Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Leandro Damiao Is Still Really Good

Howland Needs To Find His Team (The One That Plays "Ben Ball") Again

Let's relieve these sequences again:

Those moments are imprinted in our memory banks for rest of our lives. Those were the moments that symbolized the essence of a Howland coached basketball team. A team the foundation of which would be based on defense, passion, intensity and most importantly HEART. In the world of college athletics it is all about heart. That's what differentiates great programs from the good ones. We had that and more few years ago when Ben Howland ushered in a new era of prosperity in UCLA basketball by bringing in the class of AA, JF, JS, and LMR.

Those four kids and the recruiting class immediately after it (made up of DC, LRMAM, PAA, MR and Ryan Wright) came in with a chip on their collective shoulders. Except for AA and JF, none of them were McDonald All-Americans. JS was somewhat highly recruited,Wright was being pursed by Stanford, PAA by Georgetown (during their mediocre years), but that was about it. Those two classes anchored around AA and JF came into Westwood with the purpose of redefining UCLA basketball under Ben Howland and bringing it back to where it belongs.

They all came in with the overall purpose of winning and contending for championships with Wooden's program. Yes, number of them went on to the NBA, but those goals came in later years after they had established themselves in Westwood. We all got the sense of what those freshmen were made of very early in their careers when AA and JF took the team into Tucson and almost pulled off a huge upset against a very good Arizona team (at the time). We knew something special was brewing within JF and AA when they went toe to to with Salim Stoudamire in the desert. It was the ferocious intensity and drive of those two guys that infected Dijon Thompson and later on inspired Bozeman, Hollins and the entire team in their second season.

Those guys wanted "it." BADLY. Look at that video again. See how those guys hedged and rotated back on their man. Remember how those guys dove on the floor for every freaking loose ball. One thing we knew about those Howland teams in early years. We knew going into every game that there was 95 percent change that our warriors were going to outwill and outhustle the other team every time out.

That is not happening with the team "led" by Dragovic, Roll and Lee. All of these guys are mentally soft. You can read it in their body language every time the going gets tough. Dragovic has always been a terrible shooter except for the decent nights he has one every few games. Roll has good fundamentals and a sense of Howland's scheme but haven't seen him make a clutch shot or a play since a mid range jumper he sank against Pitt in a tourney game few years ago. Lee has shown signs of being a decent defender (relatively speaking here) but his offensive skills are not there, and at least from what we have seen he is no where to close to level of AA, RW in terms of bringing passion, intensity and leadership on the basketball floor.

You can sense it when you watch these guys. Every time we face an adverse situation you can sense from their body language how they are ready to crumble under pressure. They got incredibly lucky against Arizona State down the stretch as their un-leader like plays almost cost us in crunch time. So what exactly is going on?

Star-divide

The easy way out is of course to solely blame these guys and point to their lack of heart and desire. However, I also think we have to wonder why they are looking so lost, dispirited and frankly often either uninterested or nonchalant on the basketball court. None of these guys (and their team-mates except for Nelson at times) have shown any sense of urgency.

While watching these guys I often get the sense they know they are not athletic enough to play man to man defense. The team Howland has at his disposal doesn't have both the physical or mental make up of the teams he had put together to play the ferocious, inside-the-jersey defense night in and night out basis. I wonder if going through the same insanity over and over again is sapping their moral and causing them to look so dispassionate on game days.

Yeah, after some soul searching in next few days, I am sure these guys are going to come out and play with a little intensity (perhaps) against Berkeley in our next game. However, does any one really expect our guys to handle Christopher, Roberts and Randle all at once? Uh yeah, perhaps Howland will throw in a zone once again here and there, but what good that will do when he stubbornly goes back to man-to-man with the same dreadful results again?

I am not worried about this season any more. I did have a little false sense of hope after seeing the zone defense against ASU. I thought perhaps Howland for once was showing genuine commitment to making adjustments and adapt to the personnel he has at his disposal (which btw is his responsibility). However, all of that hope was quashed yesterday afternoon when we saw a team sleep walking through the same insane routine we have witnessed earlier in the season.

Moreover, I thought Malcolm Lee's comments were pretty disturbing:

"We were physically ready, but our mindset wasn't," said Lee, who along with guard Michael Roll led the team with 15 points. "Better preparation would have made a better outcome. Getting up, getting loose, getting pumped.

"Last time we played early in the morning it was a bad game, too. We just have to be better prepared."

WTH? The guy, who the coaches are counting on to be the next "AA" of this basketball team is openly questioning the level of preparation they undertook before what was their biggest game of the season. These guys needed to "get pumped" to play Arizona? Get that? A UCLA basketball player has to "get up" and "get pumped" to play Arizona at Pauley? Again, something is terribly wrong with this picture.

I think after Gordon left many of us were hoping and praying that it had solved issues impacting the team. I am not entire surely that is the case right now. Except for few fleeting moments this season, I have been watching a UCLA team that has been playing zombie basketball, led by bunch of role players who are not worthy of taking up the leadership mantle of Ben Ball warriors. Meanwhile, the underclassmen seem thoroughly dazed, confused and often demoralized without any sort of leadership on and off the court.

It is up to Ben Howland right now to find the right mix again. It is not happening with the current personnel on the court. There was a time in Westwood, when Howland had no problem with reducing the minutes of upperclassmen like Brian Morrison, and allocate them to his eager freshmen. He had figured out a way to make his freshmen hungry, inspired, and tenacious enough to battle like warriors. He needs to find a way to get that formula back. He needs to find a way to get his current group of underclassmen hungry and instill in them a sense of urgency, the same way he was able to do with his first two classes in Westwood.

Yes, the Gonzaga moments were something special. They were also not on aberration. They typified the Ben Ball warriors, we all fell for years ago. I want to have that team back which played its hearts out on defense, dove after every lose ball, went after every rebounds like bunch of junk yard dogs, played with unmatched ferocity living up to their obligations to the four letters in front on their jerseys.

I want that team back which dug deep, played defense when chips were down, instead of taking stupid, dumb, three pointers to get back in the game. I want that team back which was together, on each other, when chips were down, instead of just drooping their heads, and lollygagging on defense when the game got close. We lost all of that somewhere along the way last season and it has exacerbated into an unwatchable, ugly form this season which sullies and insults everything that was all pure and holy about Ben Ball.

I hope Howland figures it out and find that team again. He needs to do it with the guys who will be around for him next season and beyond, not with the ones who will go through the motions, playing a brand of "basketball" that is anything but Ben Ball.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

You Won't See The Team You're Looking For...

…Until next season. The talent on this year’s team lies with an inexperienced freshman class that will look better as the season progresses but doesn’t have what it takes right now to play up to the level we’ve come to expect. Anderson and Lee are part of last year’s busted recruiting class of which we’ve analyzed to death — they are what they are and won’t deliver what you’re looking for (although Lee is getting better on the talent front and will continue to do so.) Roll and Drago are role players at best and will never be more, and are only thrust into the roles they’re playing because they’re the best Howland has at the present time. You’re right in that we’re missing a killer instinct from the Howland glory years. But we’re also missing the talent. Both of these things I expect to be rectified next year thanks to this year’s freshmen, Zeke Jones (we need a good PG who is also a leader) and next year’s frosh. This year’s team will continue to play well at times (ASU) and play what appears to be inexplicably bad at times (UofA.) But it’s not inexplicable. And in my opinion Lee can try and fool himself into thinking the team didn’t prepare. But in my opinion that’s a mask for the fact that he got worked over on Saturday and would like to think it was for reasons other than he wasn’t good enough that day.

by Bruin Die Hard on Jan 3, 2010 3:14 PM PST reply actions  

I don't have much hope for this season

I do wish that Howland started to set the foundation for next season by going back to his roots this season. That would entail building the core of this team around players who have a track record of buying into his defense. And if those guys are not available among the current group of starters, then go with the freshmen and get them coached up and much needed experience in the mindset with dedicating themselves to defense fist.

The magic in 2005-06 season would have never taken place, had the freshmen from 04-05 not given a real chance to make an impact or more importantly gain on court experience in their very first season. The 2005-06 season wouldn’t have happened if Brian Morrison was logging 30 mins a game in his senior season in Westwood.

by Nestor on Jan 3, 2010 3:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Exactly.

Setting the foundation for the next season is something he clearly didn’t do last season (with or without the Holliday surprise). He can get the pieces for the next year minutes without mailing it in.

As for that Gonzaga game—dang. I still find myself watching it every couple weeks. By far, the most intense sports watching moment of my life. I remember right after the Farmar-M’bah-a-Moute sequence, I slipped on a rug in the living room and fell hard on my back. I then proceeded to cheer whilst laying on the floor.

Things’ll be back in order in no time, though. I’ve got faith in CBH—he’s not as oblivious to all this as some play him out to be.

by deepdish on Jan 3, 2010 4:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Your last para.

Is keeping me going. However, that said a losing season this year will not be acceptable. Losing seasons should never be acceptable for UCLA basketball. Period.

by Nestor on Jan 3, 2010 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Time and patient

IT takes time for a team to mesh together and for a leader to emerge. This is a young team we all need to be patient with them. They will make mistakes and we will get better as the season progresses on.

by kyl57es on Jan 3, 2010 4:53 PM PST reply actions  

Doesn't have the horses

Something CRN said when I saw him speak alongside CBH last spring at an alumni program is really coming back to haunt CBH now. As we all probably know, CBH is a big football fan, and when he discussed CRN’s team during the 08-09 season, he said “You don’t have the horses.” We all knew he was right, and the 4-8 season confirmed it.

Now, unfortunately, it looks like the (horse)shoe is on the other foot. CBH is the one lacking them. We’ll just have to wait until next season to see if the stable is getting replenished sufficiently to take us where we are accustomed to going…

by daggy on Jan 3, 2010 5:27 PM PST reply actions  

One thing I don't understand

is the ragging on this player or that player for his perceived lack of heart, skill, leadership qualities or what have you. None of that sort of “analysis” can possibly help in any way. We are all seeing the same things and suffering as Bruin fans, so I do understand the expressions of pain and frustration, but if any set of players ever needed patience and support, it is this one. Similarly, it is bordering on the absurd to suppose that CBH is not pondering all this and doing all that he can to solve these problems. The youngsters are getting more minutes, the zone experiment is being tried, a variety of player combinations is being utilized. So give it time. A coaching staff can only do so much to improve the various aspects of the game, individually and collectively, and believe me, it always takes longer to bring about these improvements than you think it will. U of A displayed so much more aggressiveness and quickness, especially in attacking the basket and in rebounding, that, given a poor shooting performance, we had only a slight chance of winning that game. But we will have another game, another chance. Of course, it is vital that we keep our heads up and compete every second of every game, and the fans have to be supportive, not dismissive and scornful. There is plenty of room for improvement for all the young players, especially TH, who seemed at home with the pace of U of A’s game. But they can all do more, even those Seniors, mere role players though they may be. Next weekend will be rough, no doubt; but inconsistency means that we can be both surprisingly bad and surprisingly good. So suck it up, Bruin fans; whatever may come, Go Bruins!

by ReineSeite on Jan 3, 2010 6:36 PM PST reply actions  

I appreciate the thoughts Reine

But if this team doesn’t play hard on a consistent basis then I will be calling them out and specifically it’s head coach even more. I have no problem accepting a rebuilding season. I have no problem with roller-coaster results in terms of wins and losses with an young team. However, I will not be cool with inconsistent, listless efforts.

This UCLA basketball team has not been playing hard on a consistent basis. That is not right and it will not be acceptable if it results in a losing season.

by Nestor on Jan 3, 2010 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

You nailed it Nes!

I can’t figure out why these players aren’t willing to put the effort to buy in to Howlands very Physical Defense. Watching them on the court discourages me! I can’t imagine how it’s helping other players get into that hungry mindset. Maybe it because they feel like they have nothing to prove. But given what ihavebeen seeing, these guys better show up on game days. This cool relaxed vibe is apparent in our losses and the few times they got Their bare knuckles into the style that Howland implemented on his other classes are the wins we have been able to pull off. These guys seem like quitters and to they really need tough love. I have not seen anythig spectacular from any player. What I did take pride in was seeing Nelson fighting tough enough to get that enormous black eye that showed me flashes of Aboyas and Mbahyamoute’s intensity. These players for the most part are resembling (and I hate even thinking this) Dorrelian! I am right here with u Nestor I want our warriors back. But more importantly I want UCLA to be a WARRIOR factory. Every second counts! Fight to the end! Am I just crazy? Or is watching this crop of hoplessness on the court driving me insane?!

by UCLABRU1 on Jan 3, 2010 7:12 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Unfair to ML

Not going to touch ND in the leadership argument. To my mind, MR gets a pass. He is as close to anyone to maximizing his ability. He has upped his game from previous years and become a better passer and has shown some ability to drive to the basket. But he will never be a great defender and he can’t play faster than his talent allows.

But ML? Give the kid a chance. He is trying to lead but he is also trying to find his game. If you want to unfairly compare to Aaron Affallo then do so more than in passing. First, Aaron in class and maturity cannot be beat . . . by anyone. He was one of the classiest players in the history of the game. But let’s talk about stats.

Aaron averaged 31 minutes a game and started every game as a freshman. He shot 44% from the field. ML started 0 games, only averaged 10 minutes a game but shot 50% from the field. AA had the advantage of playing a lot his freshman year and not having to be relied on the offensive end.

In his sophomore year, AA again played next to a future pro point guard who was the unquestioned offensive leader in Jordan Farmar. That year, Farmar had another future pro in DC as a backup point guard and thus AA was never asked to play point. AA averaged 15.8 points, 4.2 Rebounds, 1.8 assists, .6 steals while shooting 46%. He had a career high of 27 points that year.

Compare this to ML so far. ML is the backup point and, like AA, the teams go to defender. Don’t dismiss the first part as for example against AZ he played 15 minutes at point because JA was so bad on defense. He did this while doing a great job defending the other team’s best player and limiting Wise to scoring 4 points while he was in the game. But to the stats. So far he is averaging 14.6 points, 4.7 Rebounds, 3.6 assists and 1.4 Steals. His career high is 29 points on the road at Notre Dame.

The stats compare and ML is having to do more than AA with a lesser supporting cast and arguably no point guard.

Now the intangibles. I am NOT going to compare AA to ML here, AA is rightfully a legend and ANY comparison would be unfair as I am trying to say ML is just starting. ML doesn’t even know how to talk in an interview given the quotes I’ve seen versus AA who was born a 15 year veteran. But let’s again take the AZ game, checkout a game tracker which will show he had shut out Wise and with the score 66-51 and 6:16 left he took over the game and played as hard as he could. He started with a defensive rebound followed by a layup. He then got another defensive rebound and got fouled making one of two. He set TH up for a layup which TH blew then made a three pointer on our next possession. He then made back to back layups on our next two possessions taking us down to the 2:38 mark. When we were making our last desperate drive for the game ML’s line was 4-4 (1-1 from three), two rebounds, one should have been assist, and 1-2 FTs.
 
Why did he not do it the whole game and what about how bad he shot for the rest of the game? Well besides the obvious that he is not MJ, he was doing a great job as a defender and he is trying to learn to play under control and with maturity. The last is hard for ML. All his fouls were dumb frustration fouls. He can get out of control as shown by his TOs and his play. But the kid has passion and is trying. Unfortunately for him and unlike all the other CBH players of the past, he is having to learn while being the go to defender and play two positions, one a new and arguably the most difficult position of point guard.

Thus, ML may become a very good player and yes even a leader but give the kid a chance.

by DCBruins on Jan 3, 2010 7:39 PM PST reply actions  

Things change

Just getting around to commenting after watching the dispiriting game on Saturday morning, after missing the ASt. game. I have two notes, and I agree with what DCBruins is saying here about ML. The comment on preparation is unfortunate, but as far as the game is concerned, I agree with “unfair to ML.”

My own breakdown hasn’t changed since bponcho started calling out JA early on. The fact is that CBH doesn’t have his best players on the floor, and guys are playing out of position. The first half against Ariz. showed this clearly, and when JA tweaked his groin and played limited minutes in the 2nd half, the Bruins played much better, and played them even, aside from some of CBH’s baffling extraneous substitutions. JA is barely serviceable as a sophomore backup PG in the Pac-10. There’s a catastrophic trickle down that comes from placing him in such a key position, a leadership role with his hands on the ball much of the time, for extended minutes. The effect on senior MR is disastrous: he’s forced to play out of position at SF, and he’s guarded by the bigger and stronger player of the opponent’s wings. This caused him great difficulties against Ariz. in the first half, but his offense opened up in the 2nd half when he was guarded… by a guard. My rosy, optimistic view is that MR is a poor/homeless man’s Jerry West, a classic shooter and perimeter player, not a PG. But if you want to render a player like West or the homeless West or MR as ineffective as possible, play him at SF.

ML is an inexperienced, talented, rapidly rising PG. Again, he’s being asked to play out of position, asked to be an Affalo or RW, which is a tall order, and it’s not even what he should be doing anyway. Jrue Holiday largely failed at the same assignment last year as a freshman, and he was playing with DC. ML will make mistakes and have letdowns, but the Bruins are a far superior and more active team when he’s the primary ballhandler. Honeycutt is a good SF, also young and mistake prone, but again, activity and effort are more important.

Put it this way: who would you rather face, if you were the opposing coach, in the starting lineup and for extended minutes during the game: JA, ML, and MR, or ML, MR, and TH? Do you fear JA and his meager stats and increasingly poor track record?

But the second note was more pertinent to Nestor’s post and “Ben Ball.” The thing I’m wondering, watching Ariz., is whether the rest of the Pac-10 is catching up to the defensive mantra that gave CBH so much success. Ariz won the game with their defense, rebounding, hustle, and all-around tough play. It energized their offense, and allowed them to punch back after every Bruin mini-run trying to get back in the game. Arizona, without a whole lot of talent, looked like the true Ben Ball Warriors at Pauley on Saturday morning. Perhaps other coaches are seeing that you can do more with less if your players really commit on defense and the boards.

by citizen zhiv on Jan 4, 2010 1:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Sad

but the poor sacrificial lambs over at United States China* are playing the classic “Ben Ball” much better than we.

"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09

by Blue Me on Jan 3, 2010 7:48 PM PST reply actions  

very true

Just cherry picking a few stats, USC is shooting 43.7% compared to our 45.4%. USC has a horrendous assist/turnover ratio of 1/1.7 while ours is 1.1/1. We also get more steals and block more shots (barely) per game than SC. And yet, USC finds themselves at 10-4 while we are 6-8. Why? Well, primarily because of team defense. USC is #2 in the country in Defensive Efficiency, according to Pomeroy Ratings. UCLA: #149!

by insomniacslounge on Jan 3, 2010 10:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Half of it at least

We had efficient offenses when we went to the Final Four. They have an awful offense.

by SuperBruinMan on Jan 3, 2010 10:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB