and all the Bruins. Kudos to Abdul, of course. Now we have to deal with WSU. I hope the guys can stop replaying their highlights in their heads and buckle down to preparation. I was much encouraged by the improved zone slides and the ability to handle different attacks without seeming to be lost, as before. The Cougs had a dismal outing against ASU’s matchup, scoring only 46 points, but I doubt if they will play that badly again. Still, there is no doubt that we have a real chance to win two in a row, if only we can show some consistency from one game to the next
Slightly off-topic
But in re: incoming freshmen, like this soundbite from Tyler Lamb (who presumably has not spent much time talking to MM…)
Tyler Lamb, another highly recruited guard who has signed a national letter of intent with UCLA, will enroll in summer school so he can get started early. He loves that Howland preaches defense and has a history of sending players to the NBA.
UCLA starts two freshmen, and Lamb said he’ll have an opportunity for immediate playing time as well. From his talks with current players, he’s actually encouraged.
"They’re not happy with the way things are going, but they believe in the coaches and are following the system," Lamb said. "Things will turn around."
Well put
Our trip to seattle next month definitely will be a mess. When the SPTR’s walk onto the court at hec ed, they turn into the biggest clowns. It’s painful…
That makes the Cal win more impressive though
Cal is one of the best team’s in the conference (in a down year) and we beat them on the road.
I agree
Lats night was not a turning point. We all know what this team is and it’s not good. That said, I was at the game and it was great. We were competitive the whole way and had a miracle ending.
This season for me: just enjoy the good moments when they come, don;t get too down at the bad moments and hope the returning players improve.
by RealisticBruinFan on Jan 22, 2010 1:57 PM PST reply actions
Looking for Growth
I don’t know how you turn around a season that features a home loss to Cal State Fullerton, among the rest of the misery. But if I can see growth and maturity, that will have to suffice given this season is what it is — and many of our players are who they are.
BL and MM don't play much
because they lose the competition in practice. Its that simple. CBH is going to play the guys who succeed in practice and know what to do on offense and defense. RN and TH obviously won the competition. BL and MM can’t compete. As poorly as ND plays in games, he probably dominates those two young Bruins in practice. The reason they don’t play is that they don’t measure up yet. He can’t redshirt the entire roster.
The Reason the Pauley is empty
Is that it is hard to watch this team play and lose. The SC game was like waterboarding to the Bruin faithful. Add to that a rainy midweek game and you get an empty house. The other reason is that student tickets are divided so that half the students can’t go to every game. That’s insane in a season like this one. They should just open the doors to all the students to fill the empty seats.
The weather was a big factor.....
many people were forced to stay home because of flooding. Some were only just able to return to their homes in burn areas after being evacuated for 2 days. Thursday night was stormy and windy. Add to that our poor playing this year, thus many ticket holders did not show up. Those that were there, were loud and supportive. Not sure exactly how many fans were there – but more than 1/2 full. Actually, given everything, I was surprised that there were as many people as there were.

by 




















