Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: On Hazards And Hulks And Tigers, Oh My!

Stanford Thoughts: Dreading About Another Saturday UCLA Implosion

Kind of funny. Heading into this Saturday's game against Stanford (7-7, 1-1 in the Pac-10), Bruins (7-8, 2-1 in the Pac-10) find themselves in exact same situation they were in last Friday, when they were getting ready (well at least we thought our guys were getting ready) for a Saturday matchup against Arizona. Just like last week the Bruins are coming off  a big (kind of ugly and lucky) win against a tough Pac-10 opponent and have some reasons to feel relieved (hey and perhaps even good) about themselves.

Just like last Friday we find ourselves in a position from where Howland's team has a great opportunity to climb back up to the .500 mark and perhaps give themselves some real hope heading into rest of the conference season. Yet I am not feeling all that great about this game.

I want to feel hopeful about tomorrow's matchup against Stanford and dream about leaving the Bay with a completely unexpected sweep. I really do. However, right before I think about getting my hopes up, I have visions of our "defense," all those ugly, head-scratching turnovers, and our usual brilliant performances from the FT line. So yeah, despite all of your best efforts to get me hopeful for tomorrow afternoon's game, I am anticipating it with a sense of dread and expected disappointment.

One thing we can already expect for tomorrow is that the Stanford Cardinal are not going to be cruising in this game like their Bay Area counterparts doing on Thursday night at Haas. They are going to come into this game with a chip on their collective shoulders (kind of like Arizona did at Pauley following their loss against Southern Cal) with something to prove to rest of the league. They got swept by us during last year's season series and they are going give everything they can to get us back tomorrow afternoon (3 pm PST, Prime Ticket) at Maples Pavilion. We barely won against them at Maples last year weekend and we have had a history of letdown on that court in recent years even with our classic Ben Ball warriors. So, if we are going to even think about coming out a victory tomorrow afternoon, we will need our guys to come out and give their best effort and fight for 40 minutes, while playing with some semblance of consistency and composure.

Star-divide

It will be very interesting to see how Howland gets our guys defensively prepped for this game.  After showing zone against ASU he pretty much ignored it against Arizona. We saw a lot of it against Cal on Thursday night. Although I think, we have ways to go and lot to improve upon on our 2-3 zone, I thought it did have at least some positive effects, as it disrupted the Bears offensive rhythm a bit, while give our guys a little breather to keep themselves fresh on the offensive end. Going through the numbers, it seems like Stanford might be a decent candidate to throw some zone against as they are particularly they are not a great shooting team from the 3 pt line (guess I am jinxing it all now).

We are going to have our hands full with Landry Fields, their 6-7, 210 senior forward, who is averaging a team-leading 22.5 points and 9 rebounds per game.  He has been in a bit of offensive slump during the Pac-10 conference season though. He shot 9 for 24 in the opener against Cal and then went 5 for 14 against Southern Cal. That concerns me even more because seems like he is now due to have a big game on Saturday. It will be interesting to see who guards him on Saturday. I am assuming Howland might be throwing a combination of Honeycutt and Roll. Either way he is going to be a challenge.

The key in terms of matchup is going to be in the backcourt. Jack Salisbury from the Stanford Daily (BTW how come there is no Stanford sports blog on the internets? It's really crazy) has a nice set up on this:

[T]the match-up between each team's guards will likely decide the game. [Jarrett] Mann will have the task of facing Bruins point guard Malcolm Lee, who leads the team with 14.1 points and 3.9 assists per game. Sophomore Jeremy Green, the Cardinal's strongest perimeter threat, will have the task of guarding Roll. Green is more athletic and a bit stronger than the veteran Roll, so he may have the advantage in that match-up.

Green is the second leading scorer for the Cardinal (16.7 ppg). He was big on Thursday night as he pumped in 17 points in their 1 point nail biter against the Trojies. I guess we can count on Lee to guard him on Saturday as it's a good bet Howland will task his best back-court defender to guard their most prolific playmaker.

I would really like to drink the kool-aid and be hopeful that Lee will be bottling up Green and our mix of man-to-man and zone defense will neutralize the Cardinal just enough on their home court. I would also like to think our offense will be just enough productive to get the job done against a very mediocre defensive team [Per Pomeroy, Stanford's opponent have an effective FG% of 52.2, ranking the Cardinal 278th in D-1].  However, just when I get my hopes up I remind myself of our ugliness from the FT line [61.1% (!!!) and ranked 329 per Pomeroy] and our penchant for turning the ball over.

The key on Saturday will be whether the Bruins can play smart, be composed and play with passion and purpose. Can we stop ourselves from imploding and going through the motions like we have on number of occasions this season after putting together what seemed like encouraging moral victories or in couple of occasions two actual victories? I keep trying to find reasons to feel confident but can't come up with much.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 22 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Did I miss a week?

We didnt play stanford away last weekend did we? Guessing that’s a typo.

Anyways, I can see the game going just the same way as Wednesday, but I think Stanford will shoot more than 10 percent from 3 point range and keep us out of range… That definately had something to do with us winning against Cal

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by Josh Schlichter on Jan 8, 2010 7:33 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

You said

That we barely beat stanford at maples last weekend. It wa before the jump

Formerly ucla13_usc9

by Josh Schlichter on Jan 8, 2010 8:46 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Gotcha

Edited. Meant last year.

by Nestor on Jan 8, 2010 8:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Reeves--just win!

I see it differently—the key to the game is Nelson versus Landry Fields with his 20 plus points per game. If Nelson holds Fields to 12 points, we win. Sorry to put all that pressure on a freshman, but Reeves, now is the time to be the absolute animal you are.

by peggysue69 on Jan 8, 2010 7:34 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Reeves will not defend Landry

He is going to go up against either Zimmerman or Trotter.

by Nestor on Jan 8, 2010 8:30 AM PST up reply actions  

from a mental/physical standpoint

do you think CBH should consider ND as the 5 in the zone with RN at the 4? I feel like RN would have better close-out speed when the ball gets swung around to a weak-side shooter and would also be better able to keep up with players on the move than ND. ND looks bulky enough to defend centers, and has European flopping ability on his help defense…; and RN might be an even stronger rebounder going up from the 4 rather than battling against a 5. Also would put RN in more of a position to get up to the other end of the court when we break, with ND arriving as a late trailing 3-ball option.

by britishbruin on Jan 8, 2010 10:30 AM PST up reply actions  

Check out 11's comments below re. JK

I think that makes some sense. Wait … WTH am I doing getting sucked in again. Noooooo.

by Nestor on Jan 8, 2010 10:47 AM PST up reply actions  

smart

I think it’s a smart idea

by RealisticBruinFan on Jan 8, 2010 12:30 PM PST up reply actions  

Defending Fields

is the heart of the matter, it seems, since he is Stanford’s best player by far. He averages 22.5 points and 9 rebounds per game and also has accumulated 30 steals. Jeremy Green is another solid performer, after which the stats for the other players drop off. Fields is 6’ 7", 210 lbs. and a Senior. I don’t see a matchup for him amongst our mighty Bruins, but I’m guessing maybe TH gets the assignment, with help, in the defensive scheme. Stanford has a much better record at home (6 -2) than away (0-4), so no help there. Still, they had only a one-point win against the despicable Trojans. This is not an impossible task, but our inconsistency has to worry us. Maybe the trend will be broken Saturday. TO’s have to be significantly reduced, to state the obvious.

by ReineSeite on Jan 8, 2010 9:06 AM PST reply actions  

I think JK play a big role tomorrow...

Keefe has the experience, length and just enough lateral quickness to make Fields earn his points. Make no mistake, he’ll get his points, the Bruins will be okay as long as Fields doesn’t become a facilitator. If Fields can get others involved off his dribble penetration and post play, then UCLA might be in a for a long day. I see Howland mixing it up, using several guys against him TH, JK in man, collapsing on him in the post, making him a passer. He’d good on the glass too. One thing working against Fields is he’s gotten into foul trouble in a number of games. Honeycutt has the type of ability that could give Fields problems on defense.

Life is what happens when you're busy making plans.

by 11 Banners on Jan 8, 2010 10:45 AM PST up reply actions  

nestor the naysayer

What’s up with your passion bucket!
Where is your relentless optimism? I don’t feel nearly
qualified to offer the level of analysis you do, but surely
things can’t be that bad! I’m not asking for moral victories,
 but perhaps managed expectations!

I realize our team is young, I know there have been and will be
Growing pains, but tje upside on this team is tremendous.
If this were a team of seniors who had hit their ceiling
I could understand the piss and vinegar, but our starting line up
is typically made up of 3 underclassman/first year starters.

They won a game they weren’t expected to. Guys are starting to figure things out
Sure there are some disapointments, but this is a year where we learn and grow.

I’m just saying, isn’t there someone out there that can offer a less pessamistic,
Optimistic yet realistic opinion?

class of '99

by ungalan on Jan 8, 2010 9:29 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

Well

No one is preventing you from offering up your optimistic take. You are more than welcome to write up via fanposts. I am being “realistic” given what we have seen from our team this season. I don’t have any confidence in our guys to get it done on Saturday given our propensity to consistently self-destruct.

However, if you want to feel confident and rosy about Saturday, again go right ahead and write up your posts. Remember … no one is paying us here to write and spoon feed them with just feel good stories and be their Bruin shrink (I kid).

As for my passion bucket, I am still here. :-)

by Nestor on Jan 8, 2010 9:45 AM PST up reply actions  

Glass half full

Bruins are 5-2 their last seven games. UCLA has settled down on offense – not to be confused with becoming consistent, but have developed a rotation and an identity. The implementation of the zone defense has allowed Howland to shorten his rotation and for the players to stay out of foul trouble. Defensively this team has limitations, but against certain opposition they will thrive. Stanford is the type of team the Bruins will have success against.

The Cardinal mirror UCLA in that they struggle on defense and have played inconsistently on offense outside of Landry Fields. Jeremy Green is an excellent spot up jump shooter but he’s not much of a finisher. The Cardinal have trouble keeping the opponent off the glass – sound familiar. The overall lack of athleticism on Stanford’s roster shows up when they are forced to go to their bench.

Like several teams if the Cardinal shoot well they are a very tough team – they should have beaten Kentucky. But in losses to Texas Tech, Northwestern, California and Oklahoma State (all in the last seven games) they ’ve shown zero ability to defend the three point stripe. USC was playing well heading into their match up with Stanford, but are coming off the news of a post season ban and the Trojans really struggle to make jump shots. It was a great matchup for Stanford coupled with better timing.

I’m very realistic about this season’s team, but can see the obvious signs of a team coming together and trusting one another. The Bruins will come out of Palo Alto with a hard earned victory, something like 68-63 – look for Malcolm Lee to rebound off a poor performance at Cal.

Life is what happens when you're busy making plans.

by 11 Banners on Jan 8, 2010 10:17 AM PST reply actions  

11

Have been really enjoying your takes (but I am not going to get myself sucked into your optimism!!!). Seriously, I think you need to think about aggregating your takes into a fanspost on each games, so they stand out.

by Nestor on Jan 8, 2010 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

Thanks

When I have time to really analyze a game and break it down I’ll do that.

Life is what happens when you're busy making plans.

by 11 Banners on Jan 8, 2010 10:22 AM PST up reply actions  

Amen!

+1 on Nestors request to offer more analysis, and I will buy into your optimism. I think the team is still finding itself. not typical of the last 3 years, but 5-2 over the last seven is promising. I wonder what the record is post drew gordon?

class of '99

by ungalan on Jan 8, 2010 12:23 PM PST reply actions  

I believe 5-4

First two games were losses post DG – Kansas and Mississippi State…

Life is what happens when you're busy making plans.

by 11 Banners on Jan 8, 2010 12:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Did you guys know this...

Despite the Bruins terrible OOC record and horrendous overall play they have an opportunity to make a realistic run at an at-large NCAA bid. UCLA has seven losses to the NCAA RPI Top 100:

  1. Kansas
  2. MSU (neutral court)
  3. Butler (nc)
  4. @ Notre Dame
  5. Portland (nc)
  6. Long Beach State (nc)
  7. Arizona

Butler was a one point defeat, ND and Kansas were respectable losses. Those don’t go unnoticed by the selection committee.

The Bruins, unbelievably, have two Top 30 RPI wins:

  1. California (road win is huge)
  2. Arizona State

I know RPI is only one criteria. In one of the other big ones strength of schedule (SOS) the Bruins have a top 50 SOS.

What UCLA has to do is finish no worse than 13-5 in conference (I know a stretch). They have some decent opportunities to balance their ledger with a few more RPI Top 100 wins – #56 USC, #60 Washington, #73 Oregon, #94 Washington St., rematches vs Arizona, ASU and Cal.

It’s a long season. It’s great to have a team that is still growing and makes dreams like this possible.

Life is what happens when you're busy making plans.

by 11 Banners on Jan 8, 2010 1:07 PM PST reply actions  

Stanford website?

It’s called Google. Seriously though, I wish there were one.

Formerly ryebreadraz

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Jan 8, 2010 2:42 PM PST reply actions  

Worth mentioning again

Howland has only lost the Thursday (or Wednesday) game of a series once, and that was to ASU last year IIRC. In the past he has had warriors who could beat bad, mediocre, good, and occasionally great teams with little preparation, and were almost undefeated with extended prep.

Therefore, I think winning on Thursday and losing on Saturday is more than just an emotional letdown given this year’s team. I think that they need a full week of practice to beat a decent team, and we have been fortunate to play the better opponent first so far. We will not win every Thursday game, but I think that is where the majority of our Pac-10 wins will come this year no matter who the opponent.

by Sideout11 on Jan 8, 2010 4:40 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB