FanPost

Pac-16 Updates (x2): Weekend Conference Re-Alignment Chatter Open Thread

I don't think we have ever had this kind of information overload in a span of 7-10 days. I haven't had the chance to really digest all the information concerning conference expansion. We know the top lines:

Guess I am more content to let this play out. I found the perspective (HT SBN) Adam Jacobo from Black Heart Gold Pants (SBN's Iowa blog) very interesting. Adam points out how Texas is positioning itself to be the home wrecker twice in three decades (emphasis added):

What's not going to happen, though, is that Texas stays in the Big XII. Oh, they'll claim to have tried their hardest to keep the conference together, but they could have accomplished that with or without Nebraska and/or Missouri in the fold. Nobody's ever asked Texas and A&M why, precisely, the conference couldn't survive without a Nebraska program that had spent the last few years lamenting the XII's increasingly Texas-centric approach. We can't even intuit a plausible answer why that's the case.

Moreover, it's disingenuous to pretend that Texas' Big Ten fantasies didn't start over 15 years ago, or that they haven't persisted since. After all, it's not as if Delany and OSU president Gordon Gee talked about Texas turning down the Big 10 on the conference's merits; it's that Texas Tech made it a "Tech Problem." If the Pac-10 wants to slather the Red Raiders in cash, it's their prerogative and it probably strengthens their conference in the immediate short term, but still. it's just TTU.

And so either the Pac-10 or the Big 10 happily welcomes into its conference the main actor in the only two I-A conference deaths of the last 50 years. If UT decides it can't be in a conference with a football program on a death sentence, then the Southwest Conference can't exist. If UT decides it can't be in a conference without a Nebraska program that's been complaining for years about the (state of) Texas-centric approach of the conference, then the Big XII can't exist. And if, in a couple decades, UT decides to convince Ohio State/USC that they can't handle conference network revenue sharing when they're in the same conference as Northwestern/Washington State or Purdue/Stanford , then the Big/Pac Tewhatever can't exist either. And just like every time before, we'll all act so, so surprised.

A perspective all of us should keep in mind while looking at this:

Pac16infos_medium
via:nickramz

Let's use this thread to discussion all conference realignment related news.

GO BRUINS.

UPDATE (N): It looks like Texas A&M might have the votes to join the SEC. Via Chip Brown's twitter:

Texas A&M regents have the votes to join the SEC and could announce that move as early as next week, sources tell Orangebloods.com

And that OU is being lobbied to join the SEC as well.Texas A&M to SEC is being advocated by oil barons:

Those in favor of the move, led by regents Gene Stallings and influential former Exxon Mobil executive Morris E. Foster, prefer the SEC from a regional, financial and athletic standpoint and feel like there are bonds between the SEC and A&M that work.

And the Texas Governor's fingerprints (who has a very "interesting" background with flirtation with secessionist whackjobs) are also on this SEC posture:

In addition to Stallings, A&M's charge to the SEC is also being supported by Texas A&M System chancellor Mike McKinney, who once served as Gov. Rick Perry's chief of staff. Perry is a former yell leader at A&M who still remains very tied into the school's day-to-day workings.

A call to Perry's office Saturday by Orangebloods.com resulted in a statement from Perry released by spokesman Rob Johnson, who added that Perry is in China.

It also sounds like SEC officials such as Commissioner Mike Slive might already be in College Station as well. I think I would prefer Utah over Kansas in the Pac-16. I rather stick Kansas hoops in a non BCS conference instead of having them in ours. Just my 2 cents. GO BRUINS.

UPDATE II (N): Jon Wilner ponders about Missouri:

* Who’d be No. 16?

If A&M joins the SEC, the Pac-10 would be sitting on 15 teams (assuming the Oklahoma schools, Texas and Texas Tech join).

The top contenders for the final spot, reportedly, are Kansas and Utah. Which way would the Pac-10 go? Salt Lake is the 31st-largest TV market in the country, Kansas City the 32nd. And KU would, of course, bring its powerhouse basketball program.

(I still wonder about Missouri, which would be a great fit for the Pac-10 academically and brings the No. 21 TV market in St. Louis. Are the Tigers destined for the Big Ten? If not, the Pac-10 should make a run at them

Hmm. I like the combination of CU/Missouri better than CU/Utah or CU/Kansas. GO BRUINS.

<em>This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.</em>

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Bruins Nation

You must be a member of Bruins Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bruins Nation. You should read them.

Join Bruins Nation

You must be a member of Bruins Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bruins Nation. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker