UCLA's utilization of the blitz. Overall, I'd say it was successful with a sack, a turnover, a QB...

UCLA's utilization of the blitz. Overall, I'd say it was successful with a sack, a turnover, a QB laid out and probably as many plays for little gain as went for decent/big gains.

over 1 year ago Scotucla03 4 comments 0 recs |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

For all the offensive improvement possible,

I will say that the tackling in this game was pretty darn good. In a sense, a worth while “trade-off” if such an option was ever available.

by UC.Clipper on Sep 28, 2010 8:48 AM PDT reply actions

In a couple of them

we went to man coverage and if the running back stayed in, the linebacker we assigned to cover him went in on a blitz, which I think was a good way of being conservative, but still creative. You’ll notice a few zone blitzes thrown in there too and even when we blitzed, it was usually five. Bullough was spot on in being conservative, as is the gameplan vs. Texas, while still being creative.

Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take

by Ryan Rosenblatt on Sep 28, 2010 9:35 AM PDT reply actions

+1

Best called game yet by Bullough. He outdid himself from last wweek. Need to give him the credit for the last couple weeks. He’s done what we’ve been waiting for.