2010 Bruin Baseball Preview Part 2: Pitching
The tradition continues with yet another five-part season preview that will take us right up to the very beginning of the 2010 UCLA baseball season on February 19th. We've got the basics of college baseball out of the way and took a look at the all-time UCLA team. In part 1 of our five-part preview, we took a quick look at last year, a peak at the schedule and some of the opinions from analysts around the country for 2010. This part 2 will look into the pitchers. Part 3 will feature the Bruins' position players and Part 4 will be a look at the Pac 10. Part 5 will complete the preview as we take a look around the nation and where the Bruins stand in the national sense.
It doesn't take much for a pitching staff to outshine an offense the way UCLA hit last year, but it would be a mistake to overlook the Bruins' accomplishments on the mound in 2009. With freshmen starting on Fridays and Saturdays for most of the year, the Bruins finished 21st in the country in ERA and 9th in strikeouts. Now, the two freshmen are sophomores and multiple key cogs in the bullpen are returning from injury, giving the Bruins one heck of a pitching staff. Multiple analysts have said UCLA has the best one-two punch in the country and even UCLA head coach John Savage didn't have enough good things to say about the staff.
"I love our arms," Savage said. "From top to bottom, we have as deep a staff as I've ever had." High praise from a man with a NCAA title to his name as a pitching coach, a position he received accolades for his work in for developing some of the best pitching staffs of the 1990's.
Sophomore Gerrit Cole will be UCLA's primary Friday night starter and having manned the post for the majority of last season, he will be no stranger to the pressure. The Yankees' former first-round pick amassed a 4-8 record and .191 batting average against and 3.49 ERA for the Bruins last season. Besieged by poor fielding behind him and forced to go up against the other team's ace each week, a recipe for disaster with a bad hitting team on your side, Cole's record was less than indicative of the quality of his season.
Cole showed his mid to upper 90's fastball when he needed it and even showed a devastating two-seam fastball that still clocked in as high as 95 mph. Complemented by a hard breaking slider, Cole gave opposing teams fits with his pure stuff, never more so than against a very good Cal lineup when he went 8.1 innings and allowed just two hits and one run. Cole's biggest nemesis last year was himself, as he struggled to command his pitches at times. That aspect of his arsenal looked to be improved in the fall, especially the command of his two-seam fastball in on lefthanders, a pitch that could potentially be dominating. With Cole toeing the rubber on Friday nights, the fans will be in for a treat and the UCLA defense may not have to work any harder than those in the stands.
While Cole got all of the hype last season, it was fellow freshman Trevor Bauer who was the team's top pitcher. After skipping the final semester of high school to enroll at UCLA early and pitch for the Bruins in 2009, Bauer came in with the poise of a wily veteran. Immediately thrust into the closer's role, Bauer picked up a pair of saves and pitched in MLB stadiums, hostile environments and against some of the game's toughest lineups without flinching. When elevated to a starting role, Bauer took his game to an entirely new level, especially against Washington when he threw a complete game, one hit shutout. Bauer finished the season 9-3 with a 2.99 ERA with both his win total and ERA the tops among Pac-10 freshmen. His season was so extraordinary that he took home Louisville Slugger National Freshman Pitcher of the Year.
The sophomore has an array of pitches and in the words of Savage, "it seems like he has a new pitch every day." What really separates Bauer from the pack, though, is his unmatched determination and competitiveness. With Bauer following up Cole on Saturdays, opponents won't get a breather, unless you count the one they get making that slow walk from the plate to the dugout after strike three.
The Sunday starter role is still up for grabs, although after having a half-dozen in contention in the fall, the number has been whittled down to two. Junior Rob Rasmussen and senior Garett Claypool are the two battling it out for the final weekend starter role, although the loser of the battle will still get to start in midweek games so not all would be lost. Rasmussen is a crafty lefthander with one of the better curveballs in the Pac-10. Getting to that curveball is the only problem Rasmussen has had, although that looked to have been corrected this summer. In the Cape Cod League, Rasmussen excelled, earning the start in the league All-Star Game and being named to the All-Cape Cod League team. This was a welcome development for the southpaw who looked outstanding in the 2009 season's first few weeks before struggling the rest of the way and finishing with a 6.45 ERA and .295 batting average against.
Claypool has always been a talented pitcher who hasn't quite gotten the looks as a starter that he'd hoped for. A Freshman All-American, Claypool has spent his career shuttling between midweek starter and the bullpen, never really getting to settle in despite solid numbers. Last season, the righthander went 2-1 with a 3.46 ERA, second to only Bauer on the Bruins. Claypool has always fared better starting games than coming in relief, even going six scoreless innings having allowed a single hit versus Long Beach St. last year.
Both Rasmussen and Claypool provide the Bruins an attractive option on Sundays and whoever loses the battle will certainly have the edge versus whoever toes the rubber opposite them in midweek games, but both are eying that Sunday role. With Sunday games taking place during the day and midweek games at night, it's possible that Claypool gets pushed to midweek duty and the heavier air that accompanies it. Rasmussen has long been a Savage favorite too, making it all the more likely that Rasmussen starts on Sundays, but nothing has been determined to this point.
The UCLA bullpen struggled some in 2009, predominantly due to the struggles of a couple key upperclassmen who have since moved on to the professional level. While those pitchers move out, freshmen and more importantly, those returning to health move in. The most prominent of those recently healthy is redshirt sophomore Dan Klein, who will serve as the team's closer. After being sidelined by a shoulder injury midway through his freshman season, an injury that cost him last season as well, Klein returned in the fall and looked downright dominant in four scoreless innings. His fastball has enough life to set-up what is one of the better changeups in the Pac-10 and his demeanor, born out of a football career that earned him scholarship offers as a quarterback, lends itself well to closing.
Another redshirt sophomore pitcher returning to health to help out in the bullpen is Erik Goeddel, a highly touted recruit who was derailed by an elbow injury. Goeddel too looked exceptional in the fall and he may very well hold the key to the UCLA bullpen, which is looking for a steady starter to closer bridge. Fellow righthander Scott Griggs will look to thow his name into the mix out of the bullpen. The highly touted freshman has issues repeating his motion and can be wild, but his stuff is exceptional and while still far from refined, Griggs has made strides from when he stepped on campus in the fall.
Junior Matt Grace will bring his 22 appearances last year with him into 2010 and serve as one of the primary lefthanders at Savage's disposal. His 4-3 record and 4.73 ERA is respectable, but his greatest asset is his durability that allows him to come back on consecutive days or pitch upwards of four innings in an appearance. Two other southpaws figure to get extensive looks in relief in Matt Drummond and Mitchell Beacom. Drummond joins Klein and Goeddel and the returning wounded after missing last season, but in 2008 he was 2-2 with three saves in 18 appearances as a sophomore. Beacom is the most interesting of the lefthanded options as the towering 6'8'' sidearmer whips the ball towards home plate with good velocity and outstanding movement. The redshirt sophomore is coming off of a good summer in the New England Collegiate League and can be dominant with just a bit better command than he showed in the fall.
Those 11 pitchers should comprise the bulk of the UCLA pitching staff and barring any unexpected developments, could range anywhere from good to the nation's best. For a team with a plethora of question marks on offense, a pitching staff like UCLA has is a must and the Bruins will lean hard on the staff in 2010. Cole and Bauer and known quantities who will give the Bruins a great chance to win each and every Friday and Saturday, which one of Rasmussen and Claypool will set UCLA up nicely on Sundays and midweek. With Klein looking ready to consistently slam the door shut at the back end of games, the big question for the Bruins is who get the ball from the starters to Klein. Goeddell has the potential to demoralize batters with his filthy stuff and if he can do so, the lefthanders will be able to compliment him when the situation dictates, giving UCLA excellence from innings one through nine.
15 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Tim Schlatter
What are you hearing about him? The reason I’m asking is he is giving lessons to two of my sons and he is a really good kid and is one of the key reasons we’ll be heading out to catch more UCLA baseball games this year.
Will he sniff any action?
Great write up as always! Keep’em coming!
Looks like he may have graduated
I know he was injured last year, but I just assumed had more eligibility. I’ll ask him this weekend.
Probably why he has so much time to coach kids…. His playing days may be over….
You're correct
Schlatter is no longer with the team. He was a redshirt junior last year so I wouldn’t be surprised if he decided to move on since he got his degree.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 11, 2010 2:23 PM PST up reply actions
Ryan ...
how many scholarships does the baseball team have to give out?
I know they give out both full and half scholarships — do you have any idea how many they give out in total>??
Also — do you have any idea who has a full ride, who has half a ride and who is a walk on? I do realize that being a walk on in baseball is not like being a walk on in football or basketball (those guys are sort of afterthoughts, though occasionally one or two of them contribute).
11.7 scholarships per team
It’s a very low number (35 players per team) and has been a major source of contention in recent years.
Over the last decade or so, the NCAA has changed or added rules that have really hurt the sport. The lower scholarship number is one, as is the 35 man roster limit. The NCAA also changed the transfer rule to the one used in basketball and football so players must sit out a year if they transfer. That even goes for walk ons who get no scholarship money so if another school is willing to give them some scholarship money, they must still sit out. The NCAA also recently mandated that no scholarship player can get less than 25% of a scholarship so if a team is left with extra scholarship money, they can’t give a guy who was getting no money 10% as a way to reward them. Instead it has to go to a guy already on scholarship. The list goes on and the rules the NCAA has put on baseball are unlike anything they’ve put on any other sport and it’s really hurt the sport.
I don’t think it’s right to speak on any specific players scholarship status, but most guys don’t get a full scholarship. There are some programs that refuse to give out any full scholarships, instead splitting them up over a greater number of players. On every team though, there are walk ons playing a good chunk of time.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 11, 2010 2:32 PM PST up reply actions
Interestingtly ...
due to Title IX, the softball program offers more scholarships than the baseball program. I just didn’t know the number. It’s one of the ways the school makes up for the 85 football scholarships and ensure that men and women get the same number of scholarships.
I wonder how the NCAA came up with 11.7 and 35. 12 and 36 is so much easier to divide up.
We talk here about college baseball and why it isn’t more popular and all that. I wonder how many more players would choose college over the pros if there were more scholarships to give out and if there would be a resulting rise in the quality of play and a resultant rise in popularity?
I would think the low scholarship number plays a bit to UCLA’s advantage vis a vis USC and Stanford, because it’s a lot harder to pay your own way over there than it is over here.
No way to know …
Thanks for filling me in …
I’m just noting this — not trying to start a Title IX debate.
UCLA definitely has an advantage over USC and Stanford
because it is cheaper. USC fans like to throw that out there to explain the team’s struggles of late, but that ignores the success of Stanford, Rice and Vanderbilt among others. All are private, more expensive schools that have flourished even as scholarships have dwindled and more players have to pay their own way. The issue UCLA has is even though they have the advantage over SC and Stanford from a monetary standpoint, unlike in other sports, they’re competing with Fullerton, Long Beach and San Diego St. for recruits and all are cheaper than UCLA.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 11, 2010 3:02 PM PST up reply actions
Maybe Irvine, too ...
doesn’t Irvine also play pretty good baseball?
Cal State Northridge was good when I was in college, too.
I guess there is a sweet spot for UCLA baseball: talented players who would rather not pay private school tuition and who want a better academic experience than a Cal State offers.
I’m not knocking the Cal State’s by the way — a college degree is a college degree. But some of the more academically minded kids likely prefer a UC to a Cal State, which is why I mentioned Irvine, probably should mention Riverside, too.
This thread is not the best place for this, but I have to say that UCLA baseball remains a mystery to me. They’ve had so many great players over the years and many good ones, yet they’ve consistently failed to play in the College World Series. I think Gary Adams only went once in thirty years, despite the many MLB players who have worn the Blue and Gold.
And during that time, Northridge, SC, Long Beach, Pepperdine and Fullerton (and maybe Irvine, too, I don’t remember but for some reason they are sticking in my mind) have all had great seasons and if I’m not mistaken have all not only played in the college world series, they’ve won it. (Again, I think I’m off on Irvine).
I’m not one of those UCLA fans who think anything less than a national title is acceptable. But I’m baffled that in the 35 or so years that make up the Adams/Savage era the team has like one appearance in the CWS. I get that it’s hard and that the stadium needs fixing up and maybe there has not been the commitment of resources. But during that same period UCLA has won national titles in so many of the so-called “Olympic sports” including some sports we don’t even have any more.
I don’t mean to sound greedy, but heck, it’s easier to understand why UCLA football has not won a national title than it is to understand how UCLA baseball has so consistently been absent from the CWS.
A related question
Is college baseball like MLB in that a team can have only 25 players available per game?
Twitter feed: @dexterfishmore
by DexterFishmore on Feb 11, 2010 5:02 PM PST up reply actions
Depends on the game
Conferences have their own rules and the NCAA has theirs so it changes for the postseason. I believe the NCAA changed their rule this year, but I can’t remember what it is right now. I’ve seen 25 dress before and I’ve seen more.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 11, 2010 5:29 PM PST up reply actions
I'm close to a third year player
and he gets his books paid for, about 125 per quarter. Other schools offered more but he wanted to be a Bruin. Because of summer ball, he can’t get a job to help pay for school. He will have close to 6,000 in student loans when he is through.
That's not unusual
It’s just what the current world of college baseball is like. The coaches have been pushing for the scholarship limit to be pushed to 15 over the past few years and recent success in the classroom, as measured by the APR, as well as the growth of the game may make it a reality in the near future. We are dealing with the NCAA here though so who knows.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 11, 2010 5:56 PM PST up reply actions
6,000 or 60,000?
Because most undergrads at UC who borrow money for four years end up closer to 60 than 6….
The UC’s aren’t as good of deal as they used to be. Fees have tripled in the last ten years, and administration has an explicit policy of wanting to charge what the ‘market’ demands. This means private school rates. If I seen an administrator refer to a student as a ‘consumer of education’ one more time I am going to barf.
Maybe I’ve just been around too long and I’m getting old….
What about Derek Klena?
Is he going to figure in at all? He is a freshman, and I’ve seen him play since little league. He is a gamer with great credentials.
Klena showed flashes in fall
and I think he’ll get some innings this season, but won’t get in much in competitive games. He can serve in a mop up role this year, but I did like some of the stuff he showed in the fall so he could be a real contributor out of the ’pen next year.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 11, 2010 10:34 PM PST up reply actions

by 






















