New York Times Analysis Exposes Steve Lavin As A Lazy, Incompetent Fraud
Bill Witz from the New York Times (who also happened to be the UCLA beat reporter for the LA Daily News prior to Brian Dohn) has written up a must read analysis on Steve Lavin. As St. Johns fan are reveling about a Lavin "resurrection" and reveling about their "home run" hire, Witz essentially clowns St. Johns by exposing the real story behind an ESPN puffed up fraud who has nothing to offer beyond predictable cliches and one line talking points:
A little more than a month before Steve Lavin, with John Wooden as his best man, was to marry the actress Mary Jarou at an exclusive cliffside resort in Laguna Beach in 2007, several hundred wedding guests received an e-mail message from the couple.
Sorry to inform them, it read, but too many guests had accepted their invitations to the wedding, far more than the resort could accommodate. Instead, the couple announced, they would be heading to Europe to marry.
The couple apologized for any inconvenience and assured guests that they would receive photographs of the wedding.
The story of Lavin’s nuptials should prove instructive for fans of St. John’s, which made its own commitment to Lavin, an ESPN analyst and former U.C.L.A. coach, on Tuesday when he agreed to a six-year contract worth at least $9 million. The Red Storm and its fans are about to be welcomed into Lav’s World, where wedding plans are not the only decisions that are made by the seat of the pants.
Witz linked back to BN to bring up that classic email wedding "message" which was saved right here back in 2007. Going back to Lavin, the article is simply devastating which goes beyond the wildly inconsistent and hair pulling performances of our basketball program under this jack ass's leadership.
Witz essentially outs him for being an idiot and a lazy fraud during his time as the UCLA "head coach":
[S]ustaining success eluded Lavin, who was personable and outgoing, a charismatic ambassador but one who often gave the impression he did not seem to enjoy the actual work that accompanied his job. Once, when the Bruins took the court for a game against Gonzaga, he turned to an assistant to ask if the Zags played zone or man-to-man. One summer, he left the recruiting circuit to fly to Boston to watch baseball’s All-Star Game at Fenway Park.
At a high school tournament near Seattle, while coaches and scouts sat in the bleachers taking notes on prospects, Lavin watched the games from the side, pedaling away on an exercise bike until he was soaked with sweat.
Well now no one will ever accuse us of making up those stories. Witz went on to include Baron Davis' dig against this toolbag and then noted how he essentially surrounded himself with his buddies while milking his so called relationship with John Wooden:
Though Lavin played up his relationships with Wooden and the Hall of Fame coach Pete Newell, an old family friend, he surrounded himself with friends and neophytes. Three of the five assistants who worked for him at U.C.L.A. were his former high school or college teammates. The others had little coaching experience.
We will let the Lavin story go at least for now (unless he takes any kind of shots at UCLA). It looks like Witz has now essentially served up the warning shot to St. Johns community about what they are going to go through in the coming years. As for us, we can't wait to get our shot against this toolbag when he brings his team into Pauley.
GO BRUINS.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lets move on
Focus on UCLA here and now and in the future.
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Mar 30, 2010 8:00 PM PDT reply actions
Focus
Did you take note of the multiple posts focusing on what is going on with UCLA basketball now? Did you see how we started the day with football? Did you see the baseball posts.
Yes, we will move to a different topic when appropriate. However, we are going to note articles/analysis that are relevant to UCLA. Lavin is not the only topic we have discussed on BN today. As always if you want topics to focus on, you can write them up.
I didn’t see you contributing in other threads today relevant to UCLA football/basketball except to pop up here to register this whine. So your comment is a little ridiculous. We don’t really appreciate people telling us what we should be writing or not writing.
It is important to talk about why Lavin stunk
His allies and others such as those at ESPN are going to try and make UCLA look bad indirectly. They are going to try to say UCLA was ungrateful for this “very good but not John Wooden coach.” That is his spin. .
It is important that we counter that he was not fired because he did not win NCAA Championships but that he was a bad person, coach, etc. Actually there is some legitimate question whether he should be called coach. It is important also that UCLA remember it the next time they have a coaching vacancy in any sport not to promote an assistant because of the chaos etc. at the moment.
Thus Lavin is an important topic now.
I hear what you are you saying
but I feel about Steve Lavin the way I do about my ex-wife. I don’t wish anything bad for her, but I am glad that relationship is 13 years in the rear view mirror. And if some other sucker wants to marrry her that is his problem . .. .
Pass the popcorn.
I give him 4 years before being canned? We need apoll..
Congrats Moderators though
For being referenced in a NY Times article. High praise indeed
I was watching sportscenter and heres what some reporter said:
“Steve Lavin was not St. Johns first choice but he wasnt UCLA’s first choice either and it worked out just fine for them. he took them to sweet 16 four times, the elite 8 once and never had a losing season untill the year he was fired” so much wrong with this I dont know where to start
(its a paraphrase based on what i remember, not an exact quote, but that was gist of it)
by frozenflame5858 on Mar 30, 2010 8:45 PM PDT reply actions
This article makes me like Witz.
I take it he was better than Dohn (and Gold, although it may be too soon to tell)?
Ahh, the NY media. It has begun.
And from the NYT, no less. Won’t be long before he makes the back pages of the tabloids.
Lavin in the NY tabloids
This could be very entertaining. Lav could be like Rex Ryan without a good team or any coaching talent.
by bruinponcho on Mar 30, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Great article
Sometimes after a while it feels like a lot of the treatment of Lavin might be a bit hyperbolic. I mean, he was at UCLA for 7 years – how could he not count as a coach? But then you look back at what actually happened and it’s just astounding.
The Bruins had 10 losses of more than 25 points and created season highlights for the local programs . . . In 2001, two days after losing by 29 points at California, the Bruins shocked No. 1-ranked Stanford. The next season, after losing to Ball State and Pepperdine, they upset No. 1-ranked Kansas. . . . the Bruins toppled No. 1-ranked Arizona in the Pacific-10 tournament. The Bruins had lost to the Wildcats by a total of 71 points in two previous meetings.
Now it's relevant to UCLA.
“Howland also said details are being worked out for a home-and-home series with St. John’s, which would start next season. Steve Lavin, succeeded by Howland as UCLA’s coach, was hired Tuesday as coach at St. John’s.”
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-0331-ucla-basketball-20100331,0,7763086.story

by 




















