Notes on ESPN’s Dishonesty & Ethics (Or Lack Thereof)
This is not a big deal and not worth a frontpage post but it's certainly worth noting here on BN. I want to add couple of points to Westwood Wizard's excellent post taking apart ESPN's smearmentary "documentary" which targeted UCLA to make a point about filmsy oversight in NCAA athletics. As WW noted pointedly while UCLA athletics may have number of issues it needs to address "this ain't one."
The whole premise of the film was ridiculous as Luchs drove up a private access road being used by construction vehicles doing work on Pauley Pavilion to demonstrate his "point." Moreover, contrary to his insinuation it is not an NCAA violation for a student-athlete to speak with an agent as long as he or she does not accept anything from that agent.
In addition to the obvious problems with this film, there are couple of additional points worth making here. This has to do with how dishonest and unethical ESPN was when it promoted this nonsense.
First, even though ESPN's "film-makers" passive aggressively suggested that there are issues concerning oversight at UCLA, it did not bother including the salient point that just one month ago UCLA was certified by the NCAA which denotes that it "operates its athletics program in compliance with operating principles adopted by the Division I membership." I don't recall ESPN mentioning that anywhere in their "documentary." Conveniently they left this document out of their broadcast.
Second, ESPN also forgot to mention how the network hosts perhaps the biggest fansite of none other than UCLA's rival Southern Cal. Yes sirree, you think ESPN has a little conflict of interest problem here as they are the "home" network of WeAreSC.com, which they relentlessly promote on their official Pac-12 platform. [Sidenote: I don't have to get into much detail about the Trojan shilling of SChilly Smith].
One would think if ESPN had a shred of integrity, they would provide the full context and disclosure how they are financially tied to UCLA's most hated rival while attempting score a pathetic hit job on UCLA. But as we saw from the ugly and disgusting Leach/Feldman saga, honesty and decency are not part of the SOP at the Mickey Mouse Operation that is preoccupied with the bottom line - profits - over actually presenting an impartial and objective view on sports.
Keep all of this in mind next time you see these losers try to launch another pathetic hit around NCAA issues and UCLA. When it comes to ethics and following rules, ESPN shouldn't be throwing stones.
GO BRUINS.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of BruinsNation's (BN) editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of BN's editors.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
+1
Oxymoron of the day: Espn ethics
sjh
by Class of 66 on Oct 13, 2011 10:41 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
BSPN
The WWL has gone from being the Associated Press of sports to the Fox News (or MSNBC) of sports. Totally biased and often unethical.
And it pisses me off even more when they call themselves the “Worldwide Leader” but don’t even show the Rugby World Cup (which by the way had the USA playing in it). Bass fishing? Of course! Billiards? Certainly. Drag Racing? Indubitably.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Was it on Versus?
Scrolling through the TWC channels last weekend, I did see Rugby World Cup programming, but I don’t remember which network. I also don’t recall seeing Team USA among the matches that were aired..
by snorkeldorf on Oct 13, 2011 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions
Yup, Versus
They’re into the semis now. Wales vs. France and Australia vs. New Zealand. Both matches are live in Versus in the middle of the night.
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Oct 13, 2011 11:51 AM PDT up reply actions
Right
NBC had Canada vs. New Zealand on Sunday a couple of weeks ago. It was kind of funny to listen to them trying to explain the rules and all.
ESPN is just sucking, they offer terrible analysis, absolutely worthless. I wish they would start a ESPN 4 for sports that are popular in the rest of the world. They could show a lot of great soccer, rugby, aussie rules football (it’s a lot of fun).
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Well that's what ESPN3 is supposed to be
You get regular soccer, Aussie Rules and league rugby there.
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Oct 13, 2011 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Yup
Two roads diverged in a wood and I – I tweeted my followers to ask which I should take
by Ryan Rosenblatt on Oct 13, 2011 2:13 PM PDT up reply actions
Yeah...
I wish I could get it on my ipad. So stupid.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I have a droid
but watching sports on that tiny screen is just not as much fun!
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Dammit!
I haven’t watched the quarterfinals yet! If there was one “upside” to being a big rugby fan here in the US, it’s that it’s soooo easy to avoid finding out results before having the time to watch the games! Enter Mr. Rosenblatt . . . alas.
NBC has shown some games — they even had USA vs. Ireland. Thank goodness for the horrible playing conditions — they kept the USA in the game.
A bit of a surprise to see moody, mercurial France go on to the semis, and even more so to see South Africa beat Aussie. If it ends up being France vs. New Zealand, all of NZ will be collectively crapping itself, since France has proven to be the ultimate bogeyman for the ABs in the world cup (1999, 2007).
Like Fox News yes, MSNBC no.
While both are biased, Fox makes up facts and tells mis-truths. MSNBC has opinions but they get the information right. bspn can’t seem to get the information correct time after time.
Go Bruins!
We must be watching different MSNBC channels
ESPN clearly has no concern for the truth. They have television contracts and anything that might jeopardize them is buried or hidden behind a calculated wall of lies.
They're probably doing it
because we’re talking up Mike Leach so much.
I have not heard a word on that network in years
I watch a game if it happens to be on ESPN, but I make my decisions on what I will not buy based on what I see being advertised.
Just one guy, I know, but if everyone opted out of buying anything pitched on that stationi, maybe it would make a difference.
I guess only the geezers can remember when ESPN was innovative and interesting. Now they’re not. Just as the face of UCLA is Coach and the face of just$c* is OJ1, the face of ESPN is Craig James doing a hit job on a coach because his failure as a father made his kid an arrogant brat with an inflated sense of self and entitlement. Yeah, I know I just described a trOJan, but it fits.
+1
I had cable solely for sports, nature/science like Discover (and occasionally the Hitler Channel). I cut it out of my budgets (money and time) and I gotta say life’s better now. I can’t watch at home so I go out and watch with people: friends, family – even strangers in a sports bar (many become friends by the end of the game).
Life’s better.
If ESPN hackery motivates even a handful of viewers to cut the cord and go out and live, then it’ll be (nearly) worth it.
Play with so much passion nothing else matters
by KnudsenRockne on Oct 14, 2011 7:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Knudsen, try high school football.
My uncle in law and I go to quite a few games here in Tampa. We saw Garcia (USC) when he was at Jefferson High, and Aaron Murray and Orson Charles (Georgia) when they were at Plant. The guy I thought was the best I had ever seen was Robert Marve, now with Purdon’t, and he’s fading.
Anyway, high school football is relatively cheap – generally $10 for parking, ticket and a hotdog and a coke. And the players are generally very good. You would enjoy it, I think.
Thanx for the tip
Living in the late ,great Golden State I should be abel to findi interesting teams to watch.
OTOH: The NFL lets you watch millionaires get the shi-nola beaten out of them ;)
Play with so much passion nothing else matters
by KnudsenRockne on Oct 15, 2011 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions
completely agree
I really like ESPN and read it daily, but it’s beyond annoying how biased most of their coverage is. I skim over Ted Miller’s Pac-12 blog daily and I’ve noticed how WeAre$C is suddenly on there. I also noticed that for whatever reason Stanford gets their own personal blogger. Now, I have no issue with Stanford as a school or its athletic program but why do they need their own special blog posts? They are in the same conference as us. Heck, Oregon is as good as them and don’t get that attention.
Not to mention
The gate at the end of the service road is NOT usually open, so you can’t just drive up to the practice field. In case Luchs hadn’t noticed from the giant cranes and fences up, there’s a minor renovation going on at Pauley Pavilion. Maybe that’s why a service road would be open? I also notice that he didn’t go during a practice to actually illustrate his point. If he had, we probably would have seen players ignoring him and coaches telling him to move his effin’ car.
We're havin' too much fun today. We ain't thinkin' 'bout tomorrow.

by 


















