Spaulding Roundup: Cleared Locker, Wet Weather & Other UCLA Notes
So it's official. Just in case anyone here was foolishly holding his or her breath, here is the official word from Steve Sarkisian:
Jake Locker is cleared to play! Let's make sure Husky Stadium is rockin' for the entire nation to see. Go Dawgs!
Bob Condotta from the Seattle Time has the toplines on breaking news of the sun rising in the East:
Locker practiced all week after sitting out the previous two weeks of workouts, and a game at Oregon on Nov. 6, with a broken rib. And after Tuesday's practice, doctors examined Locker one more time and pronounced him good to go.
Locker practiced all week after sitting out the previous two weeks of workouts, and a game at Oregon on Nov. 6, with a broken rib. And after Tuesday's practice, doctors examined Locker one more time and pronounced him good to go.
Of course none of this should be a surprise. All of us including Coach Rick Neuheisel knew all along that Sarkisian was going to start Locker for this game notwithstanding all the elaborate coach speak around issues of medical clearance. Apparently Sarkisian at least on paper got a little snarky about people not falling for the media show:
UCLA coach Rick Neuheisel, however, has said repeatedly all week he expects Locker to play.
Responded Sarkisian: "Well, he probably knows our doctors pretty well. Maybe he knows more than I know.''
Anyway, thankfully the nonsense is over. Bruins can now completely lock into the game plan for attacking Locker. We have talked about how our defense needs to be ruthless in the way they come after Locker (without being cheap shot artists). They need to make every effort to break his will early and disrupt him from getting into any kind of rhythm.
I think the key for the Bruins will to make sure to keep Locker contained and throttled in the pocket, and force him to attempt to beat us with his arms rather than his legs. Bruins have had a tough time all season with mobile QBs. Hopefully they have learned their lesson by now and are well prepared for this latest test on national TV.
Neuheisel met the press for the last time this game week as the Bruins had their final Spaulding practice before tomorrow night's game. He essentially laughed (for good reasons) at all the melodrama around whether Locker will start "the biggest joke of all time":
Neuheisel also talked about the need for the Bruins to get off to a "good start." Although he then droned about needing to "hang around" with Washington, I hope he will be coaching with the mindset to go for the throat early. Huskies are coming off three straight demoralizing and blowout defeats. I think the best thing for the Bruins will be to come out strong, take the lead and step on their neck to crush their will early.
As for practice here are some tidbits from Jon Gold:
* A lot of special team work today, a lot of passing against scout team, and Richard Brehaut looked really sharp. He had one pass to Josh Smith on the side of the end zone that he just wouldn't have made a few weeks ago.
* Nelson Rosario and Sheldon Price will see increased action, but I don't anticipate too much Steve Sloan as he works his way back in.
The news about Brehaut is encouraging. Hopefully he gets into a good rhythm early. Interestingly during a conversation with ESPN710 in Seattle Sarkisian mentioned how the Huskies are preparing for play action and down field throws:
"The origin of the pistol really is one that is a hybrid of a quarterback being under center and running the normal runs that you have with your quarterback under center - whether it be the zone play or the power play or the stretch play - combined with the shotgun run, zone read game where the back is offset next to the quarterback, working the zone read stuff."
Sarkisian said another key is stopping the run, which would put pressure on UCLA's quarterback Richard Brehaut, a sophomore who has thrown for over 200 yards just once in six games this season.
"They've got good coaches, too," Sarkisian said. "(Head coach Rick Neuheisel and offensive coordinator Norm Chow), they're going to have a nice game plan together. They're aware of the fact that our first goal on defense is to stop the run. So we've got to be prepared for the play-action pass and their ability to really throw it down the field over our heads. We've got to be smart, we've got to be sound, and we've got to tackle extremely well."
We will see I guess. It will be a shock if the Huskies do not come out and stack the box early fully committed to stopping our running attack. As he mentioned in the video above, Neuheisel essentially telegraphed what the coaches are planning to do in Seattle:
With the forecast for Thursday's matchup including heavy rain, UCLA knows throwing the ball could present a problem. Then again, a dry football hasn't been a cure-all for the Bruins, who have struggled in the throwing game for much of the season.
"We've been able to be successful without much in the way of throwing the ball," Neuheisel said. "We'll see if we can do it again. Usually wet doesn't necessarily mean you can't throw the ball, it just means you've got to keep the ball dry. But the ability to run the ball becomes more important, no question."
More on the weather issue from the LA Times:
The forecast for UCLA's game against Washington on Thursday calls for temperatures in the 40s and a 50% chance of rain. UCLA long snapper Christian Yount prepared for potentially soggy conditions in practice Tuesday by repeatedly squirting the contents of a water bottle on the football before snapping it to holder Danny Rees.
Though Neuheisel said the running game becomes more important in wet weather, "wet doesn't necessarily mean you can't throw it, it just means you have to keep the ball dry."
I think the wet ball could become a dicey issue for guys like Jet Ski (and possibly with Malcolm Jones as well) given what we have seen last couple of years. Then again keep in mind that the Huskies also have lot of kids who are from Southern California, including their primary ball carrier RB Chris Polk. So the issue could even out. What UCLA cannot do though is appear to be predictable and conservative early on. If the Bruins remain in a conservative posture of playing not to lose, they will face the danger of falling behind against a Husky team, which is going to come out in a frenzied emotion.
Speaking of the weather, Tony Dye is looking forward to playing in the rain (HT Blair Angulo from ESPNLA):
Dye is also looking to "push the distraction" of "black out" to the side. Interestingly Tony noted that they players were begging the coaches to respond with their own "white out" but the coaches weren't really going for it. Come to think of it UCLA football uniforms in white pants (either at home or on the road) could be pretty cool.
Tony Dye and the Bruin secondary will need to be very aggressive against the Huskies. Peter Yoon from ESPNLA reports:
The Bruins have been using an aggressive substitution pattern in the defensive backfield, so much so that it is difficult to tell who is getting first team reps and who is with the second team. Aaron Hester, Andrew Abbott, Sheldon Price and Courtney Viney have all been playing at corner. Tony Dye and Rahim Moore are the first team safeties, but Dietrich Riley, Dalton Hilliard, Stan McKay and Alex Mascarenas have gotten an uptick in reps.
"We're fortunate that we've developed some depth with attrition," Neuheisel said. "Some other guys have had to step up and become really good players for us so we want to make sure we keep everybody fresh. We know that [the Huskies are] a big play offense. They've got a lot of balls down the field type of air show and it's important that we stay fresh."
I am excited to have Dalton Hilliard back in the mix. He adds an element of physicality into our defensive secondary. Both he and Riley have the ability to level those intimidating, bone crunching hits that could change the tone and complexion of an entire game. We saw that in our last game when Riley destroyed the Quizz, and it could be really helpful if our defense can send that kind of message early on Thursday night.
No doubt the Bruins are going to be in a tough situation and they are going to play in weather condition that will freak out an average Southern Californian (who haven't lived outside of the Golden State). Yet as Neuheisel mentioned (and noted by the LA Times), Bruins have done more than OK in very recent past in tough weather conditions. They handled the freezing temperatures here in DC (it was ridiculous even for the Washingtonians) and then cruised to a victory with a focused performance in Pullman. They have the talent and potential to put together a good performance on Thursday night and build on the momentum from Oregon State. Let's hope they take full advantage of this opportunity and turn the "black out" into a funeral for the Huskies.
GO BRUINS.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I am really excited about this game. Mentally, I think I circled this game before the season started, and after two days of UCLA hoops, I can't wait for the game to start.
I would love it if UCLA came out with white pants. A Thursday night road game is the perfect setting, and doing so against a “black out” would be outstanding. If the staff could actually keep the idea secret until the game starts, it would be epic.
I hope that Josh Smith had a chance to work on punt returns over the long break. Washington has one of the worst coverage units in the nation, and there is no crowd stopper better than a TD return.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 17, 2010 8:11 AM PST reply actions
Yep
They have the worst coverage team in the Pac-10. Huge opportunity for Smith and it’d be awesome if the coaches let him return punts.
Does Smith even work on returns?
He was a dynamic return man at Colorado, and although he may have had some dropsies in practice earlier this year, I wonder if it was just rust. Embree does a good job fair catching, but he doesn’t have the explosion to get past the first wave, and therefore has no chance for a big return.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 17, 2010 8:42 AM PST up reply actions
Dropsies
or so they say. That’s the only thing we’ve heard. Smith was arguably the top kickoff and punt returner in the Big 12. Why he doesn’t get a shot, is one of the great mysteries of our time.
Interestingly
He was about to get a shot against Stanford and then he had that mental block and went out there on 3rd down. He hasn’t been asked to return punts since then? I wonder why. He made a mistake and I am sure lessons were learned but why are coaches still holding him out. They didn’t seem to apply the same standard when Embree keeps dropping passes and Paulsen was killing us with his bonehead mistakes last season.
maybe a confluence of factors?
dropsies ; mental blocks ; off-field distractions ; etc?
What I don’t get – and mentioned to DCBruins a couple of weeks back – is why we don’t go for punt blocks more aggressively if Embree is just going to stand there and make fair catches. We seem to waste those blockers on returns that never take place…
by britishbruin on Nov 17, 2010 8:59 AM PST up reply actions
It's a very good question
Embree is just a safety net, Smith is a weapon when it comes to return game. I wonder why he hasn’t been eased into punt return duties by now.
unlikely this is the game for it
if the ball is wet.
by britishbruin on Nov 17, 2010 8:45 AM PST up reply actions
a fair point
was more commenting that coaches who haven’t shown faith thus far are unlikely to now make that leap under these conditions; but we shall see.
by britishbruin on Nov 17, 2010 8:48 AM PST up reply actions
Exactly.
I’m not opposed to Embree bearing the brunt of the load of punt returns. IIRC, he has only dropped on punt this year, which we recovered. He did drop one when Ore. St. interfered, but I won’t hold that against. He’s reliable, for the most part, and that is important.
There are times, however, when you can use the return game to your advantage. Having a weapon back there can be critical. Da Bears rode Hester to the Superbowl. Against a team with poor coverage, I would like to see a weapon back there.
Catching punts is hard. Not only do you have to catch an awkward ball, you have to do it with the defense breathing down your neck. Not everyone can do it, but Smith can. If Smith was good at CU, I don’t see why he all the sudden cannot hang on to the ball. In my estimation, Smith just hasn’t had the shot to do it.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 17, 2010 8:58 AM PST up reply actions
Right
Smith did it at CU playing in a league with much tougher weather conditions. I doubt he has magically forgotten how to field punts and I don’t understand why the coaches have been babying the idea that he is not ready to return punts yet. It’s the same conservative mindframe that has held back this program this entire season.
N, I don't know if you saw this.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/paul_daugherty/11/10/ban.punting/index.html
Personally, I tend to sway towards the “conservative” end of the spectrum when it comes to football, but some interesting points are made in this article. I meant to post it a while ago, but it slipped my mind.
by AllHailMightyBruins on Nov 17, 2010 9:13 AM PST up reply actions
I hate when statistical analysts
dumb down their statements to fit an audience, giving credence to people to take it out of context.
If the Pats’ opponents had never punted, they would have been much better off. The Pats would drive 40 yards or 80. It didn’t matter.
First sentence may well be true – the Patriot offense may have been so efficient that starting 30 yards further back may have only reduced their likely points scored on the drive by a small amount, and that effect was less than the likely value of going for it on 4th down and potentially scoring some points yourself. But the latter two sentences are simplistic, almost certainly incorrect in a very real sense, but exactly the sort of thing that will then be applied out of context to other teams.
I can buy the general point made by the analysts – though I would love to see how they controlled for selection effects, as the raw success percentages could be very misleading – but the narrative from the author is total pseudo-science.
by britishbruin on Nov 17, 2010 9:35 AM PST up reply actions
..
Embree does a good job fair catching
This is awesome.
Actually not.
In the last game he called for a fair catch, then instead of catching made a block…and got us penalized.
Go Bruins!
#2 of 4
BIG, BIG GAME. We need this one in the worst way in order to go bowling. I have a gut feeling that we’re going to see a couple more wrinkles offensively in this game. I’d be content with a screen or two but anyways…… Even without the weather conditions, win the turnover battle and we should be in position for the W.
As for Sark, who the hell did you think you’d fool? Lol….Locker missing Senior Day? Please~
I get that 'conservatism' is bad
but when our strength is running the ball, and UW’s weakness is defending the run, and it is wet, surely our play mix should be run-heavy this game, with the pass used to keep them on their toes rather than coequal with the run?
I’d like not to see too many predictable run-run-pass-punt sequences, but I disagree that we have to be aggressive in the pass game to begin the game. If we go run-run-run-punt to start the game, then that is a different matter, but I’d like to see if UW can stop our run game before going away from what seems like our most favorable matchup of strength vs weakness. We should have a plan that allows for adjustments, but I don’t think we should come out firing on the basis that relying on our strength would be too predictable.
Again
You are raising a strawman that we are suggesting the offense fire out with passes all the time. What we have suggested over and over is not to be predictable one series after another. We could be in serious danger of blowing this game if we go in there with the WSU game plan trying to out-physical these guys. Chow has to mix in both toughness and creativity to keep the offense going in a tough environment. Otherwise, we are going to keep getting stuffed against an 8 men front and be in dire straits heading into last 2 games of the season.
Washington is the kind of opponent where an offense takes confident steps forward to open itself up instead of doing the same old conservative BS that has largely been proven to be ineffective throughout the season.
I don't disagree with your phrasing here
we certainly need to mix in some creativity. Hence I dislike run-run-pass-punt sequencing, and if we see a lot of that I think it will be overly conservative and predictable.
But if we see an 8-man front and still average ~4-5 yards per carry on a consistent basis, then I don’t see how much we need to ‘open up’ the offense. I’m in favor of a run-heavy game with variety in the run plays called and pass plays called at unpredictable moments to set up the run game.
I guess where I feel we are talking past each other is I think it is possible to be ‘conservative’ by relying heavily on the run game and short precise passes, while not having to fall into being ‘predictable’; but when you are talking about ‘conservative BS’ I don’t know whether you think mixing in a few long pass plays per game is a necessary component of a successful offensive strategy. Can there be ‘creative conservatism’?
by britishbruin on Nov 17, 2010 9:18 AM PST up reply actions
I do think having an offensive scheme
That incorporates well placed deep passes (or attempts) to develop credible threats, passes that gets our skilled athletes in space are required component of successful offensive strategy. If Chow can’t develop that then he is not going to be any different than the joke offenses we saw under Dorrell. Thursday night would be a good place to start in getting the offense opened up instead of relying on tired, predictable, and boring conservative mindset.
Remembering Daluiso -- and History Repeating. Go Bruins!
I was at the incredible UCLA game in UW’s Husky Stadium when Don James’ Huskies had the unmitigated gall to hand out red Roses to all the fans (even to the UCLA fans!) to celebrate the fact they’d earned a Rose Bowl bid the week before – basically totally DISSing our 5-5 UCLA team before they even took the field! Talk about a "no respect" locker room motivator! It was a blustery cold and miserable day (typical Seattle) on the FROZEN TUNDRA of Montlake as waves of wind-driven clouds brought rain, hail and snow intermittently to Husky Stadium. The sun even made one cameo appearance (to Keith Jackson’s ‘Whoa Nellie!’) at half time for 2 minutes (because in Seattle, if you don’t like the weather, wait 10 minutes and you’ll get something completely different).
What made it worse for us “Californicators” is that the Santa Ana’s were blowing strong in SoCal, so we departed SoCal in scorching hot 90 degree weather on Thurs afternoon to fly to the ‘Great White North’ (foolishly wearing only flip flops, shorts and a Bruins polo shirt). When we arrived in Seattle to mid-30’s temperatures and unrelenting RAIN - a guys T-shirt at SEATAC baggage claim suddenly made complete sense: "Welcome to Seattle – where you don’t get a Tan - you RUST!"
On game day Saturday, we few, proud bundled-up Bruins joined our very gracious Husky Alums on their fabulous Party Boat (Argosy Cruises “Good Times”) for the delightful trip from Lake Union to Lake Washington and the Bloody Mary’s flowed like the River Nile. UW is one of the few college venues where you take a BOAT to the stadium – so never go by car.
The weather turned from bad to ugly as we arrived at Husky Stadium, received our red Rose, and headed for the Visitors seats in the closed west end zone (with a great view of Lake Washington). Luckily for us, my handy Bota Bag flask was full to the brim with Frangelico. The golden elixir was mixed half/half with the hot chocolates throughout the game to keep us alive and in voice as the Bruins slugged it out with the Huskies. It was so darned blustery and cold we Bruins drank all the hot chocolates/coffee in the entire stadium by the end of the 3rd Qtr. UW didn’t sell a single Coke/Pepsi that day (too damned cold — got anything HOT???).
The game and momentum waivered back and forth because our Bruins were not going to go down without a fight. Roses be damned! Our Mighty Bruins fought them like the Dawgs they are in spite of the freezing rain, hail and ice. Then, in the waning moments of the 4th Qtr as the snowflakes began to fall, our kicker, Brad Daluiso, kicked a game winning field goal as time expired — crushing the braggadocio of the Huskies and sending their previously jubilant crowd silently into the night to CRY in their Red Hook beers.
The few, loyal Bruins brave enough to endure the despicable weather reveled with our Bruin team and sung the ‘UCLA Fight – Fight – Fight’ songs late into the evening and partied downtown at ‘Ivar’s Acres of Clams’ restaurant (waterfront Pier 56) all night long. As an added bonus, $UC lost their game later that night — so the fabulous ‘TWO-fer’ (a Bruins win and a $UC loss) was had all in one glorious weekend! The Party was ON in Seattle!
Can history repeat itself tomorrow? I predict our KAI FORBATH (Death, Taxes, Forbath!) will kick another game-winning BUZZER BEATER field goal tomorrow for another Bruins victory! Go Bruins! Whip the Dawgs!
What is a Fan post?
Sure, but I am not sure that is? Didn’t get the instruction manual – and somewhat technology challenged.
by SUPER-BRUIN on Nov 17, 2010 10:37 AM PST up reply actions
Fanpost
is the section that shows up on the right hand side of BN. Essentially it is an opportunity for you to put up a stand alone blog post. On the top right hand side of the blog you will see a set of options. You can click on Fanpost and then essentially post the great comment your just put up in this thread.
It’s good stuff and fanposting it will allow more BNers to see it (then having it buried in a comment thread).
Sounds Like Big 10 Football Weather In Seattle Tomorrow Night
Wish I could be out there so I could throw on the heavy weather jib. God knows I’ve sat through enough crappy/cold (and I mean COLD) weather at Kinnick Stadium over the years.
White pants?? Hmmm….interesting.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Nov 17, 2010 10:44 AM PST reply actions
Hahah. This will be interesting.
My girlfriend lives pretty close to Seattle, and will be in Seattle when the game is going on (not watching, though, more urgent matters), and, while she doesn’t keep tabs on sports, she’s just cheering for the Huskies.
But, yeah. More relevant notes. If we can run it, which I think we can, it will help. (talk about being obvious)
This is a game we should win IMO
Of course, the oddsmakers probably say otherwise since they go by stats and past performance.
I’m going by my belief that we are finally playing the right people, whether due to injury or the coaches changing their minds about the young kids.
We have the right qb in his fifth game, so he’s played 1/3 of the season and will only get better. We should see more of Malcolm Jones, Gatorade POY, and Smith and Marvray. Our o-line is pretty solid now. Maybe we can rediscover the TE, too. Bottom line: we should score at least 28 points against a weak Husky defense.
We are getting younger and better on defense, too, especially with Zumwalt and Riley, and especially when we play pressure defense. I say Locker throws at least two picks and we hold them to no more than three TDs or less.
If we play to win, we win, 31-17. If we play not to lose, we lose.
Come on coaches! Let’s be positive and let the players play!
GO BRUINS!
on a site I look at for informational purposes
UW is favored by 2.5 points.
by britishbruin on Nov 17, 2010 1:53 PM PST up reply actions
Sheldon Price
Is it just coincidence that in his absence there hasnt been any taunting by our defense? Oh well, I guess we have to deal with that again.
by Bruins#1 on Nov 17, 2010 5:58 PM PST via mobile reply actions

by 
























