The Pistol Offense and You (CLA)
Bumped. GO BRUINS. -N
Hey everyone, I have been working on this idea for a while, and here is my guide to the Pistol Offense ("revolver formation) at UCLA:

Credit: Fat Chucky Eats Again
The basis of the Pistol Offense has been covered plenty of times, but here is a few main bullet points for its structure:
- The Quarterback lines up 3 yards behind the center
- The Running-Back lines up 3-4 yards behind the Quarterback
What is the main benefit of running the Pistol Offense?
- The Offense retains the basis of the Pro offense, but adds the Quarterback to the running game
In numerical terms, a Pro, or I-formation offense has 10 players on the field on running plays (The quarterback turns his back to the plays and hands the ball off), but a pistol offense has 11 players (The Quarterback only has to rotate to his side on some plays, therefore making him a viable option to run the ball).
Some key plays... after the jump
(Videos courtesy of Chris from SmartFootball.com, and various users from YouTube)
1. Read Option
Everyone knows how Oregon runs the ball; deceptively, smoothly, and effectively. In the Pistol Offense, that deception and quickness can work between the tackles. Check out Nevada's read offense in these videos.
As you can see, this play leaves one man unblocked, hence the "read." If the defender goes upfield, the quarterback hands the ball off to the running back. If the defender tries to cut off the running back and runs down the line, the quarterback keeps the ball.
Some more "complex" or "new age" forms of the read option allows UCLA to use their newly found speed and athleticism in the open field, as shown by these cut-ups. The concept of the triple option in the spread option is one in many forms, but the bubble screen option is something that is starting to make strides in College Football today (it has been covered here before if you want to check out that article).
The triple option with a bubble screen uses the concept of a defensive end read, then the Quarterback will read the defensive back covering his weak side receiver: if the DB flows towards the QB, the QB will throw the ball to the "bubbling" receiver, if the DB stays at home, the QB cuts it upfield.
While this play is not shown in the pistol in this video, the concept is the same.
2. Play Action
The next benefit of running a pistol offense is that a play action play takes less time, and stays loyal to the typical Play Action flow. Check out Nevada running the bootleg pass. On the second play, Kaepernick keeps the ball off of the bootleg.
Keep in mind, the running game can also reflect the typical Pro Style, Off-Tackle/Stretch Running play, as shown in the video below.
As you can see, the bootleg pass is going to be a huge part of UCLA's passing game this year.
A couple of thoughts:
In a typical Pistol offense, the Quarterback and Running-Back are about equal in terms of carries and yards. In other words, having an effective balance between the traditional off-tackle running plays, and read option plays will make this offense really click. If one element is removed (for example the quarterback running game in the scrimmages), the entire offense is effected.
On a less aggressive note, UCLA isn't "changing," or "moving" to a new offense. UCLA is adapting their offense to fit the talent and personnel for the 2010-11 season. As Coach Neuheisel has said before, the offense is just a new formation, all the plays will be the same.
This subtle change should help the offense loads right off the bat, and as the offense starts to "click" within the new formation, UCLA should start making major strides Offensively, both in statistics and in the Win Column.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
25 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The way I see it
A revolver only gets 6 or 8 good plays per drive. A pistol is good for more… If you get my drift
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 26, 2010 4:42 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I hoping for the Neuzi
a much more rapid fire weapon capable of decimating opponents in a minimum of time
by britishbruin on Aug 26, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions
one question
Where’s the F-back? and re: Nestor’s request to call it the Revolver can we call them Bullet-backs?
The F-back can be damn near anywhere.
It replaces either the slot WR or TE in the above diagram and can be utilized as a TE, WR or RB. This means the F: can line up in a 2-tight set and be a pass threat TE (mismatch against LB); can line up in a 4-wide set (mismatch against DB); can line up as the slot or TE in a reg. 3-wide set (pain in the @$$ for whoever has them); can line up in the backfield as a RB; or can line up as a TE (or WR) and go in motion into a RB or lead blocker role. Basically, these guys are studs and should be able to do damn near anything they are asked to do.
I doubt that we’ll run the same read-option oriented offense that the pistol is known for. I really believe CRN and CNC will implement more of a zone stretch, play action scheme. And yet, somehow I foresee an double tight F-motion triple option bootleg pass with RB threatening the dive, the F threatening the outside run or swing pass, and the QB threatening the off-tackle or quick over the center strike to a cross route Fauria over a biting LB. That would be a sight!
Lets hope
our QB’s can stay healthy in this running offense. Is that a stretch ?
by LouisianaBruins on Aug 26, 2010 2:54 PM PDT reply actions
I see it like this
It’s a lot safer to run for yards than for your life.
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 26, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions
My first question was whether we had a QB who could run like that.
Then I scratched that – our coaches know what our guys can do, and it seems pretty unlikely that they would put in an offense if our QBs were not also good runners. Now, can our QB run this formation with his mouthpiece in?
Perhaps
The biggest question mark going into week 1
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 26, 2010 4:35 PM PDT up reply actions
Check out Richard Brehaut's runs here:
youtube highlights… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjvyHmhNKEQ&feature=related
Good runs by Brehaut at these times in the video:
1:08
2:05
2:50
3:39
4:50
And he was doing it out of their ‘pistol’ type offense with reads and options
Easy money and faithless women, red-eye whiskey for the pain...
Good find
He’s definitely got the talent to step up and make a difference in both parts of the offense. Hopefully he can shake off those technical jitters he had last time he was on the field.
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 26, 2010 6:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Brilliant post
Thanks so much for that 03rdn9, it’s a great explanation of the whole thing, and finding the videos to embed helps my understanding enormously too. Fair play to you for the effort!
Same here
Just excellent analysis, with video examples so even us couch potatoes can understand. Thanks, 03rdn9.
My memory fails. You (03rdn9) once told us what your handle means, but I forget. Is it third and nine from a particular game? The Barnes-to-JJ game?
Yes and no
I’d rather it remain a mystery… just take note at how many times UCLA goes into 3rd and 9 situations… I call it the Terry Donahue story: “Sure, we’re getting somewhere, we just aren’t getting anywhere,”
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 27, 2010 11:11 AM PDT up reply actions
Ouch!
With the number of injuries our quarterbacks have experienced over the last few years, its understandable why we have five of them on the roster. With the exception of Darius Bell and perhaps Posthuma (an invited freshman walk-on) we have recruited drop back passers not duel threat quarterbacks and as Kevin Prince found out last year if you don’t slide it hurts.
I here’s hoping we practiced the sliding drill a lot this Spring and Fall.
That’s debatable
Both Brehaut and Prince ran offenses in High School that required plenty of playmaking with the QB’s feet, and UCLA’s top QB prospect (Brett Hundley) is nothing but a scrambling QB, so I don’t know what you are talking about there.
But I do agree that sliding is something that needs to be worked on… but then again, Prince is looking more and more like Tebow
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 28, 2010 9:00 PM PDT up reply actions
I disagree about Hundley.
He can run – for sure – but all the video’s I’ve seen show a strong and accurate arm. Don’t get me wrong, the kid is far from developed, but he has a crap load of potential and will be able to thrive in a pro-style offense. The proof is in the two schools in his final list: UCLA (CNC) and WAS (Sark). Both expect their QB to take a snap from center and drop back to throw (though they appreciate a QB who can run when things break down).
Veer
IMO the best series you get out of the pistol is the veer, as the TB is lined up very close to the QB and he has an extra second to option the defender since he is lined up in a short shotgun. Those first videos of “read option” actually appear to be the Nevada veer series. Advantage of the veer over the zone read is that it is not dependent on zone blocking frontside for it to work and it hits straight north-south. Maurice Drew was a great veer dive back in HS at De La Salle – if only he were still around to take the veer dive out of the pistol.
Zone/Veer
The first two videos are zone read, the final video is a veer play, from my perspective. Sorry didn’t go through to check.
It would be interesting to see the Pony Formation integrated to that typical triple option veer look. It won’t develop nearly as quickly as De La Salle’s does, but an interesting prospect IMO
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 29, 2010 4:00 PM PDT up reply actions
btw
That midline play is amazing with a fast 3 back like MJD
Formerly ucla13_usc9
by Josh Schlichter on Aug 29, 2010 4:02 PM PDT up reply actions

by 























