Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dog Football! Which Breeds Are Best Suited For The Gridiron?

Pac-10 Commissioner Doesn't "Expect" NCAA To "Hammer" Southern Cal

Chew on this from tWWL's Pac-10 blog (emphasis added):

As for other topics, Cowherd (Colin Cowherd of ESPN) asked what it would mean for the conference if USC football got hammered by NCAA sanctions.

Said Scott (Larry Scott, Pac-10 commissioner), "I don't expect that."


That response may be more than flip.

Keep in mind that the Pac-10 is the only conference that conducts its own investigations of potential member rules violations. Therefore, the conference probably has reviewed as much testimony and documentation from the USC case as the NCAA. Scott should have a fairly significant knowledge of what is going on, though he is new to college sports and is a neophyte when it comes to NCAA rules enforcement.

USC meets with the NCAA’s Committee on Infractions will meet Feb. 19-21 in Tempe, Ariz. It will be six to eight weeks before the NCAA's verdict is made public.

If Scott is making this kind of conclusion based on his office's "win investigations" he and the Pac-10 as an institution should lose all of their credibility to rest of the conference. If it's a case of him not knowing much about NCAA rules enforcement, someone from the conference should get him better prepped on how to handle these questions.

Star-divide

I hope this was a misstatment on his part and nothing more than that. The way it stands right now, his answer makes him look ignorant and completely out of touch. It makes him look impotent just as his ineffective and incompetent predecessor.

It would be good to get more clarification from Pac-10 commissioner concerning his answer and exactly what he means when he doesn't "expect" the Trogan to get "hammered by NCAA sanctions."

GO BRUINS.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Larry Scott is a Johnny come lately.

We’ve been expecting the NCAA would do nothing for years!

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Feb 16, 2010 7:25 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

Irritating

This kind of crap makes me sick. It makes me fearful that somehow they know something, but if they don’t it’s just plain idiotic and irresponsible. And if they do, then someone is being paid. Knowing the trogans, this could very well be the case. Disgusting.

"The entire world that bleeds blue and gold ... they have been dying for this." - Coach Rick Neuheisel

by uclafan11 on Feb 16, 2010 8:24 PM PST reply actions  

Don't really know how he would know

PAC-10 has more to lose than the NCAA. We need to see the findings first and then speculate on the punishment. This guy is just trying to let the NCAA know that the PAC-10 is going to stick by its money-maker. As far as I’m concerned, you can take that SUC money and stick it where the sun don’t shine.

And if nothing happens to them, the NCAA is a joke for an organization and I would urge every school to do what SUC does because it’s obvious you can get away with cheating.

*I* ran over George Tirebiter.

by Bruins102NCAA on Feb 16, 2010 9:02 PM PST reply actions  

You can only get away with it

If you make the NCAA a lot of money.

SC isn’t bulletproof because they sell out their home games and win conference games. They own the police and the NCAA because they sell jerseys nationwide, their players are celebrities (Leinart, Bush, Sanchez), SC (and therefore NCAA) references show up everywhere in pop culture (music videos, reality tv shows, etc.), and because they have the blind allegiance of morally bankrupt fans who will spend their last dollar on SC paraphernalia as they hold on to the belief that the OJ Mayo and Reggie Bush stories are part of a media campaign to slime their professional college teams.

If you can replicate that (and some schools can), why wouldn’t you openly cheat?

by Rhapsode on Feb 16, 2010 9:12 PM PST up reply actions  

As much as I agree that they make money for the PAC-10

they are still only the 13th money maker in college sports. Plenty of teams are above them and have been nailed. Alabama for instance.

I think that perpetuating the myth that they are too big to punish works into their hands. Just like the “vast” network of alumni that supposedly make up for the fact that they paid 50k a year for a sub-standard education.

For me, it’s at the point where I really don’t give a flying **** what the NCAA does. I think that every other team needs to do what SUC does if that is “pushing the envelope” as Peatie says. To my mind, the NCAA and PAC-10 stand to lose all credibility. Screw them and SUC. I have the utmost faith that they will get theirs at some point and I’ll be there.

*I* ran over George Tirebiter.

by Bruins102NCAA on Feb 16, 2010 9:36 PM PST up reply actions  

I am not sure what there is to get upset about

Like MexiBruin said, we have expected this for years. The NCAA has been looking for an excuse to not punish SC and they dragged their heels until the opportunity presented itself.

As we are all aware, SC punished the basketball program for the football program’s sins. The NCAA immediately jumped into action and concluded its investigation into the football program.

Larry Scott may be a horrible or great commissioner (I can’t pass judgment just yet), but I don’t think he is to blame for saying to the national media what we have known forever. The NCAA will not seriously punish SC so long as there is even a transparent and flimsy excuse for not doing so.

In my opinion, what we will be hearing from the committee is this: SC investigates and deals with its own athletic transgressions, just look at what the basketball team is going through. The committee talked with many people and Reggie Bush, Pete Carroll and the rest of the SC athletic department say that no one knew what was really going on (it is not likely that anyone else’s word will be given any weight since all non established SC characters in this story are criminals or just not credible). Had they known, they all would have taken swift steps to fix the problem, even if it meant hurting their national title hopes. Obviously, if anyone had known anything, it would have been reported and gone through the proper channels so that SC’s athletic department could properly deal with the offenders.

We know what’s coming. Everyone knows what’s coming. Why are we surprised that the PAC-10 commissioner knows what’s coming?

But even with this negative view of the entire process (and my firm belief that the NCAA sees short term money as more important than the integrity of their premier sport), I still hold out hope.

I hope I am wrong. I want to be wrong so bad it hurts. I just don’t think I am.

by Rhapsode on Feb 16, 2010 9:03 PM PST reply actions  

+1

Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!

by Minnesota Bruinfan on Feb 17, 2010 4:26 AM PST up reply actions  

+2

all the way around, including the faint hope.

by Bruinut on Feb 17, 2010 7:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Nothing substantial is going to happen to u$c

So far Bush and Mayo refused to talk to the NCAA investigators and they don’t have any power to force those crooks to cooperate with them. u$s is going to claim that they had no knowlege of any of these violations. So the NCAA has nothing. The Bush camp lost their bid to keep the abitration hearing private. That means everything is going to be public once the arbitration hearing starts. So if the NCAA is really interested in finding out the truth then they would have waited until after the Bush arbitration hearing to close their case but suprise, suprise, they closed their investigation shortly after Bush lost his bid to keep the arbitration hearing private. The NCAA already gave u$c their accusations. The meeting scheduled for later this month is for u$c to answer the NCAA’s accusation against them. After that it could be up to eight weeks before the NCAA decides what, if any, punishments will be. The most they’re gonna get is a little slap in the wrist.

by MVBruin on Feb 16, 2010 10:13 PM PST reply actions  

I heard the interview live on the radio

At first I was fuming, but then I reasoned that he had to say what he did. He’s going to be negotiating a new TV deal and ESPN is the whale he’s chasing. While the NCAA decision should come out before any substantive talks take place, there’s no reason for him to create any negativity regarding one the prime pieces of the product he’s selling.

He shouldn’t be privy to the NCAA’s decision anyways.

by ishXdavid on Feb 17, 2010 1:15 AM PST reply actions  

yup

sounds like just a way to deflect the question.

by britishbruin on Feb 17, 2010 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Did anyone ask the obvious follow-up question?

“As for other topics, Cowherd (Colin Cowherd of ESPN) asked what it would mean for the conference if USC football got hammered by NCAA sanctions. Said Scott (Larry Scott, Pac-10 commissioner), ‘I don’t expect that.’”

It seems to me that the next question should have been, “Why don’t you expect that, Mr. Scott?” My guess is that the skilled reporter said something more like “Moving on, Mr. Commissioner, wasn’t it tragic about that terrible accident during the Olympics?”

Nothing will happen, in my opinion. In fact, UCLA might get sanctioned because of all the anti-ncaa statements here. And just$c*’s institutional arrogance will get even larger. They will add the ncaa police to the lapd as another owned entity.

by Fox 71 on Feb 17, 2010 4:13 AM PST reply actions  

context of the just$c question

The question about potential just$c sanctions was framed within the context of a new TV contract for the Pac-10. Cowherd was focusing on the Pac-10’s lagging revenues ($100M+) behind the Big-10 and SEC.

He should’ve asked your follow-up question, but I don’t think Cowherd really cares. He’s the only Pac-10 honk with a national radio show on ESPN so he rarely says a disparaging word about just$c.

by ishXdavid on Feb 17, 2010 9:25 AM PST up reply actions  

Crime does pay in the NCAA!

I suspect that the Pac 10 commish knows of what he speaks. I was reading a discussion in the fishwrap this morning about recent penalties handed out by the NCAA, and they don’t really amount to much. The focus seems to be on forfeiting games with a few scholarship losses and some minor monetary penalties. Forfeiting games is sort of like trying to unring a bell – do we feel any better about our game against Memphis in the Final Fourt in which Memphis used an ineligible player once that came out? Meanwhile, Calapari gets to dash for the cash at Kentucky and is back to his old tricks there, I’m sure. The NCAA will probably make SC forfeit some games, maybe give up a few scholies and provide a few more wrist slaps. There will be no post-season bans for the football team. It’s really all a big joke, but the NCAA is itself an evil organization (IMO) that is set up primarily to hold down labor costs in sports like basketball and football.

by bruin7982 on Feb 17, 2010 3:02 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ks_ucla_small
A Break From Sports: Fun Old Pix of UCLA, Westwood
Small
UCLA Vital Signs and the Chianti Cancer
Screen_shot_2011-07-27_at_9
UCLA Hockey Team Suspended Before Final Crosstown Cup Game vs. USC, Appeal Tomorrow

Recent FanPosts

Jaxnjaz_school_pic_11_2011_small
Ben Howland Cracks ESPN's Bottom 10
Licenseplate_small
Who Is Your Most Hated anti-UCLA Villian?
Small
Comparison to Stanford Athletics Fundraising
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
Warning: Southern Cal May Have Better Hoops Future than UCLA
Troll_small
Hoops Thoughts
Uclabear1_small
Atlanta Fans Are Not Too Amused By Jim Mora's Falcon Comments
Small
The Moment I Realized Howland Lost Me
Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. Cal
Small
Pop Up Ad on Cal Game Today

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB