Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Bruins Scratch, Claw and Clank Their Way to an Ugly, But Welcome Win

When the Bruins went down by 15, I turned to my dad and said, "at least we have one good basketball team." He thought I was talking about the Lakers, but boy was he wrong because apparently UCLA has a basketball team that can find a way to get it done late. UCLA trailed throughout the game and not only were losing, they looked like the far inferior team for the duration, but some great offensive play by two seniors, Michael Roll and Nikola Dragovic, led the Bruins back to a victory. Trailing by eight at half, the Bruins forced overtime and a jumper by Roll with 1.9 seconds left gave UCLA a 76-75 win. Here's the box score.

Player of the game honors certainly go to Roll. In addition to his game winning jumper off of a beautiful bank pass by Jerime Anderson, Roll was able to hit for a team-high 19 points to go along with five assists. Dragovic chimed in with 18 points and four assists of his own and while his defense was horrendous, he did hit some big shots so in a season with little to cheer about, we'll stick to that. Reeves Nelson had 15 points and two blocks, one of which was a key one late. Most of Nelson's damage came at the line, both literally and figuratively. Seven if Nelson's points came on free throws, but he did attempt 14 of them, bringing attention to UCLA's 15-26 effort as a team from the line. UCLA is the Pac-10's worst free throw shooting team and couldn't even live up to those expectations today, coming up short of their season average.

Star-divide

This way by no means a pretty game for UCLA. At times, the UCLA defense looked like they were training to be bullfighter, zone or man. There were a couple key stops though, namely Nelson's block and I would be remiss if I didn't mention a fantastic block by Bobo Morgan in the first half. While Cal made a distinct effort to attack Dragovic, it is also concerning to see the Bears get the ball to the free throw line against the UCLA zone off of the dribble. You cannot allow dribble penetration in the zone and UCLA did. As I said, it was not a pretty game and UCLA has a lot to work on, but when you can get a road win in the Pac-10, you take it and with this team, you run with it.

If there is one thing we can take from this game it is the effort and passion they showed throughout the second half and in overtime. While there were dozens of stupid plays by a variety of guys, the effort was there. Malcolm Lee, for the struggles he had, did his best to keep playing through some cramps (his frequent cramping has to be a concern though) and the entire Bruin team clearly were passionate and intense about winning this game. Lee's wanting to fight through the pain and the reactions of the bench in a tight game are just a couple examples, but you can all chime in with your own because they were a plenty.

Now, the key for UCLA will be translating this performance into another strong one on Saturday. A few times this season, including just last week, UCLA followed up a good effort with an embarrassment. That can't happen in what is always a hostile Maples Pavilion. This is your postgame thread so do with it what you'd like. That is everyone except N who is too busy eating crow.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Truth in 2010

Never ever doubt the unwaivering courage of a basketball player wearing blue whose coach is named Ben.

by peggysue69 on Jan 6, 2010 10:08 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

I do

And will continue to do so unless Senor Dragovic is benched

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by Josh Schlichter on Jan 6, 2010 10:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey Nes

Glad to see you didnt rip yourself too much Ryan I mean Nestor

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by Josh Schlichter on Jan 6, 2010 10:08 PM PST reply actions  

Interesting fact

if you rearrange the letters in “Ryan Rosenblatt”, you get “try an b la nestor”. I dunno what this means. This doesn’t completely make sense to me. But you can see where I’m going with this.

Go Bruins!

by Harsha on Jan 7, 2010 9:30 AM PST up reply actions  

The other good news is

Stanford beat U$C by a point tonight.

Bleeding powderkeg blue and gold for 55 years. Go Bruins!

by Digdog on Jan 6, 2010 10:10 PM PST reply actions  

THAT was welcome news, indeed.

I think it’s called a perfect day.

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Jan 6, 2010 11:47 PM PST up reply actions  

What crow? What crow are you guys talking about?

You guys already excited about a letdown loss against Stanford? :-)

Have a great night everyone. See in the am!!!

by Nestor on Jan 6, 2010 10:12 PM PST reply actions  

Live up to it!

Or else I’m gonna get a post going

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by Josh Schlichter on Jan 6, 2010 10:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Supreme Court cafteria

Since you are in D.C., I recommend the crow at the Supreme Court cafeteria. Have it with a caesar salad and some ice tea.

Hopefully Monday we can all dine on some scrumptious cardinal de stanford.

by peggysue69 on Jan 6, 2010 10:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Just remember Nestor

to always write up a pessimistic pregame warmup and always doubt our team, it seems to work

"I can't believe I ate the whole thing" Homer Simpson

by AMM19 on Jan 6, 2010 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Good night brothers and sisters

Hope there’s a FB game thread tomorrow night.

sjh

by Class of 66 on Jan 6, 2010 10:14 PM PST reply actions  

I'm watching the 2nd half again

It’s so much nicer with no stress! One thing I love it the bench reaction. Especially Moser and Bobo – those guys are LOVING it!

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Jan 6, 2010 10:16 PM PST reply actions  

I was at my aunt's house for her B-DAY

and my cousin was trying to go to sleep, she had been crying all day. They made me go to the other room as i was pumping my fists and flailed my arms very quietly though. One of my most exciting times watching ben ball.

"I can't believe I ate the whole thing" Homer Simpson

by AMM19 on Jan 6, 2010 11:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Had to avoid the 2nd half thread b/c I was about 15 mins behind

But regardless of how ugly the game was at times, it always feels good to win at Cal.

Definitely won’t be questioning effort today. Execution? Well, I’ll just allow myself to enjoy this win instead. :)

by insomniacslounge on Jan 6, 2010 10:18 PM PST reply actions  

Nice win for the Bruins tonight!

Even if it involved a lot of luck in terms of Cal’s abysmal 3-pt shooting, I will take it! Still waiting for the inevitable letdown against ’furd though. (I hate Furd more than Cal ever since the Maples Massacre) I am happily eating crow for my ND-trash talking right now.

Go Bruins!

by Bruin1996 on Jan 6, 2010 10:19 PM PST reply actions  

Agreed

but I love that the effort is there. These guys fight.

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Jan 6, 2010 10:19 PM PST up reply actions  

oops

that was a reply to insomniac

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Jan 6, 2010 10:20 PM PST up reply actions  

I agree that the effort level was way up tonight

But unfortunately they have a habit of being up and down.. really inconsistent.

Go Bruins!

by Bruin1996 on Jan 6, 2010 10:21 PM PST up reply actions  

+1

I’ll agree with ‘these guys fight’ when I see them do it for a couple of games in a row.

by britishbruin on Jan 6, 2010 10:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Nice trick, "Rye",

putting up the post-game thread while “Nestor” leaves little one-liners in the game thread.

Seriously though, this win still hasn’t sunk in. Maybe the anti-mojo took over my brain.

No matter. Despite turnovers and 3-pt bricks and FT atrocities, the team played with heart in the second half. Of course, making those 3’s and FTs helps and taking care of the ball.

Wonder how we can get to do that consistently.

greg in denver - UCLA guy for life

by gbruin on Jan 6, 2010 10:19 PM PST reply actions  

I took a peek at Conquest Cornickles to get their take on the Stanfurd game

I know they’re a little upset about the situation with their bball team now, but well after the game was over, they had a total of FIVE comments in their game thread. To put that in perspective, we had 1,282. I guess they’ve totally lost interest.

By the way, OJ2 isn’t exactly well liked over there, which is remarkable. It’s not like his baggage was invisible when he arrived.

by Fox 71 on Jan 6, 2010 10:20 PM PST reply actions  

I didn't think

they cared to begin with.

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Jan 6, 2010 10:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm rooting for Texas

and there should be a game thread up. If N doesn’t do one, I will.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 6, 2010 10:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Yep

We will def. do a game thread tomorrow night.

by Nestor on Jan 6, 2010 10:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey!

I thought you were going to bed.

Go Bruins!

by peggysue69 on Jan 6, 2010 10:33 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Whoever you like

Nestor put up a poll/fanshot asking which team people here are rooting for. Texas looks to have a slight advantage on BN.

formerly bruinhoo

by Patroclus on Jan 6, 2010 10:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey!

This is the 2nd time you said you were turning in—the adrenaline rush got you rattled? That win has got me wide awake.

by peggysue69 on Jan 6, 2010 10:36 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Tough one

I still have a love for Texas after the last Rose Bowl they won! I also have no problem with Alabama. I will be rooting for whoever is losing to catch up and send it to OT! :)

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Jan 6, 2010 10:25 PM PST up reply actions  

One thing I am going to think about in the am

Our zone defense. Cal shot very poorly. Unbelievably poor. However, we did learn in our podcast (kids you should listen to it) that Cal had tough times against zone D before this season (even though it was without Robertson). Still that discussion was prophetic tonight. Our zone D frustrated them in the second, allowing our offense to get going in second. If we made our FTs (just like we did against ASU) this wouldn’t be a close game.

Of course now I am bracing for a cold shooting day and a listless performance against Stanford.

by Nestor on Jan 6, 2010 10:24 PM PST reply actions  

Had Lee even made one of his front end 1-and-1’s, this game might not even have been close

I loved seeing the zone though. Yeah there were times when the team showed that they were new to the zone, but there were times when the zone seemed to absolutely stifle Cal’s every attempt and the mixing up between zone and man-to-man seemed to keep Cal out of sync all 2nd half.

by nickramz on Jan 6, 2010 10:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Interesting

I thought our zone D looked out of sync (particularly in the first half), and demonstrated our lack of comfort with it – when Cal wanted to, they ran plays across the middle from the backside, and we didn’t deal with it at all well, with ND and RN not communicating well and not transferring responsibility on the men moving without the ball. In the second half, I was watching ND/RN more closely, and they started maintaining physical contact with players more tightly – making sure they knew where the players were even if they were looking in the other direction at the ball, rather than letting them float around. Looked like some coaching instructions had come down (presumably via the half-time interviews…). Didn’t stop players (ND chief among them) from missing assignments from time to time, but looked a lot tighter to me. But in terms of Cal’s 3-ball shooting – we were doing just as good a job at inducing misses from them beyond the arc as they were at inducing misses from us at the stripe.

I think mixing up the defenses was a good move, though, helping keep Cal off balance. I think that served us better than sticking with one strategy. IMHO we don’t play man or zone well enough to make it our only defensive weapon against any opponent.

by britishbruin on Jan 6, 2010 10:37 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you still up?

Goodness gracious sakes alive—go to sleep Nestor!

by peggysue69 on Jan 6, 2010 10:39 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

thoughts

wow so much good and bad in one game. .. here are my random thoughts in terribly thought out order.

—We can complain about how bad we are at the line, but in reality we shot to form. Cal has only themselves to blame 2-20 3-ptrs for a great 3-pt shooting team.

—. If we have to rely on ND to shoot well to win games we will not win many games. I thought he was weak in man-2-man, but in the zone he might be worse. I think he needs to shoot 70% to be a net positive while zoning and about 60% when manning.

— We can improve on our careless turnovers. How many were forced or due to even decent defense? JA takes a few steps forward on offense then takes them right back with awful and nearly awful turnovers. (except for that clever final pass deflected off the defender’s arm to Roll for the game-winner) Not to mention he can’t catch or lacks concentration when catching. I think JA is getting closer to playing decent offense, but his defense is awful. Man just lay a body on someone going by you and let the refs foul you out.. same goes for ND.

—TH and RN can rebound. Then need to play as many minutes as their fatigue and foul trouble allowes. And our guards are ok at it as well, but then again will we ever be able to fastbreak off a miss needing all 5 players to rebound?

—We clearly need to mix up defenses since we are not really good at either just to throw teams off. Heck maybe we should try a surprise half-court trap in there just for surprise. It’s not like we can prevent teams from getting layups anyway. We may as well get a few steals and easy baskets out of it.

—Which leads to ML. He is terrific in space in the open court, but how often will he get that chance? Talk about fools gold.. his making shots against Notre Dame has given him a tad too much confidence shooting challenged jumpers early in a shot clock.

—Is the pac-10 headed for one bid? Never had a less than 4 I think since it has gone to 64 and as Cal and Washington have now shown no one is that good.

—I am beating my dead horse with this, but I want more bobo. I would like to see RN being able to avoid the center matchup sometimes. Bobo can take up space and surprisingly with a minimum of coaching can get a deep spot and catch the ball in the interior against most pac10 centers that choose to play man. Lets draw some fouls early in the game with bobo and RN and not worry about their inability to make fts if we can pile up foul trouble. Furthermore hide him in the zone defense, but never.. I repeat never with ND on one side of that zone.

That is enough random thoughts for now

by Penny2i on Jan 6, 2010 10:43 PM PST reply actions  

Bobo looked good...

…playing against a slower, less athletic big man than himself. He struggled defending anyone quicker. But it would be nice for someone else to be able to take some pressure off RN – it would be nice if he could put some of those post moves on a power forward rather than on a center… in the meantime, I’d like TH to get as many minutes as possible for his rebounding from the SF position and make the opponents account for more than one of our players when a shot goes up.

by britishbruin on Jan 6, 2010 10:54 PM PST up reply actions  

keep it simple

honestly I think you have to keep it simple for him. Not every player you get will be able to play the pick and roll hedge the way you want them to in a man. With bobo I would simply say son stay under the basket and protect the rim.. that is it. Secondly he is too big for faster, agile players if you keep it simple. Get your arse on that man behind you and make yourself a big target. Now we need to have players understand how to be a little patient on one side of the floor to allow him to get open and deliver the ball without getting a 3 second call. But it is not brain surgery. I think he has shown at least he can catch a ball, so that is mildy comforting. In the end teams will have to double him which is where the trouble might ensue for him. Then he would have to think and react. I would like to see us go to that well however to force teams to play us instead of us running around trying to figure out how we are going to match up with them. We have good overall size, so lets use it. If anything we will benefit next year.

 I don’t mind like other people RN getting so many looks inside despite his lack of FT shooting ability at the moment. I expect him to improve there significantly the next couple seasons. I would like to see him doing it on the second biggest player of the opponents however. Obviously he had no chance against an Aldrich and it’s foolish to think a 6’7" frosh can handle that.

The reality is bobo will not get more than 15 minutes almost ever because ND largely and JK sometimes takes up those minutes. There will be plenty discussed about ND’s net effect I am sure in the coming months as he drives us crazy with his feast or famine game. And JK well he doesn’t know which way is up or down anymore. He just does things he thinks he should be doing with almost no understanding of what is happening around him at times. An example would be that long rebound that he continued to box out his man instead of just going to grab the darn rebound. We have exactly 2 players that can get space and position to catch a pass on the interior and I have seen no reason given our squad that we should not be developing them ad naseum.

by Penny2i on Jan 6, 2010 11:10 PM PST up reply actions  

not sure you can 'simplify' away a lack of athleticism

Just from last night’s game, playing against a man, he couldn’t deal with more athletic players. I think you have more of a point on the offensive end – if he gets his post game going, he may be able to draw a double team and make space for others. He looked a little more on his game offensively yesterday.

by britishbruin on Jan 7, 2010 7:45 AM PST up reply actions  

I love Nestor!

I was thinking about you you N the whole second half! I think you were our teams motivation for the night. :0)

Go Bruins!

by westwood12003 on Jan 6, 2010 10:51 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

It reminded me of the SF Giants Blog here on SBN

Tim Lincecum had a no hitter going into somewhere in the 7th inning. We were all getting hopeful, as we hadn’t had a no hitter in 30 years I think and even longer than that at home.

The post game report was that the Giants broke his heart again and he’ll never see a no hitter in his lifetime thrown by a Giant.

Guess what, Jonathan Sanchez the next day throws a no hitter, and he was one bobble away from a perfect game. We’ll just ignore the fact it came against the Padres…

by freesia39 on Jan 7, 2010 9:16 AM PST up reply actions  

My thoughts...

ML – feel free to mix in a banana. Ok Seriously, how many endgames has this guy missed due to cramping. You’d think UCLA could afford the input of a sports nutritionist or SOMETHING. What the heck is up with the cramps? His battling is gutty, but this simply shouldn’t keep recurring.

MR – More than anything else, more than the 3 point shooting, the savvy drives and distribution, and the “LOL oops” game winner; this guy to me seems to be the emerging leader. There was one occasion they had a closeup on him coming out of a time out where he reminded all 4 other guys on the court that they had only one time out remaining. That kind of small stuff is huge in my opinion.

The season as a whole – It looks like we’ll win when MR and ND have good 3 point shooting nights, not so much when they both don’t..

by Orz on Jan 6, 2010 11:25 PM PST reply actions  

Pre-game projection note

Pomeroy’s system had predicted a 23-point win for Cal tonight (86-63), and we have now beaten his (current) 2 best teams in the Pac-10.

formerly bruinhoo

by Patroclus on Jan 6, 2010 11:31 PM PST reply actions  

Seriously?

He picks Cal and ASU as the best 2 teams and not Washington

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by Josh Schlichter on Jan 6, 2010 11:32 PM PST up reply actions  

top-2 in his ratings among pac-10 teams as of today

Guessing that UW fell behind ASU after the home loss to Oregon last weekend.

formerly bruinhoo

by Patroclus on Jan 6, 2010 11:35 PM PST up reply actions  

Not the best night for Pomeroy and the Pac-10

Cal had a 97% probability of beating UCLA
USC had a 66% probability of beating Stanford, and
Oregon State had an 87% probability of beating Seattle U. Ouch.

formerly bruinhoo

by Patroclus on Jan 6, 2010 11:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Same in Sagarin's

whose system predicted a 21.5 point margin

by SuperBruinMan on Jan 7, 2010 12:05 AM PST up reply actions  

I love games like this

where the joy of winning randomly washes over you every now and then for the rest of the night.

by SuperBruinMan on Jan 6, 2010 11:44 PM PST reply actions  

This is what I said after losing the Notre Dame game

“We needed to play quicker on offense, setting up the threes for Lee or Roll [who were the hot hands], then quickly going down to Nelson if they were not open. Message to CBH: we are NOT a good half-court team, period.”

I think I was half right. We are a good half-court team if we set up the threes for our hot shooters and quickly go down to Nelson if they are not open. And in the zone we are effective enough defensively, in fact quite impressive in the second half this game.

Did you notice that even Anderson was comfortable in the flow of this offense of looking for the threes and then going inside? And he made two threes very confidently. Mmmm…letting the players play. What a concept!

This is how we beat Cal! We almost lost anyway because of our first half turnovers and our poor free throw shooting, but we played more in control in the second half and cut down the turnovers drastically. If we could have shot our free throws at even a 60% clip we could have won easily in regulation.

I applaud CBH for adjusting his strategy and using the threes to open it up underneath for Nelson, who was the man. Actually, if Lee had been more into his game we could have four super players for the game. Of course, we can’t expect four players every game to play out of their minds, but CBH has figured out how best to use their talent.

This does not mean we are over the hump, but as long as our players play like they did tonight WE CAN BE PROUD OF THEM WIN OR LOSE.

More than their win, which was amazing, I am proud of their grit, their heart and their determination. I look forward to the rest of the season whatever the outcome.

GO BRUINS!

by uclahy on Jan 7, 2010 12:06 AM PST reply actions  

Thank God CBH finally told our guys to make their wide open shots

I have no idea why he was telling them to turn the ball over and lay tons of bricks earlier this season. Must be some newfangled coaching strategy I don’t know about. Great adjustments by him, and kudos to you for your general advice that he obviously took. Give yourself a well deserved pat on the back for that gem. You should tell him to tell our guys to make their FT’s next. National Title here we come!

by Tydides on Jan 7, 2010 12:39 AM PST up reply actions   2 recs

don't forget

the way he told JA to mix up his play – overdribble into a crowd and take tough shots and leave yourself open to offensive fouls for most of the game, and then, when the game is on the line, pull the switcheroo – dribble into space for a wide-open mid-range shot, but attempt to feed the ball down low to a covered man with less than 3 seconds to gather and make the contested shot.

by britishbruin on Jan 7, 2010 7:41 AM PST up reply actions  

You guys are hilarious

You’re very good at distorting my views into ridiculous straw men and laughing at them. You’re quite the troika. Ha ha.

I gave credit to CBH for letting his guys shoot threes earlier and often, find their rhythm and play through Nelson when the defense overplays the perimeter, instead of squeezing the air out of the ball and trying to play power basketball like we did against ND, and you mock me with sophomoric sarcasm about CBH"telling" the players to make wide open shots and controlling JA like a robot. Funny. Funny.

But the truth is obvious whether you want to see it or not. CBH has changed his philosophy to suit his team’s talent. He is not playing East Coast power basketball. He is playing a more hurry up, three point offense where the inside pass is the counterpunch. He is playing a 2-3 zone. He is letting his players play instead of trying to control their every move. These are all good, necessary things that helped us beat Cal, a very good team.

So keep on laughing. The joke is on you.

by uclahy on Jan 8, 2010 1:27 AM PST up reply actions  

notes

I was thoroughly frustrated with the beginning of the UCLA/CAL game and started taking notes of what was so upsetting until the late comeback. Despite an amazing OT win, a real important win for such a young team, I still had two MONSTER issues with this team and was wondering if anyone else agrees:
 
1. Howlands substitutions: Anderson was benched to start the game and Honeycutt and Lee at PG started the game off with energy we ha vent played with yet this year. Honeycutt was aggressive and strong and Lee set an up tempo aggressive pace for our offense. Then, all of the sudden, Anderson is in, Honeycutt disappears (pretty much for the rest of the game) and we slow down and the mess begins. Why does he always seem to make subs right when we are on a run? I think the subs are our biggest momentum killer, well actually second biggest next to…
 
2. Jerime Anderson is HORRIBLE. I know everyone is on Dragovitch this season for being a bum, but Jerime Anderson is MUCH MUCH worse. His pass that was deflected and luckily knocked out to Roll at the end of the game was an attempted NO LOOK PASS. ARE YOU KIDDING ME. He must have dribbled the ball off his leg or foot 20 times in the game and looks lost when trying to set the offense up, up top. Lee needs to take over at PG and Honeycutt needs more min as a result. Anderson stinks on D also. He is the weakest link of the team and you cant have that at your starting PG position and Howland HAS to realize this.

by DK BRUIN on Jan 7, 2010 7:55 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB