CBH vs. the Perfect Storm
As part of his response to Bellerophons post, rb bruin stated that "this year is kind of the confluence of worst case scenarios." Since I couldn't have said it better myself, I thought I'd simply quote him and then back up his statement with a quick look into what could have been. Somewhere in an alternate universe where Howland can catch a break, our starting line up looks like this:
Jrue Holiday, Malcolm Lee, Chace Stanback, Reeves Nelson, Drew Gordon
This is not some wild scenario. This is not pie-in-the-sky "what if Kevin Love and Russell Westbrook stayed four years" thinking. This is what should have happened.
Looking at that line-up, the first thing that stands out to me is the dramatic increase in athleticism. There's also a solid increase in length. If Howland had those tools to work with, you'd better believe we wouldn't be experimenting with zone this year. Additionally, none of these players would be playing out of position (i.e. "power forwards" hovering around the three point line or 6'5" "small forwards" lacking athleticism). We still wouldn't have a great shooting team but easy buckets in transition and the ability to slash to the hoop would more than make up for it.
A little statistical analysis to show just how unfortunate the early exits/transfers have been. The following are the per/minute efficiency numbers (based on the NBA.com equation) for all the players that should be wearing the Blue and Gold this year.:
| Drew Gordon | 0.59 |
| Reeves Nelson | 0.57 |
| Jrue Holiday | 0.51 |
| Chace Stanback | 0.47 |
| Malcolm Lee | 0.43 |
| Tyler Honeycutt | 0.37 |
| Mike Roll | 0.36 |
| Ryan Wright | 0.35 |
| Nikola Dragovich | 0.31 |
| James Keefe | 0.3 |
| Jerime Anderson | 0.28 |
Stanback and Wright's numbers are with UNLV and Oklahoma respectively, while Jrue's numbers are based on last year's stats and a freshman-to-sophomore year multiplier I came up with using similar players. For those of you that don't know, Stanback is leading a 12-2 UNLV team in rebounds and steals while putting up a respectable 8.6 points per game.
Long story short, while we could be doing slightly better with what we have this year, you have to admit that not having three of your four most productive players is going to submarine most teams.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Exactly the point I was trying to make...
…one of the major flaws with Howland is sustaining success and retaining talent. Not being able to keep Stanback was a blow (especially given what he has been able to do at UNLV), while losing JH really hurts us at PG, where JA (who is showing he is not cut out for the job) is getting a lot of minutes (leading to a lot of turnovers, mistakes, and tenative offense).
I was just going to say that N.
The word on the street is that guys don’t want to play for Howland. And, yes, we’ve had this argument before. Howland needs to open up the offense, but defense wins championships, etc. etc.
The point remains, Howland needs to do a better job of hanging on to the guys that make the difference. Many say that this is UCLA and that is all the reason anybody should want to be here. But, we are uber fans, and not everyone sees Westwood the way we do. Not everybody knows the legacy of Bruins hoops the way we do.
Howland and his staff need to wake up and join the 21st century and recruit the right kids before and after they sign their LOI. Then recruit them some more when everyone tells them how close they are to making mill
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by 




















