Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ryder Hesjedal Wins Giro d'Italia

Spaulding Roundup: More Recruiting Momentum (And OL!) For UCLA Football & Notes On Expectations

Let's start the morning with more great news from the recruiting front. Give all our recent discussion on offensive line recruiting, it is only appropriate that yet another OL committed to Coach Rick Neuheisel yesterday. Per Brandon Huffman of Bruin Report Online, Jacob Brendal from Plano, Texas, who happens to be the sixth ranked center in the country committed to UCLA last night (HT uclaves).

Jacob becomes the 4th OL commitment and 6th overall commitment of UCLA's class of 2011, which CRN and his staff are clearly building with a focus on the trenches. Brendel will also become the 12th OL recruit from last three years (and Bruins might not be done this year yet). So, I think people can pretty much stop with the nonsense that CRN is still simply obsessed with recruiting skilled positions, like he might have been at his previous stops.

What I also like about our current crop of OL recruits is that they are all coming in with kind of body frames, that can be developed through methodical S&C regimens in college. The approach CRN and his staff have been using wrt to OL recruiting is different from the one Bob Toledo had in the late 90s, who simply was going after huge bodies out of high school, who didn't develop as many had hoped during their college careers. We will see how it all works out under CRN.

Brendel's offer list is pretty impressive including schools such as California and Stanford, which as demonstrated previously, have done a pretty solid job of developing OL in recent years. You can also take a look at some of his highlight clips via ESPN here. So welcome to Westwood Jacob. More football notes after the jump.

Star-divide

So let's go back to one of the popular discussion topics for this time of summer, which is the expectations for this coming season. Over here we have been talking for a while about how the reasonable range for UCLA football for this coming season is somewhere in the middle of 5-7 and 9-3 record. Yesterday stumbled into this nugget from Rival.com's Oli Buchanan, who had this to say while discussing possible "underrated teams in 2010":

It would come as no surprise here if UCLA, which is ranked 63rd, has a better showing than some may expect. The Bruins' quarterback and offensive line situations should improve and the defense, despite some significant losses from last season, still will be solid. No team anywhere will have better special teams. K Kai Forbath will give the Bruins an edge in any close game. UCLA has made gradual progress under coach Rick Neuheisel. Now, in his third season, the Bruins may make a run at eight or nine victories in 2010.

Shhhh. Don't share that too much Oli. Well obviously Oli is looking at the high end of our expectations range. We will see if that materializes as it also depends on the health of our big guys in the trenches and of course on Kevin Prince's decision to wear his mouthpiece.

While UCLA fans need to keep their expectations in the reasonable range, it is kind of amusing to see what some other fans around the conference are thinking about facing off UCLA this upcoming. From Andy Panda at Building The Dam:

The trip to the Rose Bowl will be another game that goes a lot like it did two years ago, with Rick Neuheisel's improved Bruins giving the Beavers all they can handle for a while. But as happened the week before against the other Bears, offensively challenged UCLA won't put enough points on the board, and OSU will head home with the win.

Right, it will be just like the game from two years ago with Kevin Craft calling the signals. Somehow last year's game, which UCLA would have won if not for a sure fired dropped pick-6 from ATV in the closing min. Anyway, let's hope Oregon State team is thinking the same way when they come down to the Rose Bowl. Speaking of woulda, coulda, shoulda, this is even more amusing observation from Washington's UW Dawg Pound, putting UCLA in the category of sure wins for the Huskies:

Rick Neuheisel pulled one out of his shorts when UCLA beat UW last season. The loss knocked UW out of bowl contention. A missed UW field goal and a late interception gave the Bruins the win. Washington was a better team last year and they are the better team this season.

Hmm. I seemed to remember a different game in which the UCLA offense was dominating a Husky defense, until Donald Butler took out Kevin Prince with one of the cheapest shots of last year's Pac-10 season. What I remember was after Prince went out, our defense did a pretty good job of throttling and pressuring Jake Locker, gutting out a solid win. It is kind of funny to see Husky fans proclaim UDub at the better team even after losing to us with our backup QB.

Heading into this year's game, I do think the Huskies are going to be the favorites given they are playing at home and will be lathered up with CRN hate on a Thursday night ESPN game (still don't think it was a smart idea for UCLA to agree to Thursday night dates for Eugene and Seattle in the same year). While the Huskies should have the upper hand with their Heisman contending QB (at least according to all the pre-season pubs),  I doubt our football team is going to be intimidated going into this matchup. We will see.

Anyway, don't mind fans from other schools thinking of UCLA this way heading into this season. I think it will work out well if the teams and fans from rest of the Pac-10 keep thinking of the Bruins this way. On our end, if we keep building on the progress from end of last season, and the steps we have taken this off-season, 2010 will shape up as a pretty decent year. Can't wait.

GO BRUINS.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Welcome Jacob

Im wondering how many more OL were going to take. Obvisouly we are going to have room for a big names such as Asiata or Hart but it seems as though if we get another OL commitment is going to be from a (dare i say) high ranking OL.
Yeah UDub definitley had the better QB in that game for sure. Our 3rd quarterback we put in the game was able to dig us out of a hole and make drives to secure the win for us. If Locker is really as good as advertised (heisman hype??) then he would have been able to lead his team down for a score in the closing seconds of that game, I guess playing 8th place team in the PAC10 was to big of a stage for him.
I like CRN taking these chances with thursday nighters against UW and UofO. Since he has been back at UCLA he has never backed down from a challenge and has done whatever it takes to put us in the spot light. If we are going to become an elite program again we are going to have to play well in those games and show the entire country how much bigger faster and stronger we are. I dont remember who said it but “you miss every shot you dont take.” So kudos to CRN’s boldness.

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on Jul 13, 2010 7:26 AM PDT reply actions  

Spot on

I think the chicken littles worried about us not getting our share of recruits can calm down now. Since his arrival, CRN has proven that he is a formidable power when it comes to recruiting. I’m loving the Big Uglies we are getting since games are won in the trenches. You mentioned it but CRN has brought in 9 OL recruits (excluding the CTS hybrid class) and depending on where Young plays, it could be 10. Therefore, I don’t think this stigma of him not paying attention to the OL is justified IMO.

LOL at all the other Pac 10 blogs putting us in the guaranteed W category. Whatever…..I’ll take our boys against theirs anytime and feel confident that we’ll come out with the W.

Another thing to note about that UDub game. It’ll be Senior Day for Locker and company so you can pretty much guarantee that it’ll be a zoo up in Seattle. I think it’s a little too much considering we already had the Oregon game and the ASU game after Thanksgiving on national tv. Maybe CRN knows something that we don’t know? Maybe he feels this team is ready to make some noise on the national level? We’ll see about that.

by BlueReign on Jul 13, 2010 8:20 AM PDT reply actions  

Speaking of those who were worried about our early recruiting

and clamoring for higher rated OL commits (mostly other sites), Marc Mustoe recently picked up an offer from Notre Dame.

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

The hype around Udub is interesting

Sarkasian won 5 games last season with Locker. Here are some questions to ponder:

How many games Willingham would have won the year before if he didn’t lose Locker in IIRC second game of the season?

How many games Sarkasian would have won in first year in Seattle w a 3rd string qb and one legged starting TB?

Just something to think about as poor ole UCLA goes into CRN’s 3rd season and UDub marches to the Rose Bowl running right through our Bruins. :)

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 8:34 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I hate to admit it

As much as i hate to admit it Sarkasian is a good coach. I do believe we will beat Washington, but winning in that stadium is always hard to do.

by ovillarr13 on Jul 13, 2010 8:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

What makes you admit that?

Sarkisian had one season with a Heisman-caliber QB and won 5 games. I’m not saying he’s not a good coach, but regardless there isn’t enough in his body of work to make that determination either way.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jul 13, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

How would have Washington been the year before if Locker did not get hurt, certianly better than they did. It is too early to say anything on Sarkisian.

by DCBruins on Jul 13, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

eight or nine

sounds great. It’s a tough schedule tho. I can see us beating Kansas St, Washington St, Oregon (they don’t have Masoli), Washington, and Arizona St. But all the other games are a toss up. Stanford is well coached. Houston has crazy Offense. Texas is Texas. Cal, Arizona and USC are always tough games.

by ovillarr13 on Jul 13, 2010 8:37 AM PDT reply actions  

USC is going to be a disaster by the time we get to em

I would put that one in our favor.

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on Jul 13, 2010 8:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

That could cut both ways

If they are a total disaster and we are looking like a bowl team, that game could be there “season.” Regardless they will likely treat our game like a bowl game because it will be there last of the season.

by DCBruins on Jul 13, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

let em book us as a "w" for them...

i’m sure they booked stanford as a guaranteed win last year, how’d that work out?
lookin’ good meng

Across The Face

by rb bruin on Jul 13, 2010 9:07 AM PDT reply actions  

I'll be saying this all season:

Our schedule is very tough.

We could have a good team and not have a great record.

We’re @ Oregon, @ Cal, @ Washington, @ Texas and for good measure we open @ Kansas State. That’s five pretty tough road games (we also play at ASU). To top it off, Nestor noted that two of those games are Thursday night game of the week types … very tough to win those in hostile territory.

I’m not conceding anything. We could win 9. But it will be very hard.

by Achilles on Jul 13, 2010 9:21 AM PDT reply actions  

My (optimistic) picks.

I have us going 2 of 3 in Non Conference games and 7 of 9 in conference games. That’s 9-3 if it plays out as I foresee it.

The best thing you can do for your children is to love their mother. John Wooden

by MexiBruin on Jul 13, 2010 11:05 AM PDT reply actions  

+1

I like your breakdown, hopefully we get there.

by Bruin'96 on Jul 13, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

LOL Well

Apparently every $uc football player must meet with compliance officials and provide documentation on their current housing, automobiles, and employment. Link

I wonder how many trogans will start biking to campus next week?

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 11:34 AM PDT reply actions  

Assuming

they know where the campus is…

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jul 13, 2010 11:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Jon Gold interview with Jacob Brendel

http://www.insidesocal.com/ucla/2010/07/brendel-opens-up.html

Gold isn’t kidding when he says the kid sounds extremely bright. Sounds like he could have the potential to be a solid leader in the future.

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

Not ideal

but if he was that candid with Gold, I’m sure there has been a much more comprehensive discussion of that nature with CRN. Doesn’t bother me too much.

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

we shouldnt confuse his commitment with him being commited to UCLA

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on Jul 13, 2010 12:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope

buy I like his apparent honesty and maturity though. Hopefully he bcomes committed to UCLA.

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 12:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

It sounds like he has a fail safe

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on Jul 13, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

but you are right

I guess sometimes you just prefer someone not to be so honest so that I feel all warm and fuzzy about our recent commitment from a great pipeline area. But then again honesty is never a bad thing and it sounds like he knows how to play the (recruiting) game, or that someone else has told him to snag a spot early so that in case his dream school doesnt come offering he will have somewhere worthwhile to go.

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on Jul 13, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Great attitude

and he’s very honest. If Northwestern opens up a spot for him, I wouldn’t be surprised if he goes there. And it shouldn’t be a surprise or an insult to any of us…he pretty much admits it. It’s his life and he has every right to make what he thinks would be the best decision for himself.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jul 13, 2010 12:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

As long as he doesn't switch

via an hour long, vitamin water sponsored television special on espn, there won’t be any hard feelings.

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think we are going to better, much better.

Yes, it is a tough schedule, but that’s UCLA, right?

I think we really have the horses at almost every position. There are some depth issues at the d-line, but we have the talent almost everywhere.

The only real question is do we have the rider, the QB, who can step up and be consistent and efficient. He should beep helped also by a better running game. It’s really a question of confidence, that intangible belief in yourself that calms you down to keep your focus clear and simple at a moment of crisis.

Hopefully Prince will have that this year.

As for the Thursday night games, they make sense since they are not well-travelled by our fans. But for me, who loves to go to these road games, it makes it much more difficult because you have to take the time off from work in addition to all the other costs.

Bottom line to me is that CRN is trying to raise our profile dramatically. Two nationally televised games on ESPN against two tough teams is the price you have to pay. How else are our p,ayers going to learn to rise to the occasion on the biggest stages of college football?

if you want to be the best you have to challenge yourself. CRN is doing that. Our program will be the better for it.

GO BRUINS!

by uclahy on Jul 13, 2010 12:13 PM PDT reply actions  

You are being a little delusional

We have the potential to have horses at almost every position. The key word is potential and it’s not clear if we are deep. We have to see how we hold out at DL. We have discussed that at length. The improvements at OL and QB have been incremental and we have to see what kind of steps we take this year.

So it’s overly simplistic (message boardy rhetoric) to just outright declare we have horses at almost every position.

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think its a "team" decision on the part of UCLA

which includes discussion between DG and CRN. I am guessing if CRN doesn’t want something, it wouldn’t be on our schedule.

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right

I am sure the network comes with the $$ proposals. Then our guys mull over it. In this case, I really wish we vetoed the Thursday night offer re. UDub but whatever at this point. Doesn’t matter much.

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

It matters a bit

If CRN has control over the schedule (albeit certianly not total) then he better be ready for UDub on a Thursday night. Literally better than anyone at UCLA, he had to know what this game would be like and how he could be an issue. He has 12 days to prepare (as does UDub) so I think he should be in a position to win it.

If he had no choice or objected, that is different case. So I think it does matter and I think CRN better be ready for it.

by DCBruins on Jul 13, 2010 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I meant

It doesn’t matter at this point in the sense that this game is already scheduled. Every game matters on our schedule. Not just this one.

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 1:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would not ever expect ...

RN to pass up a chance to showcase the program on national television.

I honestly believe that the financial considerations and the opportunity to play on national television (the Thursday night spot might be the only time all week that there are no other games on … maybe the Saturday night ABC game has no competition, I’m not sure?) and show off the program.

I think strategic competitive reasons would be outranked by the money and the exposure. It would be different if they were non-conference games. In other words, if K-State cancelled our game, we might choose not to play Alabama or Florida instead — because we already travel to Texas and who needs road games against two top five teams. But the trips to Oregon and Washington are unavoidable and playing in Eugene or Seattle on a Saturday is still a rough trip, so it’s not like the schedule is that much more difficult because we’re playing on Thursday. I mean, it’s worth noting as Nestor did, but it’s not totally different than playing them on Saturday.

In any case, I’m sure RN’s attitude is that we’ll win and the whole country will see it. The only thing that scares me is a blowout on either trip as you don’t want the whole country seeing that. But I don’t think we’ll be blown out regardless of who wins.

by Achilles on Jul 13, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think there is a difference

In playing a Saturday afternoon game in Seattle v. Thursday evening, nationally televised game on ESPN. If UCLA was already a top-5 program with proven record of showing mettle on the road, then I’d be for it. However, in this case we still have a rebuilding program and I would have opted for the safe route.

Ben Howland did a masterful job of scheduling in his early years for giving a young team confidence. I wish football was thinking the same way during the formative years of program building under CRN.

I hope this is not an ugly night. I think the Bruins are going to give these guys a battle but there are reasons to be concerned given our history on the road in these kinds of games.

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't really disagree with you ...

maybe only be degree of difficulty, as I noted. We’ve both seen games in Seattle, it’s a death trap on Saturday afternoons. I agree that the hype of Thursday night turns the volume up to 11, but Husky Stadium is deafening and rowdy no matter when you play there. Autzen, if anything, is tougher to visit.

But I would not expect RN to look at it that way. I would expect him to want to play on national television (with my prior caveat the exception).

by Achilles on Jul 13, 2010 2:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Right now I have both of these games as losses for us

I will be extremely (and pleasantly) surprised if actually win one of those two. It will be a miracle if Bruins actually win both.

by Nestor on Jul 13, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thursday night question

N-

Do you know off hand if any of our Thurs night opponents face us after a bye week? If so, it will make it 10x more difficult to pull off a win in t hat situation

by Bald Eagle on Jul 13, 2010 2:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

That helps us more than them ...

because we won’t lose a prep day by traveling midweek. We will have all the prep time we need with the week off.

They weren’t traveling either way.

by Achilles on Jul 13, 2010 3:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I sort of contradicted myself ...

I said I would never expect RN to pass up a showcase, then said we might pass up Alabama if we were already playing Texas.

I didn’t mean that to be confusing. But let me say this instead:

I would never expect RN to pass up a national television showcase except under extraordinary circumstances like playing Alabama and Texas in the same season or something like that.

by Achilles on Jul 13, 2010 1:58 PM PDT up reply actions  

It makes sense

You need some games, especially early and with a young team, to find yourself. If every game is tough in the non-conference. . . that may be too much to ask of a young team

by DCBruins on Jul 13, 2010 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

You make a good point

Udub is different though (as CO will be) for CRN on a personal level. It worries me because ESPN will likely try to make it about CRN v. UDUB instead of UCLA v. UW. It is like giving fuel to fire.

Also, I think the best recruiting for CRN on the road is to win right now. At home, sure go for the money. But on the road if HE has the choice, then I think he should play it a bit safer.

by DCBruins on Jul 13, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

As long

as they don’t ignore the fact that CRN’s checkbook won that battle that won’t annoy me too much.

With no game the week before, do any of you really think our odds of winning are significantly lower on Thurs. than Saturday? As said above, we have to play there anyway and to shy away from the national exposure would be a mistake imo. To refuse the nationally televised game because we’re afraid of getting blown out on the road doesn’t make sense. We’re not playing a national title contender, we have every reason to believe we’ll be in that game. Also, idk how likely getting one of these national tv thursday games is for us @ home…I don’t think Pasadena will like that.

by Chris09 on Jul 13, 2010 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Emotions

Play a role in college football. Coaches need to know how to work those both ways. I know that is obvious but ESPN coming to an “only game in town” night dials it up to 11.

Obviously, this is not as big a factor as Locker or Prince being hurt would be, but it could be a factor.

I think this adds the pressure and the need for CRN to win this game (assuming he had some reasonable say in the choice.) With 12 days off as well, in the abstract (which this early it really is the abstract), he needs to win this game. On the flip side, as Nestor mentioned, if we don’t play well (again this is early so if we are on our 4th string QB or some such this is irrelevant) then he compounded the problem.

I understand that we have a tough schedule but we have had some early breaks which make it easier. $UC is imploding and Lame is not a good enough coach to deal with it (based on Oakland) and OR lost its best player. I really think this is a good year for any PAC 10 team other than WSU (who are hopeless) to get hot and exceed expectations.

Not fair to say CRN has to be the coach or UCLA has to be the team to exceed expectations, just saying there are some opportunities this year as well that aren’t there as much when $UC is running a pro program and OR is overlooking felons.

by DCBruins on Jul 13, 2010 2:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

How much do you want to bet

that Cheatey Petey will be at that game? Just another chance for ESPN to brown nose him and help him whine a little more.

As far as I’m concerned, we had nothing to lose by scheduling that Thursday game with Udub. However, I have a feeling that if the U$C* sanctions had come before that game was scheduled, CRN might not have gone for it. Call it a hunch.

But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.

by tasser10 on Jul 14, 2010 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yup

The game will be all about anointing Sark as the heir for Pom Pom.

by Nestor on Jul 14, 2010 10:25 AM PDT up reply actions  

PLaying on thursday and playing on saturday are the same difference

Its still football, they will still have the same talent on the field. Yeah UW will be amped to play this, but dont forget UCLA will be as well. And after the opening series, all that extra motivation goes out the window and it is just another football huge football game in the PAC 10 for both teams.

A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil

by MaltBaa on Jul 13, 2010 2:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

OL is key

Two years ago our O line was swiss cheese. Last year, they were adequate and improving. I personally believe that our offensive struggles were primarily the result of limited options and no running game because of the offensive line limitations. It looks like this is turning around, and bodes well for the future.

by 75NatChamps on Jul 13, 2010 2:45 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB