Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jeremy Lin's Game-Winner Was Incredible, Worth Remembering

New 2010 Football Schedule: More Exposure For Bruins On National TV

When Texas Tech announced that their football game versus Texas in 2010 would be on September 18, there were fears that UCLA's game with the Longhorns would be moved. The date of the clash in Austin, TX could be moved or the year the two teams played could be moved. Well, it is the date that has been moved. Today, UCLA announced their 2010 football schedule and in addition to the Longhorns and Bruins on ABC in prime time, the entire schedule features more national exposure than UCLA has ever had.

New 2010 UCLA Football Schedule (Tentative)
Sept. 4 at Kansas State
Sept. 11 Stanford on ESPN or ESPN2, TBD
Sept. 18 Houston
Sept. 25 at Texas on ABC, 5:00 pm PT
Oct. 2 Washington State
Oct. 9 at California
Oct. 16 BYE
Oct. 21 at Oregon (Thurs.) on ESPN, 6:00 pm PT
Oct. 30 Arizona
Nov. 6 Oregon State
Nov. 13 at Washington
Nov. 20 BYE
Nov. 26 at Arizona State (Fri.), TV and Time TBD
Dec. 4 USC

Before the 2009 college football season has come to an end, the Bruins already have two prime time national games for 2010 and another confirmed national game. Odds are the Arizona St. game will also be a national game (although whether it is ESPN or FSN will be determined later) and the USC game will likely be on ABC so long as both teams prove to be national players.

With national signing day just a month away, you have to look at this type of exposure and smile because you can bet it will help with 2010, 2011 and 2012 recruiting. It will also allow the entire country to see the blue and gold, which should benefit the athletic department in their negotiations for a new apparel and equipment provider. The ease with which our Bruins in exile will be able to see CRN's bunch is a plus too. Needless to say, this is definitely a football program on the rise. The question is how far it will rise.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ha

I was just going to write this. Thanks Rye.

by Nestor on Jan 4, 2010 3:55 PM PST reply actions  

Woo!

This means the home opener should be either a 4PM PST or 4:30 PM PST start, which’ll mean plenty of time for tailgating. That Houston game may be a 7:30 PM start on FSN as well, so it looks like we may finally get some relief in terms of having morning games next year.

AZ and OSU games will probably be 12:30 PM PST starts on ABC, though.

I like the new schedule. All three of our first games are now winnable, and the byes are in great spots. The stretch that will make or break the season is AZ, Oregon State, and @Washington. Win all three of those (entirely winnable games given the home/away mix), and the season sets up quite nicely down the stretch.

by CAJason80 on Jan 4, 2010 3:56 PM PST reply actions  

I like it

But Thursday night in Eugene. Yikes. The stretch between the two bye weeks are going to be brutal starting with Oregon and ending with Washington.

I really like how the games are spaced out though. We have a little extra time before that last regular season game. Kansas State is going to be a tough very game. However, if we can pull a win at Manhattan … it may set us up really well.

by Nestor on Jan 4, 2010 3:59 PM PST up reply actions  

It's as good as we could hope for

With our schedule being as tough as it is, the way it has set up couldn’t get much better. An early Pac-10 game, in this case Stanford, gives us an extra Pac-10 bye. As a result, we only have two back to back road games and both are spaced by a bye.

While Eugene on Thursday will be brutal, it could be the biggest win for the program in at least a decade if we pull it off. A big if, but Oregon could be a top 5 team and we’d be on in front of the entire country.

The Texas game should be a blast, on ABC in prime time and the way our schedule sets up, we could be 2-1 or 3-0 going into it. I think I’m going to make the Austin trip. I want my BBQ!

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 4:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, that Oregon game will be very, very difficult

That said, the three week stretch with AZ, OSU and Washington is what is going to define the season. OSU loses Canfield next year so they’ll be breaking in a new quarterback….you have to hope that combined with being at home gives us a nice edge in that game.

As for Arizona, I’m still never entirely certain what to think of that team. They’re losing Mark Stoops and also could potentially lose Sonny Dykes if Texas Tech is interested in him…not sure how interested in him they are after that Holiday Bowl debacle, though. I don’t see AZ as potentially tough as they were this year.

I honestly think Washington might be the most difficult of those three games, with Locker being a senior and the team perhaps responding in Sarkisian’s second year. Plus, it’s at Washington.

I did read a rather humorous post on the SBN site for the Huskies that was predicting that UDub was going to finish 4th in conference. Not likely. Washington will be lucky to be 2-3 after its first five games, and 1-4 is a lot more likely. Their opening schedule is just brutal. @BYU (L), winnable game against Syracuse, Nebraska (L), @ Cal (L), @ USC (L). Perhaps they steal one of the games that I have marked down as Ls, but that’s not a good way to set up a run in the Pac-10.

by CAJason80 on Jan 4, 2010 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah I read that post too

Those guys takes on UCLA heading into game this season was amusing to say the least (John is a good guy though). I do think Huskies will be tough in Seattle next year with Locker.

However, this year if not for the turnovers and Prince’s injury on our end, we would have been able to blow them out at the Rose Bowl. We were killing them offensively. It will be interesting how we handle them with our new defensive personnel. Bullough will be on the spot (in that game and throughout the season).

by Nestor on Jan 4, 2010 4:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Why would Oregon be any tougher on Thursday than Saturday?

Autzen is the most consistent home terror in the Pac 10 — I see no difference in difficulty between playing there Saturday morning or Thursday night. At least a win will be seen by the entire nation this way.

by bluebland on Jan 4, 2010 5:13 PM PST up reply actions  

nice to have byes

before our two shortened weeks

by britishbruin on Jan 4, 2010 3:56 PM PST reply actions  

Extra day before SC

We play Arizona State on Friday the 26th and have an extra day to fill our passion buckets for the Saturday December 4 rumble on our lawn.

by peggysue69 on Jan 4, 2010 4:06 PM PST reply actions  

Maybe not such a great schedule for student attendence

School next year begins Sept 20 (Monday of 0 week), so the Stanford game will definitely be less attended. Can’t be sure about the Houston game, but I’d bet on a smaller student section for that game as well, as many (at least in the dorms) will be moving in then.

Also, the SC game is on the Saturday before finals, which again may be a factor to some. And as last year, it could cause problems for the bonfire.

by jaffa on Jan 4, 2010 4:08 PM PST reply actions  

Well you guys :-)

You have a lot of time to wage an all out campaign to boost the attendance and get all the upperclassmen (living in the apartments) to come out early!

by Nestor on Jan 4, 2010 4:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Specifically games broadcast by David Norrie

So let’s hope the dude is not in the ESPN booth either.

by Nestor on Jan 4, 2010 4:18 PM PST up reply actions  

well if you're going to Austin it won't matter right? :)

Has there ever been a player better than Detlef Schrempf?

by bucknellbruin on Jan 4, 2010 5:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Good call!

All of a sudden, I really don’t care who is calling the game.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 7:15 PM PST up reply actions  

There's no way

We’re on college gameday

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by 03rdn9 on Jan 4, 2010 7:10 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Depends on what the other games are that day

and how each team starts. With Rice, Wyoming and Texas Tech to start the season, UT could be undefeated and we could get off to a good start as well at 2-1 or 3-0, although it will be tough.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 7:18 PM PST up reply actions  

I really don't want to be an away team

Especially if it would be on Gameday. So much fluff and if we get blown out, it will bring the program down… Remember OU TTU?

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by 03rdn9 on Jan 4, 2010 7:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Herbstreit

usually doesn’t call the gameday game and instead heads to another big primetime matchup

by AMM19 on Jan 4, 2010 8:38 PM PST up reply actions  

We're the primetime ABC game

so he’ll likely be calling our game. Whether or not we’re on Gameday is completely independent of that.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 8:41 PM PST up reply actions  

When has he not called

The gameday showcase? He’s done two in one day, but when has he not? With the exception of the UF vs UA game (CBS owns everything Urban Meyer) he has called every gameday matchup

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by 03rdn9 on Jan 4, 2010 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

He doesn't do the Gameday game

He does the ABC prime time game. Sometimes that’s the Gameday game, other times it is not, but his game assignment has nothing to do with where Gameday is.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 10:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Sometimes

when they reach the primetime game he gives his analysis on the game rather than calling it so he doesn’t show objectivity.

by AMM19 on Jan 5, 2010 6:56 PM PST up reply actions  

WOW

that was moving, but I’m a HUGE fan of College Gameday

by AMM19 on Jan 5, 2010 9:54 PM PST up reply actions  

Why?

Is it the deep insight of Corso? What does he say that’s (a) accurate or (b) something you didn’t already know? Same questions about any of the guys. if it’s the enthusiasm of all the kids yelling “Wooo” at the top of their lungs, just go to a high school football game on Friday Night, and you get plenty of kids yelling “woo.” Do you need to know who they think is going to win? Again, why? Does it enhance your viewing experience to know that one of these guys thinks Texas will win while the other thinks Alabama will win? Do you care about Mark May’s opinion about anything?

Are these guys experts? The California Evidence Code helps here. Section 801(a) says, in paraphrase, that a witness such as Corso or Herbie, can offer opinions only when they are related to a subject that is sufficiently beyond the common experiense that the opinion of an expert would assist the watcher of the football game. In my experience, none of these guys offer anything that you don’t already know. (There is one exception, in my opinion. Coach Dungy – I listen to his analysis of what happened because it really adds insights.) But here’s the kicker. Section 801(b) says that in addition to being on a subject which the watcher knows nothing about, like curling — oh wait, it’s football which everyone who participated in this blog knows well — the expert must be giving his opinion “based on matter, including his special knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education.” What “special knowledge, skill, experience, training and education” do any of these guys have that the viewer doesn’t have? Corso is especially vulnerable here – he was a sub-mediocre coach. His overall record was 73-85-6. He averaged two conference wins a year in his ten years in the Big 10. According to one wealthy and influential alumnus (named Wiki Pedia), he pads his football expertise by serving as the Director of Business Development for Ticonderoga Pencils. Now that is a resume that would surely make you want to hear everything he says.

Do the pearls of wisdom on Game Day add to your enjoyment of the game? If so, then by all means watch it and listen to it. If the announcers tell you things you can’t see for yourself, or add insights that you didn’t think of, then you must watch. But if the announcers make you hurt, or if they detract from your enjoyment of the game, as just about every color man does, or if they are just wrong a substantial part of the time, they why do you endure it? Is it to hear the crowd yell, or hear the sneakers squeak? If you have to hear those things, then turn the volume way up. But you seem to have forfeited your right to gripe about what you hear.

Or as our (actually your) governor said, “Cohm vit me if you vant to liff.”

by Fox 71 on Jan 6, 2010 6:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Fox

FWIW I have hardly watched Game Day since I started blogging. I only watch it now if it precedes a UCLA game on ESPN or going back to check highlights of it online re. a topic I am interested in finding more context on.

by Nestor on Jan 6, 2010 7:56 AM PST up reply actions  

I think there is much more information given out here than on Game Day or Real Housewives of Bristol

All the technical details about defenses and zone blocking and all that is what we get here and never see on Gameday or anywhere else. That’s what we should be getting there, with the benefit that it comes from guys who have actually played. Coach Dungy explains that a lot better on his analysis of the pro games.

One of the things that I would really like to see on one of the TV stations is a visual explanation of some of the things the guys just blithely spout. For example, “Well, Bill, State’s quarterback is really slow in his reads and checkdowns. He’s got to fow the footbaw quicka if State’s goin’ to win this footbaw game.” What does it look like from the QB’s perspective? When he goes back and looks right, what does he see that tells him he’s got to look elsewhere? I would like to see that illustrated from the QB’s point of view.

My favorite is “Well, Bill, States’s defensive coordiator really made some adjustments at halftime of this footbaw game to shut down Tech’s running game.” What sort of adjustments? The end moved over three feet and got a different angle that’s better? OK, tell me that. And also tell me why it’s better. Presumably these guys aren’t just making up these comments …. Well, maybe they are just making them up. Forget that.

I leave the sound off because I can tell what happens on a particular play. I can watch the slo-mo replay and see the good block. Or I can see where the guy missed the block. I leave the sound off because I don’t need to hear the attempt to create excitement (whether it’s real or part of the effort to make the game interesting.) I don’t need to know what some ex-coach would have done (and Coach Dungy NEVER says that.) There’s a reason why he’s an ex-coach. i don’t need to hear people state the obvious. “Well, Bill, State’s in four-down territory in this footbaw game.”

Maybe I’m getting to be a geezer, but I don’t think so. I have had the good fortune to work a few games in the press box at the Trop, and have listened to the way Duane Staats and Joe Magraine worked games. Not all of the best stuff came with the microphone off, although that was generally some really funny stuff. Those guys did indeed provide insights, although not all of them got on the air. (E.g., I remember vividly when a particular ex-player color guy mentioned between innings that he thought a pitcher’s ostensible injury after he had been shelled for lots of runs was fake. He pointed out that you can’t be cut or sent down when you’re on the DL, and mentioned one of his ex-teammates who did just that. Another announcer (not Staats, but you’ve heard him and seen him) said that a particular player (who I don’t think is in the league any more) is a horrible person, and it hurt him personally to have to say that he did anything well. That’s the kind of stuff I would like to hear on the air, but obviously that’s not going to happen.

by Fox 71 on Jan 6, 2010 9:29 AM PST up reply actions  

You take these things to heart huh?

I just like to observe people even talk about College Football even if they don’t know what they’re saying. I try to talk and debate with my friends at school but they either get bored or hate sports.

Theres few things i wake up early in the morning for and college gameday is one of them.

by AMM19 on Jan 6, 2010 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

Well, at least do me a favor

When you talk and debate with your friends, don’t use the word “like.” Civilization will advance a little more for your effort.

by Fox 71 on Jan 6, 2010 5:30 PM PST up reply actions  

oh Fox71

you’re so wise

"I can't believe I ate the whole thing" Homer Simpson

by AMM19 on Jan 6, 2010 7:30 PM PST up reply actions  

one of my all-time favourite posts

If I could quadruple ‘rec’ it, I would.

by britishbruin on Jan 6, 2010 7:36 AM PST up reply actions  

A funny thing happened while viewing the floats...

We were out viewing the Rose Parade floats yesterday and stopped at the LA Times booth. Among the free giveaways were 2010 football schedule posters for UCLA and USC. The Bruin poster pictured Jackie Robinson; the Trojan poster showed off Mark Sanchez. There were very few Bruin posters; the last was gone by the time we left; whereas there were lots of Trojan posters still on the table. So we tried to figure out why this was so:
A) Times has SC bias so they printed twice as many Trojan ones as Bruin ones?
B) There were originally an equal number of each, but the sophisticated visitors and the literate ones chose UCLA?
C) Families (the majority of the attendees) gravitated to Jackie and his race relations contributions rather than to Mark and his gender relations degradations?

by ucla7477 on Jan 4, 2010 5:01 PM PST reply actions  

"Exposes"

Interesting choice of words, but I’m sure no suspicious meaning was intended.

I hope we are not “exposed” to the world unless it’s to show everyone how much we have improved…

by Barnes2JJ on Jan 4, 2010 5:27 PM PST reply actions  

lol

Ok. I didn’t want to take any chances. Since it’s top of BN, made a quick edit. :-)

by Nestor on Jan 4, 2010 5:29 PM PST up reply actions  

It's all good

Oh, you didn’t have to do that. I just kept thinking that some anti-Bruin was going to pick up on that. Let’s hope we continue our wins on TV following the Temple game.

by Barnes2JJ on Jan 5, 2010 5:12 AM PST up reply actions  

GREAT SCHEDULE.

Love the fact that the Bruins are still playing Texas. Looking forward to traveling to Austin.
Love the Thursday night game at Autzen. Excellent exposure.
Love the day-after-Thanksgiving game at ASU. More exposure and an extra day to prepare for $UC*.
Love the TWO byes (especially before road games).
Love Stanford on the WWL.

Kudos to CRN and the AD for getting this done.

Much improved over last season (OSU only on tape delay and WSU only on a station almost everybody did not get).

by orlandobruin on Jan 4, 2010 6:20 PM PST reply actions  

Can we all just agree

that we ALL travel to Austin and have a massive UCLA party there?

greg in denver - UCLA guy for life

by gbruin on Jan 4, 2010 7:47 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

YES!

Gargantuan party! Get there Bruins!!!

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Jan 4, 2010 7:51 PM PST up reply actions  

HUZZAH!

No more Texas game on Yom Kipur!! This must be noted, my fellow Bruins ;).

Now, us Jews can celebrate the new year…and go see the bruins down in the South haha.

GO BRUINS

by PopnFried on Jan 4, 2010 8:10 PM PST reply actions  

B-Y-E??

So we’re playing this B-Y-E team twice? Who are they, Brigham Young Extension?

by FilmBruin on Jan 4, 2010 8:12 PM PST reply actions  

Bye bye addidas

That’s what I hope to hear soon. Anyone have any insight as to exactly when our contract is up and if we are talking to under armour or nike? Either company is a drastic improvement from the trash addidas has been slaping our logo on and calling merchandise.

by UcantCLA on Jan 4, 2010 10:05 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

The adidas contract ends in June

We are currently talking with all three major players, Nike, Under Armour and adidas.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 4, 2010 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

i will celebrate like we won the national championship

the day we get rid of adidas…okay maybe slight exaggeration but you get my point. Personally I would like to see nike, because i think they do a much better job of marketing their teams, but UA is fine too, as long as its not adidas, im really not a fan.

by uclabruin34 on Jan 4, 2010 11:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm curious about the Adidas situation

Because though perhaps football isn’t huge fans of them, Adidas is great for all the other sports. I’m not sure how UA fits in that picture, considering UCLA isn’t JUST a football school. We certainly must consider the other sports, though I imagine our major revenue-producing sports get the biggest say. I imagine Nike does a good job of producing products for all sports; not sure about UA.

by Captain Leebeard on Jan 4, 2010 11:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Great News!!

No game on Yom Kippur!!!! Some G-d somewhere, heard our prayers!

See you all in Austin!

by Bald Eagle on Jan 4, 2010 10:09 PM PST reply actions  

Man, That Would Suck....

I was counting on us being on primetime Saturday night down in Austin….

Are we STILL suffering from that 20-6 debacle vs. Notre Dame back in ’07?

Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Jan 5, 2010 4:28 AM PST up reply actions  

Anyone notice

that U$C has 13 games because they play Hawaii? And this time, no bye before they play us. Time to pay the piper, trOJies.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jan 5, 2010 11:48 AM PST reply actions  

What? No Charleston Southern or FIU?

What’s the deal with scheduling K-State, Houston and Texas as our OOC opponents? I guess we had no choice but to schedule these cupcakes. I mean, a true national championship contender would have scheduled much tougher non-conference opponents like Charleston Southern, or Tennessee-Chattanooga, or even powerhouse Florida International.

How much lower can we go?!

Seriously though, awesome schedule. Yeah, it will be tough and we won’t win all of them, but I’ll be psyched to watch us play.

by Kerckhoff405 on Jan 5, 2010 11:50 AM PST reply actions  

C U

IN austin!!! so excited!

by tundrabruin on Jan 5, 2010 2:34 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ks_ucla_small
A Break From Sports: Fun Old Pix of UCLA, Westwood
Small
UCLA Vital Signs and the Chianti Cancer

Recent FanPosts

Jaxnjaz_school_pic_11_2011_small
Ben Howland Cracks ESPN's Bottom 10
Licenseplate_small
Who Is Your Most Hated anti-UCLA Villian?
Small
Comparison to Stanford Athletics Fundraising
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
Warning: Southern Cal May Have Better Hoops Future than UCLA
Troll_small
Hoops Thoughts
Uclabear1_small
Atlanta Fans Are Not Too Amused By Jim Mora's Falcon Comments
Small
The Moment I Realized Howland Lost Me
Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. Cal
Small
Pop Up Ad on Cal Game Today

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB