Let’s say we get the PAC Beban (16): Football

I’d like to take a hypothetical view of the conference move. This proposition covers sports only, no revenue, politics, academics, just sports.

Football Organization:

I expect the sections to be divided as such for Football:

West: Cal, Stanford, Oregon, Oregon State, UCLA, USC, Washington, Washington State

East: Arizona, Arizona State, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas Tech, Texas A&M, Colorado

Thoughts: It really bugs me that the Arizona schools may be ousted from the conference. I won’t miss them, but it still bugs me that the conference will be torn apart to add new teams, and from the look of the Eastern Conference, they could have a tough time catching up to the juggernauts of the division.

Football Scheduling:

Here’s an example of a possible UCLA “pre-season” schedule (modeled off of an SEC Schedule)

  1. Out of Conference
  2. UT/TTU/A&M/OU
  4. Out of Conference

To avoid “the perfect storm” I kept UT and OU in the same rotation, and to avoid making two trips to the same area, the Arizona schools are on the same rotation as well. This schedule also allows for a complete tour around the western division, keeps rivalries in tact (i.e. USC-UCLA, as well as the midyear matchup between UT & OU), and is diverse enough to allow Out of Conference games. Hey, why not, add an Out of Conference to the two rotations, and add a BYE week to the Out of Conference slots.


Championship: The Championship Game would most likely take place at the U of Phoenix stadium. The winner of the respective division, by any form of tie-braking, would get a bid to the championship game. In effect, the winner of the East (for the next few years at least) would be the winner of the Red River Shootout, and the winner of the West would be more or less of a tossup.  

BCS: Now here is where things can get real interesting, the Rose Bowl and Fiesta Bowl are jeopardized here. To avoid pure “At-Large” bids, there could be some very complex, long string selection processes written. I could see a situation where the winner of the PAC-16 Championship game could get the automatic Rose Bowl bid. Then, the Fiesta Bowl would go down the drain for the Big XII winner, as well as the Holiday Bowl.

Want an edgy suggestion? Make the MWC a BCS conference, they’ll act as the new Big XII, filling spots for the Holiday and Fiesta Bowls. Just a suggestion...

The qualifications for the PAC-16 in the Holiday Bowl could be 2nd place team in the East, 2nd place in all of the PAC-16 if they didn’t receive a BCS bid (unlikely), 3rd place team in the entire PAC-16, and a thousand other combinations. It’s actually pretty complex once you think about it.

The biggest problem would be bowl eligibility for both the divisions; for instance, the lower echelon bowls such as the Pinstripe, Dallas, Armed Forces, and Las Vegas Bowls could be surrendered to accommodate for the new competitive nature of the conference. 

That’s it for the Football version, I’ll get into basketball should it deem necessary, or favorable to BN.

<em>This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.</em>

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Bruins Nation

You must be a member of Bruins Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bruins Nation. You should read them.

Join Bruins Nation

You must be a member of Bruins Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Bruins Nation. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.