New York Times: "Sanctions Will Take A Toll" On The Trogans
The New York times on how the "NCAA sanctions will take a toll" on the Trogans:
“You can trade the bottom 20 guys or 25 guys on your roster for a great quarterback,” Kiffin said. “It’s more important.”
Kiffin may come to regret that remark because his depleted roster may be his biggest obstacle. It fell to 70 scholarship players Wednesday when the university gave a full release to the junior college linebacker Glen Stanley. Four reserves and two signees have bolted the program.
U.S.C. was already 15 scholarships short of the N.C.A.A. maximum of 85 before the reduction of 30 scholarships began. Kiffin said U.S.C. will be unable to exceed 75 scholarships in the next three years.
Kiffin said that U.S.C. had brought in just three offensive linemen in its past two recruiting classes. Eight to 10 would have been ideal, and he is feeling the numbers crunch.
“The margin for error is very, very small for me,” Kiffin said. “If we’re going to sign classes of 15 guys and other people are signing 25, the last thing we can do is sign three guys who don’t make it academically or two guys who end up getting kicked out of school.”
There are other signs that Kiffin’s tenure at U.S.C. could be more of a blip than a reign. He said Tuesday that the Trojans’ new athletic director, Pat Haden, has not mentioned anything about extending his contract to help him survive the sanctions. That is a common practice when a coach has to deal with the sins of a previous regime. [...]
U.S.C. still has tradition, a fertile recruiting base and plenty of recent success on its side. But as Kiffin’s first Trojans training camp starts next week, the long-term prognosis is not good as he stares at an emaciated roster and impending sanctions.
Read rest of it here.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Edited your post
Thanks for wanting to share this but please note do not cut and paste entire articles. It’s a bannable offense. We take it seriously for copy right issues. if you want to share this piece provide a link and you can chose to excerpt the parts you like (6-9 grafs).
But do not cut and paste entire articles (we make that very clear in our rules and have mentioned it repeatedly on BN). Note how your post was edited and please share articles that way in future. Thanks again for bringing this article to our attention.
"Rips" seems a bit strong
The article seems pretty neutral and even handed on describing the NCAA sanctions and possible effect.
Now if there was a line like “The evil empire of U$C deserves every punishment that the NCAA threw at them.” then I would agree with you.
This article does a good job...
pointing out the double edge sword USC is facing. The scholarship reductions will have a definitie effect, but so will the fact that they will have to compete without cheating for the foreseeable future. Well, at least not getting caught cheating!
sins of the previous regime?
Kiffin is the previous regime whose sins he inherited. Reaping what he sowed, no one should feel any pity.
It's not a good enough reason
Just because he was there during the Cheatey years doesn’t mean he did wrong. After all, CNC was there too. But Lame has baggage. It’s Lame’s character that sullies his innocence. He’s got no morals.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
by tasser10 on Aug 1, 2010 9:33 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Right Off The Bat, Lame
You don’t “trade” players in college football—that has to wait until they’re pros…you know, playing for pay legitimately…
(Oh, never mind, you clearly have never clued into that distinction, anyway.)
Also, when have any scholarship football players ever been “kicked out” of your school? (Seriously, has that actually happened?)
Love My Bruins

by 


















