UCLA: Where the Best Come to Learn, Both On and Off the Court
If you want to play for an elite college basketball school but not read a book, you go to Connecticut. If you don't want to play college basketball, but have to kill a year before you go pro, you go to Kentucky where they care more about draft position than championships. If you want to play for an elite school, learn basketball, and get an education, you come to UCLA.
As almost everyone knows by now, Kyle Anderson and Jordan Adams signed letters of intent yesterday to come to UCLA. First, on Kyle Anderson: He has been ranked as high as #2 player in the country and the first word to describe him is "smart" or an "incredibly high basketball IQ." A 6'8" point guard/forward who has made believers out of the doubters who said he was too tall or too slow to be a point. Some still say he is a facilitator or passer instead of point, but all say he is a winner.
Why did he come to UCLA? According to his AAU Coach: "[Coach Ben Howland] runs plays instead of freelance offense and that's great training for the next level ."
According to Kyle himself:
However, during the recruiting process, Anderson learned more and more about Howland's reputation on the defensive side of the ball.
"That's an area I need to improve to make it to the next level, so he will help me out a lot," Anderson said. Often listed as a small forward, Anderson has a point guard's mentality and is comfortable with the ball in his hands, a la Magic Johnson. Defensively, he is in position limbo.
Anderson sees big things for himself and the Bruins in his first season. "Of course, winning the national championship and being a strong contributor," Anderson said, while describing his ideal UCLA experience. "Staying at UCLA until I am ready to go to the NBA and enjoying the whole college process."
Why does UCLA have so many players at the next level? Because it teaches basketball, ala the UCLA Factor.
Anderson is all over Youtube and it is easy to find him. A number of videos are here. But if you watch just one, try this one recently posted by Jon Gold. Why, well multiple times he fakes his opponent out so bad, they literally trip over their own feet. In this video he dribbles, passes, rebounds, block shots, hits threes, etc. You can see why he can legitimately be considered a candidate to play any position 1-4. CBH said of his position
"He's going to have the ball a lot. Next year it will be Larry Drew and him playing the point. He can play with, without the ball. He's so good with the ball. He sees the floor so well. They'll definitely be playing together at times."
. . .
"I hope he can eventually defend the two, the four, the one. Defensively, (the three) is where he'll be most comfortable. He has to get that better at that end. Offensively, hes as good as there is out there."
The moral of the story is UCLA has finally recruited the PG its fans have been looking for, just not in the way we expected.
The other player is a recruit, while not as splashy, a leader who also fills a need. You look at the current team, and quite frankly since Michael Roll left, you have to ask where is the true three shooter? Jordan Adams is "one of the best pure scorers in the country".UCLA has been missing for a while now. He is also a winner and a leader, as CBH said:
Jordan Adams is a really good shooter. He's a team captain for Oak Hill, a very good team, one of the best in the country. We're really excited about him. Watched him play a lot this summer. He can play the wing, play the two, play the three. He's used to winning.
In one small way I feel sorry for Adams. All the stories yesterday are on Kyle Anderson. But that is the way it always seems to be for Adams. Remember when he played against #1 player in the country Shabazz Muhammad? The stories were all about Shabazz but Adams still scored 39 or so points. Adams put on a shooting exhibition and outplayed Shabazz for parts of the game.
Adams is 6'5" and only the number 50 recruit in the nation. He is a bit thick in the body but he is very young. Not only is he the best shooter coming out of high school for UCLA since MR, he really reminds me of MR. He is a fierce competitor.
As you can see in this mix tape he is not just a three point specialist. He has touch and can shoot from everywhere. This tape shows him driving a lot.
I realize this year has just started but I am very excited for next year. Oh and according to CBH UCLA is not done yet:
On what he expects for the rest of recruiting:
"We may still sign another here early. ... I expect to sign four."
Come to UCLA those who want to learn and win. Go Bruins.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks, DC
Do you want to speculate on who the other early signee may be? Parker?
Some think so but
Parker himself said he would not in one recent interview. I think he waits but then again he may declare as it is hard to read young kids.
I will say he seems like a good kid who will work hard to become a very good player.
by DCBruins on Nov 10, 2011 6:20 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
"I realize this year has just started but I am very excited for next year. "
Agreed. Although I find myself getting pretty geeked up for the game this Friday, even though it’s LMU, even though we have to schlep to the Sports Arena on a Friday night.
Thanks for the post. Go Bruins!
by RealisticBruinFan on Nov 10, 2011 6:24 AM PST reply actions
Anderson
Nice link to Gold’s video. Looks like he has big hands as he makes those one-handed passes so easily.
I am no expert, and I know everyone carries the ball these days, but I worry that Div I refs may be tougher on Anderson for that violation than the high school refs. Of course, CBH will make sure he adjusts.
by Arturo del Mundo on Nov 10, 2011 7:18 AM PST reply actions
i noticed the same thing about the potential carrying violation
but it wasn’t too glaring. I’m not worried about it.
by DoubleTroubleBruin on Nov 10, 2011 11:29 AM PST up reply actions
What Is The Etiquette Here?
Is it okay to post this (see below) in a regular thread or should I start a Fan Post?
chadfordinsider Chad Ford
Draft Blog: Top 5 NBA prospects in the Pac 12 led by UCLA’s Josh Smith insider.espn.go.com/nba/blog/_/nam…
(insider)
29 minutes ago
I wouldn’t post what you need an “insider” to view.
Thanks
You can't post the content
of what is behind a subscription wall, but you can certainly provide a link, and in that case a fanshot is best.
But hey, what do I know. I’m just the 800 lbs bruin in the room.
Great review
Are there any fan posts about how this will all work on the court, with or without Shabazz Muhammad?
The way I see it, we could lose two-four players (LJ, Jerime Anderson, and possibly Reeves and Josh to the NBA).
Still, our front court could choose between the Wears, Stover and Branden Lane.
This means the front court is Tyler Lamb, Larry Drew, Da’End Parker and Norman Powell possibly competing with Anderson, Adams and Shabazz. I can see a
PG-Anderson
SG-Lamb
SF- Shabazz
with Drew, Parker, Poweel and Adams spelling off the bench.
Combine this with say the two Wear twins, and you have a unique offense. Or go small ball:
PG: Drew
SG: Lamb
SF: Shabazz
PF: Anderson
C: Stover
The good news is if either Josh Smith or Reeves returns, we get more scoring. Even if Shabazz decides to go to Kentucky (what I believe is his only other option), we still have a more mature Da’End Parker. And if all this is in fan posts somewhere, I apologize and I’ll try to start getting it in there.
It is hard to say as there are too many variables
Start with that fourh recruit. Is it Center like Parker mentioned above? Also, how do Lamb, Parker and Powell work out? Can they defend a quick one.
I am with you in it is fun to think about but IMO it is too early to start guessing.
by DCBruins on Nov 10, 2011 9:39 AM PST via mobile up reply actions
Totally agree
I just couldn’t resist. I mean the variables are gigantic—especially if Josh is a leading NBA draft choice, though he has significant issues (weight, conditioning). And Shabazz is a not a done deal at all.
It does seem to be filling up with a lot of talented people, and the final question is if anyone transfers to get more playing time. We’ll see.
Michael C
www.onviolence.com
Shabazz is not guaranteed to sign with us, even if we "favored"
Thought it’s interesting you’d say Kentucky is the only other choice, a school where it seems he has nothing to gain.
I think Shabazz is a guaranteed lottery pick regardless of where he plays. With that in mind, he should go somewhere close to home. UNLV and UCLA are close to home, the benefit for UCLA is that he can get a quality education should he decide to come back after leaving for the NBA, like so many past Bruins.
I’m just being hopeful and biased, but really, I don’t see what Kentucky has to offer him.
You don't see what Kentucky has to offer Him ? Well, I do.
Let’s play devil’s advocate here, not that I want this dude to actually go to Blue Grass country.
Lexington has the basketball tradition, same as Westwood although you can argue about the Wooden legacy, the new Pauley, etc. Besides, it is a one year deal for him, any which anybody spins it. So if even for just one year, he could miss out on the education part if he chose Kentucky, this is not his foremost concern. How he can use the time to " sharpen his saw " , showcase his formidable skills to pro scouts matters more.
Now, we can say Howland is by far the better coach, even as a person than Calipari. Yes, you’re damned right. But then look at all those draft choices coming out of Kentucky in recent years, all of them one and dones. They fare well too, albeit debatable for us admittedly.
Of course, in the end, when this dude reaches for his cell phone and call, I want it to be Howland on the other end.
Shabazz Reminds Me A Lot Of Ed Davis
However even at this point it looks like Shabazz has filled out more and has a better mid range shot.
JMO
Yeah
That shows why he is number one, with a good outside shot and good power finishing at the rim.
Michael C
www.onviolence.com
He Has A Nice Looking Stroke
though it was a small sample. He also looks like even on somewhat difficult and athletic shots he tries to maintain the proper body balance. His stroke is compact with good follow thru and his release speed appears to be a bit above average.
His handles didn’t appear to be too bad either though at this point he seems like he almost exclusively left handed.
Cool video thanks
This kid is the real deal and would look absolutely fantastic with UCLA across his chest. In his interviews, he also seems humble and thoughtful like he’d be a good ambassador of our program. Fingers crossed.
As a sidenote, after watching that short video, I can’t help but wonder what poor Rosco Allen is gonna do at ’Furd without Shabazz drawing every defender and kicking the ball off to him for uncontested bunnies…
by DoubleTroubleBruin on Nov 10, 2011 11:27 AM PST up reply actions
Kyle Anderson
reminds me a little of Jamaal (Keith) Wilkes, one of my all-time favorite Bruins. Wilkes was not flashy, but boy did he know how to play…, and win.
Like Anderson, Wilkes was not known as a burner. But, also like Anderson, he was heady, smart, and smooth. He always seemed to be in the right place, for a put-back, for a short jumper, for a rebound and outlet pass. They called Wilkes “Silk” for good reason.
May Anderson do for the Bruins back court what Silk did for the front court.
Never Thought of Silk
Thanks, interesting comparison.

by 



















