Sunday Thoughts: Bullough/Palcic's Moments, Chow/Neuheisel's Adaptation & Other Macro/Micro UCLA Notes
Let's this post with a bit of a sober note. If you have visions of 10/9/8 win regular season dancing through your heads STOP. Stop right now and exit BN. We don't want to see the kind of knee jerk nonsense we saw flooding various UCLA online communities (including the comment threads of BN) right after the loss against Stanford after experiencing the opposite end of the spectrum yesterday afternoon in Texas.
This is why I have to kind of roll my eyes at all the articles and posts about Rick Neuheisel getting a "signature win" in Austin. I think it would be smart for all UCLA alums, students and season ticket holders to make sure we do our best to maintain our perspective, stay even keeled as we ride through rest of the season hoping Rick Neuheisel will methodically build on the significant improvement from last season (which looks even more tangible give how impressive Temple has looked in the early going this season).
I think I will start with expanding on the points made last night concerning Rick Neuheisel's words as the head coach of UCLA. I have no idea whether yesterday's victory is going to stand out as a "signature win" (even though it was UCLA's first road victory over a top-10 team since the 1998 season when Cade and co beat Arizona in Tucson). However, what we can certainly discern is the unquestioned leadership of CRN:
First of all, you must credit Rick Neuheisel, no matter how much that pains his myriad critics. He could have lost his team, but instead he refocused the Bruins. The only explanation for that is leadership. The Bruins were picked to finish eighth in the Pac-10, but demonstrating clear physical superiority on the road against Texas -- it wasn't the turnovers that did in the Longhorns; it was the Bruins -- suggests that any conference team that takes them lightly might be in trouble.
So naturally it was CRN, who was quick to put cold water on anyone getting deluded with unrealistic expectations for rest of this season:
Could this year's UCLA-Texas game eventually propel the Bruins into the national scene? And what about Neuheisel? Could this be the springboard he needs to finally make good on his 2008 hiring promise that the football monopoly in Los Angeles is over?
"Time will tell," Neuheisel said. "I've been here before. You don't have to look very far into my resume to know that I'm the ugly duckling. But you keep believing good things will happen and if you work hard enough, they do."
That was Peter Yoon from ESPNLA talking about "signature win" although he slipped in misinformation and myth about CRN concocting that infamous "monopoly ad" in his first season as the UCLA head coach.
I still have no freaking clue where the Bruins will end up. In my ballot that I just submitted for our Pac-10 power poll, I voted UCLA as the 7th best conference team at this snap shot of time because I am still not sure whether we have what it takes to put together a consistent effort as an inexperienced team, and win tough games in Berkeley, Eugene, Seattle and Temple. I hope our players continue to play with that chip on their shoulders and prove skeptics like yours truly wrong. More on those guys and their coaches after the jump.
Chuck Bullough's Defense
Speaking of proving skeptics wrong that is what defensive coordinator Chuck Bullough has done for two straight weeks. His defense is now somewhat on fire. They got started early when sophomore FS Dalton Hilliard laid down a crushing hit early in the first quarter. It wasn't just Dalton laying the wood all over the field. Tony Dye continued his All Pac-10 level play yesterday by destroying Texas Longhorns at DKR.
Then we had Sheldon Price, who has clearly taken multiple steps forward in his sophomore season. Price perhaps had one of the best days a Bruin CB has had in recent years in terms of shutting down his guy and just absolutely locking down his ma with one fierce tackle after another. He had at least couple of huge stops on 3rd and short situations. The development this young man has gone through in last two years is nothing short of remarkable and a testament to our S&C coaches, our DB coach and Bullough.
IMO the play of Bruin defensive backs last two weeks has been a big factor in allowing Bullough to get aggressive with his blitzing schemes. And boy he is getting liberal in bringing the heat. He unleashed younguns like Cassiush Marsh and Keenan Graham on the Texas OL, making them look totally hapless. Speaking of hapless, I think it's the ultimate statement of respect when the Longhorns ended up having to double team Akeem Ayers. Think about that for a minute. A LB was getting double teamed by an offense with a compilation of some of the best talents in America.
As for Akeem, my suggestion for everyone right now is just to sit back and enjoy him for next 8-9 game. He is gone. I just don't see how UCLA coaches can put together a good argument for him to stay if he keeps playing at the level he is operating at right now. At this point Akeem is probably a top-15/20 pick and positioned to be (fingers crossed) next impact player at the NFL representing UCLA. So let's enjoy him like we did Brian Price last season. UCLA will never replace someone like Ayers, but as a team we are only going to get better as players get even more accustomed to this scheme and talent level keeps going up in Westwood.
Palcic's Savage Line
What else there is to say at this point. While Chuck Bullough gets the game ball on defense, Bob Palcic gets it on offense now proving why he is one of the best in the entire game. Let's think about this for a minute. UCLA rushed for 193 yards on 32 carries in the second half vs. Texas, gaining over six yards per attempt. That is not just getting it done. That is utter domination of one of the best rushing defenses from last two years. And Palcic is doing it with a group of guys - "the Filthy Five" - who as has been widely discussed in recent months have gone through a lot of adversity as a unit.
If you watch our line, it is mindboggling to see how kids like Sean Sheller and Darius Savage are pushing around the Dline in the trenches. Just think about where those guys were in recent years demoralized and recovering from injuries. It is also clear the zone blocking scheme in the revolver formation has really enabled these guys to gel together as a unit and optimize their ability as a group. I never thought I see the day a UCLA offense would ram it down a Texas defense by running the ball 22 straight times. That is simply surreal. That brings me to the next point.
The Adaption of Norm Chow and Rick Neuheisel
Coaches tend to be stubborn guys. It specially happens for guys like Chow and Neuheisel who have been so successful in developing quarterbacks and explosive offenses during their previous experiences at all levels of football. However, like any other profession, in football the coaches who tend to get an advantage of their peers, are the ones who are always look to adapt and find ways to innovate around the base templates of their philosophies. This is why it is nothing short of fascinating to see how Neuheisel and Chow have gone about in adopting the revolver formation based on Chris Ault's pistol offense in Nevada.
It's usually the CEOs who are always looking ways to innovate and making sure they are adapting to the changing times, maintain their products' brand and then build on it. What is happening in Westwood with Chow and Neuheisel is a little bit of that. We talked about UCLA needing to develop an "identity" following the Stanford game debacle and it appears that is what these two have done.
We now have had two games in a row against top-25 teams (BTW absolutely annoying when our fans yell "over-rated" at vanquished opponents ... just save that for the Trogans please) where our offense rushed the ball more than 50 times. Yesterday we had more points (34) than passing yards (27). That is absolutely mindboggling involving two of the premier coaches who had championed the WCO/pro-set offense at the college level. Yet here we are looking at a Bruin football team, which is basically operating a power running offense. From Bruce Feldman on ESPN:
The really shocking part: the Bruins got this win by throwing for only 26 yards and 12 in the game's first three quarters. During one stretch of the game, the Bruins had 22 consecutive running plays. Twenty-two in a row?!? This is, after all, the offense piloted by the game's grand QB guru Norm Chow, the same guy who has produced six first-round QBs and three Heisman winners. It is truly stunning in this business of system guys to grasp the transformation that has taken place with Chow's offense this year. This is like Joe Paterno showing up on game day wearing gators or Jim Tressel wearing his sweater vest on the sidelines -- without a shirt underneath.
I am kind of liking it the same way when Ben Howland brought in his defense-first mindset in Westwood. Now, I don't think the coaches are giving up on the passing game. Not at all. Before the Texas game, I thought if we were to have a prayer Prince needed to pass for more than 200 yards. Well it turns out that UCLA coaches were not focusing on numbers but more on efficiency. Prince did complete 5 of his 8 attempts. What was interesting that few of his attempts came in fourth quarter when the defense loosened up and he was able to get easy completions to Nelson Rosario for crucial clock eating third down conversions. I think as defense keys more on our running game and the DBs get preoccupied with our backs, it will open up more opportunities for Prince and allow us to have an efficient passing attack. In other words, Cho w and Neuheisel might be looking at building out our passing game by leveraging the strength of our running attack.
The Three Monsters?
Too early for any kind of title. However, it was beautiful to see both JetSki and Derrick Coleman respond to their own set of adversities. JetSki responded to that early fumble with a brilliant afternoon. While Coleman basically shut up all his critics by proving why the coaches have so much confidence in him and that he is more than just a blocking back. What I also really liked about Coleman yesterday was that he was running with a little violence and he was also constantly driving his legs to keep the pile moving and fall forward. That is not something we had seen from Coleman in his first couple of years in Westwood. Malcolm Jones' appearance was brief but it was productive during second half. Can't wait to see how they perform next weekend at the Rose Bowl.
Special teams
The special teams had a huge day. Josh Smith made his impact felt in his huge kickoff return in the second half. I thought Taylor Embree was solid in punt return, securing the ball, and also making good decisions in knowing when to get out of the way when ball was heading into the end zone.
What else can you say about our kicking game? Okay so Kai was slightly human but he connected on other big ones. Jeff Locke was booming them all afternoon including the game setter that pinned the Longhorns deep, allowing Sean Westgate to deliver that bone jarring hit. Beautiful stuff.
Other notes
- It's been fanshotted already. Prince "pulling rank" on our trainers was his Cade puking moment. It's cool that it already came in his second season as our starting QB.
- Still ROFL at all the concern trolling about Prince not being mobile and not being able to run this revolver formation
- Cory Harkey is a damn good blocker but man I wish he catch the easy ones on those third down conversions. Comeon Cory!!!
- If you haven't done it yet, familiarize with the "legend of Rabbit's foot"!
Lastly, just want to end with a note on our students and younger alums. Wrote on Friday on the eve of the game, how I thought it'd be incredible for students and our newer alums who have experienced nothing short of a dark decade (with just some sputtering moments of Bruin greatness). It felt really good to see these images from Westwood. I really really hope what we experienced collectively as a community here on BN, out in Texas, all over the country, and in Westwood, is continuation of the steady improvement we have seen since CRN came to Westwood.
I don't think it will be a surprise if we have to endure more difficult moments in the coming year given how many challenging road trips are left on our docket. What I hope is our coaches and players continue to bust their rear ends in practices, get all the support they can from the Bruin Nation, and make us proud us both on and off the field. We are going to get there ... eventually. It's still a journey. Hope we all stick together through this.
GO BRUINS.
46 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Post
This will definitely be the defining sports moment in my 4 years at UCLA, which was made all the sweeter by the fact that I was there to witness it. Now all that is left is to beat $c, because I’ll be damned if I go winless against them as an undergrad.
No man
The goal is to have a winning record in our conference and a W in that last reg season game. That’s what we are shooting for this season.
My personal list
I guess I should clarify. You’re right, simply beating $C is not a program expectation, just a personal one of mine. The focus is on improvement in the conference race, no matter who the opponent. I just want to be able to look back and remember handing it to those jokers at least once.
Agree
Beating $c is not the only thing left. I think if we continue to work hard and build off of what we did yesterday, the last game of the reg season will take care of itself. We need to focus on the tough road ahead in the pac. If we build off the Texas win we should be a pretty happy bruin family at season end.
by UCLAbruins4life on Sep 26, 2010 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions
We came. We saw. We...
I saw passion in their eyes and fire in their bellies.
I saw “We Won Already” from the first series.
It cannot be coached. It must be owned inside. I saw a team chasing people even when the game was won.
I saw denial of 4th D conversions over and over that exploded off the ball. No you will not.
I saw class after the last fumble when CRN took a knee rather than run up the score.
I saw a new era begin in Westwood on a fiery day in Austin.
It is not the beginning of the end, but it is the end of the beginning…W. Churchhill.
The turf was not real, but the NEW Bruins were.
That Maya quote is extra stupid
When you consider WTF would a trogan fan know about using personnel? Their entire recent run has been fueled by paying players and thus recruiting better than everyone else, which their coaching staff can then Herp and Derp and throw any kind of plays out there because they have mismatches at virtually every position.
Maybe if they employed some sort of strategy rather than the undisciplined crap they trotted out there on a weekly basis for years, they wouldn’t have underachieved and have more to show than one soon-to-be-stripped title to show for it.
There's a picture up on the official site now
of CRN looking pretty animated in the locker room. I hope that they’ll have video of whatever he said to the team after the game yesterday like they did after the Tennessee win last year.
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Sep 26, 2010 2:47 PM PDT reply actions
CRN in locker room
This video doesn’t include what he said, but here is Neu and the boys in the locker room.
by truebluebruin on Sep 26, 2010 4:36 PM PDT up reply actions
Signature Win?
Great post, Nestor. I’m 100% with you – it IS too early to call this a signature win. We really do need to see how the rest of the season plays out. That said, it does have the makings of a signature win. This was not some squeak-it-out, gutty-little-Bruins type of upset. This was a dominating performance where our guys over-powered one of the top programs in the country over the past decade. I’m definitely expecting some more bumps in the road this season, but it’s hard not to think positive right now!
Nestor
Whats your prediction on our win total based on what we’ve seen so far?
Personally
I just think this gives us a chance at the 5-7 win season that the BN frontpagers were expecting & that most rational fans where hoping for….
I know it really doen't matter right now...but
How is it that UCLA is still not ranked after wins against two back to back ranked teams…..In fact Houston is technially ranked higher than UCLA…..Makes no sence what so ever!!!!!
I'm OK
with not being ranked. Save that for the end of the season. What’s the Wooden quote about the difference between character and reputation?
Polls don’t matter. Look at Ohio State and Florida. They are good teams, but play only two away games all season of any consequence. The Buckeyes have EIGHT home games. How do you measure that against people who play real teams and agree to play a tough non-conference game on the road?
competitive greatness
speaking of Coach Wooden, in the UCLA versus Texas preview video on uclabruins.com , at 5:00 Prince references Coach Wooden’s pyramid and the concept of competitive greatness.
Great to hear a football guy quoting Coach; UCLA should offer a John Wooden history class and make it required for all athletes.
Great win, but after 4 games,we have 2 losses.
The polls really aren’t about who is actually the better team. If they were, there wouldn’t be any preseason polls, because how can you proclaim someone better than another team without having played a game? You also wouldn’t have a Florida team who is obviously not the team they were in recent years ranked ahead of Stanford. So just judging by the records and not the quality of the team or their opponents (it has already been discussed who just$c has played up to this point to rack up their 4 “impressive” victories), we have 2 losses while no one else in the top 25 has more than 1 (only 6 of them have 1 loss, the rest, none). But while this OOC sched was grueling, I think that we are the better for it, and will be more ready for our conference schedule, which is what the OOC is for in the first place.
formerly Westwood78
by PhoenixBruin on Sep 26, 2010 4:10 PM PDT up reply actions
Not the team they were in recent years
You might not have noticed, but Florida pretty much found their Tebow of the future on Saturday. They’re starting to pick up momentum – they’ll be plenty good by the end of the year, and I’d wager significantly better than Stanford.
Way to go Coleman.
First off, +1 on your comments about Harkey, Sheldon, & Coleman. Coleman proved a lot yesterday. I still think that JetSki is the man that gets it going, and Coleman is the change of pace, but how about that bruising running yesterday. I laughed off Jackrabbit4’s mention of his 20-25 carries of bruising running, but he continued to prove his worth yesterday.
formerly Westwood78
This was just as important for the PAC 10 conf nationally as it was for us
I have also read many comments about how UCLA should have no problem winning 9 or 10 games this season. What people who don’t follow our team and don’t follow our conference don’t realize is, we have several teams that are Texas’ caliber and better. I think Stanford already showed us this a couple weeks ago. This game helps others to see what kind of football is being played in our conference.
In addition to that, their weaknesses played right into our strengths, allowing us to shut down their passing game (the stats make it look like they were decent in this area, but we controlled them). And they couldn’t exploit our weaknesses with our run defense (or maybe we just got better) because their rushing attack isn’t strong.
All in all, it’ll be a tough pac 10 sched ahead, and all I’m hoping for is consistency. What happens after that is what happens.
formerly Westwood78
The Bruin DB's and LB's Put The Hits On
I’ll bet the Texas receivers are sore today. The Texas receivers developed alligator arms during the second half when running routs across the middle.
great post Nestor
Excitement we now have. Whether that translates to 9 wins can only be labeled a wish.
Just watched the game again. The single most important thing to me is your word Identity. We are going to play our game: run or die and solid defense. We Dominated Texas thoroughly.
Whether that is going to be good enough we will see over time. Hopefully we will improve in the passing game, eliminate penalties and imrpove.
It truly is amazing that CRN and CNC have adopted a foreign system and have built the team’s image around it. So yes they have exceeded expectations around that.
I could come to love the running game!
by Bruin Dad and Grad on Sep 26, 2010 5:07 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Aside from a great win,
UCLA needs to take away from this game that it was an overrated Texas team (definitely not even top 10). While it’s great to see the offensive run working, the pass still frightens me for its lack of demonstration. But this will make up for the loss in Kansas State.
2-2 was definitely something most Bruin fans were ready to settle for in the first 4 games..
Great post, Nestor
We need to maintain that perspective. yeah, it was a good win but like CRN said, there’s a lot of things to fix. Hopefully we’ll find a passing game that works in the game plan!
You have to be impressed
by how far the Bruins have come since the Stanford thing. I didn’t boo Neuheisel then because I have never booed any Bruin and I respect what every athlete goes through. But I did ask myself and my son if we could come back from such an experience. We have an answer. We just got through dominating a highly-ranked team on their home field. If they are truly 7th or merely 20th, or whatever they may be, they were beaten down. The heat and the crowd didn’t matter, because we had the greater strength and heart. Of course, N is certainly correct to point out how much remains to be done, but the turnaround has been remarkable. It is now foolish to doubt what these coaches and players can do. Of course, it’s only a four-game record, and, as a wise man once said, the future lies ahead. No one in this league, even Wazzu, is going to give us anything. But this team is growing.
How does the potential NFL lockout
affect Ayers’s decision to turn pro? I dont really know any of the details about the lockout or how it will affect college prospects, does anyone know anything about this?
Two tremendous wins against decent teams
It is a tribute to the coaches that they have made adjustments that have improved the team. After almost no pressure being brought to bear in the first two games, Coach Bullough has created pressure which made a great deal of difference. It may be that the the freshman were simply not ready to be as involved as they are now. The Revolver has been an extraordinarily effective running attack, the OL has been the most pleasant surprise, and Jetski has emerged as the star of the team, with Ayers and Patrick Larimore shining on the defensive side. I expect the passing game to improve as the season goes on. I think KP showed last year he can be an effective passer, and I look to the receiver corps to find a way to get open to give him easier angles and to stop dropping the ball. The OL has been great on the run, but they are not giving KP enough time to pass. Incredibly, we needed no passing game to beat Texas.
I think Stanford was simply the better team and we would lose to them 7-8 games out of ten. But Kansas St. was just an ordinary team. [However, they are 4-0, so they are certainly not a bad team. In fact, our two losses are to teams that are a combined 8-0.] I remain disappointed that we came out to start the season not ready to win, under circumstances where we are looking to improve to a level where the best recruits want to come here. I really think we could be 3-1 right now, and I wish we had given Stanford a challenge, win or lose, rather than simply looking inept.
So the glass is half full and half empty. The great news is that we have had two very good wins in a row, and we have an enjoyable season to look forward to, where we will have a chance to win each game. I expect up and downs with a young team, but they have shown resiliency and grit. This determination makes you proud to be a Bruin, the exact opposite feeling we had after the Stanford game. We may go 5-7 or 8-4 or any other combination, but we have a season to watch. Go Bruins.
TY for the one stop shop article which is spot on
First off, although I’m not completely sold yet, I owe CCB an apology. I’ve been calling for his head but he’s been dialing up the D the way I had hoped and envisioned. Maybe he was waiting for the new guys to get comfortable before he loosened the reigns. As long as he doesn’t clam up, I’d gladly eat my humble pie each and every week.
Next, I was dead wrong about Coleman. I don’t know what took him so long but as you noted, he is a violent runner now. DC definitely deserves the Thunder role to Jetski’s Lightning. I hope he realizes how tough it is for opponents to tackle him and continues to make them pay if they dare get in his way.
Some other thoughts:
-Coach Palcic is an OL God. What he has done with the Filthy Five is nothing short of remarkable. Major props to our OL who are proving the critics wrong.
-Dye is playing at an All Pac 10 level like you noted. He is as steady as they come and that 4th down stop was all him.
-For those people that were and continue to question Westgate, I think its time to shut it. The guy just makes plays. He isn’t the biggest or fastest but he’s always around the ball and that fumble he caused was HUGE.
-Graham is going to be special once his technique improves and he gains more experience.
-Sheldon took a lot of heat but like I said last year, he is going to be an All Pac 10 and 1st rounder when all is said and done. He didn’t have the luxury of a RS but we can all see the talent. Him and Hester are going to shut down a lot of WR’s and allow Bullough to get creative.
-Hope Bullough continues to use the Nickel if it means more of Hilliard. The guy can simply bring the wood.
-Our offense will to improve (specifically the passing game) as our guys get more familiar with the Revolver and as you noted, defenses overload against the run. I expect us to be a lot better offensively by the end of the season. Defense too. :D
Lets take care of business against Wazzu and not have a letdown. No looking ahead. 1 game at a time boys! GO BRUINS!
Re. Bullough
I still want to wait to see how he schemes against spread type of offenses in the Pac-10. I am really encouraged from last two games like you but holding my breath still for rest of the season.
I'm no football expert...
But it is slightly surprising how well KP now runs the pistol. I think what Maya is missing is that to be good at it you just don’t need to be Michael Vick. KP is not fast, but what he makes up for that he compensates for by selling the fakes so well. The LBs are frozen watching the ball each play, and each play he sells them the hand off, or sells them the run so well that they are all flatfooted before Jetski is off for 8 yards or KP is around the corner for 13. So KP is succeeding not by being a running QB. He is succeeding by freezing the LBs with the sell.
Powder to the People
Coleman gaining violence
Maybe that’s why he was put on the kick off team. Maybe he is in Ayers-replacement training.
Honestly though, why is he on the kick off team? OK, he made some tackles there, but how did that ever become an idea worth exploring?
Prince bolting off the trainers table was classic
I love that the cameras picked that up. Speaks volumes about the integrity and passion in these kids, and how they’ve bought what CRN is selling. If he continues to grow from here, that might end up being HIS signature moment…
for those few that feel compelled to take shots at Texas fans…. I have several friends who live in Austin and who live and breathe their Longhorns. In my experience, Texas fans are knowledgable, decent, smart football fans, and the ones I know had nothing but respect and congrats for the Bruins. Just saying…
Easy to see why people are calling for an 8-10 win season now
If this team is capable of going on the road and blowing out a top ten team with a great rush defense, who’s to say that they can’t do the same thing at Oregon or at Cal? And if this team is capable of blowing out a solid top 25 team at home, why can’t they beat Oregon State or SUC? Sure, that’s a dangerous and unrealistic mindset to have, but I can still see how they arrive at it. We do have to be cautious following this game, of course (who can forget the many lapses in concentration following big wins in 05, as well as the 06 Nut Bowl, the 08 BYU game, etc), but you can’t act like this win doesn’t change things. Prior to the game I had us penciled in for 5-6 wins and an outside shot at the postseason; now I’m thinking seven wins, eight if we’re lucky, and a halfway decent bowl game. That’s not too much to hope for, is it?
I say focus on beating Wash St. first.
Then gear up for one hell of a challenge against a Cal team in a stadium where we don’t often play to our potential. I think with 2-3 games left in the season we’ll have a good idea of where we stand regarding post-season (whether it’s 4 wins or 9 wins).
Sorry to be such a buzzkill, but we did play inspired AND the longhorns completely looked past us. They aren’t that bad of a team, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they beat both Oklahoma and Nebraska this year.
Really, assuming we don’t lay an egg against Wash St., the Cal game will tell us a ton about the mental growth of our young team. If we can win that game, against a team with a balanced offense with a star RB and a solid corp of receivers, then we’ll have basically seen every kind of offensive/defensive challenge that we’ll face this season.
Our guys need to stay sharp, and our leaders need to implore our team to rally together and realize that we haven’t really accomplished enough to relax and bask in any glory. I’m relieved that the Wash St. game is this weekend, because even if we have a let-down effect (which I’m afraid we will), there’s still a strong probability that we should win by a minimum of 10-20 points. In a way, I kind of hope we get challenged by the cougars so that we don’t go into the Cal game (who has a bye this week) with the same attitude that Rahim Moore described the Texas players as having before kickoff.
some other thoughts on tempering enthusiasm
In the last two games we have had better results on both sides of the ball than we had in the first two.
On the offensive side, I do believe we have made genuine improvements in the performance of KP, the implementation of the pistol running game, and the willingness of the coaches to play to our strengths. Put us up against K-State now and I’d be confident we would move the ball on them. The question moving forward for me is whether we can get our passing game going before our opponents start scouting the pistol better – we currently have something of an element of surprise, but will need to have a little more passing threat to keep teams honest.
On the defensive side: I wonder whether we are taking too much from the results. People who were calling for CCB’s head are now praising his amazing performance; but I think we overlook the relative quality of the OLs we’ve played this season. K-State and Stanford seem to have much better OLs than Houston and Texas. As one of the Texas-blog previews said ‘the Texas defense will be going against a serious run attack, something we haven’t seen on the field and can’t simulate in practice’ (my emphasis). Where Stanford tried to account for Akeem on every play, and generally did a good job, I just watched Texas let him run wild. One play stands out in my memory, Akeem lining up at left end, and just running by the Texas RT to get a sack. It didn’t strike me that this was some great schematic advantage CCB had dialed up, but a Texas offensive line that couldn’t generate a run game or protect the QB. I do think we have improved our tackling from earlier in the aseason, so at an individual level I think we are seeing the defense grow; but I’m not ready to say CCB has got it all figured out. I would also say that we have been pushed around by run-first teams and have done a good job on two pass-happy teams, so again, I am not willing to imagine we can shut down balanced or run-heavy teams until I actually see it happen.

by 





















