Ben Howland's Embarrassing Milestones In 2009-10 Season
Coach Ben Howland anointed himself as the "Caretaker of Westwood" guarding the tradition and prestige of a program built by the greatest coach in college sports (if not American sports landscape). He got off to a wonderful start when was able to resurrect the UCLA basketball program from the wreckage left behind the previous "head coach" by winning the conference and making a run all the way to the national championship game within three years. He followed it up with two more Pac-10 titles and Final-4 runs arguably making a case for himself as most successful coach in Post-Wooden era.
However, consider the following ugly milestones Ben Howland has already set during his seventh season in Westwood:
- UCLA lost to Cal State Fullerton for the first time in school history under Howland (Bruins were 9-0 against the Titans prior to this season's debacle).
- UCLA lost to Portland for the first time in program history (Bruins were 3-0 against the Pilots prior to the humiliation in Anaheim).
- UCLA lost to Cal State Long Beach State for the first time in school history under Howland (Bruins were 11-0 against the 49ers dating back to 1970).
- UCLA lost to Southern Cal by its worst margin ever in Pauley Pavilion.
- UCLA's lost to the Trogans by the worst margin since 1945.
- UCLA got swept by the Trogans for only the 5th time since 1942-43.
- UCLA lost to Washington by the worst margin ever when it got destroyed by a score of 68-97 in Seattle last night on national television.
- Bruins home attendance record to date (8,045 per game) is the third worst in Pauley's history ["Only two other seasons have they averaged fewer: 7,855 in 1987-88 and 7,810 in 1992-93."].
If not for a buzzer beater by Mustafa Abdul-Hamid against Concordia (!!!) there would have been another bullet point above. Moreover, the season is not even over yet with potentially ugly road trips looming in Arizona. There is also more than a 50-50 chance that Howland will set a school record with his second losing season in Westwood. In fairness, his first losing season should be attributed to Steve Lavin in the record books. Still it would be unprecedented for a coach like Howland to be responsible for a losing season after rebuilding this program in Westwood.
What does this all mean? Of course this is not a post arguing that Howland needs to go. However, this is a post in which we want to emphasize to Howland he need to look himself in the mirror before things spin even more out of control. If he wants to salvage this season and finish on a positive note, he must set the tone for next year by playing his underclassmen, while rewarding a senior like Michael Roll, who have given four plus years of blood, sweat and tears for this program. It means Howland needs to get back to what made him great at UCLA.
Howland needs to get back to committing himself to putting on players on the court who are dedicated to his vision of defense, fundamentals and 40 minutes of focus, intensity and effort. Otherwise, if Howland sticks to the same formula rest of this season, there is a good chance he will be setting more ugly milestones, and losing more than just basketball games at UCLA. He will be throwing away his reputation, which once again was tarnished on national TV (also at the expense of the program he is supposed to be take care for Coach Wooden) this season.
GO BRUINS.
51 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Tailors lament..........
I had a professor in grad school who use to tell us about the poor cloth syndrom. He would tells us that you could give the best tailor in the world a bunch of gunny sacks and tell him to make a suit out of them. When the tailors finished sewing he had a suit that looked like a gunny sack.
CBH has the same problem this year, he was given a bunch of gunny sacks and asked to make a team out of them. He’s tried his best but a gunny sack is still a gunny sack.
We have a group of indivuals that haven’t learned to play like a team and haven’t absorbed even the basics of Ben Ball. Defense what’s that?
I love Ben and what he’s done for UCLA and I’ll cut him some slack this year. This year was like a bad game of Texas Hold’m. You have to try and play with the cards delt you or you fold. I saw hints in last night’s game that CBH is about to throw in his cards.
We can all agree that it’s time to say as they do in Chicago…“Wait till next year!” Hopefully we’ll get some reinforcements in the way of recruits and we’ll lose a brick layer or two due to graduation. If there are any malcontents on the team then don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. It’s time to circle the wagons and regroup!
Not quite a solid analogy
Unlike the tailor (or most professional coaches, for that matter), CBH is in full control of gathering the material that he uses to create the team. To say that he was ‘given’ a bunch of sacks might fit some of the individual ‘talent’ on this team, but not how they happened to come to Westwood.
formerly bruinhoo
beat me to it
and “not quite” is entertainingly understated :-)
by britishbruin on Feb 21, 2010 1:50 PM PST up reply actions
he wasn't given a bunch of gunny sacks
he went to the cloth wholesaler and picked them out from among some other potential fabrics.
Some part of this season is bad luck, but a larger portion is not. Whether you want to pin the blame on CBH for his failure to get the most out of a group of talented players, or want to pin the blame on CBH for his poor selection and recruitment, or a combination of the two, is somewhat moot.
by britishbruin on Feb 21, 2010 1:49 PM PST up reply actions
Howland made a gunny sack in 2008-9 season as well
with much better materials.
by silverlakebruin on Feb 21, 2010 4:05 PM PST up reply actions
That' scary N
I honestly hadn’t read your post before I posted mine in the other thread. Obviously, I share your opinion.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
Well said
Does anyone know Howland’s or Guererro’s email address ?
I feel like we have to directly communicate our concerns with the guy himself or his superior. Either way, they need to hear from us.
We can hammer all we want about his inexplicable stubbornness about playing Dragovich & Anderson consistently , etc. With each embarassing loss, he & his assistants remain in their own insulated bubble, seemingly oblivious to the deafening noises and gripes against them and their team.
Nestor, you mentioned that if we ever had the opportunity of meeting him in person on some occasions, by all means ask him point blank about those issues so baffling us. I think it would be better served if we email him.
Remember two seasons ago at Seattle, after Brockman or somebody slammed the ball at Aboya’s face, Romar sat passively on the bench. Somebody posted his email address here at BN. So I wrote Romar. I told him how indignant and disappointed we felt towards him, a member of our 95 National Championship team’s coaching staff even, to sell out his conscience by turning his back on unsportsman like conduct when his own player was the undeniable culprit. Absent any action taken to discipline or reprimand the individual, I said perhaps our fond memories of him at Pauley has all been in vain.
He responded, said he understood how it happened in the heat of the moment and nothing beyond that. I knew he wouldn’t do anything but at least he got the message. So if anyone here has Howland’s email address, I’ll write to him.
Howland's Definitely On The Hot Seat Now...
Howland has a huge task ahead of him at this point. One could argue all day about the lack of a point guard, the lack of a pure 2 shooter, lack of team speed across the team, lack of a true center, etc. All true. There are just too many reasons to not keep banging the head against the wall, and too many reasons why throwing in the towel on this season should happen forthwith. Play the youngsters and get them as much PT as possible, hoping that the experience will help them next year, or at least help the coaching staff figure out what they have on the pine right now. It’s not like they have been beset by injuries to their key players. Think back a couple of years- -if Westbrook and Love had been hurt for a majority of the year, people would let him off the hook if the season was disappointing. But this year he has everyone (not counting Gordon) he thought that he’d have. Anderson’s injury may be serious, who knows. But watching him get picked so many times in the open court, and then head to the bench with such a “laugh” painted on his face, I don’t think he really cares if he plays or not. The team is in a malaise, and Ben needs to step up and do something to fix it. A team that is in last place in free-throw shooting in the conference has problems other than shooting at its core. There’s a lack of effort, a lack of focus, a lack of caring. I don’t know if even Ben can turn this around, this year or next, morale-wise. It may take getting a new coach to clean this mess up. I like Ben, and I wish him well, but it may be too late.
kinda agree...
we’ve had some seasons full of injuries, not so much this year, though depends on what is up with JA. I feel like our projected top 6 players going in were a starting 5 of JA/ML/MR/ND/DG, with TH the first guy off the bench. Two have been hampered by injuries (JA pushed from mediocre to bad; TH potentially pulled down to very good from potentially awesome?) and one was lost for the season. In previous years we’ve lost a Mike Roll or a Josh Shipp for a season and dealt with other niggling injuries along the way.
by britishbruin on Feb 21, 2010 4:15 PM PST up reply actions
Agreed.
That smile on Anderson’s face, amid all his clumsy dribblings, mindless turnovers just grate on you after a while.
He can do us a favor, really by putting his “highly touted” point guard skills to good use at the Culver City YMCA community league. That facility on Overland Drive, right after the 10W exit ramp always posted a banner soliciting participants to its basketball league.
Maybe Malcom Lee can reunite with him there, refining his skills too before joining the pros.
Good Thing Athletic Scholarships are only given for a year
Clearly there are those on this team that haven’t earned what has been given to them.
I suspect some scholarship monies will be freed up after this season perhaps in the form of non-renewal.
Why continue to throw good money after bad?
Has BH "lost the team"?
I observe that BH has lost the team, as in they are not listening and just going through the motions. I also believe that AD’s across the country perk up when a coach loses control of his/her teams in any sport. Unfortunately, this is when many other issue come up with a team. I am amazed that this has happened in one year, from a fan’s standpoint….
Bill
Mensgym
MR remains the last vestige of Ben Ball play
Although he had a poor game against Washington, MR deserves kudos for his consistently solidly play, Ben Ball effort level and his attempt to pull the team out of mediocrity on his shoulders. Unfortunately, he’s no Lebron and the task is too tall.
WTF.....
At beginning of the season it was very easy to see it was going to be a rough season. Most people thought when Drew left, it was going to rock bottom point of this years team. I only wish it was, we have gotten worse as the season progressed. Nestor and other members of BN have a valid point to be upset and pissed off at this point. Hate to say it, even Lavin’s teams showed up big on national stage. BSPN announcers sounded like they wanted to take cyanide tablets to end the torture by half time. Is the best product we can put out on the court? Really?
The shear lack of any form of progress is amazing, effectively, welcome to the hot seat Howland. Another year of this and people will ask for your head.
Yeap. Much as I hated to give Lavin any credit
His team rose to the occasion from time to time. They beat the then #1 Stanford at Stanford, knocked off #1 Kansas at Pauley, summarily dismissed Lute Olson’s dominant Wildcats at the opening round of the Pac 10 Tourney even when the axe fell on Lavin. Just to name a few heroic wins at that time.
At one point, Bilas & Knight both wondered aloud if this might take sometime for Howland to steady his program again.
I have some dark forebodings too. Next season, if things don’t turn around soon, whatever remains of Pauley’s patience and goodwill may channel into torrents of calls for Howland’s head
The team at the beginning of the season
struggled to beat Concordia, lost to Fullerton, and got demolished by Portland as part of a 5 game losing streak. The team right around now beat Washington State by 20 on the road (more than we beat Humboldt, Bakersfield, Pepperdine or Delaware State by) and is sitting in the middle of a (really bad) Pac-10.
This has been a very bad season, but the team at the beginning was far worse than the current one, no matter how bad our last loss was.
Disagree
One blowout win over a bad team in a place where even Lavin was undefeated sandwiched in between ugly losses to SUC and UW does not signal improvement. This team is playing the same ugly basketball it was at the beginning of the year. If the Pac10 wasn’t the worst it has been in history, we’d probably be sitting around 8-18.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
You will likely have the chance to add a couple more bullets
Gold just posted that our game in Tempe vs ASU will be televised on CBS. Another opportunity to “showcase” our program to a national tv audience. Yikes.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
They're bad, but they're better than other teams we've played worse again
Bakersfield is 7-19, with wins over Utah Valley, Cal Poly, Montana State, Cal Poly, CSUN, Irvine and Idaho State.
Pepperdine is 7-19, with wins over San Bernardino, Monmouth, Hampton, Utah, LMU, Santa Clara, and USF.
Delaware State is 14-10, so they have a decent record, but the Mid-Eastern Conference is still worse than the Pac-10.
Going by Pomeroy’s rankings, those teams are #300, #277 and #260, respectively. Washington State is #113.
By the same rankings, the conferences of those teams are #13 and #29 (Bakersfield is an independent). The Pac-10 is #6.
Fullerton, who we lost to, is 14-12 in the #17 conference, ranked #214.
Portland beat us by 27, and is worse (#80) than Washington (#38), who beat us by 29. Also, the Portland game was in Anaheim, not Washington.
In those senses, each of those performances was worse than what we’ve had in the last week.
You lost me
I guess you’re trying to say that we suck a little less than we did earlier this year. Fine. After we eke out a win against Oregon St. at home, we can all rush the court.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
What does it mean to improve
if not to “suck … less.”
After non-conference play, KenPom had us going 4-14 in the Pac-10. Now we’re projected at 9-9.
by SuperBruinMan on Feb 21, 2010 9:46 PM PST up reply actions
KenPom
probably didn’t compute the Pac10 being a one-bid conference (1st time in history), or the 1st place team having 5 losses (with 4 games to play), or not having any team ranked in the top 25 the last 2 months of the season. Just a hunch.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
Of course not
Since human polls and NCAA Tournament selection are based on subjective and inconsistent criteria that are often independent of the actual quality of the teams.
The Pac-10’s overall rating in his system hasn’t really changed though. It’s still the weakest of the power conferences, and it still has its lowest rating since 2005 (4 NCAA bids, including UCLA from the bubble) and 2004 (3 bids). Based on preseason play, we were the worst team in a very bad conference. Now we’re in the middle of the pack in a very bad conference.
by SuperBruinMan on Feb 21, 2010 11:08 PM PST up reply actions
That's exactly what I'm saying
A bigger win over a somewhat better (which doesn’t mean good) team on the road is a better performance. Similarly, a slightly worse loss against a better team on the road is probably a better performance.
I’m not saying we’re good. Just that we’re less bad. Which is still improving. And of course does not merit court rushing.
+1
The team at the beginning of the season would have had difficulty beating Mater Dei or Westchester.
by 75NatChamps on Feb 21, 2010 10:04 PM PST up reply actions
I fear we could be witnessing the inevitable
Remember CBH has never been at a single program very long. He rebuilds programs in a relatively short period of time. But we are now able to see the problems with his rebuilding strategy. He rebuilds on a foundation of defense and controlled offense. It is not a flashy form of bball. Even during the good years some of us have wondered how he does it with such a slow and methodical offense. Over time, I believe this system has created an unfortunate side-effect. Slow, big guys want to enter this program, because they know that even if they are weak offensively, they could get to the NBA as a defensive specialist. Unfortunately, fast, flashy, offensive minded players are avoiding this system like the plaque, hence, lack of guards in the program. Can it be fixed? Try convincing a guy like John Wall that he would thrive in our program…probably never going to happen.
The fix….bring in an offensive specialist as assistant. Hype the hire. But will UCLA pay well to attract a high paid assist., or will they just invest in a new head? We will probably see sooner than any of us anticipated.
Louisville, KY for UCLA class of '87
That's why I suggested we email him
to let him know directly what we, Pauley fans and UCLA supporters, are thinking about his program. We can say all we want here on BN. Unless he is hearing it, nothing matters. Besides, he has AD Guerrero in his pocket too.
Look, it makes sense that people are angry at Howland. But cycles like this happen, particularly in college basketball, where a single class that doesn’t pan out can wreck your whole program. With Howland, add dismissals, early entries, and some high school hero, college zero types, and you have the Bruins of this year.
My cousin was the head coach at a Pac 10 school after having great success in another Big Six conference. He told me about the delicate balance it takes to get these kids to play together, buy in, and most importantly, get the most out of their talent. It’s just not happening this year for the Bruins, but Howland didn’t suddenly become stupid overnight.
And let’s remember this. As great as Coach Wooden was for the university, even HE was hounded by critics who were annoyed that Pete Newell at USF and Cal was getting the better of him. About three years of no championships had fans baying. Yet we know how that turned out.
So perhaps we should have a bit more patience. If we’re not talking about firing him, and no one is, and none of us are about to go suit up and actually contribute, maybe we should look at this season as an anomaly rather than the norm.
by BlackandOldGold on Feb 21, 2010 5:56 PM PST reply actions
We are showing plenty of patience
That is why we are not calling for the firing of Howland and giving him at least two years to turn this around. Don’t lecture us on what we should be writing or discussing on this blog. Thanks.
The fact of the matter is
As we all mentioned here, the prospect look so grim for a quick turnaround. Even Bilas & Knight alluded to it last night.
CBH lost this team?
I believe “Mensgym” has a valid point about Howland having lost this team. He couldn’t control Drew Gordon, he can’t control Rags on or off the court and it looks like JA doesn’t give a damn when he’s on the court. Does anybody remember Howland’s last game at Pitt during the tournament? They showed it on TV, one of his senior players had given up on the impending loss and was pissed off so he took his shoes and socks off during the game and sat on the bench. The ultimate show of disrespect to Howland. Howland left him on the bench and showed no emotion.
"Ben Howland’s Embarrassing Milestones"?
"Ben Howland’s Embarrassing Milestones"?
"Howland’s Gutless Mismanagement"?
One bad, correct that, one horrible season and based on what I read here we might as well Dump Howland and start all over again. Maybe we could hire another Steve Lavin.
The Howland bashing I’ve read on this site over the last 3 months is a little hard for me to accept and support.
Sorry, while I dislike what is going on I think that Howland deserves and has earned a little tolerance on my part as a UCLA supporter. I look forward to the end of this season and have complete confidence that he will be able to turn things around.
Sorry, but Howland is coaching in a program
where not everyone is going to have “a little tolerance” for what has happened this year. These moments have been embarrassing and he has mismanaged this season in a manner that lacks guts. It’s a sad state of affairs and Howland deserves the blame.
And I’m not writing this season off as a “normal cyclical downturn” that affects every program from time to time. As N as outlined above, each of these embarrassing milestones are historical events in of themselves, as in once-in-a-lifetime, as in never should happen again. Let me write that again: Never should happen again.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
I'll Read It
I just don’t have to agree with it and if I don’t agree with it then I have every right to say so as do you or any other commentor
Actually you are not entitled to come here and whine about it ...
… by attacking this community. If you do it again, you will be gone.
Where am I whining or attacking.
I simply disagreed with the posts as you are disagreeing with mine. I stated my point politely.
You stated your point with a sense of entitlement
Your very first comment you pipe up to write, “Howland bashing I’ve read on this site over the last 3 months is a little hard for me to accept and support.” That comes across as nothing short of whining from someone who has made ZERO contribution to this community. As stated numerous times before if you don’t like the content, then don’t read it. Don’t expect to be taken seriously if your first comment here is to sound like an entitled reader of this site.
I am not going say any more on this topic and if you retort with another attack on the moderators of this site, you will not stick around. Thanks.
I agree with you Bruins 80.
I’m a ‘70-’75 Bruin who has lived through the good, bad, and the ugly since 1970. I didn’t take any offense whatsoever by what you wrote. Nestor, I think you may be a little bit too thin-skinned (sensitive) about those who hold opposing opinions. I lurked for a LONG time before I registered or posted anything and hesitated to even write this for fear of being banned. You have a great blog, and although I too disagree with your tone sometimes, keep up the excellent work Nestor.
We all knew this year would be trying year and hoped we’d somehow pull out a decent season. WA played with passion: Senior Day, last home game of the season, and coming off a loss to the slugs at SUC. What made the loss so bad was that we played terribly; not the loss itself, IMHO.
kingslook is right: we just might be witnessing the inevitable.
Try convincing a guy like John Wall that he would thrive in our program…probably never going to happen.
I’ve said it before… our BEST PLAYERS under Howland came on a “rebuild UCLA mission”. New(er) Coach. Glory Program. Extra resume booster and attention from NBA scouts. All of that! Kevin Love actually came through Ben’s personal relationship when that kid was what? 10 or 12 years old? Maybe younger?
Here’s what I see… next season possibly being a little better than this one (not as many bullet points as noted in the article above), and the Athletic Department Head saying “We’re On The Right Track”.
We’re RIGHT to be very concerned at this juncture.
AGREE
I’ll give credit for CBH getting the program back on track, but that’s where it ends. I don’t know how this team should surprise anyone. We all knew that CBH is stubborn and rarely ever makes adjustments. I’ll give him kudos for finally resorting to zone, but it’s a little too late. Here’s a fact, in the last four years, CBH’s final games in the NCAA tourney have been blowouts. How is that acceptable when we had such unbelievable NBA talent like Love, Westbrook, Collison, Farmar, Mbah Mute, Afflalo, etc. Yeah, yeah, the first blowout to Florida was to an unbelievable talented Florida team, but the second year he made no adjustments and played the same defensive and offensive schemes. Then a terrible blowout to Memphis (who did cheat) and Villanova. IMO, he is a terrible game time coach and his loose use of timeouts is a perfect example. Although he does seem to manage to have one left every game here and there this season.
I’ll make a prediction that CBH will not be in Westwood two years from now. No, I am not advocating firing him immediately, but I don’t see how he will recover from this. Recruits don’t like his system and no one can win without talent. We’re just delaying the inevitable.
A riddle wrapped up in an enigma...
To follow up on a post by Muir Coach, the thing that is just maddening about CBH is that we did drink the Kool-Aid and while there’s nothing wrong with being stubborn (see Woody Hayes, Phil Jackson, even Coach Wooden) but when CBH is so frustratingly un-stubborn about enforcing HIS OWN PRINCIPLES, it defies logic or explanation. The oft-described Rago foibles without consequence, seeing players lolly-gag and semi-jog last night after losing possession…argh!!! I coach soccer at a high level and when a kid makes a mistake, they come out of the game, we talk, and then they return. If they repeat the mistake they sit and another player takes their spot until we can correct the mistake during training. If we can’t correct during training, playing minutes dwindle to zero. This isn’t hard and one can only hope that CBH will play the young guys (and MR) exclusively for what remains of this root-canal-without-novacaine of a season. I saw a number of flashes of good stuff coming from Bobo and BL. They and Mike Moser need all the minutes they can get if we have a chance to get this dinged-up micro-bus of a team back onto the fast lane. There, I feel better now…
JF, AA, RW and DC would be great ambassadors
for the top point guard we so desperately need. Does anyone know what their attitude is about playing for CBH and whether they sell the program?
Howland
Is the man for this program. He was when he took over, he is now. Wow. Don’t give up on him so easily. I know most of you don’t want him fired, as I obviously don’t, but I wont forget what he’s done for us. Btw, the AD is very smart, he isn’t rash and Howland’s job seems quite safe for the next couple years. Things will turn around and you’ll be laughing at yourselves in a couple years.
I’d like to see Roll be rewarded with PT but I would like to see what Morgan and Lane can do as well as Moser. I’d like to see Jerime ride the pine for the rest of the year.
by Lets go Bruins clap clap clap clap clap on Feb 22, 2010 3:05 AM PST reply actions

by 


















