Coach's 88 Apples vs. Auriemma's 88 Oranges

Bumped. -BN

Photo Credit: AP

So here's a little statistical food for thought relevant to the UCLA men vs. UConn women debate. 

Yesterday, in response to kevb's Fanpost, both uclaluv and I argued that UConn's record-tying run has a lot to do with the distinct lack of parity in the women's game.  UConn has managed to blow through 88 straight opponents in part because the drop off in talent from top tier teams (like UConn) to the majority of their opponents is so great.  Rather than simply make the assertion without any evidence to back up this claim, I thought I'd try to find some statistical back up.

The best approach I could think of for measuring top tier teams and their middling counterparts was to look at the first and second round performances of #1 seeds in both the men's and women's NCAA tournaments.  I was able to gather data from all but one NCAA tourney since the women went to a 64 teams back in 1994. 

First the numbers for second round matchups (between #1 seeds and either 8 or 9 seeds):

Wins Losses Average Margin 20+ Point Wins 30+ Point Wins
Men 56 8 11.42 13 5
Women 60 3 19.09 29 11

And now the really outrageous numbers.  Here are the stats for games between #1 and #16 seeds:

Wins Losses Average Margin 30+ Point Wins 50+ Point Wins
Men 64 0 27.47 25 2
Women 63 1 39.56 48 17

Even with the shocking upset loss on the books (Harvard over Stanford in the 1998 women's tourney) the numbers for women's #1s surpass those for men's #1s by a wide margin.  My favorite number here is the 17 wins of 50 points or more by women's #1s.  To give you an idea of how relatively bad a team has to be to lose by 50 in a 40 minute game, the two 50+ point losses on the men's side came from a 2009 Cattanooga team that went 11-9 in the Southern Conference and a 1998  Prairie View team that went 6-10 in the SWAC.

Based on these numbers, I'd say that top flight women's teams get to cakewalk more often than do top flight men's squads. 

For the record, I think that Ariemma's 88 straight is a awesome accomplishment but I also think that putting it on par with Coach's record is misguided.

<em>This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.</em>

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bruins Nation

You must be a member of Bruins Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bruins Nation. You should read them.

Join Bruins Nation

You must be a member of Bruins Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bruins Nation. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.