Dirt from The Den: Stanford Edition!
As mentioned previously, The Den will be publishing the next version of the "Dirt" at the Stanford game. However, we need some help. Please post any "dirt" you have ever read of Stanford. There is no limit or censorship of this section, so please include all DUIs, arrests, Tiger Woods stories etc. Please also include sources so that we know the stories are credible. Thanks!
Deadline to get in the first edition: Wednesday, 9/8/10, 8 pm ET
over 1 year ago
bk bruin
26 comments
0 recs |
Comments
please see http://www.bruinsnation.com/2010/8/20/1634209/the-dirt-from-the-den-an for more information
GO BRUINS!!! CHEER LIKE CHAMPIONS!!!
I for one am glad the Den has hooked up with BN...
Can’t think of things to bash Stanford with though, besides their abominable tree and Tiger Woods, which you’ve already mentioned.
by bruinbunz on Sep 6, 2010 9:05 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
The Drunk Tree
The best line is from the second link: “I’m so f*****g burned out.”
www.rammerjammeryellowhammer.com/weblog/archives/2006/02/stanford_tree_m.html
Tyler Gaffney
falling down halfway to home plate in extras in the baseball game last spring comes to mind.
We're havin' too much fun today. We ain't thinkin' 'bout tomorrow.
you can always talk about
that ridiculous misfit band of theirs. seriously, their band does weird, stupid things.
by Captain Leebeard on Sep 7, 2010 12:48 AM PDT reply actions
I actually really like their band, I think their one of the most innovative and entertaining in the country.
There’s always Leeland (sp?) Stanford to go after.
Go Bruins!
by uclaluv on Sep 7, 2010 3:37 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
hate their band
And especially the guy who announces for it. I was at Stanford last season and it was just one ad hominem attack after another against Neu. Plus skill wise, Stanford is 10 steps below UCLA’s band. They just don’t sound anywhere near as good.
I agree
that they don’t sound anywhere near as good as we do (thanks by the way), but I have to still give them props because they accomplish what they set out to do: they don’t want to be a good band, nor do they want to be Suttler Trophy winners (UCLA winning in 1993), they WANT to look like asses and be laughed at, and on occasion, laughed with. I know many in our band love and hate them, but I personally find them amusing.
by truebluebruin24 on Sep 7, 2010 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Truth be told
Their schtick is satire and they can on occasion be competent at that. But musically they are a really second rate college band—by far, the least proficient in the PAC-9. If they could compliment their satire (which can be hit and miss) with solid music, their overall effect as an entertainment experience would undergo a quantum increase.
But the music is just dreadful. The Marching Lumberjacks at Humboldt State have more musical talent that the stanford band. The sc band at least has competent musical talent. If I were leading the stanford band, I would at least try to emulate some of the musical skills of the sc band. The stanford band is just that musically wretchedly awful. To improve, they should try to become the musical southern cal of the west.
The stanford band has become so tedious that after about one piece of “musical comedy,” I generally have a desire to get up and go to the can with the comforting knowledge it will be 2 years before I have to listen to them kill a piece of music again.
LOL
I went to Humboldt State and I wouldnt be to sure about that ; ). They are a little unconventional, but most things at HSU are. The thing that the two bands have in common is that you do not have to have musical talent to join the band. They will teach you the instrument once you join. So I really do not think that any other band in the pac ten should even be compared to em, its a completely different beast.
But thank you, thank you very much for bringing up the marching Lumberjacks.
A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil
compared to stanford that is..
A bruin is good forever, a Trojan is only good... ahh eff it, just use tin foil
This is the one halftime show that I do not miss..
They know that they aren’t taken serious as a band and that’s how they want it. They have had some funny halftime moments, like the time they were in a handicapped logo formation after UCLA’s handicapped parking fiasco…and then another time they relived the whole trogan horse story, and actually played $c’s fight song better than $c!
I did hear one time that the band urinated on a field (not sure which venue) after their halftime performance. However, I’m not sure if it’s a true story or if its just an urban legend…
Stanford Band/Student Section & Our Den
Stanford band is wacky and crazy. It’s easy to “hate” them in a playful way. Of course all of the stunts they pull often making fun of opponents’ issues (often that involve us) are good natured. Unlike some UCLA “fans” though … Stanford alums don’t get caught up on how inappropriate they are behaving or whether they are hurting the Stanford band.
Stanford’s student section during Monty’s years were also fairly vicious but again no one was whining about poor sportsmanship.
So finally we have organized effort from the Den trying to create an intense and intimidating atmosphere at UCLA home field and we have some people whining. It is little ridiculous. These guys were not around when we were having discussion about how to get more students involved here on BN over last few months and now they are hear thundering down with morally righteous sermons.
As said below … if people want to whine about this … they need to take it somewhere else. There will be no compromise on this unless the Den itself decides to stop.
Simple suggestion for anyone wanting to complain about the Den ...
… organizing on BN. Take the whining somewhere else. Moreover, don’t lecture us on what we should or should not be allowing BN to be used for. Thanks. Will not give folks another warning if they continue to complain about this.
I don't think any "Dirt on Stanford" list could be complete
without bringing up this.
"I don't forget very much" Rick Neuheisel, 11/28/09
The Dirt is good for the students
because in a way it allows them to feel more apart of the game than just spectators. You have to keep in mind that many students aren’t huge football fans, but are just casual fans that only come out because:
1) it’s the first football game ever and they want to see what it’s like
2) they just want to support the school and hang out with friends
The Dirt has been around for some time now and I remember reading my first copy when I was a freshman. It was hilarious and it showed to me that people at UCLA cared about football. By reading the Den, I enjoyed the game a bit more and felt more involved as a student, especially knowing only students get to read the Den (interestingly enough, the band has something called The Note, which is very similar to the Den, but also mocks their band leaders). I think the Dirt is an excellent way to bring out the fun in college football, rivalries, and most importantly, to help students share something fun together: laughing at the enemy.
The other thing to keep in mind
By giving students, who obviously will have the tendency to be the most vicious of the spectators in any given arena, some common “mocking points”, you eliminate some of the less intelligent, but more offensive taunts that would really shed a poor light on our student body. Think Oregon when KLove came to visit. For those who are so against maybe offending some visitors, would you prefer streams of four letter words, possibly of the racist or homophobic variety? That kind of stuff doesn’t go in the dirt, at least not as long as I was reading it.
Students mocking the opposing team and their players is going to happen. You might as well give them something intelligent to say while they’re doing it.
I completely agree with this
But I don’t think that we use the dirt for any of the insults thrown from the student section. As a student I see the dirt as an interesting read, but feel as if we don’t utilize it all too much.
It does help with laughing at the enemy though.
I know where you're coming from with that
I didn’t use anything right off the page, but generally what would happen is the Dirt would tell stories that would already reinforce whatever negative preconceived stereotype I already had of a school, and I would proceed to use that to heckle their players. It usually related to the other school’s insignificance and/or incompetence in something.
Theodore Streleski and his hammer
An ugly incident and probably not something to laugh about, but it was all about Stanford…
“During his trial Streleski told the court he felt the murder was “logically and morally correct” and “a political statement” about Stanford’s treatment of its graduate students,"
Easy money and faithless women, red-eye whiskey for the pain...
The Dirt!
The Stanford Cardinal is coming to our house after opening up their season at home against FCS team Sacramento State. They needed to start their season with a little morale booster if they want to have any hope of improving on last years record, after losing star player and Heisman runner up, Toby Gerhart. One of Toby Gerhart’s replacements is sophomore Tyler Gaffney, who during a baseball game against the Bruins, tripped and fell on his face while attempting to score, costing his team a win. Sure feet, indeed.
The Cardinal is led by quarterback Andrew Luck, who is being touted by some as a Heisman candidate. Considering last season he threw for 1/3 as many TDs and had more interceptions than Boise State quarterback Kellen Moore, who only received enough votes to come in 7th place in the Heisman race, it would seem that these talks are a little premature. One thing is for certain: Luck is going to need a lot of luck if he is going to live up to the hype, while simultaneously picking up the slack left behind by Gerhart.
If you catch yourself calling them the Stanford Cardinals, stop and remember they’re not named after the bird, but after the color. And their mascot? None other than the annoying, drugged-out looking tree that I know every Bruin has fantasized about tackling at some point in their life. The Stanford mascot has a rich and colorful history that involves a couple fist fights, frequent trips to the top of the NCAA worst mascot lists, and several suspensions, including two that occurred within a month of each other. In February of 2006, the Stanford “mascot” was suspended after being seen taking swigs out of a flask at a basketball game and then blowing a 0.16. The replacement mascot was suspended a month later during the NCAA tournament following a few scuffles with security. The tree now faces mandatory pregame breathalyzers and is followed by a "protection crew" with the motto "Don’t touch our wood." … Trust me. We don’t want to touch your wood or your Woods, Stanford. Both are equally filthy!
The biggest issue facing Stanford coach Jim Harbaugh the past several off-seasons wasn’t a defensive unit with holes bigger than the gap in Chancellor Condoleezza Rice’s teeth, but in fact an extra personal bathroom that cost $75,000 to make. I guess you need that expensive of a bathroom when most offenses around the country make you soil your pants each week; well maybe not mighty Sac State. Out of 119 FBS teams, only 9 had worse passing defense and only 21 had a worse overall defensive unit. In fact, their defense was so bad that they practiced a 3-4 scheme all fall practice and didn’t use it once in the game verses Sacramento because they still weren’t "ready" for that vaunted Sacramento offense.
Any discussion of Stanford isn’t complete without bringing up the infamous marching band, the Leland Stanford Junior University Marching Band, or LSJUMB for short! The band considers itself original because they break out of the mold of classy uniforms and strict marching formations. This "originality" makes the band look like a bunch of unorganized morons running around with no purpose, kind of like Tiger Woods off the golf course. Their disarray and apparent lack of intelligence goes more than uniform and performance deep. Like the tree, the band is always running into trouble everywhere they go. In the late 80’s they were suspended after spelling profane words during a halftime show. Just a few years later, the Governor of Oregon issued a decree stating that the band may not return to his state for several years because of more inappropriate behavior at an Oregon game. In 2006 the band was suspended and fined by its own administration after some members vandalized their own "band shak." Look for more crazy shenanigans and lapses in judgment from the band as they finally had their alcohol probation lifted. Of course, the most famous and well known moment of stupidity came during the 1982 game against Cal when the band prematurely stormed the field and began to celebrate even though the refs had yet to blow the play dead. A Cal player was able to make his way through the band, take out the trombone player, and score the winning touchdown in their rivalry game.
It’s hard to believe a "prestigious" school as Stanford, founded by a deeply religious couple to memorialize their son, allows such debauchery. It’s even harder to believe that their football team believes they can come in to our house and have any chance of winning! Let’s show them what a real school looks like! HACK those trees!
GO BRUINS!!! CHEER LIKE CHAMPIONS!!!






















