Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Owners Vote to Change Trade Deadline

Spaulding Roundup: Locker Update, Seattle Rain & Other UCLA Notes

Like OMG! It might rain at Montlake! Photo Credit: The Bacher Family (flickr)

So let's start this short game week with another Jake Locker update from Montlake courtesy of Bob Condotta of the Seattle Times:

Most notably, QB Jake Locker again practiced, appearing to split reps with Keith Price, another step on the way to being able to play Thursday against UCLA. UW coach Steve Sarkisian was not available to the media tonight since this was essentially a Tuesday practice (the day he doesn't speak) so there wasn't anything new from him on Locker. [...]

Also, safety Sean Parker appeared to get hurt and was replaced in the nickel by fellow true frosh Taz Stevenson. UW already thin at safety with Justin Glenn still out with a concussion suffered against Oregon.

We will keep tracking the coach speak and gamesmanship from Sarkisian over next 48 hours but I think it is pretty safe to say that the chances of Locker starting against UCLA is probably over 95 percent. Sark is going to play Jake no matter what.

The injury situation for the Huskies secondary should be an item of interest for Norm Chow and his UCLA offense.  Washington has already been reeling all season with the second worst defense in the Pac-10 conference (giving up 440 yards per game). Washington DC Nick Holt had some nice things to say about UCLA offense in response to a silly question:

On what UCLA does that's different from Oregon: "They have a lot of similar runs, but they aren't as up-tempo, and they don't spread you out as much with the open sets. And Oregon's quarterback run a little faster than what we'll see this week. But they have some very similar, taxing plays - and we have to do a nice job."

I wonder who was the rocket scientist who thought about mentioning Oregon's offense in the same breath as our clunker. I'd love to think that some time in near future our offense will approach the game with the same aggressive mindset Ducks bring to every series. One would think, that this would be a great week for Norm Chow to really get the offense clicking, going up against Washington team that has been struggling all season.

Star-divide

As for our guys, UCLA came back to Spaulding on Sunday afternoon after taking couple of days off. Bruins went back to practices against the scout team and away from the 1 on 1s from the bye week that really ginned up the intensity few days ago. Here is Coach Rick Neuheisel's comments following yesterday's practice:

Notice how it was Chris Foster who annoyingly kept bringing up the bowl game question. Neuheisel was perfectly content talking about practices and keep the focus on Washington while Foster kept bringing up the bowl game issue without showing the slightest interest in hearing Neuheisel's thoughts on Washington. Then after he was done Foster wrote up a useless "UCLA report" weaving his own storyline as if UCLA was thinking more about the bowl game than focusing on Washington (he didn't make that case directly but his lead grafs certainly implied it). Nowhere in Foster's questioning or report there is the slightest hint of an effort to understand or find out how the Bruins are preparing for Washington.

Anyway, Foster's colleague Jill Painter from the LA Daily News (covering the beat in place of Jon Gold, who had the day off) made some effort to think about Thursday night's game. She looked up the weather report for Montlake and found out there is a "50 percent chance of rain" this Thursday night in Seattle. So she asked Richard Brehaut about playing in the rain:

"Last year, we had a couple of games where it was supposed to rain, so we practiced with some wet balls and stuff like that," Brehaut said. "It shouldn't be too much of a problem. I know what it's like. You can't have too much pressure on your fingers when you're holding the ball, otherwise it will slip right out. I'm used to it."

Brehaut estimated he played in two high school games in the rain for Los Osos in Alta Loma. UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel, the former Washington coach, didn't seem worried about the weather.

Well that was really helpful. Anyway, looks like major news related update from yesterday's practice was on the injury front. From Peter Yoon of ESPNLA:

*Linebacker Steve Sloan fully practiced for the first time since a strained hamstring knocked him out of the Arizona game Oct. 30. He worked with the second team at middle linebacker while freshman Jordan Zumwalt continued to get the first-team reps. "It was a pretty bad strain," Sloan said. "It popped and did all that stuff. I was supposed to be out a lot longer, but I feel great." Sloan says he is not concerned about whether he gets his starting spot back. "When I went out, Zumwalt stepped right up to the plate and played a great game," he said. "Coach is going to do what's best for the team. I have full faith in Zumwalt how he played."

*Middle linebacker Patrick Larimore, out since dislocating his shoulder Oct. 21 against Oregon, spoke to a family doctor about the possibility of surgery and Neuheisel said they would make a decision early this week. "He's hopeful that he can hang around and make something still of this season," Neuheisel said. Neuheisel added that no matter the decision, Larimore is questionable to play Thursday against Washington.

It would be good to get Sloan back for depth purposes at LB. Also Yoon reported that Dalton Hilliard "is fully recovered" from concussion which is really good news. I thought Hilliard made a huge impact earlier in the year before he went down with his shoulder injury. Having both Riley and Hilliard in the lineup should present some solid options for Chuck Bullough, if he is creative enough to maximize the talent at his disposal.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

We all know Locker will play

Chucky better bring it and our guys better wrap up. We need to hit Locker as much as possible considering he has a rib injury. CNC needs to make sure we exploit this poor UDub defense. A screen would be nice since Holt will definitely be selling out. Tough spot for the team but this is a winnable game.

by BlueReign on Nov 15, 2010 8:59 AM PST reply actions  

Big opportunity

For Bre to get some confidence with his first road win as a Bruin starting QB.

by Nestor on Nov 15, 2010 9:18 AM PST up reply actions  

We better be aggressive

The way to win a game like this is to jump out to a big lead, completely disorienting the crowd and the opposing gameplan, by making big plays early for touchdowns instead of first downs. Then you can rely on your advantage in the running game to control possession and the clock.

Or we can just try to grind it out and leave it up to a few turnovers or last-second field goals to decide the game.

by bluebland on Nov 15, 2010 1:15 PM PST reply actions  

I would argue

For the grind it out style. Their defense has a few playmakers, and I’m worried that going for big plays might bite us. I’d rather let them try to stop the pistol and Franklin/Coleman, then go to the passing attack with Smith/Carroll. I think the biggest concern is to try to contain Locker, anywhere he goes. He’s injury prone and if we can rattle him, it will limit their offense more than anything else. Defense is Definitely my biggest concern.

by OswegoBruin on Nov 15, 2010 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Which is why it's necessary to score as much as possible

When opportunities arise early. The grind it out style makes you more vulnerable to turnovers, because you need 18 plays to go right in a row to score — whereas a properly called play-action gets you a score in one play. The key here is going for some homeruns on first down and second and short. Third and long is the turnover territory in passing.

If defense is a concern, we should work to give it a cushion. Locker has a history of getting rattled when he falls behind.

by bluebland on Nov 15, 2010 4:00 PM PST up reply actions  

Your Argument

Presumes that we have the ability to consistantly make homerun throws. I think we have a QB who can physically throw that far, but it’s far from a sure thing. You’re right in stating that we’re more turnover prone if we grind it out, but slinging the football with young quarterback and suspect offensive line in pass pro is not far behind in turnover likelihood.

Which is not to say we shouldn’t take shots downfield. That’s critical for establishing a run game. I just am all about keeping your defense fresh and wearing down the opposing D for as long as possible.

by OswegoBruin on Nov 15, 2010 4:10 PM PST up reply actions  

and presumes we have the receivers to consistently catch homerun throws...

and, of course, the argument ‘third and long is the turnover territory in passing’ is a good reason to avoid the third and long situations that often arise when you throw an incompletion on 1st down. Likewise ‘if defense is a concern, we should work to give it a cushion’ is a good justification to do whatever we think gives us the best chance of scoring on our first drive.

Out of interest, looked up first drives this season:
@KSU: started with an incomplete pass, went 3 and out
vs Stanford; started with an incomplete pass, went 3 and out
vs Houston: started with a 9 yard Franklin run; 6 play drive ended with a punt after a 3rd and 6 incompletion
@ Texas: started with a 5 yard Franklin run: 6 play drive ended with a punt after a sack trying to pass on 3rd and 5
vs WSU: started with a 4 yard completion, Brehaut to Presley; ended with TD
@ Cal: started with a holding penalty on a passing play (IIRC), went 3 and out
@ OU: started with 9 yard completion; 7 play drive ended by an INT
vs UofA: started with a 9 yard completion; ended with a TD
vs OSU: started with a 5 yard Franklin run: ended with a TD

In a small sample size:

we scored touchdowns on 2 of 6 drives started with a pass play and 1 of 3 drives started with a run play.

we also went 3-and-out on 3 of 6 drives started with a pass, and never went 3-and-out starting with a run play; but 2 of 3 drives started with a run stalled after gaining a single short first down. Every first down incompletion led to a 3-and-out.

Our longest play on a first down was a 9 yard completion.

Don’t think those numbers support any particular conclusion, particularly as I don’t recall attempting any long passes to open up the game (though I missed some of the opening incompletions)… but thought the numbers are mildly interesting. Without having given it much thought, I was surprised to see no FG attempts on opening drives – we either click and get a TD or stall pretty immediately and punt, it seems.

by britishbruin on Nov 15, 2010 6:38 PM PST up reply actions  

also of note for historical purposes

Prince: no TD drives in 5 opening drives
Brehaut: 3 TD drives in 4 opening drives (and 1 INT after a 50 yard drive)

by britishbruin on Nov 15, 2010 6:43 PM PST up reply actions  

We need to add another color to the black...

How about BLUE. Black and Blue to Locker et al.

by 1970 on Nov 16, 2010 7:01 AM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB