Roundup From BN Walk: UCLA's Practice Dates, Dismissal Impact, Howland’s Camp & Other Notes
One of the best benefits of this year's magical baseball season has been that it dramatically cut short the long nuclear summer aka college football off-season. As we are going through the process of wrapping up the accomplishments of UCLA baseball, we now find ourselves basically just a month away from the most highly anticipated UCLA football camp in recent years.
UCLA officially released the schedule for its 2010 Summer/Early Fall camp yesterday:
UCLA will open its 2010 pre-season football practice on Monday, August 9. The Bruins will practice once daily from August 9 through August 13 as part of the NCAA acclimatization process.
The first practice in full pads will be Friday, August 13. Two-a-day practices will begin on Saturday, August 14. NCAA rules instituted in 2003 prohibit two practices on back-to-back days.
On Saturday, August 21, the Bruins will hold their first major scrimmage of Fall Camp. The scrimmage will be held at Drake Stadium, beginning at 5:00 p.m.
All practices between August 9 and 21 will be open to the public and all, with the exception of the August 21 scrimmage, will be on Spaulding Field. Practices beginning August 23 will be determined at a later date.
Yeah, you read that right. Bruins are going full pad starting on Friday the 13th. LOL Perhaps CRN is not as superstitious as rest of us. You can get the full schedule here. I am sure we will post the dates again as the days get closer. You should probably book mark that page anyway (and don't complain later that the official site didn't post the information).
Staying with football Brandon Huffman from BruinReportOnline.com has a detailed look at how the recent dismissals of three incoming freshmen affect the Bruins' depth chart in the near future (excerpting here b/c the article is not behind a pay firewall):
At receiver, UCLA has several upperclassmen in the lineup, so Paul, one of the best route-runners in the West last year, would have been able to use the 2010 season to add weight and bide his time before making a push in the lineup in 2011. What makes the situation worse for Paul Richardson is his father is a former Bruin receiver, having been coached by Neuheisel (when Neuheisel was the receivers coach for the Bruins), and a teammate of current receivers coach Reggie Moore.
For Shaquille Richardson, UCLA returns one starting cornerback in Sheldon Price and Aaron Hester, who started at the beginning of the season before breaking his leg, was expected to start opposite Price. Courtney Viney, who replaced Hester early in the year after his injury was expected to be the third cornerback with Andrew Abbott slated to be the fourth corner, after also playing extensively. So Richardson was also expected to redshirt in 2010.
But Shirley was one of the few Bruin freshman expected to play as a true freshman. And the expectations for him were high.
Shirley was one of the best pass-rushing ends as a 2008 junior at Fontana (Calif.) Kaiser before moving to linebacker during his senior season.
That path was similar to the one that Preseason All-American Akeem Ayers took at Verbum Dei in Los Angeles. Ayers was the state's sack leader in 2005 as a junior but moved to linebacker as a senior.
He's now UCLA's best linebacker, playing on the strongside, where he's been named a Preseason All-American by several publication and is a strong candidate to leave for the NFL after this, his upcoming junior year.
So playing behind Ayers, Shirley would have been able to work behind one of the nation's top linebackers, without the pressure of starting as a true freshman, but with the ability to move right into Ayers' spot, should he leave after this season.
Read rest of Huffman's analysis here. As you can see, the just punishment handed out by CRN was a little more than window dressing from the perspective of these young adults. Even though CRN provided a possibility of their return to the program, it will be up to them to resolve their legal issues, stay focused both on and off the field at a JC before making their bids to come back to Westwood. It is not going to be easy but we wish them luck.
Moving on to hoops, Coach Ben Howland is still recovering from an Achilles tendon surgery. I am sure it's the main reason why he couldn't show up in Omaha to root on the Bruins. However, he was able to show up at his annual Youth Camp (on crutches) at the nearby Pacific Palisades high school gym:
Howland is optimistic about the upcoming season, especially given the addition of twin brothers David and Travis Wear, who transferred to UCLA from North Carolina. First things first, however, and Howland is glad to be back in Pacific Palisades--the fifth straight year he has held his camp here--just like Wooden used to do decades before.
"It's a great location, a great facility and the response has been terrific," Howland said. "The neat thing is that some of these kids have been to every camp so you recognize them. It's good to see them coming every summer."
This year's camp runs through Friday, when championship games are played, followed by an awards ceremony and Howland's closing comments. Open to boys and girls ages 6-12, it includes passing, dribbling and shooting drills as well as three-on-three and five-on-five games. [...]
"Let's all have a positive attitude and learn the fundamentals," Howland told his campers. "No matter how much talent you have, it comes down to basics in the end--things like defense, rebounding and passing."
After Howland's introduction, players were evaluated and teams were formed based on age and ability. Drills throughout the week work on essential skills like dribbling, jump shooting, chest passing, bounce passing, rebounding, defensive stance and lay-ups.
Perhaps Jerime Anderson (DCBruins' favorite UCLA basketball player) is also attending the camp? :-) Seriously though, even though these kinds of stories are fairly vanilla, I can't never get enough of them. Nothing wrong with evangelizing about the blue and gold to kids all around UCLA and of course LA at a very early age.
Lastly, I will end with a note on Pac-10 expansion. Over here we have been talking a lot about the need to keep California schools together in the new 12-Pac. Sounds like the Stanford's Athletic Director - Bob Bowlsby - is on the same page (emphasis added):
* On the division split: "There has been a lot of public conversation about how it will all work out. But the presidents, chancellors and athletic directors haven't come anywhere close to going down that path yet."
* On the four CA schools being in the same division: "The tradition has been the California schools play each other (every year), and obviously we'd like to have that be the case."
* On the options for structuring the 12-team league: "We'll look into everything. We're not going to take anything off the table.
* On whether Stanford will support a football championship game: "We'll have to look at how valuable it is and how the various academic structures go into it. We'll keep an open mind."
In the same post, Jon Wilner wrote about Stanford and California possibly presenting a united front during the upcoming discussions. The post also confirms the speculation that Larry Scott didn't really think out all the scenarios before settling on Colorado (and especially Utah). It will be interesting to see how the upcoming discussions and results affect the chemistry within the conference.
GO BRUINS.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
What N, no Lebron watch?
Thanks for the great round-up. I was so disappointed last night. I was ready to switch to tWWL and watch the bronco chase all over again (as scheduled), but there it was “LeBron Countdown” with a clock and everything. I’ll have to stay away from sports radio and tv for a while and just come here for real information about something I actually care about…the Bruins. On that front, however, I hope that if JF does leave L.A, that he can find a place where he can really show his talents. I think he can be a star point guard given the right circumstances, but I would really miss him in L.A. Maybe he can go to Philly and take that other Bruin’s spot.
Anyway, thanks for all the real Bruin news today. Refreshing.
Go Bruins!
ESPN
I don’t watch SportsCenter or any of the tWWL shows unless I have been forced to due to scheduling of UCLA games. There was a time I couldn’t get enough of those shows but the continuous MTVization of sports by those corporate shmucks have made it unwatchable.
I still think it'll be interesting
To keep tabs on where JF is going to land. I’ve seen rumors of the Pacers, Blazers, and Knicks. The complaints about his defense aren’t without merit (although disproportionate considering the other points that the Lakers had on their roster), and the impression has been that he is hamstrung offensively by the triangle. This is his chance to sink or swim.
He should just
wait to see which team blows all their money signing two or three max contract guys, then sign a six-year deal for the league min. with opt outs in case he becomes an actual commodity. Seriously, the way it looks right now, some teams are gonna have three or four league minimum guys earning real minutes.
Yah, thank goodness for the internet where you can decide what to put in your head.
It’s really too bad for all of the guys, doing what they did. But I think our team will especially miss Shirley. I was really looking forward to seeing him on the field. Hopefully, if he makes it, he’ll come back with even more passion and drive.
I think 3 of the 4 California schools will have to really stick together on this division thing. I don’t know what the heck is going on with mikey, but I don’t see him having much say in anything at this point. I was thinking if Colorado is so set on being with the L.A. teams, we could do the geographic north south split (with Colorado and Utah in the North) and then trade Colorado for $c ($c could be with the northern division). That would be cool for me. Of course we’d still have our rivalry game. Kind of a mesh of the north-south and the zipper.
Go Bruins!
Re: Fri the 13th
Given how the last half decade has gone, it’s hard to imagine our luck could get worse this year. You, the king of the reverse hex, should know what CRN is doing.
Yes, Nestor Anderson could probably use such a camp IMO
I have not given up on Anderson as I think he could be a decent 2 guard. PG is very tough to play, much like QB in football it takes more than athletic talent. I am not sure he is up to that role. Look Malcolm Lee is also infinitely better as a 2 guard than a PG. Height alone should not dictate position.
I know you were being tongue in check but in all seriousness for Anderson to play significant minutes next year he must: as CBH said
“No matter how much talent you have, it comes down to basics in the end—things like defense, rebounding and passing.”
I hope Anderson is guarding the best guard in every pick up game and working hard on his defense. He has shown flashes of offensive talent but needs to work on his D.
It is going to be a very interesting year
I still think he can become productive at the 1. I will not give up hope until I see what happens this year. Remember I didn’t give up even on a clown like Rago till his junior season came to an end.
We agree on that
I also like the fact the PG position is a competition this year. I think CBH made a mistake (understandable given the roster) last year in just giving the PG position to Anderson at the start of the season. This year Carlino, Jones and Anderson will all have a shot at PG minutes. It will be interesting to watch it play out.
I also like the competition
one of the places that this differs from football is that PGs can more obviously push each other in direct competition (playing against each other at both ends), while QB competitions seem to cause more trouble…
Yep and also you can switch more in basketball
For example, If Jones is weak on offense but strong on defense and Anderson or Carlino is the opposite you can play them according to the match ups. One concrete example, CBH was brilliant last year against the Beavers when he beat their trap with Michael Roll as PG. That would not work most games or ever in football.
you're generous in your limited use of emphasis
if defense was his only problem, then he wouldn’t be a great fit for Ben-Ball, but he could at least be an effective floor general. In addition to defense, I’d also like him to work on his passing, shooting, decision-making, ball-handling, understanding of the offense… etc….
Lol, flashes
I wrote “flashes” of offense and that “I am not sure he is up to that role” of PG. If I were to write negatively I would say he has never shown the least interest in defense and it is time to move on from him as a PG.
But, I will add that I was at RW’s first game as PG and it was a disaster. He obviously is awesome now. Anderson was lazy and immature last year. Hopefully he can grow up, work hard, and contribute.
In conclusion, the only thing I feel a 100% confident on is that to play next year for CBH he must improve his defense.
is Lazeric Jones playing in an LA summer league or in the Men's Gym games this summer?
I think the season hinges on how good he really is.
by RealisticBruinFan on Jul 1, 2010 8:30 AM PDT reply actions
I tend to agree that Jones is one of the keys or the key to next year
The only things as important are TH as a scorer and team defense. I think TH needs to assert himself more on the offense end (he took only 19 shots in the last 5 games). But that said, Jones and the PG spot are likely the key to next year.
i say do away
with non conf play and play everyone in conference. No championship game. I look forward to the bay area trip every year..
"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that count's"
John Wooden.....
66 conf games, 33 losses
as long as the bcs exists, there is absolutely no way that any conference would guarantee themselves a .500 record. I liked the round robin too though, but it’s dead now.
basketball would be 66 losses
and would also screw up any RPI calculations if there are no common opponents…
good point
I assumed he meant football, that’d be crazy for basketball as well.
I think he meant football
I was in the middle of telling you 66 was correct, given all the basketball talk immediately above putting my mind on that, but ‘championship game’ clearly means football…
If we think east coast bias is a problem now
can you imagine if the pac-xx teams only played themselves? the eastern sports programming network would forget we existed, which would have its pros and cons.
that's what i meant
i’m a fan of round robin play..
"Success is never final, Failure is never fatal. It's Courage that count's"
John Wooden.....
Speaking of basketball..
has anyone heard anything regarding ML’s recovery from the knee surgery? Or how Josh Smith’s summer/physical conditioning are coming along?
Zipper!
I don’t see how else the Pac 10 is going to make everybody happy. In the Zipper alignment of divisions each school would have an opportunity to play one each of California N and S schools within their own division every year. With the added likelihood of playing one of the other California schools on a regular basis.
Also, no reason we can’t hang on to our natural rivalries at the end of the season in the zipper plan.
The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden
The article about CBH's camp states
Howland is optimistic about the upcoming season, especially given the addition of twin brothers David and Travis Wear, who transferred to UCLA from North Carolina.
I sure hope it’s the sports editor of the paper (?) that published the article that’s unclear on when the Wears can actually play.
In the immortal words of the pin I got while an undergrad: Roses are red, violets are blue...f*** $C.
Mixed Feelings On Bowlsby
While I have to certainly agree w/Bowlsby’s take on keeping the California schools together, I’m wary of his track record, particularly from his days as AD at his previous employer, my alma mater (University of Iowa). He was not well-liked in Iowa City and his most infamous moment there was when he did not renew Tom Davis’ contract after the 1999 season so he could get his “golden boy” Steve Alford.
Los Angeles Rams and the UCLA Bruins!!!!!
by Minnesota Bruinfan on Jul 1, 2010 10:26 AM PDT reply actions
Scheduling Fix
I was thinking about football division splits this morning and came up with a real easy fix to the problem. Split into North-South divisions with Col-Utah in the south and Cal-Stanford in the north and stay with 9 conference games a year. Then in addition to playing every team in your own division each year, also play one of the regional pods from the other division every year. So the California schools would play every year, as would the Arizona-Oregon schools and the Washington-new schools. So for instance UCLA would play all the south teams, Cal and Stanford every year. Then the other two conference games would rotate between the other four northern division schools. This would keep the California rivalries intact and still guarantee every school in the conference at least one trip to California each year. I think this would satisfy most, if not all, of the major concerns regarding the divisional splits.
They would get a trip every other year
For the rotating 4 schools, seperate travel partners. Hence Oregon’s four year cycle for those two out of division games might look like:
Year 1: @ Colorado, UCLA
Year 2: Colorado, @ UCLA
Year 3: @Utah, USC
Year 4: Utah, @USC
They get a trip to SoCal every other year and a televised game in the LA market every year that they don’t travel down there.
I think it would be better
if they did not go two years without playing any oppenent so it would be
Year 1: @ Colorado, UCLA
Year 2: Utah, @ USC
Year 3: Colorado, @UCLA
Year 4: @Utah, USC
While they would be avoiding playing a game in Southern California two years in a row they would still be playing a game every year that would be televised in that market and would not be able to avoid a team for two consecutive years.
UGH
The zipper plan will destroy the conference if that happens…bs non geographic divisions will not work! acc can you hear me? I would much rather stick at 9 conference games and keep Cal/Stan than go to a zipper plan with 8 games. Interesting times…the 4 cali schools may have to put differences aside and stick together and stick it to the other schools on this one. They need us more than we need them frankly.

by 
























