Spaulding Roundup: Injury Update, Tackling Debacle, Crunch Time For Chow & Other UCLA Notes
Let's start the week by checking in with the latest injury report because the Bruins got really banged up this past Saturday. The news out of Spaulding is not good. From the Daily News:
Sophomore wide receiver Jerry Johnson and sophomore F-back Damien Thigpen were hurt in Saturday's game. Thigpen suffered a broken clavicle, and Johnson broke his ankle. Thigpen already had surgery, and Johnson is waiting on a second opinion to determine if he needs surgery.
Junior middle linebacker Steve Sloan, who became starter because of the loss of sophomore Patrick Larimore (shoulder) last week, strained a hamstring and is questionable for this week's matchup with Oregon State.
That leaves UCLA with only freshman Jordan Zumwalt in the middle, with scout team linebackers Isaiah Bowens and Mike Schmitt backing him up.
The news re. Jerry Johnson is a bummer. I thought Johnson was really coming along in recent weeks. He was showing lot more aggressiveness and heart we have seen from Nelson Rosario the entire year. Hopefully he has a full recovery this off-season and can better guidance from a new position coach heading into next season.
Sloan never really looked healthy when he was in. It will be interesting to see what Isiah Bowens can do. He always had the speed and size to play LB. Hopefully Clark Lea can bring him along this week. Either way given the guy in charge of our defense is so lost (or will be lost till he makes his "adjustments" in the second half), not sure how much hope I can have around our defense right now.
I am guessing there is a chance that we will see Rosario back this week. Although, I am not anxious to see him at the top of the depth chart right now. I rather see UCLA coaches working harder to get Randall Carroll and Josh Smith more integrated in our offensive schemes, and figure out ways to keep them on the field at the same time. The combination of Taylor Embree and Nelson Rosario - two tall, slow, possession type of receivers - inspires zero confidence.
Moving back over to the defensive side, things have gotten so bad that Rick Neuheisel couldn't help mentioning that his players are simply not getting the job done when it comes to tackling. From the OC Register:
With the score at 7-7 late in the first quarter and Arizona facing a third-and-4 from the UCLA 37, Bruins linebacker Sean Westgate appeared to have Wildcats quarterback Matt Scott wrapped up for a 6- or 7-yard loss.
"They have to punt or attempt a long field," UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel said.
Instead, Scott broke free and picked up 3 yards. Arizona secured a first down on the next play to keep alive a drive that resulted in a touchdown.
In the third quarter UCLA linebacker Akeem Ayers had Scott stopped for a loss on second-and-12. But again Scott broke away, this time throwing a 23-yard completion to the UCLA 23.
Seven plays later, Arizona went up 26-14.
Note Neuheisel didn't mention Sean Westgate and Akeem Ayers by name during his conversation with the reporters (Scott Reid from the OC Register brought them up). UCLA's entire defense was a joke in terms of tackling. We haven't see tackling this bad since the days of Larry Kerr and Bob Toledo's yearly defensive coordinators following Rock Long. Except for some decent plays from Jordan Zumwalt and Courtney Viney, the defense was an abomination throughout the day.
I realize folks are not feeling comfortable by pointing our Rahim Moore's mediocre performance (while Akeem Ayers seemed to quit on Saturday). However, I am not going to take anything back what I wrote on Saturday. Moore after getting incredible hype leading into this season has regressed as a junior. He has looked lost and confused on coverage and his tackling is not up to par for an "elite" "All American" safety. Both Moore and Ayers need to be reflective of their performances because they are the "team captains," who rest of the guys are supposed to follow. Right now while they might have shown good leadership off the field, on the field our guys look lost, confused and without any leadership.
Bruins are so banged up that they are not going to be able to work on their tackling at practice:
The Bruins tackled poorly against the Wildcats, as they did in the season opener against Kansas State. Neuheisel pointed to the expanded role of the young players as the cause of the defensive regression.
Improving tackling, he said, would be a challenge, as the Bruins are limited in practice unless they risk more injuries. But, Neuheisel said, "It's a major part of the game. We have to make a big deal about it this week."
I hope Neuheisel also makes a big deal out reviewing his team's play calling. From Blair Angulo's (a Bruin alum) report card on ESPNLA (emphasis added):
Another week, another batch of questionable play calls. Down five with nearly 10 minutes remaining, the Bruins had the ball at Arizona's 35. But the boo birds came down hard when a nine-yard loss and a pair of conservative calls forced a UCLA punt.
They are only going to get louder if the Bruins stay in their conservative shell for rest of the season.
The Bruins had four deep throws on Saturday. Two of them went for TDs. They might have had another TD if Brehaut had not missed Embree and on another occasion Brehaut essentially made a rookie mistake by a new starter. They need to make those kinds of plays a regular part of their package. Of course we are not asking to go deep on every down. It is a matter of balance and when those plays are called.
As for using our OL as an excuse, those guys despite their injuries had a solid game on Saturday (one of the few bright spots against Arizona). The OL didn't give up a sack until late in the fourth quarter. They were giving our offense more than enough time to get it going. I think Bob Palcic is the only member of this offensive coaching staff who has done more with less. Wayne Moses has been adequate but he has had solid talent to worth with in Jet Ski, Derrick Coleman, Malcolm Jones and Jordon James.
As for rest of the staff the performance has been disappointing. It is clear that Anthony Barr has the talent to make things happen. Yet he is not being incorporated at the F-Back spot as effectively as he could be in relation to his potential. The production from TEs have been disappointing (and it is unclear who is exactly coaching them). Our WRs as chronicled through the entire season have been a disaster until the flickers of hope we saw this past weekend.
Norm Chow and the offense has an incredible opportunity to take a step forward this upcoming weekend. Oregon State is coming in with one of the worst defenses in the conference. The Beavers come in with the 7th ranked rushing defense (156.0/yards per game), 9th ranked passing defense (267.0), and 6th ranked overall defense (423 yards per game tied with Chuck Bullough's pathetic unit). It will be up to Norm Chow (who is in total control of coordinating this offense) to get the job done so that the Bruins can outscore the Beavers and at least make an attempt to turn around the season.
Chuck Bullough is a lost cause (Rick Neuheisel will not have any credibility if Bullough is retained at the end of the season). Our focus right now is on the other side. Next 4 winnable games - starting with Oregon State - should give us some answers with regards to whether Neuheisel should keep Chow as his OC beyond 2010.
GO BRUINS.
49 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
a question for you...where has Malcom Jones been lately?...
i know he fumbled once i think, but he is a talented freshman in a year full of other talented freshman making huge differences for other college teams…wouldn’t it be smart to work him into the offense as well as the other young players you mentioned
Yes but not really
our run game was doing fine with the combination of JetSki and DC. Therefore, there aren’t many leftovers for Malcolm.
I think 72's question is a good one though
I was wondering the same. JetSki was getting jammed up pretty good. A little dose of Malcolm could have been interesting. I wish coaches designed plays that would call for screens to either Jet Ski or Malcolm. We ran one against Oregon with good results. Again, it has to start with consistent dose of creative play calling.
To me
it isn’t about who the RB is but what we’re running. Most of our run plays are up the gut and you can see the defense pinch the middle. So whomever is in there is going to have limited success. To me, our run game is as vanilla as our passing game. I know its a new offense and all but it’s so basic that it’s easy to scout IMO.
Bowl Eligibility
should be the sole focus of this team. Getting those extra practices is a must to develop the inexperienced/younger talent. Then again, I guess the extra practices don’t matter if we don’t play them. I digress….
Really unfortunate injury for Jerry. I respect the kid for continuing to work hard although he was buried on the depth chart. Hope he has a speedy recovery and looking forward to him contributing next season.
I love Rahim (see avatar) but he has not lived up to the pre-season hype. Rahim is more of a ballhawk than an enforcer. If he wants to be an elite safety, he needs to improve his tackline which is subpar IMO.
As for our tackling issue, not really sure how being banged up hurts us. We haven’t been able to tackle for years. Coaches, you’re on the clock now. No excuses. Get it done.
One two punch?
We should never run JF up the gut! It kills me to see DC pound it up the middle only to see JF come in and attempt to pound the middle and get stuffed? wtf?
"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that count's" - John Wooden.
I actually think Jet Ski is a very good in between the tackles runner.
He has great burst. Elite burst, actually. He is just small and shouldn’t be expected to pound out short yardage when the D loads the box.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd like to see
him in space more. screens and misdirection
"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that count's" - John Wooden.
I agree, or more runs from thje F-back to keep teams honest.
Too many runs up the gut.
D lacks leadership.
Moore and Ayers are both great players, but they are both undisciplined. They freelance. It makes them great, but it also requires a sturdy defense around them. It’s hard for me to get on them for playing like they always have. I don’t think they regressed- the defense around them regressed and now their flaws are being exposed.
It’s also apparent that the D line is undermanned. Bullough has to bring a blitz to get pressure, and Bullough seems much comfortable calling a conservative game with timed blitzes. I don’t think he is sophisticated enough to draw up a variety of blitzes that can confuse an offense for four quarters. Even if he is, I don’t think he is confident enough to do so. Rather, he is willing to sit back in coverage and blame the lack of “Jimmy’s and Joe’s” as the reason the D line can’t get pressure.
It is also becoming apparent that the D does not trust Bullough. The missed tackles were ridiculous, and the players should be held accountable for their tackling, but I cannot help but believe that their lack of aggression and “want to” has something to do with the fact that they simply do not believe that they have been put in the best position to succeed.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 9:31 AM PDT reply actions
What do you see in the D
which makes it apparent that they don’t trust Bullough?
I am sincere in this question. I have been wondering if the problem
with the D is that there is no leadership (from coaches or players).
by KnudsenRockne on Nov 1, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions
The post-game comments are pretty clear.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions
It isn't clear to me
that they don’t trust Bullough.
I am not arguing that your point – I just cannot tell if they are demoralized, confused or untrusting
by KnudsenRockne on Nov 1, 2010 5:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Here is one quote. There was a couple after the Oregon game that really caught my eye as well.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions
embarrassing
Even the announcers called out Ayers for loafing on a play
Maybe I am missing something
Carter sounds frustrated but as far as not trusting Bullough…
by KnudsenRockne on Nov 1, 2010 5:08 PM PDT up reply actions
You could be right.
I could be reading too much into the comments- I thought the comments made after the Oregon game were stronger, but I can’t seem to find them anymore.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 2, 2010 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
regarding Moore and Ayres, could they possibly just be marking time
until they leave UCLA after this year and turn pro?…i mean maybe the key with them is not to get hurt so they can be drafted higher…i hate to think that’s what is going on but we are not a good team and they may not want their draft status affected by our losing record…sorry to think along these lines, but both have really disappeared the last few games, as has our team as a whole…
Doubt it
Crappy pro teams can tank to do well in the draft. If a college player isn’t performing, the likelihood of them getting drafted diminishes; or, even if they’re good enough to go pro, their position in the draft falls – and thus a significant amount of future income. A top player as part of a defense with 11 strong players taking a few plays off here and there, yes. A star treading water, just biding his time through the season while the D he’s a part of sucks – I don’t see it.
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
How about injuries?
Could they possibly be injured and we don’t know it? Maybe they’ve foundout that Bulloch is a joke and are just phoning it in?
Injuries perhaps.
It’s been discussed in a few threads that some of us suspect Ayers is not 100%. Phoning it in is not only in the team’s best interests, but even if the coaches were awful and the team abysmal, if these two intentionally play less than their best, it only reduces their future paychecks. Pretty good motivator to play as hard as you can (if you can).
Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
Football =/= Basketball
It does not pay to give less than full effort for the most part. Players rarely sustain their draft stock unless they continue to perform.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions
+1
I agree with your analysis — it makes absolutely no sense to deliberately damage one’s draft position.
And, I think both of these guys have way too much integrity to do so.
My bet — Ayers is hurt, and Moore is suffering because of the weak play in front of him.
sjh
Papidakos on KLAC yesterday mentioned they have Ayers on tape
“loafing”…he was outraged that a potential all-american was seen as not being involved in the defense as he should be, being he is the captain and all…i hate to think this is true, but now there is visual proof this might have been going on…reasons for the behavior unknown at this point…
by BRUINCLASSOF72 on Nov 2, 2010 3:38 AM PDT up reply actions
I think they need to be separeted
Ayers gave up on plays, it was obvious on TV and even the announcers commented once. His leadership should be questioned.
Moore has made some very good tackles this year. The INTs have not come but I have not seen a D look this confused this often. I am more willing to give Moore the benefit of the doubt.
The D can't tackle
because they’re not taught how to do so. Chucky is busy trying to teach them his schemes and assignments, but these are young players. Teaching technique is far more important and would pay more dividends once they get a feel for better positioning. Instinct plays a big role in football, especially as the game gets gradually faster from high school to the pros. The way they were getting schooled by that shrimpy Arizona QB was embarrassing (despite kudos to him), it was like high school football. (on another note, see how their WRs helped their QB by getting open and going for the ball).
I still see shitty tackling in the NFL. It’s embarrassing. Players just meekly diving to “hit” someone. It’s pathetic. Here’s how you tackle in rugby:

Can’t tackle above the chest in rugby, and can’t hit because it would hurt…so you have to have good technique. I was watching Inside the NFL, and even Warren Sapp said they are not taught how to tackle. I don’t get it.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I'm not sure what Chuck is teaching them, but it definitely isn't tackling.
BTW, Rugby hurts no matter how you tackle. It just hurts less when you use proper form.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
That's what
the Guinness is for after the match.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Not just Bullough - what are Howard, Hundley and Jones doing?
Maybe the DC isn’t teaching them the basics but he has assistants who should be
working on skills with their players. Why haven’t they taught them how to tackle?
by KnudsenRockne on Nov 1, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Jerry Johnson
Definitely recall the replay on the play that Johnson got injured. I was like, “Owwwwwww”.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Nov 1, 2010 10:48 AM PDT reply actions
Can someone please fill me in
could that play have possibly been called a horse collar? It seemed to me that the kind of injury Johnson sustained on that play was exactly the type of injury the horse collar rule was instituted to protect against. Excuse my noobishness.
Oh UCLA you sweet bitch, you've BRUINed me for anything else.
Well, I suppose Bullough is on the way out,
considering the huge yardage and blowouts that the Bruin defense has yielded, but it really is pretty much about the “Jimmies and Joes.” Otherwise, it could all have been corrected long ago. What is forgotten perhaps is that there are “Jimmies and Joes” on the other side of the ball, too. Before the Arizona game, Bruin lineman Ryan Taylor was quoted as saying that Arizona ran pretty much the same defense as we do. Some on BN may find that statement amazing, especially those who think that Bullough just doesn’t know about the supposedly more sophisticated schemes known to other teams, even though they are all observable on national television and available for study in a multitude of easily available sources. If we had a pass rush and could get off our blocks and actually tackle the runners we encounter on a consistent basis, and if we weren’t seriously depleted by injuries, I think many of these complaints would not be heard. I am not saying that Bullough is a great defensive coordinator, because I think he could be easily replaced, and maybe a fresh start would be helpful, psychologically. So will some Jimmies and Joes who are older, wiser, stronger and healthier.
Bullough Has to Go!
He has been given his shot and it isnt working out…
Would love to have Rocky Long back.
by WestlakeVillage Bruin on Nov 1, 2010 12:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Disagree
In most instances, you’re not going to have most of your team filled with older, wiser, etc. players. That’s the nature of college ball.
No 2 situations are exactly alike but Arizona returned only 4 starters (the 2 good DE’s from the front 7 and 2 DB’s) just like us yet their defense is light years better than ours. Granted, Zona having 2 good DE’s to pressure the QB allows them to play their scheme. We don’t have that capablility at this juncture. If so, why in the hell is Chucky calling plays based on the assumption that the Front 4 can get pressure on the QB? You have to know your strengths and weaknesses and gameplan/call plays accordingly. If creating pressure is an issue, bring it from all angles. And don’t have the CB play 10 yds off the receiver when you blitz because as we saw on Saturday, it nullifies what you’re trying to do. Chucky needs to see what Gregg Williams (Saints DC) did last night.
We may be running the same defense but we don’t look anything alike. Very few teams in college ball do the stars align. Teams are always breaking in new/inexperienced guys. Lastly, just because they’re “older, wiser, stronger and healthier” doesn’t equal success. See UCLA 2007
Sure, sure
Bullough is no genius. But watch these same guys next year, and, more especially the year after that, for those to whom it applies. You will observe a transformatioon.
It isn't that Bullough's defense doesn't work.
I don’t think there is anything wrong with playing soft coverage, as long as your front four can get consistent pressure. The problem is that this team’s front four cannot get pressure. While Bullough’s schemes may work for next years team, they are not working now. He has tried to pound the square peg in the round hole for too long.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 1, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Defensive schemes seemed ok at times
on Saturday. I was watching the second half of the game, and I remember thinking to myself “wow, if our guys were able to finish tackles on first contact, we’d be defending pretty well!”. Obviously not the case throughout the game, but there were definite times where we seemed to have the right defensive calls – just poorly executed by the players (in the realm of tackling).
Not that it makes up for previous game performances by any means, but still.
Yah. The coach is supposed to adapt the game plan to fit hsi players
It seems like last Spring he figrued out what he wanted to do and hasn’t revised his plan
by KnudsenRockne on Nov 1, 2010 5:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Not sure about that.
We’ll still be young and possibly w/o Ayers and Moore. The talent level isn’t going to change that much.
Talent may not change but across the board experience will improve
Even so, if Bullough cannot adapt when his players are injured (or suspended) then he shouldn’t be a DC
by KnudsenRockne on Nov 1, 2010 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Well, I may be counting too much
on the simple process of maturation and progress on the learning curve, where coaching can certainly help. But in comparing our defense with Arizona’s as I was doing, I noted that, of the 25 defensive players listed on their depth chart, 8 were seniors, 6 were juniors, 5 were sophs and 6 were frosh, with the actual playing time dominated by seniors and juniors, as it should be, in the normal course of events. Of course, there is more to it than that, but still…
UCLA Can't Win With Substandard Players
sorry, but UCLA’s players, overall, sucked big time.
No matter how good a coach is, if you don’t have the horses, you lose.
In football, talent also includes intelligence, since dumb players do not make it in the NFL.
Not asking them to dominate right now
but to at least play like they’ve been coached. The horses are coming, but they shouldn’t be wasted on underachieving coaches like Bullough.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Re Chow's retention
Much has been made of his ability to develop quarterbacks. We should try to keep that resource working for us. I think we let Chow concentrate on helping our quarterbacks improve. Let’s keep him as quarterback coach and quarterback mentor, but get someone else to coordinate our offense.

by 





















