Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Spaulding Roundup: From Cardinal To Cougar

Hoping for more - but not too much - of this on Saturday.  (Photo by Jeff Gross/Getty Images)

Another Tuesday brought the start of another week of practices and game prep for the Bruins. The most significant development on the practice field came through the placekicking competition. In the wake of Jeff Locke missing 3 extra points in the last 2 weeks, the kicking battle is back. Kip Smith was able to warm-up and take a few practice kicks, as was walk-on Joe Roberts. However, it was Tyler Gonzalez, the walk-on/former soccer team student manager who got most of the kicking opportunities on Tuesday. He made all 4 of his attempts in drills, and made a 38-yard field goal during a two-minute drill. After saying that "anything is possible" when it comes to placekicking this Saturday, coach Neuheisel has this to say about the kicking situation.

"We’re working through that," Neuheisel said of the kicking situation. "Kip was out kicking little bit. I don’t know where he stands for the week, but at least he was actually kicking a football so that’s moving in the right direction. We’ll continue to address the other options as we go further into the week."

While freesia had some injury news in Tuesday's roundup, there were some further details arising from practice. Tony Dye and Dalton Hilliard were back at practice, and were able to fully participate, while Glenn Love dressed but was limited in action. Justin Edison, Alex Mascarenas and Sheldon Price continued to sit out of practice due to injury. Coming off of his Bruin debut off the bench last weekend, Jamie Graham made a good impression on the practice field, seeing reps with both the first and second team defenses on Tuesday. With the continuing injuries in the secondary and the pass-happy nature of the Washington State offense, expect to see a lot of Jamie on the Rose Bowl field this weekend. Additionally, Adam Maya noted that Neuheisel may be considering replacing Taylor Embree for a more explosive option as punt returner.

In game news, Washington State coach Paul Wulff announced that backup quarterback Marshall Lobbestael will continue to lead the Cougars offense on Saturday. While Jeff Tuel has been cleared to return to action after missing the past 3 games with a broken collarbone, the performance of the WSU offense in Tuel's absence - ranked 4th in the nation in passing offense with 379 yards/game and 10th in scoring offense, albeit not against the toughest of competition - is not giving coach Wulff much incentive to make a change. At least until Tuel has gotten plenty of practice reps and the team goes head to head against some more challenging defenses. Peter Yoon wrote up a piece for the ESPN LA blog talking about how despite the quality of Andrew Luck and the Stanford passing game, the sheer number of passes and the quantity of receivers that Washington State throws at a defense may be just as difficult a test for a Bruin defense short on healthy bodies on the corners.

Star-divide

Before getting too far into Washington State week, let's wrap up a couple of things from the Stanford game. Adam Maya has some thoughts on the Bruin offensive struggles, seeming to be one of those times where even a blind man can find water. Like most of us, he liked the basic idea of UCLA having gone for it on 4th and goal on Saturday night's first drive, but was not a fan of the playcalls.

The Bruins ran four times up the middle, first with diminutive Jordon James, then twice with 240-pound Derrick Coleman, which oozes predictability, then with Richard Brehaut on a keeper. Remember, the Bruins had just moved 76 yards behind Brehaut’s arm (4 of 4, 60 yards). Where’s 6-7 tight end Joseph Fauria and 6-5 receiver Nelson Rosario?

That's what I was wondering while watching the series unfold from my seat a few yards from the goal line. Maya talked to Mike Johnson about this, and got the expected - and understandable - answer that the team should have been able to carry to ball over the goal line in 3 tries. He specifically noted that as a running team, the Bruins should have been able to get the job done. Though as I noted in last week's roundup - and Maya also picked up on in his story, there is a difference between having a favorable ranking in rushing yardage and being able to count on the running game as the primary mode of offense.

The balance between run and pass plays, in-drive as well as in the aggregate was also a subject of the article. The lesson would seem to be that the coaches need not fear calling the occasional passing play, and deviating from the Donahue-esq run-run-pass (or the modified run-run-run) model can pay off.

The first one began with 2:37 left in the first half, putting UCLA in its two-minute offense. Accordingly, they passed seven times, and ran twice, gaining 21 yards on one of those runs. Great playcalling there.

On the second one, they passed four times and ran four times. On the third one they ran seven times and passed just twice, but those passes caught Sanford off guard because they were on first down, and one of the runs was by receiver Josh Smith. UCLA converted two third downs running the ball on that drive. More great playcalling.

The Bruins are neither a running team nor a passing team; they can do both very well. But they are at their best when they are unpredictable. How else do you explain Franklin and Coleman each averaging about six yards a carry, Brehaut averaging an excellent 8.1 yards per attempt, and UCLA ranking 84th in the nation in scoring offense and 64th in total offense?

While having two running backs capable of that level of production means that the coaches are not going to deviate too far from the run, the running game is not developed enough to allow the passing game to become an afterthought - or something to deploy on 3rd-and-8. It does not mean that Brehaut has to throw 30 passes every game, but have him throw on 1st and 2nd down a bit more. Don't allow the opposing defense - not to mention the crowd in the Rose Bowl and those watching on TV - to predict the 1st down playcall.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Locke's misses

Fair to characterize these as all his, or might the fact that the normal holder (Alex Mascarenas) was out with an injury have impacted the results as well? Not blaming Embree, but every link in that kicking chain has to be strong and well oiled in order for it to work properly. Hopefully Alex gets back into the mix on Saturday . . .

The Mad Bruin

by lostnacfgop on Oct 5, 2011 7:16 AM PDT reply actions  

Which way from here?

Those who saw signs of life in the Stanford game last week, and those who saw the game as more of the same decade-long malaise will gain insight this week from WSU. The Cougars come to Pasadena on a loftier perch than last year – with a good passing attack facing a banged up secondary. Last year’s game was Tuel’s coming out party – seems like the Bruin D made him look like Elway last year, and he’s been cleared to play though Lobbesteel will get the start. Bruins are 3.5 – 4 point favorites over a team most would have placed squarely in the WIn column at pre-season. Beating the Cougars by 10 or more points ought to serve as some vindication for the “we’re getting there” crowd. Struggle – or heaven forbid, lose, and the pitchforks and torches will be aggressively circling Skippy from now until the end of his regime.

The Mad Bruin

by lostnacfgop on Oct 5, 2011 7:24 AM PDT reply actions  

No

Beating the Cougars by 10 or more points will provide no vindication because Bruins still will have to remain undefeated at home, win at least 1 remaining road game between AZ/Utah and then beat Southern Cal. If Bruins fail to meet one of those objectives … it will be officially over … at least in this community.

by Nestor on Oct 5, 2011 7:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Although to some in this community it should have been declared over at the end of last season.

The issue I’m struggling with is to find a word meaniing more over than just over, or more over really over.

by Fox 71 on Oct 5, 2011 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

Overer

The most over, of course: overest. (not to be confused with the mountain in Nepal)

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Oct 5, 2011 8:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

He's right, for how the "we're getting there crowd" would see it.

Those folks are still those clinging to the last shreds of hope, and a win would prolong that for them. If the worst happens, even those people would have to concede that it’s not gonna happen for this staff.

For those of us in the “Put up or shut up now” category, this is only the first step, as you rightly point out.

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Oct 5, 2011 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Right

I think if we win by 10+ points, we will certainly not discount it. However, as always folks should consider it with the overall body of work and then wait for more results. On the other hand, losing this game on Saturday … well … I don’t want to think about it right now.

by Nestor on Oct 5, 2011 8:46 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm concerned for our pass D

Not so much about our lack of depth or for their numbers, but entirely for our approach.

It shouldn’t be any surprise what they plan to do.

If we don’t jam their receivers, allow them soft cushions, not pressure the young QB, let their passing game get in a rhythm, and basically permit their strength to continue be their strength…well, I don’t really want to consider the consequences.

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Oct 5, 2011 8:20 AM PDT reply actions  

PASS RUSH

If we don’t get a minimum of three QB sacks in this game it’s “Turn out the lights…the party’s over” time. I DID see glimpses of improvement last week at Stanford – but not enough yet to get me completely back on the bandwagon. We need our D to play a heck of a lot better this week and to FINALLY show some gonads. Rush the passer once in a while, play UP on the wide receivers and at the very least disrupt the routes. I have to give Brehaut a lot of credit for manning up and playing hard every game – time now for our O line and wide receivers to start supporting him better. GO BRUINS – please!

by DaChiBruin on Oct 5, 2011 9:34 AM PDT reply actions  

I’ve got to think some of our players and/or coaches/assistants may be reading these posts. DO YOU SEE THAT WE’RE REALLY TRYING TO SUPPORT YOUR EFFORTS? We’re not trying to bag on the team – but it’s frustrating when we know we’ve got the talent but aren’t using it effectively. PLAY HARD AND PLAY TO WIN.

by DaChiBruin on Oct 5, 2011 9:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yup

We have tons of faith in the players’ ability and desire. The were all highly competitve recruits who chose our school. I can only imaginge how this team would look with a different staff leading the way.

greg in denver, U.C.L.A. guy for life - BruinsNation.com

by gbruin on Oct 5, 2011 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

Confidence...

WSU comes into town with it…UCLA not even close. i.e. (special teams, defense,play calling etc.)

The really not so unthinkable just could happen…and no one here or anywhere else would be all that surprised.

by GogetemBruins on Oct 5, 2011 9:40 AM PDT reply actions  

I’m still holding out SOME hope for a revival.

by DaChiBruin on Oct 5, 2011 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

"Progress"!?

Since when do we lose by 26 points and find “progress”. This is how low our standards and expectations have fallen?

Interesting quote from Brehaut in Fosters’ LA Times article today:

’The voice from “peers” could carry more weight, Brehaut said.

“Sometimes when coaches say something, guys kind of have an attitude,” Brehaut said. “Some guys may think they are better than the team. But when you hear something from a fellow player, guys listen when that happens.”’

Sounds to me like the players have tuned out the coaches…..

Brehaut said, “We’ll step in when people aren’t doing things right.”
Am I missing something or, in Chris Fosters’ article in the LA Times today, did Brehaut say that the leaders on the team need to hold the players accountable because

by SPNB on Oct 5, 2011 11:55 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Bruins Nation, an unofficial daily online scrap book covering the greatest collegiate athletic program in the nation. Established June 16, 2005. GO BRUINS.

Managers

Uclabear1_small Nestor

Arron_afflalo1_small Tydides

Brad_pitt_as_achilles_small Achilles

377011_2642084725867_1068030137_32302525_1166539782_n_small Ryan Rosenblatt

Telemachus_small Telemachus

Licenseplate_small gbruin

2761_small tasser10

Blue_bellerophon_small Bellerophon

Img_0052_2_small Patroclus

Small DCBruins

Of Counsels

094_small Ajax

Menelaus2_small Menelaus

Small Meriones

Small Odysseus

Associates

Eee_small freesia39

Uclabruins_small AHMB