Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Notre Dame's Turnaround: How Have The Irish Done It?

Excited About The Wears Of Westwood

Let's start with Coach Ben Howland's teleconference discussing the transfers of David and Travis Wear into UCLA:

His excitement about this development is pretty transparent. When we first heard about the potential the Wear Twins coming into UCLA, I was somewhat ambivalent about. When I first wrote about it here I drew up a list of pros and cons and still wasn't sure what to make of the potential transfer. Yet during last two weeks the more that I have thought about Wears about being Bruins, the more I got excited about it. Let me go through my thought process on how I became excited about this development after initially being unsure about.

First, let's take a look at the roster with the Wear Twins in the fold:

PG SG SF PF C
Anderson Lee Honeycutt Nelson Stover
Jones Lamb   Lane Smith
  Carlino   Wear Wear

So we now have 12 out of 13 scholies accounted for.  We might round out this class with Remi Barry (but I am not holding my breath for him). What is noteworthy here is there are no seniors in this roster. I think we can expect that there will be at least 2 (or perhaps 3) scholies available for next year's recruiting class. That will most likely come through departures to the NBA.

The possibility of both Honeycutt and Lee retuning for their junior and senior season in Westwood is somewhere south of 15 percent (and I think I am being charitable). I don't put a lot of stock in off-season sweet talks at booster events about how someone is going to remain in UCLA. If UCLA becomes a contender next year in the Pac-10 conference, and wins more than 1 game in the NCAA tourney, it's a good bet that development will come courtesy of improvements in Honeycutt and Lee's games. At that point, given the reality around the culture of basketball (and I am talking about basketball in general, not just UCLA hoops) one of those guys will go for the NBA bling. It is going to happen.

If you want to be  all idyllic about it and want to believe there is a great chance of both of them coming back for another season (just like having pipe dreams about Kevin Love returning for his sophomore season in Westwood) then go for it. For the realists I would suggest stick with the mindset of not having one of them or both of them in 2011-12 season. Now when you take into account,  I think having kids like Wear Twins in the fold with a core of Smith, Nelson, Lane, Lamb, Anderson (yes, I included him), Jones and Carlino will help our roster depth.

Now more than ever the recruiting strategy for Howland and his staff becomes crystal clear. They are going to have focus their efforts like a laser and comb all over Southern California, West Coast and the country for pgs and sgs, who will want to link up with potentially one of most well coached and fundamentally sound frontcourt in the country. Now there are other benefits to having the Wears in the old.  More on that after the jump.

Star-divide

While the Wear Twins are being counted as part of this year's recruiting class, in reality we have to view them as part of the 2011 class. If you view them as part of class of 2011, they become perhaps the most appealing forward prospect, given the fact they will be way ahead of any other freshman forward from that class in terms of development and ability to readily contribute at the college level. They will certainly be well prepared after being under the tutelage of Roy Williams and Ben Howland. They will be well conditioned and adjusted to Howland's program. As coach said they are not going to hit the ground "running." They will hit it "sprinting." It's a big advantage IMO.

Coach Howland talked about these two guys helping rest of the team "compete." I don't think that can be emphasized enough. Coach Howland likes to conduct tough practices. They are legendary as we have hear of stories of DC and JF going after each other, and PAA and LMR bouncing around like bowling bowls around the paint. Having the Wear Twins at Pauley, will only push Smith, Nelson, Stover, and Lane next season because they will know full well their PT is going to be on the line with these two waiting in the wings. Plus with Howland's tough style, it is always good to have quality healthy bodies at UCLA practices. So that is another big plus.

The thing that has gotten me really excited about the arrival of Wear Twins is that I think Howland might be sending a signal how he is working to get back to his Big East roots, which led to emergence of "Ben Ball" in his first five years in Westwood.  With the Wear Twins, Stover, Smith, Nelson, and Lane, Howland is stocking up the roster with powerful frontcourt players, who can potentially once again guard our paint with the same ferocity of PAA, LMR and LRMAM.

During last two years, I missed the moments when opposing players would have to take brutal punishments if they dared penetrating the Bruin defense. I think with these guys Howland can potentially bring back that mindset - the "Ben Ball Warrior" mindset - that was so clearly lacking as a team during last year's dreadful season. These guys, I believe could once again give us a chance to play more "Izzo Ball" than "Calipari Ball" and get us back to being consistent, fundamentally sound program we became during Howland's early years in Westwood.

Let's also zero in on the point of California kids "coming home." From David and Travis yesterday:

David: "I just feel like it's a great school with a great coach. I was looking for a school that was benefit me as a player, and as a student athlete. It wasn't so much (Howland's) pitch - originally I wanted to experience going away from home, playing for North Carolina, seeing what that was like. But seeing how much my family, my friends, my people support me, I missed that a lot. I miss being able to come home and see everyone."

Travis: "He basically summed it up right there - I was really intrigued with the idea of playing for North Carolina. I thought it was a great opportunity, but I did miss the support of our friends and our family out here. I did miss home."

There is more than something to it. There are many of us thousands of miles away, who can relate to it personally. There is no other place like Golden State. East Coast is wonderful in many ways. I love it out here. Chapel Hill is an amazing and beautiful college town, especially if you love basketball. Yet, there is no place like home. There is no way to describe the feeling a Californian experiences when he or she comes back home to their families, while taking in the sights and sound of the Pacific Ocean (with that cool breeze). It all sounds cliché but that's what we experience every time we go home for the Holidays. I can more than relate to why the Wears came back home and I am cautiously optimistic that it will only help them to flourish as student athletes in Westwood.

I hope they will work their tail off and also have the same effect on rest of their team-mates and help bring back the good vibe around this program which was lost with primadonnas such as Drew Gordon and Jrue Holiday poisoning the program two years ago. David on bringing UCLA back:

David: "I feel like it's a great school with a historic program. Every school has their down years. My brother and I are both going to come in and do everything we can to contribute. It's going to be great to play with a former teammate Blake Arnet, and Tyler Lamb is going to be there also. They have a lot of talent on that team, and a great coach. I don't think it will take a lot to get it turned around. We have all the weapons, all the tools to do so."

Color me excited.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 67 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Seems like very good news for the program.

It adds positive momentum building on Carlino, after a series of setbacks. They definitely will add to the practice regimen, and will add to the competition among the frontline players. The only question is athleticism. CBH has a good history of developing frontline players who work hard, like PAA, and LMR. Even KL improved dramatically over his season. The only exception is JK, who peaked as a sophomore. I am cautiously optimistic.

by 75NatChamps on May 26, 2010 5:58 AM PDT reply actions  

I agree about being cautious...

…but at a minimum, getting them on board gives the program a shot in the arm so those athletic (please, more Westbrooks!) recruits can see that the program isn’t on the way down…adding the Wears was sorely needed. Thankfully CBH had two scholies to give. Other programs may have had two or just one, but needed guards more than we do (if that’s possible). The timing couldn’t have been better. Imagine if CBH had already given away the scholies to other guys not as well-suited to the program, say a couple of foreign kids that could (not would, but could) have turned out like Dragovic! Thankfully, it all worked out, for them and for the Bruins. I think this portends great things in terms of potential recruiting advances.

by 2ndGenBruin on May 26, 2010 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

You can't rely on foreign kids

unless they are clones of Dirk Nowvitsky, Tony Parker etc with independently verified birth certificate.

Just kidding. The lesson of the mad bomber from Serbia made it numbingly clear THEY ARE MEDIOCRE AT BEST.

by Htse005 on May 26, 2010 11:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

no, Dragovic was mediocre at best

occasionally contributing a barrage of points to balance poor defense, making him mediocre on his best days; at worst, he was godawful.

“foreign kids” are not “mediocre at best”. That is the sort of completely ignorant statement that one might expect to hear from a U$C fan, not from a member of the Bruin family.

by britishbruin on May 26, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well to be fair

You were the one that made an absolute statement, and so citing the Prince and PAA is sufficient to counter that argument. He needs not state any more players to disprove you.

Now, if you’d like to retreat from what you said earlier, there’s still a problem: the multitude of American or California born players that also can’t be relied upon. After all, all but one of the players that we ended up not being able to count upon in the CBH era were born right in the good old U S of A.

How about we dispose of the generalizations and judge these guys on a case by case basis without painting large groups of players with a broad brush.

by Tydides on May 26, 2010 7:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Older UCLA Foriegn born success stories

The starting center on our last national championship team George Zidek and the starting center before him who also played in the pros Richard Petruska to name two more. We have had many good/very good foreign players and one moron. As T. points out, I am not sure our US player percentage is much better.

by DCBruins on May 26, 2010 8:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Aaah Petruska

Solid transfer from LMU. Don’t forget both Jerome Moiso and Dan Gadzuric were foreign born players who did well (despite playing without a coach)

by Nestor on May 27, 2010 4:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I am wondering if Howland

will maybe move Lamb to the 3 since next year it will really only be Honeycutt

by JulianD on May 26, 2010 6:59 AM PDT reply actions  

I think we'll see all kinds of variations in lineup when TH is resting

Depending on the size/speed of the opposing team I could see Lane, Lamb, or Lee filling in for him, with Lane only doing so against mugh larger than average opposing lineups on the floor. In most cases I would have to think that ML’s ability to defend in m2m would be wasted by moving him up a position to guard the 3, unless the opposing team’s SG is a slouch comparatively, we will need his lateral quickness next year if we’re going back to m2m.

Hopefully the rest of our backcourt steps up as well and we don’t get shredded by opposing guards, DC and RW spoiled us!

by Chris09 on May 26, 2010 9:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nestor, curious how you see

possibly three scholarships next year. I think TH leaving is sadly pretty likely, if his summer of practice and conditioning make him even better than he was last year. I can see ML leaving if he blows up like many of us see he has the potential for with confidence and conditioning – or if he implodes and seeks greener pastures, be they the green of another program or more likely the green of possibly playing for money (here or elsewhere). I’m assuming your potential third scholie would be if we don’t use our last one this year. If you’re imagining differently, I’m interested to read your thoughts.

by KSBruin on May 26, 2010 7:05 AM PDT reply actions  

Yeah

I said 2-3 with the assumption that we will most likely not use our last one this year. If I am wrong about not using the last one I will be very happy about getting Barry (but I don’t see it happening).

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 7:07 AM PDT up reply actions  

I agree but also one item that may move that rate north of 15% (which is very realistic IMO) is the new NBA collective bargaining agreement. If somehow, the rookie scale deteriorates for non-lottery picks, it might be more beneficial for the late 1st-rounders to stick around. But who knows…

by bruinhopeful on May 26, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Have you seen or heard more about Berry

since that recruiting video you posted? I know he is supposed to be very athletic, but I just didn’t see it. I’m still not sure if it is wise to sign him now the the Wear twins are on board.

by Sideout11 on May 27, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I don’t know much about him. I did hear he came by the school for an “official visit” recently and that it went well. Yet as is the case of foreign players who have had just one or two year of schooling in the US (and in this case there were issues with his eligibility) there will be extra hurdles for him to get into UCLA. So he might go the safe route and sign with a program like St. John and then you will have the “Second Largest Oil Sleak” blaring how he beat Howland out for a recruit.

by Nestor on May 27, 2010 4:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Practice, practice

I went back and looked at yesterday’s giddy thread about the transfers and nobody glommed on to the point you raise about the Wears’ impact on practices. This is big.

The 8 man “starting rotation” will be markedly better because they have to compete every single day with two 6’10" monsters. Sure, we can hardly wait until the 2011-2012 season, but the impact will be felt this year.

by peggysue69 on May 26, 2010 7:26 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I know I did...

…and others dd too. The Wears’ size will be a huge asset right away in practice, but the point is the same – with possible injuries etc. for RN and others, they absolutely need more practice players even if they can’t play in games…

by 2ndGenBruin on May 26, 2010 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're right

I missed it. You were the first to note it. Good call.

by peggysue69 on May 26, 2010 10:04 AM PDT up reply actions  

I wasn't around yesterday's thread much

But I think I mentioned the practice impact in my post from Monday. It was on my mind when writing it up, at least.

formerly bruinhoo

by Patroclus on May 26, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nestor

Are you saying I got, ‘Sweet talked’ on Saturday night? Maybe even played by ML?

I’m not sure I can make it through the day. That is how deep the hurt runs.

LOL.

I, too, think it isn’t very likely ML or TH return after next season. But I’m a bit more optimistic. I think it is more like 50-50 rather than 15%. It is a bit less for TH if he has a real, break-out season in 10-11’.

On the Wear twins, I think they will be serviceable role players, at best. More productive,hopefully then JK was, but from the same mold. I really hope they have the foot speed to play quality man defense, but my fear is we will be forced into a zone defense shortly after they make their debut in Bruin Blue and Gold.

Good day, all.

by Bald Eagle on May 26, 2010 7:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Hehe

Naah … not just you! It even happens to yours truly whenever attending those kinds of events (or road trips when get so close to the program). It happens. I don’t see anything wrong with it BUT we do need to give everyone that necessary jolt of reality (and consider it also a jolt for all of us). :-)

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 7:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

In a strange way, I don't mind it being 15%

Because if it is that low it means TH has become at a minimum a PAC 10 First Teamer and likely budding superstar. It also means ML had a very good season and UCLA is back to a PAC 10 power or more. It also should mean ML proved he could shoot outside and TH stayed healthy (two of the biggest pro questions with each of them.)

Of course, I would still like them to stay but that is a happy problem. (Maybe the NBA will strike and they stay despite great seasons.)

by DCBruins on May 26, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Not strange at all

If both of them or one of them blow up next season, it will be good for UCLA. If they decide to go … then cool. What will be interesting is what happens if they have so so seasons.

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 12:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd agree that 15% seems low

and it’s really depressing to spend time worrying about players leaving the program early before they’ve even played well enough to be drafted, but I can’t argue with the fact that losing 1 or both is a real possibility, although I can’t hope but think having them both for 2 more seasons is more likely than KL returning for his sophomore season was. The pipe that the ML/TH dream will be sliding through next spring is just a little bit wider.

by Chris09 on May 26, 2010 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I can't get with all this "excitement"

Why not?
1. C’mon, two more players outta the OC? Been there – done that – it sucks. These guys didn’t see much light in a down, down, down North Carolina season. How the heck can anybody put stock in that.

2. Practice Competitors? Please. Even if they’re MONSTERS in practice… whoopdie-doo-dah-day. Nobody’s gonna lose their job due to these two because they can’t play next year. Competing in practice only counts when there’s PLAYING TIME and NBA SALARY on the line. C’mon guys. Haven’t any of you ever played even organized ball? Yeesh.

3. JOB SECURITY. “Don’t after me after next season, I brought in the Wear Twins, we’ll be better, just wait and see”. THIS was the most important factor of this signing. BEN is strategically trying to hold on to his gig. That’s fine. That’s what men do. Since I’m a man, I see right through it.

People, we still have GAME TIME issues. We haven’t solved a thing.

Nestor was RIGHT in his original analysis of these guys. NOTHING has changed.

by Bruins78 on May 26, 2010 8:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Are you SURE you got your point across?

If I didn’t know better, I would think you are YELLING to be heard instead of making GOOD POINTS.

You have to take things in context. It is late in the recruiting season and there are few if any quality players left, let alone quality players who qualify academically and will fit in CBH’s program. The Wear twins are about as good as you can get when you take those factors into consideration. It is the recruiting next year that will be very, very important.

So please, do realize how freaking ANNOYING your typing is. Underlining or bolding makes for much less stressful reading.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on May 26, 2010 9:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

This.

I don’t mind people putting in one or two capped words for emphasis. But when they’re thrown in there randomly and haphazardly, it’s just really annoying and detracts from the message. I used to do this but then I realized that if I can’t make my points stand out on their own without using capitalization, then I either need to find a stronger point, or rewrite my sentences to improve the clarity of the message.

TL;DR: Quit randomly capping your words. It looks stupid.

by Tydides on May 26, 2010 9:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I can see it happening occaisonally

If there’s a situation when emotions run high; a game thread for instance, no one’s going to think twice about someone using even all caps after a pick or a badly blown defensive assignment or something of that nature. When it becomes someone’s MO for regular routine posts in a normal thread, that’s just unnecessary.

by Tydides on May 26, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm POSTIVE my point gets across... some... 95% of the time

Voice Inflection.
CAPS are not just yelling. It’s a mistake to make that assumption. Caps are also legitimately used as voice inflection.

Example: Chris Rock opening up a monologue on a summer night in a small club:
“It’s HOT in this m*f*!”
OR…. would you prefer the following:
“It’s hot in this m*f!*

The difference is merely inflection… or INFLECTION.

On ESPN, guy hits a homerun… does the announcer say: boo-yah! OR BOO-yah!

As an animated fella myself, I speak with A LOT of inflection.
Perhaps you do not. That’s ok. I accept you. Accept me.

Caps often signify voice inflection. Caps are not exclusively used for yelling.
In Borg speak: I WILL NOT assimilate.
In Your speak: I will not be corrected (again over this issue) by the likes of you.

by Bruins78 on May 26, 2010 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uhm

We are not looking to have Stewart Scott type of chatter here on BN. We put together this place so that we could get away from ESPN’s MTVized nonsense.

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

fwiw

I just think there is time and place for everything. There is nothing wrong with sharing excitement and emotion when something dramatic is taking place. That is why the game threads here are very different than the general threads. There everyone is firing of rapid commentary and reactions. In this thread though we are all trying to have an analytical and well thought out discussion. So you will be taken more seriously (even when you disagree) if you share your reflections in a calm and well reasoned manner.

So when we beat Southern Cal (in 192 days) no one will have any issue with going all caps during that game thread or for the following week. :-)

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

It is all becoming clear

I am Ryan, who is really Dan Guerrerro, and you are me. I think gbruin also entered the equation in recent weeks. We are all the same.

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

We should tell people

That two of those people are actually the same and let the conspiracy theorists have at it.

by Tydides on May 26, 2010 12:38 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does that mean

that I am actually Fox?

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on May 26, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

well

you guys both have “Florida” connections. How convenieeeeent … on another note check your email.

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

Oh please man

Only 2 years in Florida and I still can’t shake it! :)

Email checked. Sweet.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on May 26, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well

I will say prior to reading your above comment and just seeing it filled with CAPS followed by a post below w/ Nestor’s avatar I was expecting some sort of retaliatory attack followed by a warning that you may be banned. Granted these were all assumptions, but in theory this isn’t much different than the benefit of writing concise and seperate (visually by lines) paragraphs, people are not immediately overwhelmed and dreading reading what you wrote because it looks like a giant wall of text, or in the case of CAPS, wall of anger. It alters expectations.
That being said, the caps don’t really bother me, inflection on the really.

by Chris09 on May 26, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Inflection

is meant for speech, not writing. You are using caps in this instance to emphasize the importance of your points, not to relay excitement, hence my annoyance. Your points carry just as much weight without the caps. I do appreciate your enthusiasm (or lack thereof in this instance) and passion, nothing wrong with that at all! I just think it would be nice to keep this place for becoming an internet romper room…

So, when Akeem flattens that U$C* QB, I will be the first to say “take THAT you little biatch!”

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on May 26, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

You know it's the offseason when...

we bicker about keyboard usage all day. Is it September yet?

by Chris09 on May 26, 2010 12:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

It doesn't help

that I’m a bit anal…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on May 26, 2010 1:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

haha

anything to distract me from the countdown timer to tipoff on the front page. That and 5 o’clock today seem equally far far away.

by Chris09 on May 26, 2010 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

5 oclock today

is an eternity compared to tip off

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on May 26, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

What?

1) Tell me something I don’t know already. OC has had a history of overrated players (Chenowith, Burgess, Keefe, etc) but for every James Keefe there is an Adam Keefe. I’ll take a Klay Thompson, Schea Cotton, Ced Bozeman, Mike Roll, DJ Strawberry, Reggie Geary and Miles Simon on our team anytime. Yes, they’re mostly from MD but aren’t the Wears too? If you have ever watched the Wears, they are going to make this team better because they can shoot the perimeter J. As of this moment, none of our bigs can shoot from the perimeter on a consistent basis. Their ability to do just that, makes us better. Don’t know why people throw out Love when comparing the Wears since it makes zero sense. Love is/was special. The Wears aren’t but they’re going to be damn good players and Bruin fans will be quite happy with what they’ll bring to the program.

2) For real? You don’t think competition matters to keep people on their toes and ensure that they work hard & continue to develop their game? The Wears will be RSing but I can guarantee you that they’ll make Lane/Nelson/Stover/Smith better by having to play against them. Competition breeds success.

3) Of course CBH is trying to hold onto his job, who wouldn’t? This doesn’t mean that he is on the hottest of seats. His job is still secure but its his duty to improve the team and program by bringing in talented kids to the program which is exactly what he has done by getting the Wears. There is no need to “see right through it” because like I said, it’s his job and not some big conspiracy/strategic move to save his arse.

Look through the archives and you’ll see we’ve discussed our issues to death. We won’t find out if these issues are resolved until winter. So for now, Chillax and welcome the Wears because they are a positive addition to the program.

by BlueReign on May 26, 2010 9:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

This is a great write-up

and I’m excited once again about UCLA hoops. I was ambivalent myself about the Wear twins and the upcoming season until I read Patroclus’ post a couple of days ago, and now this one confirms my hopes for 2010-2011.

I am constantly amazed at the thoroughness of the articles and posts here on BN. It’s better than anything else I find anywhere in the MSM.. better research, more complete analysis, and far more informative. The fact that everyone does this on their own time, for no pay, is remarkable.

Thanks, guys, and keep up the good work.

Formerly UCLA Class of 86

by Class of 86 on May 26, 2010 8:25 AM PDT reply actions  

+1

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on May 26, 2010 9:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think there is reason for optimism (but we have to be guarded)

However, we still have to be very cautious and realistic. We still need Anderson and Jones to emerge as serviceable pgs. We will have to see what happens with Lee/Honeycutt next season.

by Nestor on May 26, 2010 9:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kind of like football but less severe

After a season like we just had it is going to take more than a year to rebuild from it, but basketball is a much quicker rebuild than football. I am optimistic that the Wear’s are going to become eligible right when we start to turn the corner back into national respectability. And as long as we have one of the two between ML and TH I think we will be all right, both would a bonus and obviosuly give us a shot at real deep tourney run.

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on May 26, 2010 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

We need more of Jones, if he lived up to the billing

than Anderson, even if he does keep his word to tranform his game this fall. This is legitimately an overrated player. Ther’s only so much he can give.

by Htse005 on May 26, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

its the offseason

were undefeated. its time for optimism, Anderson will become a reliable player in the future. Players like him have always blossomed since I have been a UCLA fan.

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on May 26, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

Little Random Things...

CBH’s message is solid, and for me, comforting because he is neither defensive nor giddy. I trust him, and I’m glad he is our coach. I’m of the opinion that these young men are going to improve our team, and I’m excited about them coming on board. I’m excited about our frontcourt…for the first time in a while.

I appreciate the photo of CBH with Coach sitting over his right shoulder. I appreciate CBH’s mention of JS being back from Turkey, and that he had spoken with him. (I’m big on loyalty.)

Love My Bruins

by Bruingirl83 on May 26, 2010 8:43 AM PDT reply actions  

I'm thrilled with this signing

From all accounts, it appears these young men are driven, hard working and coachable. CBH has always been able to recruit talent but unfortunately had some recruiting missteps in terms of the character that made this program so formidable in years past. This point, of course, has been belabored here on BN already. Still, it’s worth noting that the incoming class, particularly now including the Wears, all seem to be built out of the “old” CBH mold.

But even without the addition of the Wears, our front line was looking pretty good with RN, BL, AS and JS2. Much more importantly, we are in dire need of a primary ball handler. That is the key to near term success/failure for UCLA hoops. It makes Zeke Jones ability to contribute the most important question of the upcoming season. Unless, of course JA can gain back his confidence and develop his work ethic to get better. We’ve read a few things and seen some short videos but I just wish I knew more about Zeke to be confident…

2 random points: First, did anyone else find it interesting that CBH didn’t even mention the benefit of the Wears being coached by Roy Williams for a year at UNC? I did. Second, is it just me or does the wrinkle between CBH’s eyes look deeper than ever? I think last season aged him even more than it did us.

by DoubleTroubleBruin on May 26, 2010 10:21 AM PDT reply actions  

Oops

I missed yesterday’s discussion and didn’t realize both of my primary points had already been addressed in the thread. Sorry for the repetition folks.

by DoubleTroubleBruin on May 26, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

I did notice

that when he mentioned they’d been excellently coached thus far in their careers, he mentioned Mater Dei and their Dad, no mention of UNC or Roy. I don’t think it means much though, giving the Mater Dei coaches a mention makes sense for future recruiting endeavors. No good could really come from talking about UNC during his press conference.

by Chris09 on May 26, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

All eyes are on him to

restructure the program, retooling his players and most of all, reinvent himself and his vaunted coaching skills to the shell shocked Pauley fans that he still is the one person that can reignite our enthusiasm.

Tell me if those deep lines you saw are not there for valid reasons.

by Htse005 on May 26, 2010 11:39 AM PDT up reply actions  

Let Howland be Howland

Its hard to imagine a better use of the two scholarships than bringing in high character top prospects like the Wear twins. Like others have pointed out, this move is a clear sign that CBH is returning to his roots. In some ways, our back to back to back Final Four runs resulted in the program losing focus. Because Final Fours are only a stop on the way to the goal of National Championships, our inability to cut down the nets bred a sense of urgency in the program. IMO it was that sense of urgency that cause CBH to make some uncharacteristic moves. But like Coach once said “Be quick but do not hurry”

CBH’s moves over that last months are those of a man who sensed that the program was in danger of losing its way. CBH is again trying to make this program something to be proud of. Between the subtraction of the divas, the apparent recommitment of ML and JA, and the recent recruits (including last year’s recruits) IMO the program is getting back on track. While I never enjoy a down year, it is always more palatable when better days are on the horizon

by CMK on May 26, 2010 10:56 AM PDT reply actions  

Hello CMK

The program lost its way sometime last December already. He only realized it, or grudgingly accepted it after Dragovich played his last game. Until then, he had been clinging tight to his goal of seeing Dragovich leading us into NCAA’s Holy Land.

by Htse005 on May 26, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

Which Wear will play where?

and how will CBH tell if they switch and play out of position? Sorry, couldn’t resist.

by captainqtp on May 26, 2010 11:56 AM PDT reply actions  

In the video, he claims to know the difference

More importantly, can this be used to our advantage to confuse the defense? :P

by BruinEngy on May 26, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

A UNC Fan Perspective

I emailed one of my good friends who is a big UNC fan and very in tune with college basketball. I was excited to hear his response:

Me:

So what’s up with these guys? Apparently they will red shirt this year to be ready in 2011 – 12. I like the sound of two more 6-10 big bodies down low tho…

UNC fan:

They are going to be very good. I’m very disappointed they left unc.

Me:

Sweet!

Tinman

by Tinman17 on May 26, 2010 12:01 PM PDT reply actions  

A Key Stat, Rebounds Per Minute

For those who worry about the “OC toughness” or the like of the Wears one number is telling. In the ACC, it is worth noting that Travis averaged one rebound every 4.7 minutes. David every 6.2 minutes. By Comparison, Lane averaged a rebound every 6.75 minutes.

Travis’s average was comparable but not quite as good as Nelson’s (4.1) and TH’s (4.25) average per minute. I think Travis’s number is a good sign that he can play 4 in the PAC 10, especially by the time he is an older and stronger red shirt sophomore.

by DCBruins on May 26, 2010 1:27 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ks_ucla_small
A Break From Sports: Fun Old Pix of UCLA, Westwood
Small
UCLA Vital Signs and the Chianti Cancer

Recent FanPosts

Jaxnjaz_school_pic_11_2011_small
Ben Howland Cracks ESPN's Bottom 10
Licenseplate_small
Who Is Your Most Hated anti-UCLA Villian?
Small
Comparison to Stanford Athletics Fundraising
Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small
Warning: Southern Cal May Have Better Hoops Future than UCLA
Troll_small
Hoops Thoughts
Uclabear1_small
Atlanta Fans Are Not Too Amused By Jim Mora's Falcon Comments
Small
The Moment I Realized Howland Lost Me
Ucla_trumpets_small
Photos from UCLA vs. Cal
Small
Pop Up Ad on Cal Game Today

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB