My UCLA Hoops Outlook for '10-'11
(was gonna post this as a comment to our Hoops Roundup, but it got quite long)
It's become so much more difficult to really assess our outlook for our Bruins Basketball. This team is so damned young and there are so many things we'll really only know once the year starts...
Will J. Smith be in shape and effective Defensively? Will Honeycutt emerge from an ultra-athletic heart guy to a consistent player on Offense? Will Lee find his role on this team? Will we find a PG to continue the tradition of Point Guard U at UCLA? Can we establish any semblance of a Defensive and Offensive identity?
This may be the nature of College Basketball today, where turnover is so high, Freshman and Sophmores dominate the talent landscape and are expected to do so much, and the word Potential hangs over every team.
Still, this makes for an always exciting build up to the season. UCLA Basketball is my first love, and I'm really looking forward to big steps this season. Key points after the jump...
With a starting lineup of:
C - J. Smith
PF - R. Nelson
SF - T. Honeycutt
SG (more of a "Combo Guard") - M. Lee
PG - TBD [JA/TL/LJ will fight it out],
We're looking at 1 True Frosh, 2 Sophs, a sometimes headcase junior who had very little playing time his first year, and a TBD PG. I'd much rather have talented and hard working young kids rather than the senior trash we had masquerading as one of our Starting Forwards last year (and no I'm not talking about Mr. Roll)... but this will be the first year that CBH doesn't have a true and tested Ben Ball Warrior in the starting lineup since his first couple years as coaching (yes I count Roll as a warrior).
As with football, I see this as a building year and thus I'll look more at how we play the game rather than being fixated on wins and losses. The key things I'm going to look for are:
1. Do we have a game plan on offense?
Last year, our offensive gameplan was the dreaded H-P offense: A hope and a prayer. Hope that either Roll or Dragovic got hot behind the arc, and if not then pray that Honeycutt and Nelson could generate enough hustle points to keep us in the game. Malcolm Lee looked lost and frustrated last year as he struggled to find his spots and work with his teammates.
I think with Smith and a more developed Honeycutt/Nelson/Lee/Lane, we have some better options on the offensive end. I'd like to see us obviously run more inside out game with Smith and Nelson, but also more motion for Honeycutt and Lee to work off of. Let's get Honeycutt and Lee to catch the ball from 15 feet out with room to work, rather than needing to operate from the 3 point line.
Shooting has also been mentioned as a major question mark. Truthfully, I think this will be our major major weakness this year, and we'll see a ton of zone as a result. It will put a ceiling on our offensive effectiveness, and there's nothing you can really do about it besides continue to put in the practice and teach ways to bust a zone besides just shooting over the top (can we please get some penetration from the top to collapse these zones!!). There's a reason you hear CBH mention the player's improved shooting over the summer, he knows that this will be a challenge this year.
2. Can we prevent penetration from the wings?
Our D on the wings was a bit of a mess last year. JA was a sieve on defense, Lee was prone to frustration and reaching, Roll worked hard but didn't have the footspeed, and Dragovic often failed to grasp the concept that you need to stay between your man and the basket. The breakdown on the wings was often coupled with poor rotation on help Defense, which just broke the whole system down.
I hope a healthy and humbled JA will work harder on D, and that Lee/Lamb/Jones all live up to their "reps" as strong defensive players. I trust in CBH's ability to teach defensive fundamentals, but it's also on the players to implement those lessons and trust each other to stay disciplined.
3. Can we maintain consistency in our lineups?
Our starting lineup was a sad carousel last year, and our best bench player was often a walk-on. With Gordon's dismissal, injuries to TH, JA, and JK, Coach Howland had to constantly juggle lineups and bench players. Here's hoping that if changes happen in the starting lineup, that it's because Lane or Jones or Lamb played their way in, as opposed to injuries/dismissals/ineffectiveness.
My final [and probably overly optimistic] outlook:
Malcolm Lee and Honeycutt will be up there for leading scorer. Honeycutt will be our leading rebounder. Smith will play well on Offense but will also sometimes look lost and may even be posterized a couple times because of late rotations. I think Smith still needs a year to round into shape and get up to speed with the college game.
Overall wins in the low 20's, conference wins in the low teens. Our fair share of "signature wins" followed by mind-boggling losses. A top 3 finish in a still weak Pac-10, advance to the Sweet Sixteen and lose in a hard fought game against a Top 4 seed.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Given all the uncertainty heading into the season
Especially at PG, plus the fact that we’re going to be depending heavily on a freshman, I would take a Sweet 16 berth in a heartbeat.
yup
given we don’t know what we are likely to get from our C or PG position, have a Shooting Guard whose main known weakness (other than ill-advised references to being caged) appears to be shooting , a projected starter at power forward who was a liability on defense last year, and a mercurial facilitator at SF who drifted in and out of games last year, I’d say things have to break decently for us to get to the Sweet 16. We may end up as an improved team at pretty much every position from last year, but we were godawful last year, and there are plenty of unknowns. I expect TH to step up and be a star, but I am more hopeful than expectant about ML and RN, and it is unclear what can reasonably be expected of the newcomers.
by britishbruin on Oct 14, 2010 1:55 PM PDT up reply actions
yah like I said, optimistic
it’s sad to say that I’m hoping for a “Lavin-esque” run to the Sweet 16. Something along the order of entering as a 6-9 seed, a win in Round 1, an upset win Round 2, and then a loss in Round 3.
Lavin-esque
Would be compiling an all star roster of our three Final Four teams, getting to the Steve 16, and labeling it a success.
haha you're right
I was referring more to the “string a couple of wins at the end of the season to advance to the sweet 16” rather than the “woeful under-achievement of a talent ridden but undisciplined and me-first roster”
Anthony Stover
Anyone have any clear idea on how AS figures in to playing time? Maybe 10-15 minutes a game providing some relief for JS?
Stover
Backs up Smith, might play alongside JS if RN or BL have trouble defending against a longer, more athletic body. What he give the Bruins is a long, defensive minded player with the same motor as Mata-Real. Knowing how last season shook out, Howland would have played him last year and allowed him a season to learn and gain confidence. He’s raw, but has real ability as a rebounder and shot blocker.
Life is what happens when you're busy making plans.
Some thoughts on your post
Thanks CPO.
Disagree a bit on ML. He is a very good defender. I did not see him as a problem on defense and actually think he is a very good defensive guard right now.
On Offense, CBH has been quoted as saying this team will run more. Give the athleticism and the potential outside shooting problems that would be a partial answer.
On Defense. Jones is supposed to be a good defender. Lamb always covered the best man on the other team in high school. Smith has the size to take up space and give us a true anchor. This team will be good to very good on Defense. To me the biggest question mark will be RN, however, he is a good rebounder and that helps. (TH’s fouling could also be an issue.) However, I think we will return to form on defense
Consistency. Good point. Hoping we stay injury free.
Prediction. Hope you are right generally but I don’t want any more blow at losses. I expect tough games, especially at UW, but I don’t want any blow out disasters like the first half against UW last year on the road.
agree mostly
agree with you on ML.
Cautiously agree on D.
Notwithstanding what CBH has said, I am still a little curious to see what our offensive identity will be – sending Smith up and down the floor seems like it wouldn’t suit his strengths, but playing in the half-court doesn’t much suit ML and our outside shooting in general is suspect.
by britishbruin on Oct 14, 2010 4:58 PM PDT up reply actions
On running
I am not sure this is going to happen. It is a logical solution and one I have heard mentioned. But “running more” does not make you a running team. We hardly ran at all last year.
Also, Smith not running is fine. He should be staying back to rebound and guard the basket. A hot blocker helps with running.
true
and I think we saw some chemistry with TH and RN running the floor – RN has great touch around the basket, can catch and finish in motion etc, and TH is our most gifted playmaker. Smith block, outlet, and we’re off to the races.
by britishbruin on Oct 14, 2010 6:40 PM PDT up reply actions
If we want to run more
We better play some defense and rebound the ball, a task seemingly lost on our team last year. You’re not running anywhere if you’re taking the ball out of your own basket to start every possession.
I Disagree in regards to RN
I don’t feel as if he is a question mark at all. He had to play out of position last year at the 5 and was always consistent in the fact that he would bang around with bigger players and loved to finish over defenders. He is very skilled at finding ways to get his shot of around the basket the reports that he has improved his outside game for this coming season are encouraging as well. Sure, he had a few defensive letdowns (which, don’t get me wrong, are always unnaceptable) but those letdowns were contagious last year with Ragovic and other players who didn’t have the best attitudes. I feel as if moving him back to the 4 this year will allow him to be stronger than most players he plays against and he should put up good offensive numbers as well as rebound extremely well (like you said)
NP
I agree with what you wrote in your disagreement. lol.
I am probably more worried than you about those let downs but I am still thinking he will be better on D this year . Also, if your weak link defender can rebound as well as RN, that isn’t all bad.
I would be ecstatic if your prediction came true
Sweet 16 would be an incredible jump from last year. In my humble opinion we have a shot at 20 wins and maybe squeaking into the tournament as an 11-14 seed. If we can do that, I’ll be satisfied. If we don’t win more than 50% of our games overall and 50% of our Pac-10 games, then I’ll be very disappointed.

by 



















