Spaulding Roundup: Brehaut Taking Charge, Boosting Practice Tempo & Other UCLA Notes
Again, thank you to everyone who stepped up for Tyler yesterday on BN. We have built up a lot of good memories on BN over the years. Yesterday had to be one of the most memorable to date. Of course nothing that happens here has any impact on the game (despite all our silly superstitions, which we will not deviate from). Still, I'd like to think what happened yesterday gives us some perspective and put all of us in an uplifting frame of mind heading into Saturday. Now if somehow Bruins pull out a win this weekend, it will mean that insomniac will have to start blogging here every game week from here on out.
As for the team, all eyes remain locked on Richard Brehaut. He had another up and down practice yesterday. Still Jon Gold reports that Brehaut is starting to "take control of the huddle":
He strode in and out of the huddle during Tuesday's practice, barking instructions at his teammates and doling out compliments and criticisms. They responded by clapping and yelling encouragement, one of the louder practices on the offensive side this season.
"Shoot, it takes a lot of poise to be the guy, and a lot of patience not knowing if you're going to be the guy, so this is a big confidence booster for Brehaut," junior wide receiver Taylor Embree said. "Today he took that vocal leadership role in the huddle. He got on guys. He's definitely different. You can see it, the look in his eye, the tone in his voice, he's really taking control of the huddle.
"He knows this is his offense now."
Brehaut on his part sounds humble and confident:
"This has been a long time coming," Brehaut said. "Throughout my career, people have asked me, `Are you going to transfer? You guys are the same year, so what's going to happen?' But I've always honestly just said it will all work out.
"Unfortunately, it working out for me means Kevin's out for the year. Kevin's one of my best friends and I feel for him, but everyone understands that football is a violent game and these things happen.
"I think I'm absolutely ready for this, to take on the challenges of being the guy, day in and day out."
I think it is going to take another couple of games to Brehaut to develop his rhythm (hell, it took Cade McNown two years as we have noted here number of times). What I do appreciate is his humility and sense of perspective when he is talking to the media (which is often a pretty important role for a QB as he is the on-field "leader" figure in public sphere).
I thought it was pretty interesting how the team responded to his leadership during the Washington State game, when the Bruins had to march over 90+ yards for the go ahead touchdown late in second half. It is going to be tough against an Arizona team with a solid defense and without our LT and two key receivers. However, I like what I am hearing out of Brehaut leading into Saturday.
Despite the positive vibes around Brehaut, the practice review continues to be a mixed bag:
Quarterback Richard Brehaut made some good deep throws in individual drills and hit a very nice touchdown pass to Randall Carroll in the back of the end zone during seven-on-seven, but he also made a few poor throws that sailed or landed short. Also, the receiving corps didn't help with at least half a dozen drops -- several by Jerry Johnson and one bad one by Morrell Presley.
That was from Peter Yoon of ESPNLA. Interestingly Jon Gold had a different impression of Jerry Johnson (perhaps Peter had numbers mixed up?):
Jerry Johnson had a very good practice, and continues to show that he deserves more of a look. At this point, with no wideout really stepping into a star role, practice becomes all the more important, and he's been very consistent for a couple weeks now. Video with him up tomorrow morning.
Gold though corroborated Yoon's account of a mixed performance from Brehaut:
Sophomore quarterback Richard Brehaut continues to progress as the new starter, but the old demons still creep up occasionally. For every pretty deep ball was a confounding pass, either into coverage or forced to a wideout. Timing is improving, though there continue to be some issues.
Speaking of mixed performance, apparently the practice was lacking "a bit of energy" at the start. So per Gold Rick Neuheisel "interrupted practice" to get the team together and give them a "pep talk" (guessing he lit into them). Apparently it worked as practice became more spirited and physical. Here is Neuheisel after practice talking about what took place and responding to other queries:
Per Yoon, apparently CRN "spent extra time working with the defense" something he usually doesn't. As Neuheisel mentioned in the video above it was due to him wanting to "make sure that they understand" that he was looking for "some tempo" and that he is "watching everything". Per Neuheisel, the defense "responded." Guess we will see what happens on Saturday.
The defense is getting ready this week without having any idea who they are going to face at the QB position. From the LA Times on UCLA defenders preparing for either Nick Foles or Matt Scott:
"It won't be a big adjustment that we'll have to make at game time," UCLA linebacker Akeem Ayers said. "But we have to be aware of the one guy, because if he gets out of the pocket, he can make things happen running." [...]
Then there was defensive tackle David Carter's solution.
"We'll just make whoever it is play our game," Carter said. "We're going out there and get pressure on him."
Yeah, a little pressure would be nice David. Hopefully Chuck Bullough can dial it up.
GO BRUINS.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Rock Neuheisel
so we’re calling CRN “Rock” now because of the assistants that are hiding behind/under him?
actually graduated in 85, the olympics and h.locklear were distracting...
reports on Brehaut
what I don’t care about:
“Brehaut looked great throwing deep bombs on a 7-step drop with no defense”
what I do care about:
“Brehaut seemed in sync with his receivers on short and intermediate routes, consistently hitting them in stride”
I understand that the highlights for reporters are the flashier plays, but we are hardly ever going to call deep passing plays because we are unlikely to have the protection for Brehaut to make that a sensible strategy. We need Brehaut’s passing to be crisp, efficient, help set up the run game and convert 3rd downs. (same goes for receivers – don’t care much whether you can make a great leaping one handed catch on the sideline if you can’t consistently make a routine catch for 7 yards to get a first down).
i agree
I much rather “nickel and dime” them then deep bombs.
I don't care how we do it so long as we are productive
I just don’t think we can hang our hat on deep plays given the state of our line and receiving corps.
by britishbruin on Oct 28, 2010 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions
hitting receivers in stride also can lead to big plays
when you have speed in the receiver position, but that can’t catch the ball while in stride because it is being delivered behind them, or above them, or some other place that requires them to stop to catch the ball, you lose the advantage of your speed. Hitting a speedy guy in stride creates a world of opportunities and should increase your average yards per passing play a lot with additional yards after the catch.
by silverlakebruin on Oct 28, 2010 9:29 AM PDT up reply actions
yes and no - you are right
But longer slants, posts, downfield throws have been so infrequent to our offense that opposing teams play tight, jam the lanes etc. etc. I think no one fears us deep, so we have mmore difficulty hitting the 5-7 yd passes. Just as passing will open up the running game, longer passes will open up the shorter passes.
CRN hands on defense.
3-4 games too late, but a good sign that they are paying more attention to the issues on the D side. We need a much better performance on Sat than we have had of late of course.
did anyone see any of the Cal-UofA game?
curious if anyone has any insight into how Cal held them to under 11 points…
particuarly as we are a 10-point underdog this weekend, if we can hold them to 10 then I fancy Kai’s chances of kicking a field goal for the ATS victory….
Yes
Cal plays a 3-4 defense with a DC who was a previous DC at NFL. They brought pressure, were fundamentally sound when it came to tackling and were pretty physical against the Wildcats. Something we haven’t seen from Bullough’s defense.
thanks
we seem to have the “3-” part installed – particularly on 3rd down – but without the pressure…
by britishbruin on Oct 28, 2010 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions
To be fair to our guys
Cal’s defensive front-line is pretty solid with some experienced pieces. Still doesn’t excuse Bullough from giving up 130 points in 3 Pac-10 games.
but also interesting
that experienced as the front-line might be, Cal’s defense was shredded by (reasonably) balanced attacks from Nevada and $c; but totally shut down our run-based offense and Arizona’s aerial attack. I find Cal’s results to date pretty perplexing, but perhaps just a matter of matchups (though still unusual in the wild swings of scores…).
by britishbruin on Oct 28, 2010 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions
"still doesn't excuse Bullough"
I think that’s why we are hearing that CRN is getting more involved in the D.
To me, it makes clear that CRN understands that we have serious problems on D and that Bullough is not performing. He doesn’t have to throw him under the bus, publicly, he just has to try to fix the problem.
I’m not sure what “more involved” is. And, whether he has had Bullough under scrutiny for the last few games.
But, this may be a good sign.
sjh
by Class of 66 on Oct 28, 2010 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Right
I am not sure where Bullough’s strengths are – but they sure ain’t in preparing our team or play-calling. The fact that CRN is over-seeing our D’s prep makes it more likely that they’ll be prepared for AZ.
Not sure CRN can call plays any better than Bullough but something must change
by KnudsenRockne on Oct 28, 2010 2:59 PM PDT up reply actions
I want to believe in Brehaut
But…I mean, come on. Combined, CRN and CNC have been in football for like 400 years, and Rick himself was a quarterback during his playing days. If Brehaut was actually the best UCLA QB since Drew Olson or before, are they really so blind that they missed it and mistakenly kept him on the bench for basically the entire last year-and-a-half? Plus, from all these reports it’s clear that he’s not great or even good in practice; at best, he’s “looking good on some plays and bad on others.” Not exactly a ringing endorsement, and I hope that somehow he can rise above this once the team actually takes the field.
And yes, CRN, please, get involved with the defense. Switch it up, up the tempo, do something. Make some kind of adjustment. We need it.
When it's all said and done
what matters is what the kid does on Saturday. We’ve heard so much about how Prince was clearly ahead of RB in practices but the on field performances haven’t really showed that. I’m done with practice reports of how someone had a spectacular catch here and amazing interception there. Show me on Saturday!
Well...
…if he looks good on half of his pass plays…and half (or more) of the plays on offense are going to be run plays…then at worst his bad plays will account for only a quarter of the total plays. :)
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Guess what
if they score more points than we do, we’re going to lose.
I do foresee at least one pick-6, because we’ll be playing from behind all day and he’ll have to throw the ball quite a bit.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Throwing a pick
From the ESPNLA site, looks like they have a good candidate to intercept Brehaut, which will make it even tougher:
Trevin Wade, DB, Jr.—A shutdown cornerback, Wade has 10 career interceptions in only 20 games started. He only has one interception this year as teams shy away from him, but he returned that one 85 yards for a touchdown.
Chris Foster/Adam Maya/Scott Reid will have collective orgasms
If Shaquille Richardson ends up getting an interception on Sat.
Which would bring out the worst in them?
A. UCLA losing and U$C getting pounded
B. UCLA losing and U$C winning
C. UCLA and U$C winning
D. UCLA winning and U$C getting pounded
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Our best hope is that this shakes things up
and breathes some enthusiasm into our offense.
As far as Prince being better than Brehaut – he did help us win a couple of tough games.
Maybe Bre will help us win a couple of more games. Who knows, with youthful players
anything can happen.
by KnudsenRockne on Oct 28, 2010 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Bad throws
Brehaut hits some, misses some, and has some dropped-sounds like he has been waqtching the NFL. While practice is important especially in developing timing, many HOF QB’s were not so stellar during practices. He is improving and if someone can hold on to the damn ball he will look better. If he is 5 for 20 who cares if we win.
if he is 5 for 20
then I will be questioning the playcalling of 20 passes….
by britishbruin on Oct 28, 2010 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions

by 




















