Bruins Lose At Mac Court For The Last Time
I guess the one thing we can take from this game is that it is the last time we'll ever lose at Mac Court. Oregon will leave the old, rickety gym after the year and move to a beautiful new arena, but if the Bruins find themselves in the paint at the new arena as rarely as they were in the paint tonight, they will lose there too. UCLA got off to a blazing start, then tapered off the rest of the way in a complete team effort loss to Oregon, 71-66, in overtime. Here's your box score.
The Bruins inability to penetrate on the offensive end is something few teams could match. 33 of the Bruins' 64 field goal attempts came from behind the arc. If you didn't know any better, you would think that the three point line was the 38th Parallel because UCLA just would not cross it. The Oregon zone, once it turned into more of a match-up zone after UCLA's hot start, stifled the Bruins and UCLA seemed content to keep trying what wasn't working. In a radical change from the rest of the season, the UCLA offense let down the defense, although the defense wasn't the greatest.
Blame for this loss can go all the way around and when that is the case, it starts with the head coach. After putting together two very solid game plans versus the Washington schools last week, CBH and his staff were unable to adjust once Oregon adjusted to what was so effective for the Bruins early on. When Oregon switched their zone to more of a match-up zone than a straight 2-3 zone, the offense didn't change. Well, the Bruins stopped scoring, but the plays and system was exactly as it was early on. UCLA also got killed on the boards and despite not having to worry about the same match-up problems that plague a team play man-to-man, CBH never tried a big lineup with Honeycutt in the backcourt and three 6'8'' guys in the front court.Moving past the coaching staff, the players didn't get it done either. Dragovic had himself 19 points, but needed 17 shots to get it done and missed a key free throw late while also struggling defensively. Those who continue to harp on ND and allocate 75% of their blame to him though are nothing more than lazy because he was not alone in having a poor game and this isn't the first time where people single him out for complete team losses. Just about everybody needs to feel the heat for this loss and a few others this year. Tonight, ND didn't have the poorest of games either. Malcolm Lee had himself the worst game he's had in a UCLA uniform. The effort was there, as evidenced by a couple late rebounds, but it was one of those nights where nothing goes right for a player. Unfortunately for UCLA, those nights that everyone has from time to time cannot happen to any key Bruins and still allow the team to win because they're just not good enough.
As is not a surprise, free throw shooting accounted for the difference in this ballgame. Oregon got to the line more times than UCLA and despite not hitting at an astounding percentage, did far better than the Bruins. The Ducks were 15-21 from the stripe, while the Bruins managed to shoot just 6-11 despite a 3-3 effort from the freshman, Tyler Honeycutt, who also had 13 points and 10 rebounds.
Frankly, this team isn't good enough to miss free throws and have a key player like Lee have an off night. That's what happened tonight and UCLA still had their chance. This is just another in a ever growing list of UCLA losses that has the team and its fans wondering "what if." In reality though, what it comes down to is "what if this team were better" because this team is just not that good and at the heart of it all, that's what it comes down to. That doesn't mean they can't be better than they've been though.
93 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
They didn't have any pictures from this game uploaded yet
I’m waiting for them to be available to change it.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 28, 2010 10:15 PM PST up reply actions
I gotta say
that picture pretty much sums up Lee’s night. He was horrible – he couldn’t hit a shot and looked very tentative at the point.
by bornagainbruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:32 PM PST up reply actions
live by the drago...
.. die by the drago
Makes 3s early.. bricks 3s for 14 mins… doesn’t hustle back and gives armstead easy assts.. gets a couple of board off miss fts.. doesn’t overplay a shooter with time winding down on the clock.. makes a nice catch on a pass to lay one in.. with 10 seconds left he’s looking for a quick 2 , only to get fouled and miss the front end.. Drago giveth and Drago taketh away.
Most of the game when TH is not rebounding on defense and RN on offense then no one is rebounding. Drago did however show up to grab a couple key offensive rebounds I suppose. TH will be great when he figures out when to attack and when not to attack on offense.
Our attacking the zone blew chunks after about the 10 minute mark. We lacked aggression. On one hand we did a good job not wasting the dribble, on the other hand we were content to pass it around the perimeter. We need flashers to the free throw line constantly to break down the defense (not Keefe there, because you need a player that is a threat to make a basket) Sometimes we figured out how to get it to RN in there, but we need to figure that out earlier in a clock and he needs to learn to recognize when and if to work it back out. You can destroy the zone if you get it into capable hands in the paint and we failed miserably on way to many possessions by turning into the long ball shooting team.
It is mischaracterized that you shoot teams out of a zone.. our zone has been successful for exactly that reason.. teams settle for the long ball. You beat a zone by breaking it down on the interior getting everyone out of position that yields open shots from a variety of areas. That out of position consequently allows you to gain offensive rebounding possibilities. If you just settle for the long ball it is easy to defensive rebound.
(sorry reposting what I said right before game thread ended)
Poor effort
poor coaching adjustments, poor execution.
The blame can be spread very far and wide for this debacle.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:16 PM PST reply actions
Drago and Roll - 44 minutes each
Kind of surprised that Lee was ‘only’ given 37 minutes tonight.
formerly bruinhoo
I agree that Howland has to be accountable for this
And I completely agree with the point on Lee. I don’t blame Rago for everything even though I direct so much of my frustration towards him. However, he has emerged as the face of this awful team that has taken the personality of of mentally weak, dumb, and defensively pathetic squad that often tries to live by the 3. What he has done and gotten away with has set the tone and personality for this team. It’s not good. Howland is responsible for it and on court Ragovic is the face of it. No way around it. I will expand on it more in the am.
Good writeup.
This was not a debacle
It was a very typical loss for this team, emblematic of all our weaknesses.
We have no point guard = couldn’t create good shots, or any shots when the clock was down. While a guy on their team who avg 2.7 points created two threes and nailed them.
We are bad at the line = missing the front end to take the first lead in overtime, and keep yourself in it at the end.
We can’t rebound = biggest single reason we lost.
They made the plays and we didn’t. If one or two plays are reverse, we win. I think our effort was generally fine but our mental problems cost us a winnable game. This was not a Stanford/Arizona/SC kind of debacle, it was a road game against better talent that requires smart and timely plays.
Smart and timely plays like not fouling Porter to get oregon in the game
And Nelson not fouling out of the first half to kill our offensive momentum.
There were a bunch of huge turning points and we blew them.
Making plays
Oregon came up with nearly every loose ball in the second half and overtime. The only hustle play until the scrable at the end was MAH steal. Other than that, Oregon wanted it more.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 10:22 PM PST up reply actions
Not true
we got a number of loose ball plays after missed shots.
It was the routine defensive boards that killed us.
wasn't defensive rebounds = fundamentals + effort
at least when u don’t have fundamentals (like RN) he has effort…. some ppl on the team showed none
sometimes it's brains, not effort
the difference between coming down with a board and just smacking the ball to whoever is mental and fundamental.
If this was at UW I would agree with you, but it was to a very sub-par Oregon team . . .
. . . that had lost five straight and had been beaten at home by the likes of Montana. Plus, there was optimism that the bruins had turned a corner with the recent offensive improvement and the implementation of the zone defense. Plus UCLA blew a 13 point lead and was outscored 31-11 during a stretch. So, taking all those factors into consideration, I have not problem with the “debacle” moniker.
by orlandobruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:25 PM PST up reply actions
Oregon made a bunch of low-percentage threes
That were the difference in the game. It’s not like we were letting them eat us up.
Well, frankly, they . . .
. . . killed UCLA on the boards.
Shot free throws down the stretch better.
Hustled better.
They performed the fundamentals with a coach who typically relies on athleticism much better than the coach who prides himself on fundamentals.
UCLA hit their share of tough threes as well. I do not think the three were the difference in the game.
by orlandobruin on Jan 29, 2010 4:17 AM PST up reply actions
CBH lost it in the first half with playing JK
I watch in befuddlement at the closing of the first half when CBH inexplicible stuck with JK while the lead slowly slipped away. I don’t want to harp on JK, but with him in there instead of RN, there is absolutely no post threat. Thus, we jack up lots of 3s that lead to long rebounds and easy baskets. I kept waiting for CBH to sub RN in and put a stop to the run to preserve the lead, but he seemed content to try and wait out the clock for some strange reason. Oregon may have made a run even if RN was in, but at least our offense wouldn’t have stganated to a point that it wouldn’t be able to recover from like it did.
Huh?
Howland had to take out Nelson because he picked up his second foul. We did just fine with Keefe starting and taking a big lead. Problem was once Nelson went out for foul trouble and the whole team had collective brain cramp, not to mention Lee is proving so far that he can’t handle the point.
+1
i’m fine with us with no offense, BUT NO DEFENSE…… we can’t score for licks on our 1st trip to final 4…. but we fight on defensive end as if our lives depend on it
I understand CBH wanting to protect RN, but when the lead is quckly falling apart and he only has 2 fouls, you have to put him back in. As for doing just fine with JK at the start, RN came in three minutes into the game and thats when we went on the roll to take the lead. As for Lee, I dont know what to make of his lack of desire to drive to the basket. Its the one thing he can do on this team that no one else can, yet he seems reluctant to do it.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 10:25 PM PST up reply actions
Hmm
I guess I see where you are coming from. But I got the sense that Howland took Nelson out because he was getting “hot” as he just committed a bad frustration foul. I agree with you that the offense fell apart after Nelson left in the first but seemed like Nelson was set up to commit another dumb one.
True
I agree with what you are saying. I love the energy RN plays with, but he is going to have to learn to control his emotions and play a little more under control. CBH shouldn’t have to protect RN from himself.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 10:29 PM PST up reply actions
Good point
one of his biggest maturity problems as a frosh.
I’m usually a proponent of leaving guys in, and not inflicting the foul-penalty on yourself, but he could’ve easily picked up a third and perhaps taking him out with a big lead was the wiser decision
Mustafa - 14 minutes
It almost seems this guy doesn’t get minutes because of the potential that he MIGHT suck
UCLA Football, please make the switch to black cleats
Don't get me started on Howland's lack of flexibility
it was pulling teeth to get him into a zone everyone with half a brain could see this team was well suited for after 3 games.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:25 PM PST up reply actions
how bad is the Pac 10 this year?
I am a super west coast homer
and I can’t remember the Pac 10 seeming this bad …
is it just me?
No, the Pac-10 is just horrible this year
It’s why we’re in 3rd place. Look at Washington. It’s a massive implosion, that started with the class of 2008.
The only team capable of getting an at-large
is Cal. If the Pac-10 is to be a multiple bid league, Cal needs to win the regular season title by a few games, then lose in the semis or finals of the Pac-10 tourney, letting Cal get in as an at-large and the tourney champion get in.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 28, 2010 10:38 PM PST up reply actions
worst pac10 i have ever seen
that is how bad.. even when the pac has lacked depth in the past they still had at least one real good team and a couple other decent teams. I am pretty sure 4 bids has been the minimum in the ncaa since it went to 64. Not sure if it will be just 1, but it is possible at this point. I think Cal at the end of the season will lock up an at-large postion.. with USC being banned that takes what might have been another at-large type team out of the mix. If Cal goes on to win the pac10 tourney the 2nd place team had better lose to them in the final or it really could be a 1 bid. You never know if someone else will figure out how to win consistently from here on out. As of today it’s a 1 bid however.
& Cal doesn't look like a sweet 16 team
I think they’d be fortunate to get out of the first round…
see in a typical pac-10 year
our team will be dead last, or close to the bottom like lavin’s last year, but because pac-10 suck as much as we do, we are tied for #3
what a joke…. that nba 1-year rule is killing pac-10 and killing ucla, we would’ve been much better w/o those one and done (as much as i love klove, he left a huge gapping hole after he left)
There's no way you can blame
any of our current problems on KL. CBH knew from the start that there was maybe, if he was lucky, a 1% chance he’d come back for a second year. I’m with you on recruiting being a huge part of our team’s woes right now, but I don’t think KL should be the focus of that.
not blaming KL, but blaming not having a back up plan for after KL is gone
same thing with after JH is gone…. it’s short term tease vs long term team building…. my problem is with the one and done rule not the players
Rago was Rago
Some 3’s. more bricks, no D.
He was what he has has been all year. We didn’t lose tonight because of Rago.
Getting nothing from ML tonight was the difference in this game.
Getting what we get from Rago is the difference in this season.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
shot way to many 3s
that was the problem in my mind. You can’t win games shooting more than 30 3s. It just doesn’t happen very often
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:26 PM PST up reply actions
nvm, Drago 5/13 3s and ML 0/5 3s
Overall, we need to hit the paint
they shoot the same amt of 3s
ML shoot it like he throws a brick, drago shoots, he teases us with a rainbow but 2/3 of the time it ends up being a brick
I meant the team shot too many 3s
wasn’t calling out anyone in particular, but you can’t have that many threes and win.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:30 PM PST up reply actions
no, no. you're right
We aren’t a good enough shooting team to live outside the arc like that.
Though it’s not like we have so many other options. But we know what isn’t working.
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
not that we are not good enough, we just can't afford to chuck 3s
because we can’t reb, the condition to be a 3pt shooting team is u need rebounders down low…. like magic with howard
our team has traditionally have the tendency to fall in love with the 3
shipp and drago last year (but they had PAA)
DC year before (but he has KLove and Luc)
this year we have an undersized freshmen
That is consistent with what gbruin said
Rago – aka our Rainbow Warrior – is the nucleus of this year’s pathetic basketball team. He wasn’t THE reason for tonight’s loss but tonight added to his over all body of pathetic work that has stunk up the entire season. Time for another love note from Marcia.
this team just is not good enough to overcome its mistakes
and it makes a lot. and howland seems to let them be. it’s so frustrating. and nestor i think we built up the lead once keefe was taken out. it was 6-3 oregon when rn came in. but you’re right about jk coming back in because of rn’s 2 fouls
Across The Face
If we have the ball with 10 secs to go...
and we’re down by 3, why did Drago go in for 2? He gets a foul and he’s going to shoot a 1 and 1. How does that help us?? We’re down by 3!! I don’t get why we didn’t hold the ball for the last shot!!
Somebody please explain it to me b/c I just don’t get it…
The explanation...
can be in a question for you: what player are you talking about??
by KSBruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:41 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Did I see it wrong?
We grabbed a jump ball in OT with 10 secs to go. A pass goes into Dragovic in the paint and he goes up and get’s fouled. Why didn’t we set up a 3pt shot?
Oregon was fouling on that play anyway no matter what we ran
Oregon intentionally fouled on that possession. The play that we were running wasn’t the best, but anything other than a quick catch and shoot 3 and Oregon would have fouled.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 10:58 PM PST up reply actions
ML
tough night shooting for Lee, but I don’t think he was awful.. 6 assts, 6 rebs, 2 tos.. a couple dumb fouls for sure in the 1st half. Lee is a little out of position imo.. unfortunately he seems to be the most capable to play pg at this moment. It’s tough having maybe your best penetrator play the point on a team that has no idea how to rotate a guard back to balance the court. His effort was there he just can’t knock down or does not have the confidence yet to knock down the open shot. As much as I grimace when he takes a shot I did not feel like many were forced unless the shot clock was winding down. Earlier on the season this was not the case for Lee. On the other hand Drago makes a few and he loves to check his temperature.. again and again and again.
I think Lee needs to keep shooting ones that are given to him or if coach feels like he can’t make those open shots with confidence one day he needs to make Lee an aggressor which means other players need to be aware of an attacking guard and rotate back so we don’t give up easy transition chances.
one more thing
I will add to me this is essentially Lee’s freshman year, so I can live with the possible growing pains with him, RN and TH. We need them to learn tempered aggression. This season is about seasoning for what I believe are our 3 top players. They need to learn how to attack opportunities (RN good at that) and draw defenses to open up opportunites for others (TH good at that) A little more RN in TH’s game and TH in RN’s game would be nice.
While hope was still beating eternal in my chest
or however the line goes, since I only got 4.5 hours of sleep last night and I’m somehow still awake….
I was being seriously distracted by the Oregon students.
I heard Tompkins apologize for what the students said and I wondered what the heck was said. Then later on they’re singing their silly song and I blatantly hear sh*t in the lyrics. Classy. I hear “Drago-brick” which was actually helping hit his ministreak of three’s in the first half, and amazingly they wisened up enough to stop that insanity.
Then I hear chants of USA, USA. Genius. Wow, he’s not from the USA? AMAZING.
Then I hear a voice distinctly telling Coach Howland to sit down. So apparently this student doesn’t pay attention and realize that he doesn’t sit down. Just because Ernie Kent is sitting in his corner waiting to be fired doesn’t mean that every coach should be that meek. Then there’s a shot at Coach Howland’s hairline.
On and on. I think Tompkins likened them to European Soccer fans, and it is so true. Obnoxious, annoying, but probably do not understand the game like the European Soccer fans.
I’m still bitter over what they did to Kevin Love 2 years ago, and apparently the student section will never learn.
This is why the cheer needs to be emphasized as “BEAT SC” and not “F SC” because I hate stooping to the level of other student sections.
I wasn’t in the gameday thread – does anyone know why Bobo wasn’t on the bench? Did he not travel with the team?
Yeah, that reference would be an insult to most euro soccer fans
Excluding the hooligans, most of them care about and know the game very well.
formerly bruinhoo
most would be more insulted calling their game soccer
hooligans are in every country.. normally poor, disenchanted racists who need to work out some aggression. I think like most of the world and the US there are good and bad fans that are fueled by a good or bad mob mentality. If we broke down the percentages I think we would discover given the same passion for a team that the fans in the end all end about about the same number of pricks.
because cbh is stubborn
no bobo, no lane, no moser, legs got tired, made it to OT no more gas left…. start chucking 3s and airballing 3s and gameover
yeah, woulda loved to see bobo in his street clothes
for crying out loud
yup
damn CBH… doesn’t he know that flying someone across state lines is the best way to rehab them?
by britishbruin on Jan 29, 2010 2:06 PM PST up reply actions
Wasn't Drago-brick
It was Drago-bitch. Excuse my language.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 11:01 PM PST up reply actions
i actually chuckled at that..
i mean this is basketball and not tennis…. what’s wrong with getting a little rowdy to gain some home court advantage…. basketball isn’t about class, it’s not a non-contact sport where everyone is nice and gentleman like…. unless u want to watch a game where people clap silently after someone scored and be silent for most of the game hearing grunts from the players?
True, but Oregon fans have a bad history
I agree with Freesia as I’ve never cared for the “f*ck SC” chant and much prefer a “beat SC”. We are a classy school and should behave as such. Of course Oregon fans have a bad history with their cheers. Look up what they were chanting when Kevin Love played his one game there. No one was chuckling.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 11:07 PM PST up reply actions
you are right
but what can we do about it? to keep it classy maybe we have to just ban all chants or disband student section…. then all the fun is gone…. but i guess we can enjoy basketball like we enjoy tennis and golf
Meh...
Somehow, I found a way to have fun jumping and screaming in The Den while I was a student without directing homophobic slurs at opposing players and their family (like OU > KLove), or mistaking a home game for a FIBA qualifier and pulling the nationalist card b/c the opposing team has – gasp – a furriner on the court.
formerly bruinhoo
Seriously?
Is swearing necessary to express your feelings towards the other team?
A well written, well thought out, series of insults that are pointed towards the other team probably hits them harder than “F YOU IDIOTS!”
If they brought up Drago’s previous police matters, that would have probably shut him down better than yelling “USA!” But that would have required research and thought, and Oregon’s student section has not shown that capability, other than to flip Kevin Love off, get caught by a photographer, have your picture plastered in Sports Illustrated, and then your father writes in the week after saying that his son has lost his car for being so rude.
Second thought(s)
The Stanford student section used to be REALLY good at bringing up things to needle you about when you visited Maples. When I was in high school (back in Stanford’s Mike Montgomery glory days) there was an article I read about how they’d research the other teams players and find out what dirty business they had been in.
While we don’t necessarily have to go that far, I don’t think we need to swear.
First, as I switch into granny mode, there are usually children in the arena. I know they’ll hear it from others, but let’s try to keep it to a minimum.
Second, if the Eskimos have a million different words for snow, we can come up with more than one chant that doesn’t involve “F SC.” Something along the lines of “Our SAT scores are in the four digits!” will probably suffice. Or our former linebackers aren’t getting busted for DUI’s like Rey Rey.
Third, I will take even just volume and enthusiasm. Just scream. We used to do that a lot.
Dang, I’m starting to get geezerly.
minutes were a problem as well
MR and ND played over 40 minutes, and I am sure that had something to do with the missed free throws….
Ben could have used his bench more (as usual). I am sure we will here tomorrow that from now on he is going to use his bench more, and he will for one game, and then revert back to his normal habits.
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 28, 2010 10:56 PM PST reply actions
He used the same number of players
That he used in the two victories last week, causing everyone to say how much better we are in a concentrated rotation when everyone knows their roles and there aren’t constant subs.
Now, of course, the problem is that he didn’t play enough.
he also played 5 additional minutes in overtime
and the players were clearly gassed
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 29, 2010 6:30 AM PST up reply actions
Disagree
With all the timeouts in college ball and CBH’s move to the zone, those minutes aren’t that outrageous. Maybe MAH should have gotten a few more minutes, but three or four less minutes for MR isn’t going to make much of a difference when they are running on adrenaline in an overtime game at Mac court.
by bruinponcho on Jan 28, 2010 11:04 PM PST up reply actions
obviously it has been a difference in our OT losts this year
i think the rotation as of now looks great, but it would have been nicer to get a couple freshies in early in the 1st half esp when we still had that 13 pt lead…… then again what do i know
5 minutes can make a world of difference
thats the entire overtime…
"when you've seen how big the world is, how can you make due with this?"
by silverlakebruin on Jan 29, 2010 6:31 AM PST up reply actions
Now I'm no fancy city analyst, but ...
I thought we had decent outside-in game against the their 2-3 for however long that lasted (by ok, i mean better than anything i have seen out of this team all season) – and aggressive, albeit not perfect, doubling on the defensive end out of the zone for the 1st 15 minutes of the first half. The way I see it, we’re still ugly, and young, and raw – but there are incremental improvements. McCourt is not an easy place to go into and stay competitive, even against an underachieving, overdressing, last-game-vs-ucla-on-this-floor-playing squad such as this one. Our guys played with heart and intensity (again, relatively speaking) and even after dropping behind by 5-7 points, came back and pushed it OT. After that, they were as lost and befuddled as usual, and I agree CBH has a ways to go in his evolution as a coach under adversity.
I thought no one on this board expected to win this game …This is a rebuilding year – tonight was a rebuilding effort.
I only have two minor problems with CBH tonight.
Not that they would make any difference.
1. Hamid should have played more than Lee, especially in the second half when the Ducks went to their match up zone. Hamid is better at 3 point shooting, setting up the offense and HUSTLE.
2. When our game deteriorated in the second half to just shooting threes we should have shot in 15 seconds instead of 30, especially when we were behind. We were not keeping up with Oregon in shots taken and actually have better outside shooters than Oregon IMO.
These may have been enough to swing the game in our favor, but that is speculative. Of course, we were helped by Oregon’s best player cramping up after he got four fouls. He never played any more after that allowing RN to be more of a force.
Like everyone, I am disappointed, but overall I think the team played well despite the loss. We had balanced scoring and a tough defense. We just don’t have a big man in the center to help RN and our guard play, frankly, is average at best. Remember what Coach used to say? The team with the best guards wins.
TH stepped up big time all around. If he never plays point maybe we should run more of our offense through him anyway. He could be great someday.
Tough loss on the road. If we had made a few buckets at the right time, we could have won.
I know, could of, would of , should of.
At least they played with pride.
GO BRUINS!
Respectfully, I disagree.
We looked horrible on offense after 29-16. According to Ryan, Oregon switched to a match up zone and UCLA didn’t or couldn’t adjust. It was a large step backward. Passing around the perimeter and shooting threes does not an offense make. All the dribbling in the frontcourt was while backing up. Absolutely no penetration or attempts to break down the defense. No attempts to exploit matchups. 5’7" Porter guarding Lee but no attempt to use Lee’s height advantage. Walking the ball up the coach every time. No offensive urgency in the waning moment. Sorry, this looked like stagnant water
by orlandobruin on Jan 29, 2010 4:25 AM PST up reply actions
Orlando, we are on the same page.
All I’m saying is since we were only putting up threes we at least should have shot in half the time. I agree with your point that we did not penetrate or exploit matchups, but since all we were doing was taking threes there’s no reason not to take them quicker since it’s not that hard to get a decent shot at a three in 15". Instead, we spent way too much time passing the ball harmlessly around the top and never doing anything but launching a three late in the shot clock.
Unfortunately, I really think this team is one center and one guard away from being able to impose its will on anybody. Wish I was wrong.
Mediocrity
Our team is not great, its ok. When we shot well, we went ahead by 12. When they adjusted with pressure, we wilted. When they got hot, they went ahead. Two bad teams, either one could have won. TH continues to shine. He’s going to be a great one. No way he lasts through his senior year. RN is overrated by Bruin fans. He is too small and gets shots blocked or misses in close. He’s a 4 not a 5. MR played horribly in spurts, turning the ball over and taking crappy shots, then hits key threes near the end to get us back in. ND and RN are not in ready position on defense. Play hard only in spurts. MAH played another good game, but didn’t hit from the outside. ML’s outside shooting is a joke. He was our leading scorer for the first half of the season. Still, we were in it throughout, the game was entertaining, and only lacked a Bruin victory at the end. Go Bruins.
could be
This could end up being a long season down the road on the hardwood for the blue and gold..we will see

by 




















