Previewing the Washington St. Cougars - Part I: Coaches and Offense
Washington St. looks like a team on the rise. Despite the fact that WSU went 5-32 between 2008-10, the Cougars appeared to improve in the latter half of last season, and have taken that momentum and turned it into a 3-1 start this season. The team may mainly consist of lightly recruited athletes, but they are performing this year and putting up good numbers.
The Cougars may have lost their starting quarterback in the first week of the season, but the statistics did not take a hit. WSU is 4th in the nation in passing (379 ypg), 9th in total offense (518.5 ypg) and 10th in scoring (44.5 ppg). Defensively, WSU is in the middle of the pack; they are 53rd in total defense (361.8 ypg), 48th in rushing defense (127.25 ypg), and 76th in passing defense (234.5 ypg).
Paul Wulff entered this season with a 5-32 mark through his first 3 seasons. Most publications had him on the hot seat along with Rick Neuheisel. Like Neuheisel, Wulff is coaching at his alma mater which he calls his "dream job". Unlike Neuheisel, Wulff is off to a decent start this season and looks to be on the way towards saving his job.
Washington St.'s spread offense attack is coordinated by Todd Sturdy. Sturdy was a longtime NAIA coach at St. Ambrose University in Iowa before coordinating the offense at Eastern Washington with Wulff for one season. The Cougar offense has improved annually under Sturdy, beginning with a paltry 241.1 ypg in 2008 and peaking this season at 518.5 ypg.
Defensively, the Cougars are coordinated by Chris Ball, who was the defensive backs coach under Mike Price from 2000-02. Ball came back to WSU after spending a year under Dave Wannstedt at Pittsburgh as secondary coach, but things have not worked out well for Ball. The Cougar defense has been horrendous under Ball (109th in 2008, 120th in 2009, 118th in 2008). Interestingly, this year's improvement has been partially credited to the new Cougar defensive line coach, Todd Howard, who was let go by Neuheisel after last season.
Quarterbacks
Coach Wulff has announced that Sr. Marshall Lobbestael will start on Saturday despite the availability of Jr. Jeff Tuel, who has been cleared to return from a broken collarbone. In Tuel's absence, Lobbestael has performed very well. The 6'3 215 lbs. quarterback is throwing for 333.8 ypg with 13 touchdowns to only 3 interceptions.
While he will not start, Tuel may see action on Saturday. Tuel is also 6'3 215 lbs. and not much of a running threat, so UCLA should not have to prepare for two quarterbacks. The word from practice is that Tuel has been "chicken winging" his left arm, so while he may be physically ready, it's unclear if he's mentally ready to play.
Fr. Connor Halliday, 6'4 179 lbs., looks to be the emergency quarterback this week.
Running Backs
Washington St. utilizes a running back by committee approach, splitting the 32.5 rushing attempts per game between four backs. Fr. Rickey Galvin starts at halfback for the Cougars, but does not lead the team in carries. At 5'8 172 lbs., Galvin will not run over anybody, but he's been running around plenty of people this season. He's averaging 7.59 ypc, although most of his damage was done against UNLV and Idaho St. On the season, Galvin has 29 carries for 220 yards and three touchdowns.
Jr. Carl Winston brings a little more size, (5'8 200 lbs.), and is averaging about a carry more per game than Galvin. He has 35 carries for 155 yards and a touchdown on the season.
Sr. Logwone Mitz is the real bruiser of the group (6'1 223 lbs.). He has 19 carries for 80 yards and a touchdown this season.
We may also see Fr. Marcus Mason (5'9 176 lbs.). Mason has 14 carries for 112 yards and a touchdown this season, but has only carried the ball once in the last two games.
Receivers and Tight Ends
Washington St. spreads the ball out well among the leading four receivers. So. Marquess Wilson (6'4 183 lbs.) has emerged as the big play threat with 21 catches for 550 yards and 5 touchdowns this season, which follows last season's successful freshman campaign where he caught 55 balls for 1006 yards and 6 touchdowns.
Sr.'s Isiah Barton (6'1 187 lbs.) and Jared Karstetter (6'4 210 lbs.) return as well, and have 19 and 22 catches, respectively. Karstetter will play in the slot as the possession receiver, and he has been particularly good at finding soft spots in UCLA's soft zones in the past.
Freshmen Bobby Ratliff (6'2 194) and Kristoff Williams (6'2 206 lbs.) round out the receiving corps. Williams has displayed big play ability (18.17 ypc), and Ratliff has caught 12 balls through the first four games.
Offensive Line
Washington St. starts three seniors and two sophomores on the offensive line that has given up 10 sacks and 22 tackles for loss this season. Sr. RG B.J. Guerra (6'3 321 lbs.) is the best lineman of the group. The former defensive lineman is a third-year starter and honorable mention All-Pac 10 selection.
Sr. tackles LT David Gonzales (6'6 286 lbs.) and RT Wade Jacobsen (6'6 306) provide some experience on the outside, as they were both part-time starters last season and are both JC transfers.
So. John Fullington (6'5 298 lbs.) moves from RT to LG after starting 5 games last season, and Texas Tech transfer So. C Matt Goetz (6'4 270 lbs.) rounds out the starting unit.
The back-up lineman, LT Jr. Dan Spitz (6'7 300 lbs.), LG Jr. Chas Sampson (6'4 303 lbs.), C Jr. Taylor Meighen (6'3 284 lbs.), RG So. Elliott Bosch (6'4 260 lbs.), and RT Fr. Jake Rodgers (6'6 295 lbs.) provide decent size, but all appear to be lightly recruited/walk-on types.
That concludes Part I of the Washington St. Cougar preview. Fire away with any additional comments, and be sure to check back in for Part II of Washington St. preview where we will take a closer look at the Cougar defense and special teams.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
"Tuel is also 6'3 215 lbs. and not much of a running threat"
I think the Oregon State Beavers would beg to differ.
by Jeff Nusser on Oct 5, 2011 1:49 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Based on his career datapoints
It was just one game. He may not be a statute but can’t really consider him as a running threat. Then again …. against our defense even Case Keenum can be a “running threat.” I
Tuel is not a running "first" threat,
but he does have the ability to step out of some amount of trouble, and move the pocket. And he can throw on the move, rather than having to reset.
He forces an opponent to account for him with containment in short and medium yardage situations to an extent a truly immobile qb does not.
Andy Wooldridge, andy_wooldridge@yahoo.com
BuildingTheDam.Com
Go Beavs!
79 of Tuel’s 166 career rushing yards came against OSU in one game. According to the Beavers, Tuel is the second coming of Mike Vick. To the rest of the football world, he’s not much of a running threat.
Formerly AllHailMightyBruins
College football counts sacks against rushing yards, not passing yards.
Tuel actually ran for several hundred yards last season if the sacks are not counted against his net. He’s mobile, then again he probably isn’t playing.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
I know sacks count against rushing yards in CFB
I didn’t realize the extent of sacks given up by WSU. It took some digging to find lost yardage statistics for sacks.
EDIT Tuel is a running threat. Unfortunately for him, he’s been running for his life quite a bit of the time- he was sacked 51 times last year and lost 271 yards. If you add those negative yards to his rushing total, 194 yards, Tuel ran for 465 yards last year.
Better?
Formerly AllHailMightyBruins
Yes, thank you.
Sorry if I came across as douchey, but I’ve watched every snap of Cougar football for four years and Jeff Tuel was literally the only bright spot for three seasons. Plus, I don’t want you to get the wrong idea about how the offense works with Jeff in the game.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
No problem.
I don’t watch WSU football, so I wouldn’t know. It’s pretty easy for the numbers to be deceiving when you have that much lost yardage in sacks.
Formerly AllHailMightyBruins
Definitely this is our first adequate O-line in a while, we couldn't block practice dummies for about 3 years.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
So would the Washington Huskies
Attractive, Intelligent, Smart A**
by Neil Vincent Roberts on Oct 6, 2011 8:17 PM PDT up reply actions
First time comment
but didn’t we suck miserably last year when facing teams that were coming off of their bye weeks because they had more time to prepare for the pistol? And didn’t we face Oregon St and Stanford both when coming off of bye weeks, both on the road?
I’m waiting to see what Brehaut can do now that he knows he’s the quarterback, in a home environment, against a team that’s not coming off of a bye week.
WSU is not coming off a bye week
they played Colorado last week.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
I am waiting to see...
If the defense can add maybe 1 or 2 more sacks to the 10 wsu has already given up.
So would you guys describe the UCLA secondary as better or worse than last season?
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
Any secondary is worse...
with zero pressure from front 4. believe you me they are connected.
by GogetemBruins on Oct 5, 2011 3:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Of course they are
That’s why the defense has been failing the eye test in almost every game.
by Nestor on Oct 5, 2011 3:34 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Getting pressure from the front four would be huge for UCLA in this game.
Lobster isn’t mobile, and while we’ve given up our share of sacks this season, almost all of them have come from blitzes that weren’t picked up. Our o-line has been a lot better this season. I expect this will be the most athletic front four we have played all year, however if UCLA can’t get pressure with only four or five rushers I have a hard time not seeing Wilson and co. tearing apart the UCLA secondary.
"If you want your dreams to come true, don't sleep in."
Well
On paper we do have lot of great athletes in our defensive front 7. Unfotunately for us the ones with most explosive potential haven’t been developed or gotten PT.
If we played up to our potential we should be able to blow apart the Cougar backfield. But I have this feeling that it will be Cougars who will be gashing us facing our 3 men rush and 10 yard cushion from the DBs.
by Nestor on Oct 5, 2011 3:51 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Just giving Kelly the reason for UCLA's ...
secondary woes. I mean besides playing 10 yards off the receivers. It was a rather obvious thing to say if you follow BRUIN FB.
Why did Domonic Artis DeCommit from our Basketball team?
How the hell did we let this happen?
What is going on Howland?
First=Parker, now Artis.
Damn!!

by 




















