Hasiak is back at UCLA, taking classes, but he will transfer. Too much has happened and many in the locker room do not want to see him back.
over 2 years ago
Nestor
12 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
I am disappointed
but not surprised. Hopefully he has learned something through this experience and will use it as positive motivation where ever he ends up.
This sucks.
"We should have a banner up there: the only team to make the tournament without a coach." -- Baron Davis, remembering his "coach" at UCLA
by inhowlandwetrust on Feb 9, 2010 10:22 AM PST reply actions
It sucks to lose a quality lineman
but his off the field histrionics where a bit much.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
interesting comment on the CRN football culture
given our weakness at OL, interesting that they think what he is done is just too much to move past.
I really would like to know
exactly what it is that he did. It can’t just be little fights against teammates.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I'd have liked for things to work out better
but he’s not giving up. He’s in class and working. Good for him and best of luck.
For everything UCLA baseball, visit my UCLA baseball twitter.
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Feb 9, 2010 12:21 PM PST reply actions
Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute
This is being accepted as gospel, but it’s not even from an anonymous source. This is Mr. (or is it Ms.?) Foster quoting himself. Is it his speculation? Is this an opinion? Why don’t we get to share in the knowledge of the source for this revelation?
It may be true. It may already have come to pass. There might be a list on the locker room door naming the guys who signed a petition asking Hasiak not to come back. He might have obtained this material directly from Hasiak himself.Or not. He might have had a deadline and had to publish something.
Question, Bruins: If I wrote a post and said “Hasiak is back at UCLA, taking classes, but he will transfer. Too much has happened and many in the locker room do not want to see him back” and left it at that, how long would that post linger before someone questioned me about it? My guess is about 5 seconds. But no one views what Mr. Foster says with even the slightest bit of skepticism. Are the guys selling their NFL picks still on the radio on Saturday morning? I’m pretty sure that no one accepts their hyperbole at face value, but that’s what Mr. Foster sounds like to me.
I don’t know Mr. Foster from the man in the moon. Is he accurate one hundred per cent of the time when he reports from his anonymous sources or when he just posts his musings? If he’s unwilling to post his accuracy percentage on his twitter posts, then I would view comments with the same skepticism as I did the Saturday morning gambling hosts who would give you the absolute, guaranteed, sure fire LOCK OF THE WEEK baby, just call right now and have your credit card out.
But it was on his twitter
If it’s on twitter, it has to be true.
by Gen2Bruin1987 on Feb 9, 2010 4:08 PM PST up reply actions
You are right
And that is why this wasn’t frontpaged. Foster’s story could potentially be old info. Won’t go with this on the frontpage until we see def. confirmation. Until then we have acknowledge that this is out there.
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on Bruins Nation
Related FanShots on Bruins Nation
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
