New 2010 Football Schedule: More Exposure For Bruins On National TV
When Texas Tech announced that their football game versus Texas in 2010 would be on September 18, there were fears that UCLA's game with the Longhorns would be moved. The date of the clash in Austin, TX could be moved or the year the two teams played could be moved. Well, it is the date that has been moved. Today, UCLA announced their 2010 football schedule and in addition to the Longhorns and Bruins on ABC in prime time, the entire schedule features more national exposure than UCLA has ever had.
New 2010 UCLA Football Schedule (Tentative)
Sept. 4 at Kansas State
Sept. 11 Stanford on ESPN or ESPN2, TBD
Sept. 18 Houston
Sept. 25 at Texas on ABC, 5:00 pm PT
Oct. 2 Washington State
Oct. 9 at California
Oct. 16 BYE
Oct. 21 at Oregon (Thurs.) on ESPN, 6:00 pm PT
Oct. 30 Arizona
Nov. 6 Oregon State
Nov. 13 at Washington
Nov. 20 BYE
Nov. 26 at Arizona State (Fri.), TV and Time TBD
Dec. 4 USC
Before the 2009 college football season has come to an end, the Bruins already have two prime time national games for 2010 and another confirmed national game. Odds are the Arizona St. game will also be a national game (although whether it is ESPN or FSN will be determined later) and the USC game will likely be on ABC so long as both teams prove to be national players.
With national signing day just a month away, you have to look at this type of exposure and smile because you can bet it will help with 2010, 2011 and 2012 recruiting. It will also allow the entire country to see the blue and gold, which should benefit the athletic department in their negotiations for a new apparel and equipment provider. The ease with which our Bruins in exile will be able to see CRN's bunch is a plus too. Needless to say, this is definitely a football program on the rise. The question is how far it will rise.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Woo!
This means the home opener should be either a 4PM PST or 4:30 PM PST start, which’ll mean plenty of time for tailgating. That Houston game may be a 7:30 PM start on FSN as well, so it looks like we may finally get some relief in terms of having morning games next year.
AZ and OSU games will probably be 12:30 PM PST starts on ABC, though.
I like the new schedule. All three of our first games are now winnable, and the byes are in great spots. The stretch that will make or break the season is AZ, Oregon State, and @Washington. Win all three of those (entirely winnable games given the home/away mix), and the season sets up quite nicely down the stretch.
I like it
But Thursday night in Eugene. Yikes. The stretch between the two bye weeks are going to be brutal starting with Oregon and ending with Washington.
I really like how the games are spaced out though. We have a little extra time before that last regular season game. Kansas State is going to be a tough very game. However, if we can pull a win at Manhattan … it may set us up really well.
It's as good as we could hope for
With our schedule being as tough as it is, the way it has set up couldn’t get much better. An early Pac-10 game, in this case Stanford, gives us an extra Pac-10 bye. As a result, we only have two back to back road games and both are spaced by a bye.
While Eugene on Thursday will be brutal, it could be the biggest win for the program in at least a decade if we pull it off. A big if, but Oregon could be a top 5 team and we’d be on in front of the entire country.
The Texas game should be a blast, on ABC in prime time and the way our schedule sets up, we could be 2-1 or 3-0 going into it. I think I’m going to make the Austin trip. I want my BBQ!
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 4:08 PM PST up reply actions
Yeah, that Oregon game will be very, very difficult
That said, the three week stretch with AZ, OSU and Washington is what is going to define the season. OSU loses Canfield next year so they’ll be breaking in a new quarterback….you have to hope that combined with being at home gives us a nice edge in that game.
As for Arizona, I’m still never entirely certain what to think of that team. They’re losing Mark Stoops and also could potentially lose Sonny Dykes if Texas Tech is interested in him…not sure how interested in him they are after that Holiday Bowl debacle, though. I don’t see AZ as potentially tough as they were this year.
I honestly think Washington might be the most difficult of those three games, with Locker being a senior and the team perhaps responding in Sarkisian’s second year. Plus, it’s at Washington.
I did read a rather humorous post on the SBN site for the Huskies that was predicting that UDub was going to finish 4th in conference. Not likely. Washington will be lucky to be 2-3 after its first five games, and 1-4 is a lot more likely. Their opening schedule is just brutal. @BYU (L), winnable game against Syracuse, Nebraska (L), @ Cal (L), @ USC (L). Perhaps they steal one of the games that I have marked down as Ls, but that’s not a good way to set up a run in the Pac-10.
Yeah I read that post too
Those guys takes on UCLA heading into game this season was amusing to say the least (John is a good guy though). I do think Huskies will be tough in Seattle next year with Locker.
However, this year if not for the turnovers and Prince’s injury on our end, we would have been able to blow them out at the Rose Bowl. We were killing them offensively. It will be interesting how we handle them with our new defensive personnel. Bullough will be on the spot (in that game and throughout the season).
Why would Oregon be any tougher on Thursday than Saturday?
Autzen is the most consistent home terror in the Pac 10 — I see no difference in difficulty between playing there Saturday morning or Thursday night. At least a win will be seen by the entire nation this way.
nice to have byes
before our two shortened weeks
Extra day before SC
We play Arizona State on Friday the 26th and have an extra day to fill our passion buckets for the Saturday December 4 rumble on our lawn.
Maybe not such a great schedule for student attendence
School next year begins Sept 20 (Monday of 0 week), so the Stanford game will definitely be less attended. Can’t be sure about the Houston game, but I’d bet on a smaller student section for that game as well, as many (at least in the dorms) will be moving in then.
Also, the SC game is on the Saturday before finals, which again may be a factor to some. And as last year, it could cause problems for the bonfire.
Well you guys :-)
You have a lot of time to wage an all out campaign to boost the attendance and get all the upperclassmen (living in the apartments) to come out early!
Specifically games broadcast by David Norrie
So let’s hope the dude is not in the ESPN booth either.
Texas game will probably be Musberger and Herbstreit
Oh, joy.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 4:20 PM PST up reply actions
well if you're going to Austin it won't matter right? :)
Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?
by bucknellbruin on Jan 4, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions
Good call!
All of a sudden, I really don’t care who is calling the game.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 7:15 PM PST up reply actions
There's no way
We’re on college gameday
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by 03rdn9 on Jan 4, 2010 7:10 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
Depends on what the other games are that day
and how each team starts. With Rice, Wyoming and Texas Tech to start the season, UT could be undefeated and we could get off to a good start as well at 2-1 or 3-0, although it will be tough.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 7:18 PM PST up reply actions
I really don't want to be an away team
Especially if it would be on Gameday. So much fluff and if we get blown out, it will bring the program down… Remember OU TTU?
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by 03rdn9 on Jan 4, 2010 7:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions
We're the primetime ABC game
so he’ll likely be calling our game. Whether or not we’re on Gameday is completely independent of that.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 8:41 PM PST up reply actions
When has he not called
The gameday showcase? He’s done two in one day, but when has he not? With the exception of the UF vs UA game (CBS owns everything Urban Meyer) he has called every gameday matchup
Formerly ucla13_usc9
He doesn't do the Gameday game
He does the ABC prime time game. Sometimes that’s the Gameday game, other times it is not, but his game assignment has nothing to do with where Gameday is.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 10:43 PM PST up reply actions
Sometimes
when they reach the primetime game he gives his analysis on the game rather than calling it so he doesn’t show objectivity.
Or to put it another way
sometimes Herbstreit’s head appears on my screen with his mouth moving, but I don’t hear what he’s saying.
I never have understood how so many highly educated and highly intelligent brothers and sisters of mine can weep and gnash their collective teeth and rend their collective blue and gold clothing about how bad the announcers are when the power to resolve the issue is that one little button on the remote called “Vol.”
A parable may help illustrate and educate. There was a man who went camping and wanted to build a fire. So he went to the next campsite to get a light. Seeing no one around, he picked up a handful of red hot coals to take back to his place and start his fire. Holding hot coals in his hand cause great pain, and how how he complained. The red hot coals were not only painful, they were biased, because they hurt the palm of his hand more than his fingers. And they weren’t accurate. And they were nonsensical. But more than anything, they caused constant, incessant, unendurable pain. But the man wanted his campfire lit, so he kept those coals clenched tightly in his hand, lest he drop one and miss the benefit that it would confer. Indeed, he kept those coals in his hand until they simply went out. After that, he went on his favorite campfire blog and found that many of his friends were also typing one-handed because they, too, had burned their hands by holding red hot coals.
Then an older, more geezerly sage, pointed out that all of their pain could have been avoided had they just dropped the coals and used their lighter, which strangely enough resembles the volume button on a tv remote. That sage also reminded them that every time they picked up those hot coals, they got burned, and it caused tremendous pain. He noted that all of these poor souls were smart enough to know that the stuff that looked like flames probably was flames. He asked them, “Brothers and sisters, why do you inflict such pain on yourself when it could so easily be avoided?” “Oh foolish geezer,” they said. “We scoff at you. Yea, we scorn your advice. We have to pick up the coals. We have always picked up the coals. The coals are our friends, because they provide all sorts of things that we can’t do without. How could we tell whether our campfire was actually burning just by looking at it. We have to have those coals always burning our hands to make us aware that our campfire is, indeed, burning. We simply cannot know if our campfire is burning otherwise. If we dropped Herbstreit or the Lavinoma, we will lose those precious insights.” The geezerly sage replied, “Tell me then what these great benefits are, so that I too can learn why it’s so desireable to have hot coals causing me the great pain that you complain about.”
Yea and verily, no one could answer the geezer. All was quiet, except for more complaints about how much pain the coals caused. The geezer sighed and walked away, back out into the wilderness, wondering when his voice would be heard. Alas, it came to pass that the volume button was directed at the geezerly sage, who only wanted to end the pain which his brothers and sisters were inflicting on themselves. His voice became weaker and weaker. And then his brother and sisters started misusing the apostrophe, and the geezerly sage wept bitter tears.
Thus endeth the reading of the parable. Go and listen no more.
by Fox 71 on Jan 5, 2010 8:55 PM PST up reply actions 4 recs
Why?
Is it the deep insight of Corso? What does he say that’s (a) accurate or (b) something you didn’t already know? Same questions about any of the guys. if it’s the enthusiasm of all the kids yelling “Wooo” at the top of their lungs, just go to a high school football game on Friday Night, and you get plenty of kids yelling “woo.” Do you need to know who they think is going to win? Again, why? Does it enhance your viewing experience to know that one of these guys thinks Texas will win while the other thinks Alabama will win? Do you care about Mark May’s opinion about anything?
Are these guys experts? The California Evidence Code helps here. Section 801(a) says, in paraphrase, that a witness such as Corso or Herbie, can offer opinions only when they are related to a subject that is sufficiently beyond the common experiense that the opinion of an expert would assist the watcher of the football game. In my experience, none of these guys offer anything that you don’t already know. (There is one exception, in my opinion. Coach Dungy – I listen to his analysis of what happened because it really adds insights.) But here’s the kicker. Section 801(b) says that in addition to being on a subject which the watcher knows nothing about, like curling — oh wait, it’s football which everyone who participated in this blog knows well — the expert must be giving his opinion “based on matter, including his special knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education.” What “special knowledge, skill, experience, training and education” do any of these guys have that the viewer doesn’t have? Corso is especially vulnerable here – he was a sub-mediocre coach. His overall record was 73-85-6. He averaged two conference wins a year in his ten years in the Big 10. According to one wealthy and influential alumnus (named Wiki Pedia), he pads his football expertise by serving as the Director of Business Development for Ticonderoga Pencils. Now that is a resume that would surely make you want to hear everything he says.
Do the pearls of wisdom on Game Day add to your enjoyment of the game? If so, then by all means watch it and listen to it. If the announcers tell you things you can’t see for yourself, or add insights that you didn’t think of, then you must watch. But if the announcers make you hurt, or if they detract from your enjoyment of the game, as just about every color man does, or if they are just wrong a substantial part of the time, they why do you endure it? Is it to hear the crowd yell, or hear the sneakers squeak? If you have to hear those things, then turn the volume way up. But you seem to have forfeited your right to gripe about what you hear.
Or as our (actually your) governor said, “Cohm vit me if you vant to liff.”
Fox
FWIW I have hardly watched Game Day since I started blogging. I only watch it now if it precedes a UCLA game on ESPN or going back to check highlights of it online re. a topic I am interested in finding more context on.
I think there is much more information given out here than on Game Day or Real Housewives of Bristol
All the technical details about defenses and zone blocking and all that is what we get here and never see on Gameday or anywhere else. That’s what we should be getting there, with the benefit that it comes from guys who have actually played. Coach Dungy explains that a lot better on his analysis of the pro games.
One of the things that I would really like to see on one of the TV stations is a visual explanation of some of the things the guys just blithely spout. For example, “Well, Bill, State’s quarterback is really slow in his reads and checkdowns. He’s got to fow the footbaw quicka if State’s goin’ to win this footbaw game.” What does it look like from the QB’s perspective? When he goes back and looks right, what does he see that tells him he’s got to look elsewhere? I would like to see that illustrated from the QB’s point of view.
My favorite is “Well, Bill, States’s defensive coordiator really made some adjustments at halftime of this footbaw game to shut down Tech’s running game.” What sort of adjustments? The end moved over three feet and got a different angle that’s better? OK, tell me that. And also tell me why it’s better. Presumably these guys aren’t just making up these comments …. Well, maybe they are just making them up. Forget that.
I leave the sound off because I can tell what happens on a particular play. I can watch the slo-mo replay and see the good block. Or I can see where the guy missed the block. I leave the sound off because I don’t need to hear the attempt to create excitement (whether it’s real or part of the effort to make the game interesting.) I don’t need to know what some ex-coach would have done (and Coach Dungy NEVER says that.) There’s a reason why he’s an ex-coach. i don’t need to hear people state the obvious. “Well, Bill, State’s in four-down territory in this footbaw game.”
Maybe I’m getting to be a geezer, but I don’t think so. I have had the good fortune to work a few games in the press box at the Trop, and have listened to the way Duane Staats and Joe Magraine worked games. Not all of the best stuff came with the microphone off, although that was generally some really funny stuff. Those guys did indeed provide insights, although not all of them got on the air. (E.g., I remember vividly when a particular ex-player color guy mentioned between innings that he thought a pitcher’s ostensible injury after he had been shelled for lots of runs was fake. He pointed out that you can’t be cut or sent down when you’re on the DL, and mentioned one of his ex-teammates who did just that. Another announcer (not Staats, but you’ve heard him and seen him) said that a particular player (who I don’t think is in the league any more) is a horrible person, and it hurt him personally to have to say that he did anything well. That’s the kind of stuff I would like to hear on the air, but obviously that’s not going to happen.
You take these things to heart huh?
I just like to observe people even talk about College Football even if they don’t know what they’re saying. I try to talk and debate with my friends at school but they either get bored or hate sports.
Theres few things i wake up early in the morning for and college gameday is one of them.
Well, at least do me a favor
When you talk and debate with your friends, don’t use the word “like.” Civilization will advance a little more for your effort.
one of my all-time favourite posts
If I could quadruple ‘rec’ it, I would.
A funny thing happened while viewing the floats...
We were out viewing the Rose Parade floats yesterday and stopped at the LA Times booth. Among the free giveaways were 2010 football schedule posters for UCLA and USC. The Bruin poster pictured Jackie Robinson; the Trojan poster showed off Mark Sanchez. There were very few Bruin posters; the last was gone by the time we left; whereas there were lots of Trojan posters still on the table. So we tried to figure out why this was so:
A) Times has SC bias so they printed twice as many Trojan ones as Bruin ones?
B) There were originally an equal number of each, but the sophisticated visitors and the literate ones chose UCLA?
C) Families (the majority of the attendees) gravitated to Jackie and his race relations contributions rather than to Mark and his gender relations degradations?
"Exposes"
Interesting choice of words, but I’m sure no suspicious meaning was intended.
I hope we are not “exposed” to the world unless it’s to show everyone how much we have improved…
It's all good
Oh, you didn’t have to do that. I just kept thinking that some anti-Bruin was going to pick up on that. Let’s hope we continue our wins on TV following the Temple game.
GREAT SCHEDULE.
Love the fact that the Bruins are still playing Texas. Looking forward to traveling to Austin.
Love the Thursday night game at Autzen. Excellent exposure.
Love the day-after-Thanksgiving game at ASU. More exposure and an extra day to prepare for $UC*.
Love the TWO byes (especially before road games).
Love Stanford on the WWL.
Kudos to CRN and the AD for getting this done.
Much improved over last season (OSU only on tape delay and WSU only on a station almost everybody did not get).
Can we all just agree
that we ALL travel to Austin and have a massive UCLA party there?
greg in denver - UCLA guy for life
by gbruin on Jan 4, 2010 7:47 PM PST reply actions 1 recs
HUZZAH!
No more Texas game on Yom Kipur!! This must be noted, my fellow Bruins ;).
Now, us Jews can celebrate the new year…and go see the bruins down in the South haha.
GO BRUINS
B-Y-E??
So we’re playing this B-Y-E team twice? Who are they, Brigham Young Extension?
Bye bye addidas
That’s what I hope to hear soon. Anyone have any insight as to exactly when our contract is up and if we are talking to under armour or nike? Either company is a drastic improvement from the trash addidas has been slaping our logo on and calling merchandise.
by UcantCLA on Jan 4, 2010 10:05 PM PST via mobile reply actions
The adidas contract ends in June
We are currently talking with all three major players, Nike, Under Armour and adidas.
Formerly ryebreadraz
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 10:42 PM PST up reply actions
i will celebrate like we won the national championship
the day we get rid of adidas…okay maybe slight exaggeration but you get my point. Personally I would like to see nike, because i think they do a much better job of marketing their teams, but UA is fine too, as long as its not adidas, im really not a fan.
I'm curious about the Adidas situation
Because though perhaps football isn’t huge fans of them, Adidas is great for all the other sports. I’m not sure how UA fits in that picture, considering UCLA isn’t JUST a football school. We certainly must consider the other sports, though I imagine our major revenue-producing sports get the biggest say. I imagine Nike does a good job of producing products for all sports; not sure about UA.
by Captain Leebeard on Jan 4, 2010 11:53 PM PST up reply actions
Great News!!
No game on Yom Kippur!!!! Some G-d somewhere, heard our prayers!
See you all in Austin!
Man, That Would Suck....
I was counting on us being on primetime Saturday night down in Austin….
Are we STILL suffering from that 20-6 debacle vs. Notre Dame back in ’07?
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Jan 5, 2010 4:28 AM PST up reply actions
Anyone notice
that U$C has 13 games because they play Hawaii? And this time, no bye before they play us. Time to pay the piper, trOJies.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
What? No Charleston Southern or FIU?
What’s the deal with scheduling K-State, Houston and Texas as our OOC opponents? I guess we had no choice but to schedule these cupcakes. I mean, a true national championship contender would have scheduled much tougher non-conference opponents like Charleston Southern, or Tennessee-Chattanooga, or even powerhouse Florida International.
How much lower can we go?!
Seriously though, awesome schedule. Yeah, it will be tough and we won’t win all of them, but I’ll be psyched to watch us play.

by 



















